Redpill on pre-russia revolution?

Redpill on pre-russia revolution?
You could say a thread died for this but its a trump gun control thread.(template thread)

Low effort, shitty thread, but I'm also interested in Russia pre-complete-jew-subversion, so bump. Recommended material?

well of course it will be a low effort post because compared to other threads this is mainly a request you fucking brainlet

Tsarist Russia was falling apart.
It was at a very awkward place due to a lack of social development leaving it sort of in the feudal era but with loads of people in the cities agitating for modernisation.
It was a primarily agrarian economy incapable of producing a lot of modern technology.
Oh and the nobility were insane degenerate fucks whose daughters spent a good chunk of their time fucking Rasputin.

To put it simply it was a dying beast and it knew it.

You'll go far in life, I can tell.

The place was a corrupt authoritarian shithole before, after and right now. So much so that the average Russian expects nothing else.

How long has it been since the slav has known hope?

they are because its a request thread mongoloid

Was that an attempt at an argument?

You could have started the thread with results of your even 30 minutes of preliminary research. I'm also curious about this subject, but all I have to offer is the book "200 years together" might worth a look.

Do you have any Russian books written pre-Bolshevism that can assert this claim? Because Russia's history was rewritten from the ground up by the KGB. If you think the commies did spying work, it's because you have no idea of the size of their operations for history rewriting (hint: the proportion was 3:1 for "history agents" and spies)

Source: Disinformation, Ion Pacepa

Needless to say Jews wanted to destroy imperial Russia because of the progroms and pale settlement, but the Tsars treated the Russian people like massive shit through serfdom.

Now OP, if you want to understand Russia's monarchy, you have to understand two things first. Russia was always in economical crisis, because it not only had shit exports in agriculture, but it never went into an industrial reform. Which meant that if you think the English crown was in tough problems and had to sell itself to kikes, the Russian crown was even worse because it had no collaterals.

Their solution was to loan money from (((foreign banks))) and in exchange settle the more productive lands of Ukraine with a (((selected group of people))) that could profit from farming. Since there was plenty of unoccupied land there, the last Tsar thought it was a good idea to spread the development from the greener pastures, then start to gradually move the agricultural-based economy to industries.

However, the Tsar didn't had internet, nor Holla Forums to warn him about the (((people))) he chose to settle in Ukraine, and what happened was (((they))) started usury practices in an agricultural-based economy. Goys started to become indebted, and because stupid farmers can't account money correctly, especially without previous contact from (((banks))), the farms started to wither (people left instead of having to pay debts).

What it was one of the most productive pieces of land for agriculture in Europe became a hellhole with meager production, akin to modern Zimbabwe pre and post-white removal. To top it off, (((they))) started to charge the Tsar and the royal families the money the gentiles couldn't pay. The Tsar then made a deal with (((them))); let (((they))) occupy universities and education centers as to avoid the anti-semitic attacks of the goys in poor poor kikes trying to scam illiterate farmers. In exchange, (((they))) would keep lending them money to keep the Monarchy flowing with money.

The instabilities furthered up to a point where universities were the base of operations for the Bolshevik revolution. What happened next, you know damn well.

For research purposes, check: Pale of Settlement, Russian Empire pogroms as mentioned in .

Russia was slowly reforming under Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin. It's possible they would have transitioned to a constitutional monarchy had he not been assassinated.

The tsar sent 2 million Russian men to their deaths in WW1, fucked up his country, and the jews capitalized on it. If Russia had only defended its borders, communism wouldn't have ever fucking happened.

The country was already infiltrated. It was the perfect opportunity to strike.

And dont forget the considerable expense of maintaining everything east of the Urals.

The tsar was a massive imperialist faggot, he wanted to obtain the Dardanelles, just like Stalin btw. So with the goal to establish a puppet state there, he financed pan-Slavic movements in Southern Europe, although he knew perfectly well that this would disintegrate Austria-Hungary. But he didn't give a shit, and subsequently exactly this shit blew up into his face after the Archduke was assassinated and WW1 started. He should have better remained an ally of Germany like after the defeat of Napoleon, but no, he started to prefer the French.

Hang on.
As I recall when ol' Hitler was a wee boy the intellectuals in Austria were trying to convince everyone that Austrians were slavs.
Any relevance?

IIRC Austria-Hungary was a multi-ethnic empire and some elites wanted to shift the demographics in favor of Slavs.

Perhaps the only error of Bismarck was not allying with Russia in the Crimean war so the blame isn't on Russia here.

That's liberal whig history. Why would Russia transition into a democracy?

Can you elaborate? Prussia remained neutral, they didn't mobilize their troops and also didn't help Austria. How does this result in Russia preferring France, i.e. their enemy in the Crimean War?