You asked:
user said:
You replied:
In any case, perhaps false equivalence was not the correct terminology here, but here's what you're doing: You're going right back to that "it doesn't create utopia therefore fuck borders and homogenous populations and shit", and that's ridiculous.
Let's get this straight right off the bat:
There will always be conflicts.
Population can be totally homogenous, there will still be conflict, and crime, etc. Its a matter of EXACERBATION.
You're basically saying "Well, there's always been conflict and strife and crime goy, even when you were totally pure!", and that's true… But its a matter of degrees, and you're being disingenuous in suggesting otherwise.
As had everyone.
Not strictly, but in many cases? Oh yes it has! For example, when were the most-prevelant conflicts in the context of periods of war? The more technology advances and allows other clades to enter our area of operation.
You're basically trying to say "homogenous populations have no effect upon the degree of war/infighting within a society" and that's obviously and objectively false, specifically as regards Europe.
I would outright say there is a degree of equivalence, but not direct equivalence, and your entire bullshit approach here relies upon it.
Why does a nigger want koreans out, eh? Does he actually think it will reduce conflicts within his area that would be remedied under a more homogenous paradigm?
Of course not, niggers can rarely even think that far ahead - these niggers are, I wager (because I can't be assed to watch the videos if you can't be assed to webm them), because he doesn't like the koreans.
Why? Because they don't like niggers. Why? Because niggers are niggers.
So, really, what you've got here is blatant demonstration of why multiculturalism doesn't work - the koreans don't like the niggers, the niggers dont like the koreans, for entirely justified reasons no doubt in at least one case (arguably in the other), and it creates conflict.
Would there be less conflict between these two groups if they were not in direct contact with each other? Obviously, yes.
Better question: Will the Koreans be better off for it? The answer is yes.
Will the blacks be better off? Probably not - but its because the koreans actively improve their situation, the koreans are a more functional people at the biological level, in terms of maintaining a functioning 'civilized' society. So the niggers, bereft of the koreans, will likely just remain as niggers - which, they might prefer, in fact… But in terms of objective improvement, being better off? No, because they're niggers, and the koreans improve their state… While the koreans are koreans, and the niggers degrade their state… Seperate them, and the koreans are better off, while the niggers are still niggers, and so may be comfortable in their niggerdom but are still living in niggerdom (now bereft of whatever value the koreans, as a superior clade of hominid in the contexts that matter here, offered them).
Yes. Again, minimization of conflict.
And again, this isn't theory, this has been studied in practice - see Putnam.