I'm confused as to why Zero Mission is considered worse than the original

I'm confused as to why Zero Mission is considered worse than the original.

Other urls found in this thread:

romhacking.net/hacks/1186/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Autism

I think I only saw one person who thought that. He had shit arguments like "Ledge grabbing makes it casual shit"

I've heard people go as far as saying the original is the best Metroid game period because it didn't have a map, which according to them, made it feel more like an adventure.

Have you played the original?

it's a great game, is a lot more fun to replay, especially with the harder difficulty, and i don't rank it worse than the original, but it's not a replacement by any means. it's sort of like how The Twin Snakes added more gameplay mechanics, but didn't adjust to make the game challenging. here they added more QOL improvements like maps and saves but didn't adjust to force exploration and experimentation.

gameboy metroid is unplayable

If you aren't playing it on a small handheld screen, you are doing it wrong. Also G E T G O O D.

A U T I S M

rose tinted goggles