I've always heard about the Russian uprising of early 20th century, Gulag, Soviet massacres, and such being used as arguments against Marxism, but I've never heard anyone sufficiently criticizing the philosophy itself. So, what's so bad about it?
So, what's so bad about Marxism?
Marx was a kike and if this isn't bad enough for you then you can end your life.
What more do you need to criticize a philosophy, but the fruits of its adherents?
Communism is a philosophy that, at it's core, denies the fundamental truths of the world. Whether you call it natural law, or God's law, or universal truth, it is all the same. They deny race, they deny gender, they deny any kind of inherent differences between groups of people. This novel idea, that all men are not only created equal, but created the same, and would all end in the same position, if not for class warfare, is inherently backwards and a denial of evolution. Furthermore, one of (if not) the core tenants of Marxism is the idea that class warfare is the driver of all events throughout history. It is they that implanted the idea that the American Revolution happened simply because rich landlords in America didn't want to pay higher taxes to England.
Marxism is flawed in its fundamentals, and also in the actions and results of those who claim it as their guiding ideology. If you didn't already know this, you have some reading to do. I would recommend starting with the works of George Lincoln Rockwell, if you're American. The Prison Notebooks by Antonio Gramsci is also worth reading, though its author was a militant Marxist. It outlines many of the inherent abhorrence that Marxism presents. He outlines a strategy for Marxist revolutions in educated, prosperous countries that we are facing today in Europe and America. To summarize it, he advocated for a long game, where Marxists would worm their way into the fundamental institutions of a society. Education, finance, media, local politics, etc. Once they controlled those outlets, they would be able to change the culture of the society from within, in order to prime it for violent revolution. It is a backhanded, slimy, and deceitful process, and one that most of the west is in the late stages of. It is worth reading his works, simply to see straight from the Marxists themselves, what they intend to do and how they intend to do it.
read basic economics by sowell and GTFO with your stupid question. waste of a thread.
Crazy thing is you think you've got any business telling anyone else to fuck off.
A literal Rothschild kike.
My mama used to say; "Son, you ask stupid questions, you get stupid smack up side o' your head".
Nope. Not in my case.
This novel idea, that all men are not only created equal, but created the same, and would all end in the same position, if not for class warfare, is inherently backwards and a denial of evolution. Furthermore, one of (if not) the core tenants of Marxism is the idea that class warfare is the driver of all events throughout history. It is they that implanted the idea that the American Revolution happened simply because rich landlords in America didn't want to pay higher taxes to England.
You didn't refute this.
If so, why are they taking so long to institute socialism? Marxism is a ghost. It has lost its own battles with liberalism. The reason socialism of any form has died to make way for social democracy is a clear sign of this. National socialism isn't going to happen again in any form, unless you folks realize the importance of class struggle and the reasoning behind nationalizing indistry and abolishing wages. I suppose it's easier to accept conspiracy theories about gommunism than it is to accept that nationalism is dying because of neoliberal capitalism. Personally, i'm not actually a communist. I'm a marxist socialist and a nationalist (read; national socialist) at that, and from my experience, none of what you have said so far is true. Libertarian communists are slimy, and make up a majority of the movement, but anyone who has actually read socialist works will realize that the movement today is dead compared to what it once was, due to internal rot from liberalism and "tolerance". I don't think i can properly formulate responses in one post, so if anyone has questions i'd be happy to answer.
someone dump truthseeker pls
Silly goy, that wasn't true Marxism™.
It was made by a jew.
And here, I thought you were asking in good faith. My mistake.
My god, could you imagone what would happen if a National Socialist said when confronted by the mythical Holocaust that real National Socialism has never been tried before? You'd never the end of it.
You people always say that by promoting ethnonationalism we are promoting genocide. But in fact, Communists have committed more genocide than any ethnonationalist ever has. You leftists are the most hypocritical people ever.
this is what i call a kike free first post
I mean if we were trying to find the good in all things… Marxism does give us an excuse to kill people.
Did anyone say that? Who, ITT, said real socialism has never been tried before?
Every last kike must be exterminated, there is no nice way around it they all have to die because leaving just one alive guarantees that they will exist in the future to be able to do the same fucking kike bullshit all over again.
They caused the fucking exodus of legend. They are trying to do it again. Do you expect them to just stop if we ask them to?
Socialism doesn't mean jews can't be exterminated. It's hard to reform an entire race from their treacherous ways.
oh wew what the fuck. Thanks I've got a bit of a cold maybe I need some rest.
You could not be more of a moron if you had actually invented Marxism.
Why this picture of a dead faggot with possible zionist links? Do you think we need suggestions OP?
Communism: reducing civilization to its least common denominator.
Why don't we do the same though?