So, what's so bad about Marxism?

I've always heard about the Russian uprising of early 20th century, Gulag, Soviet massacres, and such being used as arguments against Marxism, but I've never heard anyone sufficiently criticizing the philosophy itself. So, what's so bad about it?

Marx was a kike and if this isn't bad enough for you then you can end your life.

What more do you need to criticize a philosophy, but the fruits of its adherents?

Communism is a philosophy that, at it's core, denies the fundamental truths of the world. Whether you call it natural law, or God's law, or universal truth, it is all the same. They deny race, they deny gender, they deny any kind of inherent differences between groups of people. This novel idea, that all men are not only created equal, but created the same, and would all end in the same position, if not for class warfare, is inherently backwards and a denial of evolution. Furthermore, one of (if not) the core tenants of Marxism is the idea that class warfare is the driver of all events throughout history. It is they that implanted the idea that the American Revolution happened simply because rich landlords in America didn't want to pay higher taxes to England.

Marxism is flawed in its fundamentals, and also in the actions and results of those who claim it as their guiding ideology. If you didn't already know this, you have some reading to do. I would recommend starting with the works of George Lincoln Rockwell, if you're American. The Prison Notebooks by Antonio Gramsci is also worth reading, though its author was a militant Marxist. It outlines many of the inherent abhorrence that Marxism presents. He outlines a strategy for Marxist revolutions in educated, prosperous countries that we are facing today in Europe and America. To summarize it, he advocated for a long game, where Marxists would worm their way into the fundamental institutions of a society. Education, finance, media, local politics, etc. Once they controlled those outlets, they would be able to change the culture of the society from within, in order to prime it for violent revolution. It is a backhanded, slimy, and deceitful process, and one that most of the west is in the late stages of. It is worth reading his works, simply to see straight from the Marxists themselves, what they intend to do and how they intend to do it.

read basic economics by sowell and GTFO with your stupid question. waste of a thread.

Crazy thing is you think you've got any business telling anyone else to fuck off.

A literal Rothschild kike.

...

...

My mama used to say; "Son, you ask stupid questions, you get stupid smack up side o' your head".

Nope. Not in my case.
This novel idea, that all men are not only created equal, but created the same, and would all end in the same position, if not for class warfare, is inherently backwards and a denial of evolution. Furthermore, one of (if not) the core tenants of Marxism is the idea that class warfare is the driver of all events throughout history. It is they that implanted the idea that the American Revolution happened simply because rich landlords in America didn't want to pay higher taxes to England.
You didn't refute this.
If so, why are they taking so long to institute socialism? Marxism is a ghost. It has lost its own battles with liberalism. The reason socialism of any form has died to make way for social democracy is a clear sign of this. National socialism isn't going to happen again in any form, unless you folks realize the importance of class struggle and the reasoning behind nationalizing indistry and abolishing wages. I suppose it's easier to accept conspiracy theories about gommunism than it is to accept that nationalism is dying because of neoliberal capitalism. Personally, i'm not actually a communist. I'm a marxist socialist and a nationalist (read; national socialist) at that, and from my experience, none of what you have said so far is true. Libertarian communists are slimy, and make up a majority of the movement, but anyone who has actually read socialist works will realize that the movement today is dead compared to what it once was, due to internal rot from liberalism and "tolerance". I don't think i can properly formulate responses in one post, so if anyone has questions i'd be happy to answer.