I'm not asking what you would prefer. I'm asking if the problem is due to the ethnicities of the immigrants or the fact that there is no expectation that they adopt the national ethic?
Out of 35million+ Mexicans that poured over the border since Reagan, 9% steadfastly refuse to learn English because of muh stolen Mexican lands (lie promoted by the Mexican government to destabilize us and other reasons). That 9% translates to a hell of a lot of people causing a huge problem. I'm not sure if this problem is predominantly an ethnic issue or an ideological one (speaking about the Mexican immigrants, not black people here).
Dylan Carter
There was a fascinating documentary I once saw about the Mexican cartels & murder rate. It was mainly about a policeman in Juarez which had the highest murder rate in Mexico. Three miles away, El Paso had the lowest murder rate in the US (both stats per capita).
They have generally speaking the same ethnic makeup, but there is a national border separating them.
Evan Lee
You seem to be arguing that we should allow immigration as long as we make the savages pinky promise that they won't rape anybody.
Luke Cook
both
Mexicans even deeply integrated into the state are not as useful as whites. Period.
You still are struggling to grasp the racial filters and fail to understand distinct differences.
I think literally everyone supports ethnocentrism to one extent or another. At least for their own group. But it only seems to be considered illegal for one group to do so.
Dominic Foster
Multi-ethnic "white" or "Caucasian" or "Caucasoid", whatever heuristic you wish to use, but the point is that they were closely related populations. Britain has been multi-ethnic for a very long time but that does not mean niggers can be integrated or that they should be. The closest example you can find of a multi-racial example would be India or Latin America (brazil in particular) and you would hardly want to emulate those and their reliance on extremely strict caste systems. It is antithetical to formalized systems.
That's because niggers have a high time preference. They don't really understand cause and effect the same way other populations do. They are not very apt at contemplating the future. This is not something that has been conditioned into them either. It is evident in their native languages in Africa where they do not have concepts for binding promises or other related concepts that are reliant on time. This has only gotten worse in the post-modern society they live in as they are extremely reliant on social institutions to fill in this role that most other populations have naturally. This has nothing to do with the fact that niggers would at least in the short-term benefit from kicking out all the koreans as they do not have the time-preference to make full use of the total capital provided by the koreans which is outweighed by factors such as gentrification and further disintegration of social cohesion. Not that I support either side of the argument here, I'm just playing devils advocate.
But to me that does not necessarily follow. There are plenty of book smart people, more now than ever, but how does that translate to applicable skill. Just because schlomo can score better on a test does not imply that he would be better at performing neurosurgery. in fact there are many components such as physical dexterity that are much more important than rote learning. I suppose that is the issue with vulgar IQ fetishization; yes it is important, but there are many other factors involved, and IQ itself is an average of many other different factors that can change from population to population. Kikes tend to have high verbal IQ, not high spatial IQ like the white man.
Luis Rodriguez
I already have you an example. Mesopotamia was a multi-ethnic nation and one of the first nations in recorded history. So was Sumeria and Akkadia. Most nations have been. The only nations to buck that trend have been in mountainous regions like the Alps or Himalayans. It wouldn't even me possible for most nations in the middle east or central Asia or North Africa to be of one ethnicity. I don't disagree but that doesn't negate my point. I'm not trying to make a point about grades. Christ. I'm just posing a hypothetical example. Do you know what hypothetical means?
