Example/Discussion of Bad Memes

Example of a shit meme. Don't do this

>twitter.com/GlumBird/status/970065551434420224
archive.is/MlLLd

The reds are at it again, making shitty memes to try and entice the idiotic masses of their ideological horse shit. Observe, and don't ever do this least your meme go stale. This thread is to discuss good practices for your memes and messaging.

The example includes the following errors:

...

I really hate these. It's called COGS you stupid greedy communist fucks. There is more to the cost of product than the labor. Who paid for the building?Who paid for the electricity? Who paid for the tools? Who paid for the toilet you sit on for hour poking your phone instead of working? Who paid for the marketing? Who paid the taxes?

Fuck. Now I have to go get my baseball bat ready.

That explains why communists always treat their citizens like shit. They dont even see them as seperate entities, just a means to produce shit. Not even as a customer like a trus capitalist would.

Never seen that picture before. Thanks.

All Leftists

After giving it some thought, I feel like capitalism taken to a degenerate extreme is just another form of communism

the cure is National Socialism

Capitalism is exploitative, but their "solutions" aren't actually beneficial, they just turn a many-layered system of classes into a two-class system. The Haves and the Have Nots.

That's not really even a meme, though, just a series of infographs. I can't see anything memetic about it.

I've been thinking something recently, and I'm not certain how to ask if I'm right.

Income reapportionment does not benefit either the welfare niggers or the government, primarily. Welfare means taking money from people who have money and giving it to people who do not. People who have money, in general, have it because they make it, but also because they save and invest. They don't spend it on stupid bullshit. This is typically because they are white (or asian), and can pass the marshmallow test.

People who do not have money typically do not have it because they spend it on stupid bullshit. Niggers primarily spend any money they get on cigarettes, greasy foods and sugary drinks.

Therefore, taking money from the people who have it and giving it to the people who don't DOES NOT BENEFIT the poor. They end up just as poor because they spent the money on consumable luxuries they don't really need, but are addicted to. The government benefits a little bit, because they can buy the vote, but they don't benefit much. Marshmallow eaters have a very low voter participation rate. Basically, if you're trying to buy votes, you'll get a lot more votes per dollar by giving the money to white people.

The only people really benefiting from welfare are the international companies selling cigarettes, sugary drinks and greasy drinks. Welfare isn't even wealth redistribution from the rich to the poor. It's wealth redistribution from the middle class to the (((people))) who own exploitative industries.

Notice, I'm defining exploitative industries as those industries which provide a product people don't really need marketed to the low IQ and low impulse control. Soft drinks, fast food, recreational drugs, porn. Things which cost the producer almost nothing but is inherently addictive or can be easily marketed to the memelogically vulnerable.

There is no real difference between the state and the kikes which own it.

...

And that's why it can't be fixed.
Whereas government can be useful and at some point it was by whites and for whites, it became a skeleton of itself at some point.
Then kike tricks were draped over it. Then the skeleton was replaced with more kike tricks.
So how do you work with kike tricks to make it a good system again?
Unlike supplanting lies with truck, you can't win a game of deceit by being honest. You change the game.
The government is the game. Replace it.

Niggers spend lots on other frivolous nonsense like jewelry, drugs, music and trendy fashion, so wealth distribution generally goes into those also. You're not wrong on buying votes though.
Welfare queens are the laundering mechanism of the state you could say.


You're not wrong.

Cancerous newfag general?

My point was that if the goal was really government power, the money would be spent elsewhere. When you're trying to buy something, you go where you can get the best value for your money. White people have a better voter participation rate, so if you buy a given group of whites, you'll get more votes out of them than if you buy an equivalent group of blacks or hispanics. So we can infer that the goal of people pushing this is not political power, but economic power.

They don't really need our votes if they own our mortgages. And its no use to them being rich if we're not poor and in debt. It doesn't matter how much money they have, if the lesser peoples of the world have equity, they'll generally take care of themselves in contentment. But if we are poor and in debt and desperate, we can be enslaved and exploited, they can pressure us into pimping out our kids like they did in Wiemar Germany. That's why (((free trade))) and fiat currency is so important to them. It allows them to move value out of our country, to leave us bankrupt and vulnerable.

They're basically crashing our stocks so we can be bought on the cheap, but in the human sense rather than the corporate.

Do you understand the ironic of the meme itself?
That "the left can't meme" is itself a meme that shits on them? It's hilarious

All of the "systems" stop treating people like human beings, and then everything goes to shit. You CANNOT abstract people into something other than what they are: Human Beings and all the complexity that it brings. Fucking reductionist kikes can't into complex systems.

...

The fact that they don't even understand how investment or building a business works does more of the job of completely dismantling their poorly constructed arguments. They have this bizarre conception that rich people just came in and took everything or that they spawned into the world already owning all the things which they then, somehow, force other people to work on, in, and with, devoid of compensation, which the rich being only becomes more rich, subsisting entirely off the suffering of the noble working class.

And they were compensated for their work.
And they were compensated for their work.
And they were compensated for their work.
And they were compensated for their work.
And they were compensated for their work.

Where, in any part of this equation, are the workers entitled to more pay or ownership of the factories, machines, and goods? Sure, the owner of the factory gets more money than the workers… but you know what he's doing with that money? Paying his fucking workers to build more machines and purchasing more resources and paying the fucking bills. If he doesn't do that, the workers cease to be workers because they become unemployed. You don't need a doctorate in economics to understand this shit!

You can't reduce irreducible systems, that's my point. The kikes don't understand the concept of emergent properties, but they try to keep reducing anyway, because of pilpul bullshit, so they completely lose their grasp on reality. The point where a kike goes 100% insane is when they hit the pilpul so hard that nothing they say has any bearing on reality. It's their genetically deepseated schizophrenia which is linked to their damaged chromosomes and mtDNA. However, they then push their insanity on everyone around them in order to further their agendas, and the results are what you see in the modern world today.

You've just described post-modernism/post-structuralism. Today's state of affairs.

jews are walking genetic disease and they have to be removed from the planet. Their denial of reality and hatred for all things natural and real is a pestilence upon the planet.

Yes, but I described the mechanics of it, not the theories themselves.

You're arguing with yourself at this point, over semantics no less. Time to stop.

Time for kikes to commit mass suicide because they violate natural law every nanosecond they're alive.

The labour theory of value is a filter that keeps people who can think critically out of communist groups. If what you're really interested in is power, then you want your droogs (slaves) to be smart enough to read and regurgitate your propaganda, but not smart enough to understand it. Their leaders (guess who) know it's bullshit, but the ideology is just a tool for them, not a statement of belief.

Ya, it's directed at the complicit masses of blue collar workers.

So even if they start mixing worth and value, think that ,regardless of quality of work, every hour of work has the same value, they acknowledge at the end that those 20 Monetary Units are because of speculation, because no one knows how the product will sell (or what the real value will be), but at the same time demand that those 20 Monetary Units are an indicator for unpaid labor for the worker and not 20 Monetary Units for the "capitalist", to allow miscalculation in worth and value assessment to keep the workers employed, or to invest in new products?

This thinking only leads to production shortages, no progress, no incentive for high quality work or excellence in any form (except if striving for excellence is part of your beeing because beeing excellent is reward enough) and even one failure in the chain leads to poverty and destruction of those that give their "labour power".

I can get behind the Idea that the profit margins today can be absurd.
But this theory is even more whacko.

"I spent 10,000 hours painting this, even though I have no talent and it looks like shit, but because of the labor power invested in this painting, it should fetch about 2 million dollars on the market."
How the fuck stupid do you have to be to believe in the labor theory of value?

Leftist level retarded obviously

Thermodynamic efficiency/returns is the only way to understand an economy.

Also why is this bugging me?
Why does it offend me so much that this model incorporates:

All of that was aptly condensed into while I was writing this.
It just gets my blood boiling.

The higher ups at the company perform labor as well, and their "labor power" is significantly higher (due to their education, experience, skills, responsibilities, connections, etc.) so it's not "unfair" or "exploitation" that they get paid more than the bottom tier. The bulk of the "surplus value" goes to the company itself in the form of profit, which helps cover unforeseen costs and the costs of expanding the business. Basically, this 'immoral' "surplus" they're talking about is whatever the owner of the company makes purely as a result of owning the business. And it's not unjust that they make this money, because their ownership of the company results in the production of all of the "surplus value" that they receive. Thus, there is no real "surplus value"- the division of the profit is all set by the laws of supply and demand. As they said regarding the labor power, it is set high enough that workers possessing the skills they require will want to get up every morning to come to work for them. They are not slaves; they can quit whenever they want and work someplace else instead.

Then the last three images go full retard.
What incentive would there be to produce them? "He who does not work, neither shall he eat"- is this not slavery? How is that better than capitalism?
How do you pinpoint exactly how much demand there is? No company intentionally produces extra; it's waste.

Commies are such pathetic faggots. "Wah wah, I produce more than I am paid." Because the company would be losing money otherwise, and would go out of business, costing you your job. "Wah wah, I make less for flipping burgers than a corporate executive makes for making phone calls and participating in meetings." Because your labor is worth less, you produce less than he does. "Wah wah, the owner of the company only comes in to work when he feels like it and he makes more than the rest of us." Because if it wasn't for his company, you would all be unemployed, or working a different job that you currently aren't because you prefer the one you have now.

Tl;dr: Yes, capitalism operates based on everybody's self-interest; ''this is why it is the most efficient system'-' the invisible hand.

That’s why in all communist revolutions one of the first groups they purge is the educated. I am unsure what would happen now, but I feel there would still be a purge on those who could understand the system.

They'd do what they are doing now, seize control of the channels of communication, the same way Lenin seized the cable wires.

Redundant. All leftists are communists

Heinlein tore into that in Starship Troopers, if I recall correctly. Really, the only decent thing leftists understand in terms of economics is that value is relative.

Why do people on this board continue to confuse propaganda with memes?

The meme is the unit of propagation, thus propaganda. You're being upset that people are discussing the classes of bad tastes instead of bad foods.

You know none of these commie faggots would hold there kiked beliefs if they actually blew their trust fund on some digging tools and made their own money. These niggers don't understand the whole "Small lone of 1 million". That shit got paid back in full and was used to make more money. I would kill for the opportunities these ungrateful faggots get and throw away. No ones above digging ditches, Especially if you can charge 500$ bucks a day.

What fucking nonsense. The button pusher is now some hero. Don't get me wrong I believe wholeheartedly in treating your employees with respect and dignity and encouraging their self improvement but lionizing the button pusher is laughably stupid to anyone that lives in the real world

brilliant. i'm reminded of "Ecotronics" which models economic systems and subsystems using electrical components and circuit topologies as analogies. with parameters like capacity, inductance, feedback, resistance (exothermic 'wasted value'); plug it into the gemba and you really start to see business differently.

I'm amazed that socialists can walk and chew gum at the same time.

To be fair to them.
We can agree that greedy exploitive employers need to hang.

If only all employers were like Henry Ford.
Who was taken to court by the Dodge brothers for daring to treat his workers well and make automobiles affordable.

those 'memes'

Technically those aren't even memes, they fit an infograph classification, badly structured ones at that.

This looked like a promising thread about the art of memetics, but instead turned into generic debate about Communism vs. Capitalism. What a waste.

The left really took all the worst things about political cartoons, and made that the standard.

This is becoming an interesting area. The definition(s) of meme. You appear to have some insight. It would be good to hear you expound on your definition.

Which aspect of a pepe cartoon is the meme? Pepe can be used to promote anything, so in a sense he is a carrier. A bringer of information, along with feels.


They overlap. With adv*rtising too. In a sense we all used to live in a world of almost exclusively forced memes, save maybe ones like 'Kilroy was here' and a few others. It might be interesting to list any others anons can think of.

Personally I dont think they're propaganda or any sort of carrier of it. No more than language itself is.
The memes we have created are a language, used to communicate feelings, thoughts and concepts in ways that words never can or at least can't do easily.

Interesting!

The excess value is not unpaid labor, though. It is what the worker pays the capitalist for the product of the capitalists investment-work, if we are to stay in the model. So the worker works in the factory, and uses the tools there. Whatever is left after his work and wage, is the payment the capitalist receives.

One might say, the capitalist leases the tools to the worker, for whatever is left after a fixed pay. He then uses that to pay for more tools, and for himself. This organizatory work is actual work, humans arent hormone-organized ants.

After the second on, they become incoherent. I cant make sense of it.

Their worldview is not based on truth and order, but wishful thinking. It's no wonder they cant organize things properly. Everything is connected, this is also why they love postmodern art and music, and a promiscuous.

I think writing like in these memes is designed to mesmerize the uneducated with an undue sense of awe in the presence of intellectual horseshit that seems beyond them without being explicitly objectionable (because normies lack knowledge of the subject).

you will find this thread interesting user

Big Henry Ford fan

I don't think (((college graduates))) with black and women studies degrees have anything to worry about when the commies massacre the intellectuals.

God, Marxism is an excercise in sticking your head up your ass as far as possible. These fags get high on manipulating semantic constructs and completely lose sight of the simple, obvious reality - I pay you to give me something I want.

I think I would agree. But the word propaganda doesn't necessarily mean negative or false.


Thanks

There was an old post, probably around this time last year about leftypol memes which featured a great mis-example of a goofy ragtag bunch of lefty characters cast as pirates on a ship. Does anyone still have that pic?

This reminded me of it. It was a great thread on meme and their production with tones of good-bad examples.