Leftist tactics

It's amazing how their indoctrination allows them to ignore that crucial fact. All the stuff about the social/economic harm caused by massive wealth hoarding by a tiny elite is basically true, the only thing stopping it from being a NatSoc talking point is the addition of "btw they're overwhelmingly kikes."

It is trade off (((they))) make to recruit emotional driven fanatics. These people are incapable of thinking in cold, calculating terms anyways. It is more effective to just brainwash them to the point of utter annihilation of the self.

Not entirely true, remember that just over half of whites are women. They're particularly vulnerable to propaganda that targets their fears, and which claims some behaviour or viewpoint is now necessary to be socially accepted, and the jew knows this all too well.

what would a leftist case for a 4th reich sound like?

I imagine it would sound something like between these two vids.

The professors and HR person (this is important to emphasize) lied about a formal complaint being filed against Lindsey Shepard, the TA at Wilfred Laurier.

therecord.com/news-story/7986445-no-formal-complaint-against-wilfrid-laurier-student-lindsay-shepherd-lawyer-confirms/#.WioR5qHobs0.twitter

That said, two can play that game. They aren't exactly nihilist on the left anymore, they left that behind.

I'm pretty sure I have a good idea of whether or not this will benefit them OP.

I had to deal with this issue in (((college))). You'd take literally 10% of the goal length in information, then add more bullshit and fluff until you've reached an arbitrary word count. That's only possible with masturbation.

Leftist tactics are and always have been very easy to detect. Those "loaded words" she brings up are always pseudo-intellectual drivel without any weight in their meaning and use. Lefties have the stereotype of shrill nagging women, like such they drone and nag on and on without making concise points and they consider that a victory.

Ay lmao

They still dont understand that the birth of our racism is not fear but disgust. Disgust is the origin and the impetus for our hatred (and some of us dont even hate) and from their we fear the revolting disease infecting what we see as pure

Its par for the course with them. I've always found it ironic that the people who use the word dialectic so much they don't seem to have any practical understanding from the greek definition to their own marxist materialist definition. They tend to only understand it within the context of one definition and as a result, when you point out that there's different ways to think about dialectics , they start making crass appeals to authorities, How definitions change with usage…in short, you cant share a common language with them and pointing that out is one of the quickest ways to dismantle any intellectual argument they try to put forward since 9 times out of 10 they will refuse to share a mutual definition that could potentially be used against them.

I think the important thing to do when ever arguing with these people is not to think of it as an argument against them but rather as a spectacle for the audience. When I'm shitting it up on Facebook My goal is most often to get an undecided readers attention and approval and I've found that my described approach tends to earn the most amount of likes on facebook from both left and right oriented commenters.

I may not be on your side Holla Forums but holy shit do we agree when it comes to fucking leftists. Go ahead and gas me if you fucking have to but at least make sure those fucks are gone before you do.

are you jewish?

Fuck off back to Israel, kike. You are not wanted in our lands. If you really want to help us, go back to your land and stay there.

I'm a statistics man myself. Get rid of the trash, things will get better.

20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist trait.

21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because the activists’ hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify race hatred.

22. If our society had no social problems at all, the leftists would have to INVENT problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse for making a fuss.

THE DANGER OF LEFTISM

213. Because of their need for rebellion and for membership in a movement, leftists or persons of similar psychological type often are unattracted to a rebellious or activist movement whose goals and membership are not initially leftist. The resulting influx of leftish types can easily turn a non-leftist movement into a leftist one, so that leftist goals replace or distort the original goals of the movement.

214. To avoid this, a movement that exalts nature and opposes technology must take a resolutely anti-leftist stance and must avoid all collaboration with leftists. Leftism is in the long run inconsistent with wild nature, with human freedom and with the elimination of modern technology. Leftism is collectivist; it seeks to bind together the entire world (both nature and the human race) into a unified whole. But this implies management of nature and of human life by organized society, and it requires advanced technology. You can’t have a united world without rapid transportation and communication, you can’t make all people love one another without sophisticated psychological techniques, you can’t have a “planned society” without the necessary technological base. Above all, leftism is driven by the need for power, and the leftist seeks power on a collective basis, through identification with a mass movement or an organization. Leftism is unlikely ever to give up technology, because technology is too valuable a source of collective power.

215. The anarchist [34] too seeks power, but he seeks it on an individual or small-group basis; he wants individuals and small groups to be able to control the circumstances of their own lives. He opposes technology because it makes small groups dependent on large organizations.

216. Some leftists may seem to oppose technology, but they will oppose it only so long as they are outsiders and the technological system is controlled by non-leftists. If leftism ever becomes dominant in society, so that the technological system becomes a tool in the hands of leftists, they will enthusiastically use it and promote its growth. In doing this they will be repeating a pattern that leftism has shown again and again in the past. When the Bolsheviks in Russia were outsiders, they vigorously opposed censorship and the secret police, they advocated self-determination for ethnic minorities, and so forth; but as soon as they came into power themselves, they imposed a tighter censorship and created a more ruthless secret police than any that had existed under the tsars, and they oppressed ethnic minorities at least as much as the tsars had done. In the United States, a couple of decades ago when leftists were a minority in our universities, leftist professors were vigorous proponents of academic freedom, but today, in those of our universities where leftists have become dominant, they have shown themselves ready to take away from everyone else’s academic freedom. (This is “political correctness.”) The same will happen with leftists and technology: They will use it to oppress everyone else if they ever get it under their own control.

217. In earlier revolutions, leftists of the most power-hungry type, repeatedly, have first cooperated with non-leftist revolutionaries, as well as with leftists of a more libertarian inclination, and later have double- crossed them to seize power for themselves. Robespierre did this in the French Revolution, the Bolsheviks did it in the Russian Revolution, the communists did it in Spain in 1938 and Castro and his followers did it in Cuba. Given the past history of leftism, it would be utterly foolish for non-leftist revolutionaries today to collaborate with leftists.

218. Various thinkers have pointed out that leftism is a kind of religion. Leftism is not a religion in the strict sense because leftist doctrine does not postulate the existence of any supernatural being. But, for the leftist, leftism plays a psychological role much like that which religion plays for some people. The leftist NEEDS to believe in leftism; it plays a vital role in his psychological economy. His beliefs are not easily modified by logic or facts. He has a deep conviction that leftism is morally Right with a capital R, and that he has not only a right but a duty to impose leftist morality on everyone. (However, many of the people we are referring to as “leftists” do not think of themselves as leftists and would not describe their system of beliefs as leftism. We use the term “leftism” because we don’t know of any better words to designate the spectrum of related creeds that includes the feminist, gay rights, political correctness, etc., movements, and because these movements have a strong affinity with the old left. See paragraphs 227-230.)

219. Leftism is a totalitarian force. Wherever leftism is in a position of power it tends to invade every private corner and force every thought into a leftist mold. In part this is because of the quasi-religious character of leftism; everything contrary to leftist beliefs represents Sin. More importantly, leftism is a totalitarian force because of the leftists’ drive for power. The leftist seeks to satisfy his need for power through identification with a social movement and he tries to go through the power process by helping to pursue and attain the goals of the movement (see paragraph 83). But no matter how far the movement has gone in attaining its goals the leftist is never satisfied, because his activism is a surrogate activity (see paragraph 41). That is, the leftist’s real motive is not to attain the ostensible goals of leftism; in reality he is motivated by the sense of power he gets from struggling for and then reaching a social goal. [35] Consequently the leftist is never satisfied with the goals he has already attained; his need for the power process leads him always to pursue some new goal. The leftist wants equal opportunities for minorities. When that is attained he insists on statistical equality of achievement by minorities. And as long as anyone harbors in some corner of his mind a negative attitude toward some minority, the leftist has to re-educated him. And ethnic minorities are not enough; no one can be allowed to have a negative attitude toward homosexuals, disabled people, fat people, old people, ugly people, and on and on and on. It’s not enough that the public should be informed about the hazards of smoking; a warning has to be stamped on every package of cigarettes. Then cigarette advertising has to be restricted if not banned. The activists will never be satisfied until tobacco is outlawed, and after that it will be alcohol, then junk food, etc. Activists have fought gross child abuse, which is reasonable. But now they want to stop all spanking. When they have done that they will want to ban something else they consider unwholesome, then another thing and then another. They will never be satisfied until they have complete control over all child rearing practices. And then they will move on to another cause.

220. Suppose you asked leftists to make a list of ALL the things that were wrong with society, and then suppose you instituted EVERY social change that they demanded. It is safe to say that within a couple of years the majority of leftists would find something new to complain about, some new social “evil” to correct because, once again, the leftist is motivated less by distress at society’s ills than by the need to satisfy his drive for power by imposing his solutions on society.

221. Because of the restrictions placed on their thoughts and behavior by their high level of socialization, many leftists of the over-socialized type cannot pursue power in the ways that other people do. For them the drive for power has only one morally acceptable outlet, and that is in the struggle to impose their morality on everyone.

222. Leftists, especially those of the oversocialized type, are True Believers in the sense of Eric Hoffer’s book, “The True Believer.” But not all True Believers are of the same psychological type as leftists. Presumably a true-believing nazi, for instance, is very different psychologically from a true-believing leftist. Because of their capacity for single-minded devotion to a cause, True Believers are a useful, perhaps a necessary, ingredient of any revolutionary movement. This presents a problem with which we must admit we don’t know how to deal. We aren’t sure how to harness the energies of the True Believer to a revolution against technology. At present all we can say is that no True Believer will make a safe recruit to the revolution unless his commitment is exclusively to the destruction of technology. If he is committed also to another ideal, he may want to use technology as a tool for pursuing that other ideal (see paragraphs 220, 221).

223. Some readers may say, “This stuff about leftism is a lot of crap. I know John and Jane who are leftish types and they don’t have all these totalitarian tendencies.” It’s quite true that many leftists, possibly even a numerical majority, are decent people who sincerely believe in tolerating others’ values (up to a point) and wouldn’t want to use high-handed methods to reach their social goals. Our remarks about leftism are not meant to apply to every individual leftist but to describe the general character of leftism as a movement. And the general character of a movement is not necessarily determined by the numerical proportions of the various kinds of people involved in the movement.

224. The people who rise to positions of power in leftist movements tend to be leftists of the most power- hungry type, because power-hungry people are those who strive hardest to get into positions of power. Once the power-hungry types have captured control of the movement, there are many leftists of a gentler breed who inwardly disapprove of many of the actions of the leaders, but cannot bring themselves to oppose them. They NEED their faith in the movement, and because they cannot give up this faith they go along with the leaders. True, SOME leftists do have the guts to oppose the totalitarian tendencies that emerge, but they generally lose, because the power-hungry types are better organized, are more ruthless and Machiavellian and have taken care to build themselves a strong power base.

225. These phenomena appeared clearly in Russia and other countries that were taken over by leftists. Similarly, before the breakdown of communism in the USSR, leftish types in the West would seldom criticize that country. If prodded they would admit that the USSR did many wrong things, but then they would try to find excuses for the communists and begin talking about the faults of the West. They always opposed Western military resistance to communist aggression. Leftish types all over the world vigorously protested the U.S. military action in Vietnam, but when the USSR invaded Afghanistan they did nothing. Not that they approved of the Soviet actions; but because of their leftist faith, they just couldn’t bear to put themselves in opposition to communism. Today, in those of our universities where “political correctness” has become dominant, there are probably many leftish types who privately disapprove of the suppression of academic freedom, but they go along with it anyway.

226. Thus the fact that many individual leftists are personally mild and fairly tolerant people by no means prevents leftism as a whole form having a totalitarian tendency.

227. Our discussion of leftism has a serious weakness. It is still far from clear what we mean by the word “leftist.” There doesn’t seem to be much we can do about this. Today leftism is fragmented into a whole spectrum of activist movements. Yet not all activist movements are leftist, and some activist movements (e.g., radical environmentalism) seem to include both personalities of the leftist type and personalities of thoroughly un-leftist types who ought to know better than to collaborate with leftists. Varieties of leftists fade out gradually into varieties of non-leftists and we ourselves would often be hard-pressed to decide whether a given individual is or is not a leftist. To the extent that it is defined at all, our conception of leftism is defined by the discussion of it that we have given in this article, and we can only advise the reader to use his own judgment in deciding who is a leftist.

228. But it will be helpful to list some criteria for diagnosing leftism. These criteria cannot be applied in a cut and dried manner. Some individuals may meet some of the criteria without being leftists, some leftists may not meet any of the criteria. Again, you just have to use your judgment.

229. The leftist is oriented toward large-scale collectivism. He emphasizes the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. He has a negative attitude toward individualism. He often takes a moralistic tone. He tends to be for gun control, for sex education and other psychologically “enlightened” educational methods, for social planning, for affirmative action, for multiculturalism. He tends to identify with victims. He tends to be against competition and against violence, but he often finds excuses for those leftists who do commit violence. He is fond of using the common catch- phrases of the left, like “racism,” “sexism,” “homophobia,” “capitalism,” “imperialism,” “neocolonialism,” “genocide,” “social change,” “social justice,” “social responsibility.” Maybe the best diagnostic trait of the leftist is his tendency to sympathize with the following movements: feminism, gay rights, ethnic rights, disability rights, animal rights, political correctness. Anyone who strongly sympathizes with ALL of these movements is almost certainly a leftist. [36]

230. The more dangerous leftists, that is, those who are most power-hungry, are often characterized by arrogance or by a dogmatic approach to ideology. However, the most dangerous leftists of all may be certain oversocialized types who avoid irritating displays of aggressiveness and refrain from advertising their leftism, but work quietly and unobtrusively to promote collectivist values, “enlightened” psychological techniques for socializing children, dependence of the individual on the system, and so forth. These crypto- leftists (as we may call them) approximate certain bourgeois types as far as practical action is concerned, but differ from them in psychology, ideology and motivation. The ordinary bourgeois tries to bring people under control of the system in order to protect his way of life, or he does so simply because his attitudes are conventional. The crypto-leftist tries to bring people under control of the system because he is a True Believer in a collectivistic ideology. The crypto-leftist is differentiated from the average leftist of the oversocialized type by the fact that his rebellious impulse is weaker and he is more securely socialized. He is differentiated from the ordinary well-socialized bourgeois by the fact that there is some deep lack within him that makes it necessary for him to devote himself to a cause and immerse himself in a collectivity. And maybe his (well-sublimated) drive for power is stronger than that of the average bourgeois.

FINAL NOTE
231. Throughout this article we’ve made imprecise statements and statements that ought to have had all sorts of qualifications and reservations attached to them; and some of our statements may be flatly false. Lack of sufficient information and the need for brevity made it impossible for us to formulate our assertions more precisely or add all the necessary qualifications. And of course in a discussion of this kind one must rely heavily on intuitive judgment, and that can sometimes be wrong. So we don’t claim that this article expresses more than a crude approximation to the truth.

232. All the same, we are reasonably confident that the general outlines of the picture we have painted here are roughly correct. Just one possible weak point needs to be mentioned. We have portrayed leftism in its modern form as a phenomenon peculiar to our time and as a symptom of the disruption of the power process. But we might possibly be wrong about this. Oversocialized types who try to satisfy their drive for power by imposing their morality on everyone have certainly been around for a long time. But we THINK that the decisive role played by feelings of inferiority, low self-esteem, powerlessness, identification with victims by people who are not themselves victims, is a peculiarity of modern leftism. Identification with victims by people not themselves victims can be seen to some extent in 19th century leftism and early Christianity but as far as we can make out, symptoms of low self-esteem, etc., were not nearly so evident in these movements, or in any other movements, as they are in modern leftism. But we are not in a position to assert confidently that no such movements have existed prior to modern leftism. This is a significant question to which historians ought to give their attention.

Blow me faggots. Either make your 1488 club password protected or understand that literally anyone can find this place. If your goal is hermetix secrecy then your opsec is clearly shit.
You aren't the only anti-commies. We share a common enemy, i am not here to stop your 4th reich fantasy. I am here to share what i have learned in fighting a shared enemy.

Yea it's easy to see why those on the left don't debate, their tactics suck. They deflect and or just call you a racist/homophobic. Works pretty well in an echo chamber though.
I'm laughing at the buzzwords they use to try and sound smart though. Overall the mood turns sour for me when you remember how much of heartless psychopath these people are.

Well if you're going to post here, you should learn to ignore posts like that guy's. Any time you're on to something you attract them. "Kill yourself" is another favorite one-liner of theirs. If your thread were actually a problem, everyone would have called you a fag and this thing would be on its way to being nuked. It's not a bad thread so far. Image in OP is a good thing to have saved, too, so you can break it out when you see this shit being used.

that's a really well made poster

Nice ID. Also, holy shit, so it literally was a strongarm tactic to bring the TA in line. Jesus.

PLEASE DO. That's what the kikes have been doing to demonize bigotry for decades and it's why bigotry is making a comeback. People are gradually beginning to see that being bigoted against certain elements of society is entirely logical and justified so the emotional appeals are falling flat.

Big businesses and CEOs wouldn't be able to hire "immigrants" if said "immigrants" were all rounded up and turned into fertilizer. Redirect that.

That's hard to do when you're using illogical appeals to emotion and your opponent is using facts. Which is why the Overton window is sliding to the right and (((leftists))) are powerless to stop it.

Well since we have a Jew here that appears to be more than just a JIDF shill, I have to ask…

You do know the holocaust is the biggest lie in history, right?

I mean, you're here, so you're seeing what we have… that the numbers don't add up, that there is basically no evidence to substantiate the camps being anything more than work camps, and that the fucking ridiculous claims made by "survivors" discredit themselves… That the whole scam was promoted by Jewish organisations and Jewish-owned media.

The very fact that some countries made laws to protect it from normal standards of historical research and debate suggests it must be false.

What say you?

Debate them if hitler did anything wrong and use their bullshit tactics against them.

Yikes. You don't like it when you get lumped in with cuckservative israel first trump supporters, so why do you lump all leftists in with radical egalitarian liberals? All I want is a closed-border, socialist, european ethno-state. Basically a return of the NSDAP except, you know, actually socialist this time around. That is a leftist ideology.

There's no difference between them, liberal.

We've come full circle.

That's their strategy? Seriously? No wonder we're gaining ground.

Yeah, go peddle your shit elsewhere, leftist.

So thats what faggot furries who beat off to animals and get fucked in the ass while wearing animal costumes think. Good to know.

Its actually stilted speech and a sign of mental illness and thought disorder. Autism.

Nice try, Holla Forums. You can fuck back off to your little (((intellectual))) circlejerk with muh based niggers and trannies. You ban all positive discussion of national bolshevism and strasserism because you don't want to save the West, you want to destroy it. You're a bunch of self-loathing red liberals. Seriously, kill yourself.

You just admitted above that you are an actual socialist in the marxist sense, that you support Strasser, a traitor who was executed in a humiliating way, and Rohm, who would have executed Hitler if he had his way and to create his "second revolution". You might not be allowed on lefty/pol/, but you sure as fuck arent allowed here either. Nazbol exists to D&C National Socialists, and to ensure we fail to resist white genocide and communist kikes in general. Pick a side, currently youre on lefty/pol/'s. They support anti-jew based bolshevism, but only when its used to break National Socialists up. They ban UNIRONIC talk about anti-jew bolshevism. Being an ironic bolshevist with anti-jew opinions is fine, because it fucks whites over. Thats you. KYS kike

See

Ain't nobody trusting your shit.

Yeah, nah. Might as well just get in the fucking oven, because your blatant d&c isn't going to work. Want to know how I know you're a false flagging shill? Because you're drawing the battle lines over economic policy and literally telling whites who support a white ethno-state to fuck off to the other side if they don't want to get fucked in the ass under capitalism.

Gas yourself.

sounds like an (((open society)))

To expand on this, the only thing that matters right now is to stop the bleeding and cut out the non-white cancer that is destroying the West. If we can accomplish that, we'll be left with a homogeneous, high IQ, high-trust society. Only then will our economic policy need to be hashed out. No one in their right mind would turn away support because of a disagreement in economic policy.

This reads like a recruitment aid for a cult. Avoid mentioning certain topics, avoid certain logical patterns, redirect thinking from logic to emotion, pepper the target with meaningless but impressive-sounding lingo, appeal to the crowd, demonize those who disagree. Do all it takes to lure the person into your group, so you could inject false guilt and overwhelm them with groupthink.
Remove "bigotry" and other associated words from that text and it reads like a manual for a Jehova's Witnesses recruiter. More proof that these people are a danger to the sane society and need to be contained, if you catch my drift.

SJWs always lie.

Youre a bolshevist. Thats a kike slavery concept, and bolshevists are communists. Youre just a communist who pretends to hate kikes, but I need to get in the oven? Mods are slow.
Youre like pic related, going around pretending to be one of us and putting cultural marxist kike quotes in place of evola on cuckchan. You people will be dealt with in a special, prolonged way. No easy end for you slimy rats, gas would be too kind.

You're one dumb nigger.

gas is still too kind for you.

Liberal tactics don't work because they're founded on falsehood and deceit. I kind of cringe when people retort with "anti-white" instead of stating facts because people are wired to think of you as a bad guy who is intentionally doing something wrong. Truth is on your side, yet you're unwilling to use it.

I don't really get the notion that fear is bad. Every organism experiences it. It's rational to be cautious about the transmission of a deadly disease or a demographic that commits the majority of homicides in the US. However, it's completely irrational to fear incorrect pronouns or white dudes holding tikitorches at night. Liberals are the fearful cowards, not us by any circumstance.

...

Very interesting. I too have come to this conclusion based on my interactions with "leftists"
However I have some doubts as to whether leftist leaders really believe in the ideology of the foot soldiers. Take Jews who so often end up leading leftists to their doom. Does a Jew really believe in communism? Perhaps. Perhaps not.
It seems to me that Jews believe not in communism or socialism but Judaism. All the other isms are just camouflage for their true objective. Capitalism and democracy too are used by Jews whenever it is convenient for them.

In any case, "leftists" are essentially bigots, ironically. They hate what they are led to believe is immoral or "sinful"
In the past they burned evil witches. Now they want to burn evil racists. No one can hate in quite the same way that a leftist can hate. They dedicate their lives to the hatred of whatever it is that the TV or their professors have told them is sinful.
However I take a more optimistic view than this article. Should we somehow seize control of the propaganda corporations and instill a real morality (self love as opposed to self hatred) I suspect that leftists will hate race mizing as passionately and insanely as they now hate racism.

Leftists are as much on the Spectrum as we are, but they are definitely in a different color section than us. They can network and shmooze and lie with genius-level ability, but they have no endurance and can't keep the mask up forever. They also have a psychopath child's sense of humor. We trade in laughs and truth instead of lies. They're not pleasant truths, and, like everything that's good for you, they taste bitter and yucky to your average normal, who'd rather be eating a Big Mac. But eating nothing but Big Macs will will eventually make your spiritual teeth fall out (for starters). That's when yet another normal comes to our side of things, because they can't live another minute pretending they're in Oz instead of Detroit. And, because we keep pointing out to everyone that the pile of black crack-addicts over there is most definitely not a singing group of Munchkins, they know who was on their side all along. The problem is that it's a painfully slow process bringing them over one at a time.

Basically, the leftists win in the 100 meter dash, but we win in the marathon. And make no mistake, this IS a marathon.

well put

They won't understand because they are not capable to. "Haha you're just scared" is literal kid behaviour, a perfect exhibit of immaturity in the left. It's also a projection of their own feelings towards us, watch videos where a single NatSoc runs into a group of Antifa and they scatter like the wind.

No refutation of what? Some schizophrenic claims with zero supporting evidence? Okay, refute this: You're a neolib infiltrator here to d&c whites. It's on you to prove that you aren't. I'll wait.

They are of the merchant mindset, we are of the builder mindset.

People who flourish in cities have to be this way. They easily make friends, but the friendship is hollow and often built entirely on lies. No one is ever around long enough to learn the truth. To the merchant everything is a commodity, even people. It's all here today, gone tomorrow. It's all interchangeable. This gives way to fads and fashion being more important than genuine quality.

As you mentioned this is also very much a child's mindset, as he has to explore and learn as much as possible.

We are the rural mindset. The rural mindset is the builder. He cares about quality, he has deep relationships that are cultivated over years. A tool that works well is more important than one that is that latest gimmick. Lies are always found out and destructive. Where they love novelty and exotics we love strength, health and quality.

This is also why they are all so horribly unhappy. Their shallow existence of cummies and the latest gadget isn't anywhere near as fulfilling as family and the pride of accomplishment.

Nobody here uses that word except for kike shills and Holla Forums.
Not to mention you admitted to be being a fucking commie, you might as well be saying you're a nigger.

This.

Good to know they're still working off the same script.

...

capped this undiluted truth

Endurance is how we will succeed.

Exceptional truth. I've had the same cellphone for six years, I wifed the first girl I was with, and my dream house is built from stone and brick and other permanent materials. Thank you for a rare insight.

Ever figured that maybe forcing them to work would be killing them, since they're averse to physical labor? Perhaps they shoahed themselves out of despair.

(checked)
Why do you think the two biggest kvetching stories in the history of kikes are egypt slavery and labour(((death)))camps? They were forced to work.

When will you realize that the shoah was actually jews mass an-heroing for the golden ipod award?

Any other leftist tactics to keep an eye out for?

how much money do the rothschilds have exactly? the banking argument is one that we can easily win. leftists are not ready for it

The kikes are trying to destroy Holla Forums through dilution, derailing and moving a mass amount of newfags here to kill our chan culture.