Who will play him in the inevitable biopic?

Who will play him in the inevitable biopic?

...

Idris Elba

...

...

this guy?

...

I like this meme. Anybody got more cone headed Dicky's?

I only have this and the one in OP but there has to be more.

(me)
Found a few more. These are really great. I want more comical shops of him if anybody has them plz.

You know every time you make threads like this we get a massive upswing in reddipol posting as they white knight for their zionist overlords and decide to stick around for a few days.

I just want the aut-white to not derail the few good threads on this board.

I just think it's a funny meme. Nu-Holla Forums doesn't shill for Dicky anyway so it's fine.

The irony. Did he get bleached?

Commie please. All kikes are zionists and the alt-kike doesn't actually give a shit about whites, they're commies just like you.

Sure fucking looks like it.

He looks 56% white.

AW, HELL NAW!

Is nobody safe?

The structures and social fabric that pteviously prevented that is being dissolved by liberalism. Nobody is safe because loyality is quickly becoming something foreign to people. The worship of the self and the narcissism that follows it is all over society.

Yeah, gosh darn those pesky liberals!

He never said it wasn't the jews, if anything he proclaimed it with "liberalism"

I'm sick of faggots like him avoiding the real issues and happily taking part in the jewish duality of left right politics. He's as much of a good goy as the libruls are.

You are also forgetting to see which hand is the one slapping us, while it's the same guy it is relevant to know where it comes from to know better
Why? because then you can counter it in public saying some actions are inconsistent with said "ideology". AKA you are saying both act the same with proof, example American politics in general and America itself

The jews are the apostles of subversion, liberalism is how they maintain their power. Yet even with the jews out of the picture liberalism would still be a very destructive force.

I'm not, I view politics through an entirely different lens and remain firmly planted far away from the liberal spectrum.
Such as? I'd say the weakened social units, disappearing values and general cultural decay are quite real issues.

The false dichotomy of left and right is simply the horseshoe theory given practical expression. If you notice how similar the aut-white and antifa are you are just noticing how this.

Radical centrism is the only path for the enlightened user to break free from the perceived binary choice of nazi or commie.

How about rejecting the entire liberal spectrum?

The answer to the nazi/commie dichotomy is to become both and fuck the centrists even harder. 😈

So are we just going to ignore the fact that it's jews pushing that mindset using their stranglehold on the media and financial system? It's better to focus on the rash itself than the parasite that is causing it right?

What about the zionist right that is just as destructive when it comes to racial matters? They are supposedly the opposite of the libruls yet have practically the same views on all the subjects that count. They believe in multiculturalism, have no problem with forced integration and regularly fellate the people that are actually destroying white nations protip: they aren't sucking librul cock.

I don't even know what you mean by this, you are either a dupe that believes in left right politics or you aren't. Judging from the way you think libruls are the ones destroying society you are thoroughly duped.

Whi is pushing those things and who is blasting the libruls (and the cuckservatives) with destructive propaganda?


They act the same because they are controlled by the same people. It's just a duality trap to divide the gullible goyim and make it easier to suck their lifeblood. Anybody who can't see that is dim.

I prefer to just select positions that seem correct from all over the political map with no regard to any overarching philosophy.

You must always have some cohesive ideological foundation from which you make these decisions, whether you are aware of it or not.

...

Yeah, it's called race.

The closest I come to that these days is "No individual, group, or institution should have too much power, because people can't be trusted not to abuse it." Which leads to a kind of moderate classical liberalism, I guess. But I don't sit down and think about what I should do or support or oppose from that position. I think "Does this seem right? Would I want someone doing that to me? Would I trust someone to have that power?" and so on. And always with the understanding that the real world requires compromise and will never result in a utopia for anyone.

More or less, the core characteristics are racial but that can go in different directions. Ideology can ennoble or corrupt.

And who would enforce this?
Basically bellyfeels then? Who do you think gave you those bellyfeels?

That's the thing, it's up to people to be involved if they want rules or limits enforced. It all comes down to who's in power, and since the barrier to meaningful participation in politics is prohibitively high for most people, we're largely at the mercy of the already powerful.
What makes your sense of ethics more reasoned or objective than mine? Who gave you your "bellyfeels"? And who came up with that retarded name?

We have a common enemy. Let's sort out our differences once they are gone

There are different flavours of liberalism, this is what's called left and right. Liberalism is a social model and an ideology, its not a part of the spectrum, it's the entirety. National socialism used to be an alternative but these days it only exists within the framework of liberalism.

And yes, I agree that the jewish problem must be dealt with but I also don't think all our other problems will magically go away once we do so. If we don't ditch modernism and postmodernism the jews doesn't matter.

This.

And who controls the people? See, this is just going in circles and it's also why this system doesn't work. You say you are a practical man with realistic goals and expectations, yet you still believe in the fairytale of democracy, of a society that's not strongly hierarchical. All you do by restricting the power you give the leaders is to transfer it into the hands of someone else. Liberalism is just as delusional as communism with its utopian dreams.
Traditionalists.

I believe the only way to counter concentration of power is by continuously shifting that power from one place to another so that nobody ever has it for too long. That's an ideal; realistically, power tends to accumulate and only gets shifted when it's been abused enough to motivate people to make a change. Whether that means elections, revolts, or the collapse of a system varies. I don't believe there's any organizational method or ideology that can rescue us from human nature.

This leads to the people in power making short term decisions and fucks us even worse. And why would you be against concentration of power anyway? When a hostile body is in power I can understand it, such as jews, international corps, foreign governments and so on, but to prevent that from happening to begin with you need a sovereign capable of acting against them. The more power in the right hands the better.

Bullshit. Even if you end up with a decent person or clique at the top of the heap, what happens after they retire or die? Less qualified people who have been waiting in the wings take over. Most people who seek power shouldn't have it, and even decent folks can be corrupted by the distance that statesmanship puts between the sovereign and the people. Just because someone shares blood or soil with me doesn't mean they're going to give a damn about me from the top of the pyramid.

And what reason do someone who doesn't even do that have to care? Do you think Google cares about you? The politicians who want to import voters to replace you? The kikes?
In hereditary monarchies the sons receive the best education possible and are prepared to rule their entire lives. Who could possibly be more qualified than that? And again, in a democracy you have very talented people working and lobbying against you and people whose only concern is winning the next election, which means it doesn't even matter how talented the actual administrators are because of what they will use that talent for.

Idris is liked by reddit so much he's literally caught whiteness.

...

Her body doesn't belong to her. It belongs to me.

Honorary white.

I was gonna say Coneheads had already been made…Lmmfao

Twist of the century.