Slavery covers a LOT of ground,
1) Financiers of the ships and crew.
2) African trader to buyer.
3) Localized holding and processing (EU, USA)
4) Localized auctioneering.
Having 'only' the 'ships' data dosen't cover the entire gamut of slavery. Normies and blacks will STILL believe it's all white people's prerogative behind the slave trade, when in reality we had NOTHING to do with it. Only highlighting one aspect barely imprints anything into the audience.
You'd need to condition your audience to understand that it takes a purely diabolical ' well connected, money oriented, insidious religious cult' to engage in the worldwide trade of human livestock.
The 'It's OK to be white' was designed to push buttons. And it did. Slavery Revisionists are trying to push the 'jealousy' button of blacks for 'imaginary reparations' against whites.
Question is, what buttons need to be pushed to make either jews retaliate, sjw's, blacks, normies.
For example, whites might respond to a accusation from a black person of 'you ran the slave trade, gibs me dat'. With 'No, white people never wanted slaves, never imported the slaves, never auctioned the slaves, WE NEVER WANTED YOU!! —- Only an amoral slave trading semetic cult is behind your woes. Look it up.'
1. You need to redirect black's anger to the real slavers, jews.
2. You need to give white people a means to deflect all accusations and refer to point 1.
Covering a tiny topic of a grand order wont satisfy those two points.
What I found 'interesting' is that the slave houses/synagoges in Curacao still exist. That is mysterious and makes an advertisers headline.
Oh, and please fuck off with your shill/derail shit. I'm too fucking tired to write all this crap out explaining a picture each time. Most people get the message.