On the basis that the first and longest occupancy should determine who controls Jerusalem i feel obliged to reclaim the City on behalf of the Hurrians.
The issue is strange yet unavoidable given that this has become the historical proving ground, in this thread then i shall explain what those issues are, provide evidence for the Hurrian claim and the religious nature of such.
In brief Canaan in general was first occupied and settled by Trans-Caucasian tribal groups generally understood as Hurrians from around 3,000 BC creating the basis for City states including Jerusalem, there was earlier occupancy and the population was generally Semitic and there was conflict which required strong fortification, the overall drive to colonize the region was driven by looking to find new resources, primarily ores, and the establishment of an easier trade route with Egypt, the Hurrians as part of the greater Uruk sphere had been in contact with pre-Dynastic Egypt since circa 3,600 BC through the hub of Susa, thus the occupation was in terms of greater regional development.
It was these Trans-Caucasians then that were still in control of various of the City states at the time of the supposed Hebrew invasion, that were considered as giants and related to the cult of the watchers from their ethnic heartland in Northern Iran/Azerbaijan, a tradition that tended towards dehumanizing towards their own genocidal takeover, achieved through subversion amongst the lower primarily Semitic class in conjunction with increased expansion of population groups from the Arabian peninsula that also ended Hurrian control of Jordan.
There was long familiarity between the two ethnic groups as the Hebrews had connectivity to the previous Syriac City state of Ebla which had been destroyed by the Hurrians of Nineveh and the entire NW Semitic Pantheon was derived from Hurrian/Hattic/Mesopotamian influence with regional and linguistic variation, with regards to that the Hebrews had determined El as their tutelary Deity in mythological opposition to the Hurrian tutelary Deity storm God Tessub (Ba'al Hadad), in effect the conflict was based upon "God Wars" and entirely derivative of Hurrian tradition within the Kumarbi Cycle in the first place.
The sign that had bound together the greater Uruk sphere and City state federation had been the Pentagram or UB sign, that later became also the seal for Jerusalem, the essential meaning bound as one, though the UB sign also had application in terms of angles/quarters the overall Pentagram concerns itself with all directions.
The term UB relates to that of Hbr in Semitic, whether habiru or Hebrew, bound as one, and also used in the magical sense, it was the case that they adopted the same term for their own federation as that which they took over.
The Hebrews took control of Jerusalem circa 1,000 BC, some 2,000 years after it's founding and ruled there some 1,000 years, the evidence that they took over a Hurrian City is thus;
"Canaan" as a Hurrian word, formed with the Hurrian suffixes. -h(h)i and -na.2 y, the word kinahhu designated "red purple
It is also the case that Biblical tradition is entirely derivative of Hurrian which is why Europeans have related to it so well, they assimilated our customs and practises.
It was the case then that despite the genocidal policy towards the Hurrians they adopted their culture and claimed it as their own.
Šuwala lingered as the Hebrew loan word for Sheol;
Of course to the Hurrians Allani was entirely positive as the Goddess of the inner Earth and source of the underground stream and was represented at Jerusalem, in later times her esoteric tradition was understood as Ruha Qudosh, literally the Feminine Holy Spirit.
Oliver Ortiz
In terms of our "God Wars" every Free Mason wants to be a perfect little Ashlar in the reconstructed Temple of Solomon whereas the Hurrian would simply want the former site of the Threshing Place restored as that in it's own right was the sacred place.
The threshing floor in the Hurrian context would have been associated with the Goddess Sauska (Semitic Athtart/Istar) and the Mount itself her brother/consort Tesub, the Ain Dhara Temple of Syria dedicated to those two Deities also the closest equivalent to the Solomonic, the convening on the threshing floor and offering of sacrifices would have related to harvest festival
The primary Goddess of Jerusalem in it's relationship to the relative West and the evening as in the God Shalom was the Goddess of the evening star/Venus the Hurrian Sauska (Semitic Istar/Athtart/Ashtart), this was the West as relative to Susa in the East and the Morning star of Susa represented by Istaran or even Ashtar of command infamy, and her cult related to the threshing floor.
The primary cultic centre of Sauska was at Nineveh and all the Semitic adaptations were derivative of her.
The rites of the threshing floor are difficult to establish but certainly the role of El-lil as God of the air would have related to the winnowing, were the chaff is caught up in the air and blown away, in that sense in allegorical terms to be caught up in the deceptions of El is to be lost, the equivalent Nordic God of the air was Loki, again the arch foe of the storm God Thor, the floors were set upon high places to involve the wind but the high place itself was dedicated to the storm God, thus the relationship between the two elements, the threshing floor was understood to connect the Earth to the Heavens.
It was also the place of the connection to the underworld and the ancestral spirits were considered to rise there and likely the sacrifice of Ba'al involving his journey into the underworld subsequent to having conceived a son to facilitate his return, all connected to the agricultural cycle, the threshing floor being the setting for such mysteries.
In overall historical terms the reclaiming of Jerusalem would correspond to the return of Ba'al Hadad. or more properly Tessub and the claims of the ancestral Hurrians, to conform with the mythological narrative, theologians will spend the next two thousand years trying to figure this out.
Connor Watson
According to the Bible it belongs to white people anyway. The three sons of Noah are Japheth (which means white, fair, to be beautiful), Ham (hot, dark, black) and Shem (which I'm pretty sure means tawny, but apparently every website has change its meaning to 'Name' - regardless its fairly obvious that if the other two refer to white and black, that the S(h)emites are the swarthy inbetweeners, those that currently dwell around that region.
It is written that God will 'enlarge' Japheth, and we know that two of Japheths sons are those who found Persia and Greece. In the last book of the Old Testament the Israelites (S(h)emites) are told that if they do not repent and return to God, they will be uprooted and utterly destroyed. In the New Testament Jesus even says that they will be replaced with a different people, that they are disinherited, and so on. In Acts Paul was going to go East, but God stops him and tells him to go West instead - to Greece and Rome.
It doesn't take a lot of brain-power to realise what is going on here. God says He will 'enlarge' Japheth, the Whites. His original people, the sons of Shem (Semites) end up disinherited and cursed, and this comes from the mouth of Jesus - and then Paul(who is himself part-Greek) is instructed by God to bring the faith to the West.
Israel, the so-called inheritance of the Semites, is to go to the Japhephites (AKA whites). Now in all honesty Israel means 'Kingdom of God' and its mention as an inheritance is almost certainly that of a spiritual inheritance, AKA heaven. However, this is the same logic that kikes use to claim that it should be theirs - and by their own logic, if one is to follow the New Testament (or even just accept the Prohpecies of the Old Testament) then it is obvious that it belongs to the Whites instead.
As an aside Ham is cursed to be a slave. Whether this applies directly to him or to his descendants is up for debate, although seeing as how blacks still live as slaves (even if just to welfare and drugs) it wouldn't surprise me if it was forever. Alternatively, according to Scripture God continuously curses people who do certain vile acts, and these curses last from 3-4 generations. Seeing as how most people continue in their ways, it would not surprise me if blacks had not repeatedly 'refreshed' their curse, even though it should have ended millenia ago.
Lincoln Wright
Jerusalem belongs to the descendants of the First Civilization, then. The one that fell at the end of the last ice age, built the Egyptian and Chinese pyramids, Machu Picchu, Easter Island, a part of which was the Vedic Civilization, and was white. You know; the one that jews (and modern egyptians) refuse to investigate the city ruins of (right on the edge of the continental shelf) because it would ruin their claims to the holy land (and egypt).
Nicholas Clark
< white kangz posting Semitic people were never white.
Connor Stewart
The problem in trying to form a biblical basis is that the story you refer to of Noah is an adaptation of the Marzeah of El from Ugarit, were he descends into such a drunken stupor he opens the gate into the underworld and the Devil Hababy emerges, the two that support him are as the gate keepers of the underworld and in the Noah adaptation Ham plays the part of Hababy, bit ridiculous really, but they were looking to provide an explanation of evil survived the flood and the Marzeah involved the Rephaim spirits emerging from the underworld and those of the ancestors, this was an aspect of the threshing floor rites.
There's no evidence for anything falling at the end of the last ice age rather the evidence is for the beginning of the neolithic period in Anatolia, that's were the importance of selective reproduction was introduced and not only in plants and animals, if it wasn't for that we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Ethan Baker
Firstly I'd like to ask why that invalidates anything that I've said.
Secondly, the story is irrelevant. The only part that matters regarding 'Israel' is the genealogies, where we find that one of Japheth's sons goes on to found Greece. I do not think that Jews dispute this, and really its all about destroying their legal argument. We, the West, which has allowed the kikes to re-take that land in Palestine - must then either openly forsake our Christianity (to be honest that might happen today, but it wouldn't have 70 years ago), or else we are forced to realise that according to New Testament Scripture - the Semites are disinherited, and that God has chosen another people, and that Scriptural as well as historical events indicate that his new chosen people are the sons of Japheth.
… Now from a more even handed perspective I'd make the point that all races can be God's people, but the Yid's reason for why it is theirs is explicitly Biblical - and our understanding of the Bible either indicates that Israel should NEVER be rebuilt, or else that it belongs to Whites (or else everyone). Regardless of how one views it, from a Christian perspective - Semites/Jews have ZERO claim to Israel, Palestine or Jerusalem what-so-ever.
Luke Torres
I'd also like to add that I'm very appreciate of all the work you've done, I love reading these old tomes, and about expert's opinions about them - and I hope you do not find anything that I've said offensive. I'm just trying to make the point that its far easier and simpler to invalidate the yid's claims than you are making out, and in my method we use their own logic and sources to dismantle their arguments.
Nicholas Butler
Thanks for asserting something that no one questioned, dipshit.
What the fuck are you doing here if you think you’re right?
It invalidates the Noah tradition because the Ugaritic basis of the drunkenness of El had no concern with three sons or race, also of course the Mesopotamian flood narratives weren't concerned with any of that, so it isn't based on ancient at that time lore but the adaptation of a tale too suit their purpose, though that represents their take on things at that time period.
But with regard to the genealogies note what i mentioned with regards to the Nuzi tablets and Hurrian interest in such, there could have been records or traditions from other sources.
It's easy to dismiss Jewish claims to Jerusalem but requires a certain amount of knowledge to make a counter claim for the Hurrians, also consider which God declared the Hebrews his Chosen people and towards what purpose.
Dominic Foster
Belief in Atlantis is compulsory for participation on this board?
Tyler Cooper
Jerusalem is forever lost to sand kikes and their pale tapeworm cousins. Mercy kill in form of a nuclear holocaust is the only doable solution
Levi Powell
If only more Christians were willing to set up casinos for money laundering like based Sheldon Adelson.
Austin Carter
Even if they did they'd use that money to support based Israel because they can't even fucking read their own book.
Joshua Cook
Have whatever opinion you want, so long as it's educated and based on investigation, not just your knee-jerk reaction
Juan Allen
RE-claim? ohh right christians that want to fight for sandnigger land because its yahweh's will. Answer this image. If you're more loyal to christianity than your own people you're a liability at best.
Matthew White
Kill the shitskins and convert the whites. Pretty simple really.
Brayden Scott
fuck off spic
Brody Perez
My own people are my family, then those at my church (and everyone in the religion), then everyone else.
Evan Reed
shit meme. the opinion is supposed to be more difficult
Joseph Smith
Obviously we are going to level the site to restore the threshing floor…
David Brooks
post like this have the sole purpose of diving white people. do not fall for this. I am a white atheist but it is perfectly fine to be a white christian and I have no problem standing up for my white christian brothers and sisters, neither should anyone other white person. whats really sad about your post kike is that it highlights your indifference to the sacrifices the white American and European communities made to prop you up in isreal. you lied to them, manipulated them and here you are throwing them in the trash by taking those conflicts out of context in an effort to discredit them and there efforts that were all lead and financed through and by the kike community. your people will pay for all of this
Luis Hernandez
...
Alexander Hughes
You could fit 26 New York cities inside of Israel's land mass with a population of 250,000,000+ people.
There is absolutely no reason Israel keeps it's borders closed. they have plenty fucking room.
Their excuse is based on racism.
Liam Rivera
Huh. You learn something new every day.
Time to destroy all those shitty Colonial/Victorian/Tudor buildings, and all their other fascist architectural styles.
Hunter Robinson
We're already divided. You can only do good by one boss, and these worthless cucks have already chosen their side. There is no way for it to be possible to worship some dead kike while simultaneously caring about your own people, as the jewish cult itself is built upon destroying the people of Europe. They'll side to the end with their brainwashed shitskin brothers any day, all the while gleefully slitting our throats while dreaming on empty promises of a sky palace. They'll died enslaved to an alien god, but not before they do everything in their power to destroy us and all that is good in this world.
We have our Gods, there is no reason what so ever to betray them, and cuck for foreign gods, much less jewish ones.
Hudson Sullivan
Only Jews get free health care in Israel. Non Jews have to pay even if they were born there.
Sounds like National askeNazism to me.
Tyler Murphy
...
Lucas Morgan
Kill blacks and kikes Help the whites see the light
Christian Reed
...
Camden Cox
is this a trick question and the train has a reverse gear?
Bentley Rodriguez
sage fuck off Bannon
Hebrew = Aramaic for "NOMAD"
There were no Hebrews and there was never a state called Israel. Jerusalem was never owne by Israelis and it's a mythology created to unify Semites against Greek occupation
Nicholas Young
My picture is asking them to choose between christian shitskins or pagan whites. Its a very simple question that shows where they're loyalties ultimately lie. Is it "divisive" to say coalburners are a problem? Is it "divisive" to say kike enablers like joe biden, john mcain- ect. are a problem? Is it "divisive" to say antifa whites who turn against their own in a heartbeat are a problem?
YES ITS DIVISIVE and rightly so. Uniting with everything for the sake of unity is fucking stupid. I'm drawing the line at whites who will kill whites in favor of shitskins because they worship the same desert god. That isnt asking for much. Many christians would choose the whites and that's why im asking.
There's no trick.
Ian Baker
Global report.
Elijah Jenkins
did you lose the saving throw vs cognitive dissonance?
Liam Anderson
Whoever needs less money from my paycheck should have it. That's you, Palestine.
Jason Evans
[citation needed]
Hudson Evans
I don't give a shit about sandniggerland. Let the Persians, Iraqis, Syrians, Lebanese and Palestinians massacre all the Jews and return the territory to the Palestinians. Then, someday, once the west has recovered from its current ills, it can be reconquered for the British Empire.
Cameron Clark
Easy. Due to their belief in an afterlife, they'd save the ones that if dead, would go to hell. Shitty meme though. Most people, not just Christians would prefer to not hurt anyone.
