Okay, let's assume I buy this narrative.
This is how I picture it.
Trump has a dog. This dog is equivalent to refusal to grant DACA amnesty.
The Dems have a garden. This garden is the equivalent of support of spic scum and their resultant demographic advantage.
Trump says, "I'll kill my dog, but ONLY if you dig up your garden, sprinkle salt on the soil, and sign a piece of paper saying you'll never grow a garden ever again".
The narrative being pushed by the above Anons suggests, "They'll never go for that! They love their garden! They need their garden! They'll never agree to it!".
Now, here's the rub:
First of all, they don't need the garden - they've already got enough vegetables to last the year (ie Dems have enough non-Whites in-country to secure demographic advantage).
Second of all, the trade is not equivalent - the implication is that the trade, Trump's dead dog for the Dem's dug-up and salted garden, is equivalent… But its not.
In theory, the Dems can re-plant their garden, they can bring in new soil to replace the salted soil, and they can ignore the piece of paper they signed saying they'd never do so.
But Trump? His dog is fucking dead.
So, Trump trading his dog for their garden isn't a good trade, because they can get back what they offered, while he cannot. And that's the score with this DACA thing:
- the Dems can get by with the muds they've got, so it won't destroy their advantage in the best-case-scenario wherein they're actually held to the deal
- the Dems, once in power, can ignore or change whatever legislation is passed to impose greater border security and end chain migration
- the Dems, once in power, can simply not man the border wall, or man it with troops who've been instructed not to carry out their duty of its defense
- the Republicans, even if in power, will never be able to rescind DACA amnesty once granted, and their ability to stay in power will be inhibited because those people will all vote Democrat
Its a bad trade, because one side is offering something they cannot come back from, while the other is offering something they can easily come back from once they're in power.