If we're to live in a civilized world with any amount of order in it, eventually low IQ and aggression will be bred out systematically (Both linked to melanin). The people in that picture if they breed will be 50% black and white. Possibly also with health conditions due to the women blacks get are usually of the lower quality. That aside, the resulting mulatto will always instinctively seek out to reproduce with better specimens with lower levels a melanin. If successful, their offspring will be 75% white and 25% black… Given the choice, I suspect most blacks would choose to have a genomic race-change to become white or asian to 1: benefit their offspring's prospects 2: to have offspring that are easier to raise and less likely to engage in degenerate behavior.
I don't think you understand conservatism. Conservatism isn't by necessity an ideology, it's inherently linked to a certain way of thinking. There are neuro-structural differences between conservatives and liberals and it has to do with r/k strategies that have evolved in humanity. In a nutshell it's the difference between missing lunch and becoming lunch.
sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/03/160331105728.htm
As mentioned, you're right, most right-leaning people don't care about ideology, they care about results. Actually I could agree with you depending on what your definitions are. I think you should read a little more about neo-reaction, the dark enlightenment, and organicism. Conservative thinking has continued to have a very diversified evolution over the years. Why do you think the whole "alt-right" started? It's people with innate conservative instincts that were fed up with it's then current state of the forms it had taken.
amerika.org/science/why-i-am-a-conservative/
Here's from Brett recently:
"The Right has, for years, gone along with this plan because since the French Revolution, there has been nothing “hip” or “new” about conservatism, which at its heart states that we need the traditional order of the ancients: strong culture, a society of honor, monarchism, hierarchy, a pervasive faith, and a dedication toward the transcendentals such as “the good, the beautiful, and the true."
Even nihilists, who don't "believe" anything, are prone to accept these things. The acceptance comes because they're simply more preferable. People want to live in a healthy civilization. They aren't just going to "go out of style" anytime soon shlomo. Good luck reinventing nature, I know you're all hard at work at it though. Not even synthetic biology or transhumanism is going to subvert the natural inclination towards certain principles such as order or the propensity to seek out excellence. Go ahead and hard-wire us all into degenerates, tell me how all that turns out. I'm sure that in itself would be entertaining, but eventually things sort themselves out one way or another.
