Am I the only one here who doesn't see the Noble savage trope to be bad?
Can you explain to me, why it's bad?
Are homesteaders who don't want to live in society, and want to live off the land noble savages?
Were the Celts also disgusting noble savages to the civilized Romains?
And why the fuck was my last post deleted?
Other urls found in this thread:
greyhawkes.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Celts built towns and villages, they were not savages.
Because the Noble Savage is a myth, lies. It would make you no better than those that would deny the existence of races.
Of course, there's nothing wrong with admiration or desire for a primitive and simple way of life like what Ted desired in his scathing critique of modernised oversocialised industrial society or what the Amish have.
Were the aztec savages then?
Amish are not savages, they are luddites.
They were not in my opinion. The native indians, the niggers and the aborigines are savages since they build villages at most, never a walled fief.
Celts didnt scalp women or rape babies, they also didnt have concepts of total warfare like the Indjuns did
The Germans were even greater savages, but even more noble, they killed faggots on sight and would not abide a woman to be a whore
Also Celts and Germans were the genetic basis of some of the greatest empires that ever lived on Earth (British, French, Germans, Spaniards)
Indjuns were the basis of……nothing. Absolutely nothing.
Aztecs and Mayans were much more advanced and slightly more noble if you ignore the flaying of virgins and sacrifice of children, but then we;re getting away from your built-up idea of noble savages.
The "noble savage" didn't live like that because he was avoiding society. He did it because he was a nigger with no idea how to build anything more complicated than piling mud on sticks.
Vikings were not noble savages either. They had walled fiefs and steel weapons.
the native americans had just gone through a great plague when we really started to get to know them, we truly saw them at their worst
if it were possible I would like to give them a second chance at proving themselves to the world because of that, but unfortunately it is not
Slide this shit
Go post this shit on half chan
This. The fact that the Germans and Celts, who were oppressed, enslaved, genocided and raped in all the ways that the Indjuns and niggers cry about except much worse, the fact that after all of that they still rose to become some of the greatest powers in the known world is just a greater testament to their nobility. The black will never bear civilization the same way the German beared Roman civilization, you need to have the capacity to be civilized in the first place. Germans were clearly intelligent to some degree, just not exactly advanced like the Romans.
the germanics live in harsh condition that did not allow them to develop as much as their southern cousins.
They make up by having northern courage and militarized society.
Niggers are savages. /thread
Were Celts savages then?
Mainland Celts weren't vikings.
no.
...
Why not?
greyhawkes.com /text/celts.txt
Social structure, law, responsibility, craftmanship…the list is endless - even compared to the Romans the Celts were not far behind becoming just as 'civilized' having ruling councils, trade, diplomacy.
What are your thoughts on the aztecs?
Savages who inherited a lot from ancient aryans.
life on easy mode. brb clear some jungle brb fertile as fuck land with no winter
Why didn't the blackies have their own Aztecs then?
How did they inherit stuff from whites? They were in south America.
Feather-serpent injuns lived in the ruins of ancient aryan civilizations, as can be seen easily by looking at the regional stonework going from clean and organized to cyclopean and haphazard. Damn styles are so different they look like strata after a meteor impact.
Also is right, Celts built their own civilizations and didn't murder their own citizens in order to feed the sun.
Can you give me a citation, because this has as much validation as the theory that Zwarte Piet was from africa.
...
Mate I'd hate the aztecs if they were alive today, they believed they must have war or the world would be destroyed.
The Swastika is the ancient symbol of our race, follow the swastika through time and history and you will find white 'gods' who travelled around teaching and building. From America to Egypt to India.
Well we still have the face-skinning kid-burning savages south of the border.
Aren't you the person from earlier who was asking about feminists and MRA's? That thread was deleted because it was shit. You don't seem to have learned your lesson, as this one is just as shitty.
They were members of a human sacrifice cult like the Jews and should have been exterminated to a man woman and child (like the Jews).
OP is a faggot who can't tell the difference between primitive fucking raiders and homesteaders.
So like those blacks who think they were aliens with weird heads.
I'm against those people as well.
Yes, dude. Noticing patterns in architecture, mythology, and symbology is the same as ayylmaos and space melanin.
The myth of dragons is everywhere, does mean dragons existed, no.
Did saint nick have a black guy helping him?
No but dinosaurs did which is why the Chinese for example use their fossils as "dragon bones" in their voodoo medicine.
Yeah, this. Chimney ash is a bitch. But seriously, look up pictures of old chimney workers, how much they were covered in ash until they looked completely niggered (and how short their lifespans were because of it).
Look up Zwarte Piet and explain to me why his clothes don't have any ash or marks on them.
I told you so…
Do you have autism, user?
You're asking someone on Holla Forums if they have autism.
...
The noble savage myth exists for the same reason you commies think niggers are the best thing ever: the faggot who came up with that stupid idea never stood in the same room as a bloodthirsty savage for more than five minutes. Anyone who was unfortunate enough to meet cannibals wouldn't call the beasts noble.
I don't know why you're bringing it up, but he's based on a devil. I don't think the devil had clothes.
I'm not a commie, and I'm indifferent to blackies.
Zwarte Piet was a comidic helper of Saint Nick. I rather doubt he was based on a devil without evidence.
I read about Vikings & England. Apperently vikings murdered, burned, raped & extorted. English people paid 10.000 silver coins on the condition that the viking raiders would leave for 5 years minimum. The vikings came back after 1 year which is pretty nigger tier in my opinion.
I like vikings alot but maybe they were just evil dicks, what does the great minds of Holla Forums say?
Your English keeps failing and I'm starting to think it's not just typos.
Tackle the argument you grammar Nazi.
You have a lot of learning to do, have you read the Vedas? Do you know the history of Sanskrit? Do you know the history of Hinduism and to a further extent Buddhism?
Ancient Aryans the ancestors of white Europeans have more of their history saved in fucking India than in their own fucking kiked skulls.
I was like you once, its the only reason i am willing to reply.
Uh, what argument? That someone drew a cartoon of a nigger slave in the 1800s so aztecs weren't retarded indians?
That there isn't evidence of him being based on a devil.
And aztecs were barbaric red skins.
name your sources
Yes, as they didn't build the large structures in their lands. Their myths state that their gods did. They also ate people and practiced human sacrifice.
As far as I'm concerned, red men are feather niggers.
Who's language was written on the was in stones?
If it wasn't them then who?
An ancient race of white people who just so happened to be in south America, and then disappear into thin air?
You don't need to be a savage teepee nigger to live off of the land user.
*on the walls
Another shill slide thread that belongs on cuckchan or reddit. SAGE this shit and report.
Probably not.
Because there would be no: hospitals, food banks, food reserves, clean water, water reserves, churches, medical research, armies to protect the "noble" savages from other nations that decided to become civilized, disaster relief efforts, schools, housing standards, need I go on?
Homesteaders don't want to leave society, they just don't want to be TOO dependent on it because their afraid the supply chain might break some day. So no they are not "noble" savages.
They probably were TO THE ROMANS, but they were not, in fact, noble savages.
It was either too jewy, or a mod got a little click happy.
Red dot or woo-woo indians?
I like you.
The one with red skin.
The race of whites they called their gods.
Not into thin air, they went back to their home after a stay in South America to try to restart civilization after the flood. Vid related.
So red dot kind?
Child, you can't just waltz in here and start asking questions. Fucking /cbts/ I swear. Lurk like everyone else or take this shit to 4chan.
Nobody just makes a stone temples and then leaves.
We Wuz White Alien Godz N Sheit Dog.
The woo woo kind.
The red doted ones at least had stone temples built.
You do if you are restarting civilization from total collapse.
EVERYONE PEOPLE DESERVES THEIR OWN NATION
We have savages in our history, we must understand and some may wish to further research it or embrace it. It is part of our nation. To each people to each nation, savages like nig nogs, pajeets, and spicdians have their own we have ours. Plain and simple. I didn't read OP just had to say it.
Mate, whole good condition towns left because of a civilization collapsed? They wouldn't rather live in their unoccupied homes that haven't anyone else living in them?
I don't care about a nation with one nationally.
Yes
Because you're a faggot.
Teepee niggers were and are worthless savages.
Very good bobs, and also very faga
You're question is pretty broad so I don't know where to go and I'm not sure you're talking about what I'm thinking of.
Viking is basically a reaver, a raider who goes by sea, it was not a race/ethnicity but more like an occupation. But they are however distinguishable from every other type of sea raider in many areas (namely that they were Northmen/Norsemen, their longboats etc.) so the name is appropriate. The event I think you're talking about with the tribute paid to leave was during Danelaw and the invasion of the "Great Heathen Army". The tribute was not to leave England but to leave Wessex the only remaining kingdom in England after the vikings raided each kingdom (Mercia, East Anglia etc.)
Danelaw was conquered English land taken by Danish vikings sometime in the 9th century. The reasons for invading are, what is the accepted narrative, that during those ages property was inherited by the first born son and not much of the land in Scandinavia is suitable for farming (don't know about animal husbandry). So as you can guess people took what they needed and we see the rise of vikings (793-1066 AD). I mention all of this because what we saw in Danelaw was that some of the invading vikings, after they had taken land, kept it. They put down their weapons and began to farm the land.
So why did those vikings who did not claim land return to Wessex after they accepted ransom? I dunno, to get rich?
I realize after typing all this out that I didn't really answer your question so I'll post some works you might be interested in:
The Vikings and Their Origins by David M. Wilson, The Vikings: A History by Robert Ferguson, A Histroy of the Vikings by Gwyn Jones and the Poetic Edda and Sagas.
But I'm some anonymous guy so why believe me
It's likely they were chased out by the red men after some time of having a caste system in place to preserve bloodlines.
As far as "We Wuz", we actually were.
The Code by Carl Munck (A Study in Geodedics):
youtube.com
Ancient Whtie Mummies of Asia:
youtube.com
as well as pics and vid related.
The evidence suggests that they were trying to rekindle their own civilization using other peoples as catalysts for trade and development shortly after the flood waters receded. This would likely result in situations like India with the Aryans and their caste system. Eventually it broke down under the weight of all the mud 'people' and they were forced to flee, or mix out of existence. They also built their megalithics to be physical representations of mathematical constants and equations, without using the Pi ratio.
3rd time trying to post this. Dammit Jim, you Masonigger let me post.
Fuck your shareblue slide thread
Also these pics.
It's bad because it's a myth. Savages are just that. Savages. There is no dignity in being primitive. Indeed it generally causes humans to fight with each other far more often and far more brutally. Civilization brings terrible weapons of war, but also longer periods of peace.
Gingers.
There is nothing wrong with having a large amount of your population living off the land, in fact that would be a basic tenant of a NS government, here is how you do it without illiterate savages raping babies.
Easy, I just moved a huge percentage of the population back to the land with no coercion, savagery or slavery required.
You a fuckton of learning to do.
I'll actually address your question.
I think the 'bad' feelings on noble savage on pol are coming from the feeling that if the savage (read:non-white) is spiritually superior, then in some, and there are those that would argue most important, ways they are superior over the ubermench.
Lefties of course detest the savage part of the equation. Mainly because they are scared of words, cause wuurds can huurwt.
Personally I like the imagery of phrase, it puts the imperialist mindset in somewhat approachable terms