For example, papyrus 66 >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papyrus_66 _They say 66 is the oldest and nearly complete; but the trouble is I don't want anything that was DISCOVERED in 1952… even though it was dated as the earliest, I want there to be a historical record of the manuscripts existence since ancient times.
And I don't care about any other books of the bible, so it doesn't have to be one of the four unicials, which are known to be the oldest complete version of the entire bible. I'm just concerned with finding an old source for the gospel of John. Thanks
Yeah, probably because many of them think the Bible is actually divinely ordained and not written down by men and not finalized until the Council of Nicaea. To say nothing of all the parts which were discarded as not canon and then lost when those filthy fucking Religion of Cuck™ic sandniggers burned down all those libraries in the Levant.
Leo Johnson
Looks likea guy dancing. The upper right can be a face and it can be that dance where people put there arms at their sides like sticks and curve their hands back. Alternatively, the upper left can be the head where the upper right is a hand and the bottom left is their leg lifted up.
You have some research to do, but I think the Codex Vaticanus is probably the best candidate for a old source of the Gospel of John that has any type of recorded history. Here is what wiki said;
Nicholas Hughes
Maybe take this bullshit to /christian/ because it isn't Holla Forums cunt.
Julian Lopez
That's your mistake there. Stay away from nu-leftypol
