Socialist countries and their sheltered Locations

Whenever shitlibs argue that America should become more socialist, they sometimes point to the "successful" models of Nordic countries or Canada. Completely unaware of how sheltered these countries' locations truly are.

For Canada, all they ever have to contend with is just us U.S. citizens at the border. People who are comparatively a lot more law-abiding than people from drug-infested, latin/south american countries. Never having to deal with these volatile immigrants that leech off welfare like America was to deal with daily.

The same goes true for Nordic countries and their little peninsula. Separated from mainland Europe by various bodies of water, they don't have to deal with the Full brunt of this muslim invasion that's going on right now. Having the luxury of being geographically located far away from these shithole african & middle eastern countries. Not yet reaching the unsustainable critical mass that mainland countries are fully suffering from these welfare leeches, like Greece or Italy.

So whenever a Canadian or Nordic socialist is preaching about how great their countries are, I think to myself: "What a sheltered piece of shit, you are."

Canada and Nordic countries are importing shitskins weekly by the boatload. Geographical location means nothing when their governments are run by kikes.

I don't have any ideological opposition to "socialism", though it's a broad term and everyone seems to have a different definition for it. Socialism isn't the problem, it's non-whites in white countries. I think almost any economic system could work for us if we fixed our demographics.

These locations are sheltered in the sense that they've had breeding populations in a place where failures freeze and starve in winter for centuries, causing their local genetics to tilt towards more productive and functional people, enabling a productive excess that makes people unconcerned with having their money systematically stolen to support others. Which is now becoming a dysgenic lure to populations that didn't get centuries of winnowing. Whoops.

Not now, but it has kept our populations homogeneous for the last thousand years. The reason why the Scandinavian socialism works so well is due to the almost complete absence of corruption. There is very little control, we just trust each other.

When my grandfather grew up nobody had locks on their houses. Nobody had picket fences around their properties either, not even when I grew up. In small villages it is still common to not have a door bell. They just walk into each others houses to see if the neighbors might be home. In some areas it is even common to leave the keys inside your car without locking it.

Most of the "socialism" in Scandinavia, or Norway at least, is not payed for with taxes but just a result of voluntary work. If your kids are attending school, then you are expected to help maintain the school property on your spare time. The same goes with cleaning up the parks and beaches. The naval rescue service are not a government agency but a voluntary group. The same goes with the mountain rescue services, etc. Thousands of hiking paths in the forests and mountains are maintained by voluntary groups as well. They provide tens of thousands of mountain cabins that everyone can use for free. Small villages have voluntary fire corps that don't get payed. Just by living in a suburban neighborhood you will be expected to help clean the area and maintain the playgrounds and soccer fields for the kids to use.

This proves that you don't need capitalism to get things done.

That sounds like some sort of, dare I say, national socialism?

Exactly. The national socialists in Sweden always make that point. The Scandinavian countries have been implicitly national socialist for decades due to the absence of foreign races. It simply occurred naturally.

Sadly, all of that is changing now.

I'm not really against socialist policies either. I saw someone on facebook post something about another country that has paternity leave and all kinds of support for married couples having kids and the usual leftist HURR DURR WHY DON'T AMERICA GOT DIS. All of it seemed like a really cool idea, even if it is extremely socialist, and I'd love to have it, but I don't want those same benefits extending to non-whites. If the government wanted some kind of child tax credit for couples with kids, I'd be in favor of it, since it encourages breeding, except I don't want non-whites to have it. I only want policies that benefit my race. In a multicultural society, that's hard to do, but in an ethnostate, ALL the policies benefit your race because it's the only one there.

What name do economists give for the system that lets niggers occasionally work part-time at some fast food place or Wal-mart for drugs/prostitution and forces white people to pay for their kids' food, shelter, school and healthcare?

You don't really need policies or high amount of regulation. If everyone in society are decent honest hard working white people, then they will naturally develop trust for each other. After a while it will be natural for your employer to pay you some sort of leave for having children with no regards for profits. The business owner will see his own company as a service to the people as many are already doing today.

What about the central Europe socialist countries after WW2? Like Czechoslovakia? They weren't part of the Soviet Union so were they run by jews same as the bolsheviks?

Right, which is the optimal situation. But right now, instead of social policies like employers providing for their employees, ie. encouraging decent behavior, we have policies that barely enforce people to be not shitty, ie. taxes to pay for roads, cops, etc. Society is so far degraded to just think it'll switch overnight, it needs to be corrected in steps.

Canada only started that about around the late 90s. The Diversity was pushed by Quebec, because Quebec has more or less been waging a cultural war against the English language and everyone who speaks it in Canada.

So whenever a Canadian or Nordic socialist is preaching about how great their countries are, I think to myself: "What a sheltered piece of shit, you are."
I think the same shit about libfag coworkers

But you don't have to do it on a federal/national level.

Socialism is still generally less efficient and often utter shit, given that you seem to get just as good results with whites who don't have the socialist support systems. But whites can make almost anything short of actual fucking marxism barely function.

At the end of the day the best solution really is just to rwds and cull the chaff.

"Our Values"

Pathetic OP. Lurk a few more years.

This is the most misinformed and misleading statement I've seen in quite some time. I don't know if you're one of Levant's fuck toy pushing D&C disinfo but you need to get educated on multiculturalism in Canada.

With shit politicians like justin trudeau and such, I'm not surprised. While not impervious to the harmful effects of leechy immigrants, I'd say it's still much more preferable than the current situation we have in America. We're located Right Next to the breeding grounds (mexico, cuba, etc) and there's no shortage of these endless wetbacks. Meanwhile, the rate of immigration in canada is seemingly slower by comparison, because boats can only travel so fast.

To NOT be located right next to drug-infested, crime-ridden Mexico is a luxury that is lost on oblivious canadian socialists.

Not true Socialism

What does socialism have to do with proximity to spics when you can build a wall and only give the benefits to citizens, who should only be of the nation's primary ethnic group? When you can remove your non-whites and make sure that benefits are only given to them while also engaging in eugenics programs to remove the lazy or overly degenerate whites? To help curb corruption, get rid of all of the jews and remove them from positions of power and influence while you're at it. Actually this socialism is starting to sound pretty nationalistic, I wonder what we should call it?