Is it possible to be a communistic capitalist? I feel I agree with fiscal elements of both systems...

...

CZ'd

Collectivism is the primary issue anyone moral should have.

Human beings are social organizers, not social organisms.

The trouble with modern capitalism is also its collectivist tendencies. But unlike communism this is not ingrained innately within it. What we are practicing is a corruption of capitalism.

There is no compatibility between the two, it's one or the other. Anything in the middle is just a failed abortion of compromise.

I'm serious. How the fuck are Jews not white?

You're just jealous that they, as a group, have what the white race lacks. Racial solidarity.

fucking trips

I agree. Capitalism is good because of property

Time for discussion is over. You're either with the White race or not, and it is very clear that you are not, cunt.

...

Tfw waiting for train
Tfw actually a woke asf natsoc
Tfw Got bored and baited to start some shit
Tfw you bought it

Thx lads, trains here. Could've let it go on but I don't want the fun to end by mods taking the thread down.

Oy vey!!1!!1 I'll have you know I'm a journalist at the new York times!

...

fpbp
But in all honesty, isn't national socialism capitalistic within the national socialistic framework? In the same way you can be a nationalist libertarian that is libertarian within the framework of the nation (i.e. citizen do whatever the fuck they want, everybody else gets fucked, especially (((subverters))) )

No worries mate
Take it easy

I honest to god double checked I wasn't in Holla Forums.

Capitalism requires private property. Commies don't allow that. All production must be controlled by the collective. Either through the state or in the endgame utopia by the masses/workers. You're a retard to think they'd ever be compatible.
Commie economy isnt bad though. It's everything else about them. Fascism, NatSoc and tge other third position systems use communism and socialism.

It allows private business only if it serves the interests of the nation/völk. Otherwise no. Fascism is a more diplomatic approach. Gives private business stake in the state but also beholdens them to it.

Also forgot sage on last post sorry.

dubs again

Imagine if your house belonged to the state while Obama was president. How many Africans do you think he would pack in there? That's communism. It's not compatible with anything except insanity.

...

Yes, in the same way it is possible to be a heterosexual faggot like you OP
Seriously though, communism and capitalism are both jew constructs, so you could be both if you were a jew

WEW

one more dubs

got em

Stop asking.
Lurk more and when you have something with substance, come back to us.
By the way, hang yourself commie.

Yeah, just own Apple products.

"National" is the key word. Both capitalism and communism are globalist tools for cultural and physical genocide of peoples.

You lolberg faggots will get the rope just as fast as commies like OP.

Fuck Off

Kill
Your
Self

You could be a distributist, which is the real center between capitalism and communism. Look it up.

n a t i o n a l s o c i a l i s m

^ CIA

Attempting to implant to the subconscious thoughts of CIA erm, that is suicide.

Also:
That wasn't Marx's idea; that was Marx adopting Hegelian thought, and Hegel wasn't a dirty communist kike.
COMPLETE THE SYSTEM OF GERMAN IDEALISM
sage for double-post

Pick one, idiot.

The important thing to realize is that economics is not an end in itself, but a means to an end, and that end is the safeguarding of your people. So the best economic system is the one that fits your people the best. Anglos would probably prefer more capitalism. Scandinavians would prefer more socialism.

diametrically opposed

Global report.

Fuck off, Jews are a different breed of sand nigger

ackshully its was Fichte

That sounds like what commies call state capitalism (i.e. socialism outside their books). Basically the state is like a company that owns everything. Beware that, like any huge company, the less important stuff will be mismanaged because it's simply impossible for such a huge monster to work properly, be it private or public. Even some commies like Haldane acknowledge that can't work in practice except in tiny countries.
Perhaps something you'd find interesting is Fascism. In case you don't know it has mechanisms based on syndicalism so both industries and workers are represented in the government.
I share 's opinion on what system is best: it depends on the circumstances and if you try to shove something people don't want down their throats it'll end badly even if it's perfect in some made-up scenario.

It's called being a cohenite.

It's the same semitic shit.

Capitalists and communists have always worked hand in hand against White interests.

wew, your glowing so hard I was nearly blinded

Yeah, it's called Judaism.

Bump

This is a National Socialist board, faggot.
>>>/liberty/
>>>/trs/

SUBVERSIVE ATTEMPT TO OBSCURE REALITY AND FACTS ABOUT BOTH SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO CHIDE UNEDUCATED INTO A WAY OF THINKING.

OLD TRICKS SCHLOMO.

Marx was only right about the means of production being necessary for a functioning state. that's why foreign trade is bad on the whole.

thanks fam, i'm woefully uninformed on Fichte

look here, also notice logging at top of thread.

consider this.

Sure, just be one of the Commies at the top. They all live well.

Keyword there kiddo, is 'feel'. That's because you only have a high level understanding of each. So instead of making shit threads, you need to read more.

A LOT more reading.

at least even capitalists know the flaws of their system.
here in portugal, they barely ever teach you the flaws of communism in schools (at least that i remember) and there's even political parties advocating for that system.

Yes. It's called National Socialism.

First, go back to Holla Forums
Second, kys

Of course it is, friend. They are two sides to the same materialistic coin. They are painted as a dichotomy so that the people who are living under one will consider the other evil and the enemy while they are being enslaved. Both are terribly Jewish, and they use both as goals to ensnare people.

The modern definition of 'capitalist' was coined by that very same inventor of communism, that Karl Marx. It was described by him to be everything that communism was not, a direct counter-part, and something wholly and utterly evil that all men of good morals would stand against. His version of capitalism did not exist, nor has it ever existed, nor has it ever been likely to exist. There are a few others who bandied around the word 'capitalist' before him, but that definition which we use today - and which many imbecilic Americans seek to defend; has never been a real thing, nor has it ever threatened to become a real thing.

This is definitely not a slide thread.