Is America the Only country that allows hate speech?

America, a country.

While I do appreciate the leeway citizens can get from a Lack of enforcement, the problem with Brazil is that hate speech legislation is enshrined directly within its constitution.
So unless a constitutional amendment comes along and repeals this (which is highly unlikely), the Brazilian constitution had already compromised its citizens' free speech rights since the very beginning.

While the international UN's pressure and insistence on implementing hate speech laws is a serious problem, one must not forget about the additional pressure added on by regional intergovernmental organizations as well. Specifically the European Union, among many others. Which just recently, threatened to create laws that'll punish powerful tech giants with massive fines for Not stopping hate speech on social media (an impossible, herculean task). American tech giants, mind you. As in, if even non-European companies can feel the pressured censorship from merely working within the EU's boundaries, I can only imagine how much worse it is for EU countries that are directly within the belly of the beast. Nationalistic Poland (for example) is currently facing possible sanctions for not bowing down to the demands of their EU overlords.

And then there are also things like the Council of Europe's European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), whose articles 10 (which permits "justifiable" restrictions on free speech rights) and 14 (which talks about the need to curb discrimination) are sometimes used to justify hate speech laws and their implementation.
< 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
< 2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confdence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
< The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.

As well as that recent shit with Richard Spencer's banning from all 26 Schengen countries (Poland, Finland, etc). Even though, regardless of whatever you think of him, he never committed murder or any serious crime to warrant a punishment of that scale. All he did was politely express views that were considered "hateful", "illegal" wrongthink that apparently Needed to be banned from Europe at any costs.

While I do respect nationalistic Poland and certain Scandinavian countries like Finland (which hopefully does have Lax enforcement and few arrests for hate speech, as some anons say), western European countries face a double uphill battle in trying to preserve their free speech rights. Not only from the oppressive UN, but Also from the EU as well. Often failing to reach the same levels of free speech as the US in the process, unfortunately.

România If the EU doesn't force it to have hate speech laws.

America is the only country that defines hate speech as specific threats of violence against specific people or groups, which is the only REAL form of hate speech there is.

The rest of the world trusts their shitty governments to define "hate" speech, and that opens a Pandora's box of abuse and censorship.

America is the only sane country on Earth, a country that absolutely KNOWS that, in 90% of the cases, government is for sale, and can't be trusted.
There are places in Europe now where citizens can't even speak out against further "refugee" invasion, without a call from the fucking cops.
Just think about how insane that is.

This is absurd. There is no "REAL" form of hate speech. Those laws are only there as a way to back door affirmative action style policy into criminal law. We can thank our black marxists and their flower child allies for that one.

Actually, the terroristic threats laws have been with us for many decades, and it has been illegal to promote the violent takeover of the U.S. government since WW2.

He didn't deny the Holocaust at all. He did talk with Anglin with Enoch on one of their podcasts though. Anglin denies it. Enoch jokes about it, but it seems that he's mocking the notion of (((them))) milking an old Ox for acquiring additional profit, producing entertainment, and enforcing institutional power in western nations.

"Hate speech" is a misnomer. It's really just orwellian "thoughtcrime" with a better marketing label.

Don't forget that most non white countries are 99% their ethnic make up so hate speech isn't really a thing.

Would you like to join me in a boycott of Israe-
THIS IS THE FBI COME OUT WITH YOUR HANDS UP