Is he "Our Guy"?

Is he "Our Guy"?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0blscnNK-Wc
youtube.com/watch?v=Gd9OhYroLN0
commonruin.wordpress.com/2015/06/15/first-world-phantoms/
youtube.com/watch?v=lmFJC_qFoes
youtube.com/watch?v=f-07s9oYNXA
marxists.org/reference/archive/adorno/1944/culture-industry.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=Vt9IUbhIjpk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

What if he is actually leftcom who likes to LARP as mautist-turd worldist?

He should be the villain in the next C&C: Red Alert sequel.

It's officially finished Yuri.

He's anti-idpol so that's a start.
youtube.com/watch?v=0blscnNK-Wc

I wonder if Stalin and Mao were like Jason.

Jason seems like the type of person who would have no problem gulaging half the population in the name of State-Capitalism.

I honestly wish he did long ass shows, because I'd listen to him all day like a Hanoi Hannah, and I'm not even a Tankie, I just love that propaganda aesthetic.

Maoism Third Worldism is one of the worst things to come out of the left in decades, even worse than autonomism or post-Marxism (which MTWism seems similar to).

They weren't

Actual authoritarians that rise to positions of power are much more competent and insidious.

Read the April Thesis and tell me that the same person who wrote that turned out to be insanely authoritarian and literally just went around mass murdering peasants because "muh urban elitism". You wouldn't. If you read the April Thesis and much of Lenins other works around the time, you would think he was a Libertarian.

I want to see him fight Andrew Anglin in a boxing match.

I remember my comrade called this guy's house when Holla Forums doxxed him back in February and his mom answered.

He literally still lives with his mom despite being 36.

Let that sink in.

In todays economy (not just in the US, or Europe - huehue here) it's getting harder and harder to buy/rent a house and so on.

It's a trend that is quite perverse.

...

it is, if you don't want to be in debt for you whole life.

To be fair, Jason lives in Canada which is doing quite well right now, so well Trudeau is inviting immigrants in left and right.

It would be like two fat penguins in a shoving match

Is he the origin of tendies?

Tendies?

hownu.ru

...

Didn't he have an apartment and he got evicted or some shit? I thought that was what the court case was over last year or so.

Yes. He got into a fight with his old landlord back in 2013 and had to live with his mom while on trial.

I sort of want a MTV style reality show that just follows Jason around yelling "REVISIONIST", "MUH IDEOLOGICALLY PURE MLM IS THE PEAK OF IDEOLOGY"

He's like the modern day Hoxha, the difference being that Hoxha was actually known to be one of the most academically intelligent and articulate world leaders.

I saw this tweet when he first posted it. Holy fuck it makes me rage.

jason cuckold. fuck jason

youtube.com/watch?v=Gd9OhYroLN0

I honestly don't get MTW. Is the ideology trying to say the real global enemy isn't the bourgeoisie but white people? If so, how can it claim to even be Marxist if it prioritizes the nation ahead of class?

...

No thanks. Execute all homos

Why is he so obsessed with NK. they would probably execute him for being fat and homosexual

there are plenty of leftist who choose to be moralist and deem "X thing" as degenerate
that doesn't nessecairly mean they're against LGBT people, interracial marrige or something silly like that

In his cooking videos he mentions his roommate a lot

It's because you know he is right but your socialization does not allow you to admit it

So nobody knows the story behind this?

Uh, is this a b8 post? Because if so, 8/10 got me to respond

I've heard vague unsubstantiated rumors from anonymous people that "Jason did something awful a long time ago" for a long time but this the first time I've heard he "raped and killed someone". Honestly, as terrible as I think his show is and TWism is in general, its possible that its a cointelpro ploy.

Or it could be this:

How Jason manages to find and mess with people even more autistic and delusional then he is is beyond me.

You do realize the 9/11 victims were a bunch of porky yuppies who full-heartedly supported American imperialism? Jason is hardly the first leftist to take that position.

eh, there are still way too many innocent proles who worked there and didn't have it coming :/

Yeah like the firemen.

he is pretty good at triggering first worldist/imperialist anarchkiddies and trotskyist scum

That's 100% based, I like him even more than I used to.

I like him OP

fuck off jason

His very existence brings rage to r/socialism users so sure why not.

MTW is just anarcho-primitivism for Marxists.

Those were made before he got arrested and had to go back with his mom.

He despises BLM.

youtube.com/watch?v=lmFJC_qFoes

Yes. Jason is known to use this website to get more subscribers.

he amuses me.
no he's not "our guy".

He hates idpol and SJWs as much as we do tho.

he hates "first world" workers as much as the entire bourgeoise spectrum does
he's a retarded LARPer

youtube.com/watch?v=f-07s9oYNXA

he's a loony tho.
not saying he's a bad guy, he's just too crazy to attract the normies

...

He's a right-deviationist. MTW is not science but *scientism*: it prioritizes dedication to the "scientific method" over regard for human agency.

It's still Holla Forums-tier language.

...

It has no place on the left.

why? whats your argument?

the argument is that right wing politicis do not benefit the left wing

Is he /kim's guy/

how is the word "degenerate" right wing politics?
It's just a word.

you have to say "decadent" or "decaying"

Communists should be using pop culture to destroy the ruling ideology.

You know what

For all the shit he gets he looks depressed as hell so I can't get mad, I can only relate with his inner screaming

...

...

...

entirely right wing behaviour

totally not moralism

If you think the left-right wing theoryis based on morals ur retarded

According to a former friend of his, he's attempted suicide four or five times. His attempts didn't go through because he's fat and tried to an hero with pills.

I feel for Jason the same way I feel for Larry David

Don't. He's made plenty of death threats to other comrades in the past four years.

nice strawman, faggot

"decadent" implies the previous ideology was preffered

so I'll ask you, Do you want to preserve the ideological suprestructure of capitalism?

Someone tweet this image to Jason and ask him to explain it.

yeah, no
it means that it is self-destructive at this point, and nothing else

if this shitty attempts at strawmanning is all you got you should probably go >>>/suicide/

Decadent means "in decay".
This is describing an objective truth of imperialism.

You are interpreting it as "used to be better", which is your evaluation, not an objective truth.

I am stating the fact, you are morally interpreting and then making the absurd attempt of pretending everyone has to come to your assessment and judge it accordingly.

This is not the case, and you are a dipshit faggot for trying.

...

...

he is? proff?

that's fucking hilarious. Like, satan-chan tier hilarious.

absolutely , regular bourgy socdem capitalism is better than fascism or imperialism, or are you willing to imply life in the west is worse than in Afghanistan or Yemen

that doesn't mean its not a dialetical necessity for bourgy capitalism to turn into fascism, but to imply we should have a moral point of view on this is retarded, which is what the people using the word "degenerate" as a criticism for the behavioural changes is not a position for the left to follow

and if you are againts this self-destruction, why do you think using the word "degenerate" for the social behaviour that comes with capitalism decay is a valid position for the left?

we don't label the social changes as "degenerate", because as you said, thats just capitalism self-destruction

then there is no reason to fight againts "degeneracy", retard, as the ideological superstructure collapsing is not what bothers us, fun is none of our concern

Reminder:
marxists.org/reference/archive/adorno/1944/culture-industry.htm

again, strawmanning
can you do anything else, retard?

You do not understand where decadence leads you. Not beyond capitalism, but back to the beginning. Imperialism is self-destructive in a sense to become self-preserving. It is destroying productive forces and commodities to set back the markets to an earlier, stable stage.

You have not understood the basics, you need to go and kill yourself in shame.

Too bad Jason thinks Pol Pot was CIA. He'd be a great comrade.

...

The product of decay, all the destructive forces, and this includes anarchism, fascism and fun, is not the solution, but the dialectical reinforcing powers of the old order.

These are the antithesis to the productive forces, the working class and socialism.

Due to the class nature of your ideology you cannot see the systems self-serving aspects of this destruction. You do not understand the synthesis in the antagonism of classes instead, and you fail to grasp the reactionary nature of the decay of imperialism that you are inherent to.

Only Marxism-Leninism is the movement that can and will overcome imperialism and the destruction it brings, that is holding back the working class and mankind, by creating the new order.

Said so in multiple videos.

He used to talk about it on his FB page. He knows the guy from the North Korean embassy in Toronto.

WTF?

kek, delicious tankiddie tears

/you

"I don't liek it so its not dialetical" is not even a coherent argument, so it's retarded to belive you handed anyone's ass

M-L failed, all the advances of the Soviet Union happened after Stalin, Stalin was too busy killing his own personnel to do anything

M-L did not get rid of any form of imperialism nor destruction, M-L still reliaed or market relations inside and with other nations

deal with it kiddo

you are already finished, boy.

The discussion was about fun and decay of imperialism, i have laid out that you have no understanding of these terms and what they mean in context of imperialism.
You have failed to adress the arguments, this has devolved into petty shitposting on your part.

Now go kill yourself in shame, >>>/faggot/

That wasn't really an argument. He's right ya know, ML does seem like a failure. Why didn't the USSR manage to turn into socialism? Catalonia and the UFK turned over their means of production to the workers. Care t explain why the mighty USSR couldn't even do that? Why were they so undialectical?

The Soviets were in charge. They were so in charge that they were subjected to the presidium, decided to ban factions and murder Bukarhin cause reasons.

You guys have to shitpost way harder than that to bury your failure that is your lack of ability to dispute me and mask your entire ideology and its lack of relevance throughout history.

I really shouldn't even amuse me by replying to any of that stupid shit you're using to smokescreen your pathetic failure to adress dialectics, but fucking look at this

Anarkiddies think winter only goes after Nazis. This is the level of delusion we're dealing with here.
top kek.

Greentext works better if it actually adresses something that is there. Case in point: my comment right here.

The master isn't the antithesis to the slave, the free man is.

Those are revisionist.

0/10

faggot/dicksucking

Stalin didn't, considering he murdered his teacher for spreading "german idealism".
Hegel literally never said "thesis - antithesis - synthesis".

i guess judaism is much closer to the truth then, well that sure makes sense and there is nothing inherently wrong with this "argument".

the level of non-arguments in this thread are through the bottom

Yeah Stalin was too stupid to understand dialectics.
It isn't, in the master-slave dialectic the antithesis to the slave isn't the master, it's the free man. The antithesis to the master isn't the slave, it's the abolitionist. Make your case instead of memeing.

Just to refrain, Stalin literally never read any of Hegel's major works. Lenin did, Stalin did not.

seeing that the shitposter is gone, i'll see to answer you in time. i am confident i got the basics and it's apparent that the anarkiddo got btfo

but it's heading to 6 am now and i really don't feel up to going through german works again to check if i got the terminology mixed up, but i probably don't and you're full of shit.
i'd then also have to go look for the english translations etc. to fuck you up, so that's not gonna happen right now.

and i read Marx and Lenin throughoutly do don't give me your "stalin got it wrong" shit. and no, you do not know what stalin read and what he didn't.
contain your anti-soviet shitposting for now and i can actually take you serious.

This. Stalin's "contributions" to Marxism are awful.

look, this is the shit that makes anyone just roll their eyes at stupid cunts at you, even if you had a point - which you still don't.
your rhetorics are pretentious and laughable. just stop humiliating yourself like that.

nice IP

It's not that. I'm not expert in Hegel and I've only watched lectures and read books on Diamat specifically, but Marx's conception of Hegel isn't even universally accepted by Left-Hegellians as "the right one", so I think getting your idea of dialectics from Stalin who got his understanding of dialectics from Lenin isn't a good idea in general.

But from what I've gathered, "anarchism" wouldn't be classified as "reactionary". I don't see how the sublation of capitalism into socialism is opposed to anarchism. Some contradictions (like Say's Law economically being contradicted by M-C-M') could potentially be resolved by a mutualist bank (which is what I gather piratefag is).

his fee-fees are hurt.

...

Like pottery.

read what the anarkiddy wrote on "degeneracy"/"decay" of imperialism

He takes it, and that's notoric for anarkiddies, as a "positive" thing, as the "solution".
They think the systemic destruction that imperialism brings will dissolve it.
Going even further though, they want decentralisation, they want small production and so on.

Now, tell me, Mr. "not expert in hegel" Fedoraposter, how does this translate into dialectics?
Why would you argue this to be not reactionary?

i had 2 bans for absolute bullshit reasons over posts

tell me where this anarkiddy was not shitposting
anime smug faces, walls of greentexts, derailing of the discussion and smearing the soviet union

how is any of this related to the debate that we had?
how does this contribute anything to the board in general?

how do you want to argue that this isn't genuinly not needed, whether be it Holla Forums yelling "cuck" or someone you have sympathy because he was trying to flood over my contributions?

wew showed me mr fedora man

if this were "despotic" then genuine comments like yours would be gone to and it'd be a circlejerk, you're being paranoid and biased

Because anarkiddie doesn't want to restore a previous status quo, or preserve the current status quo. He wants to destroy it. You may think his ideology is misguided and ultimately regressive, but that doesn't make it reactionary.

geez it was a hyperbole.
I'm sorry glorious leader Board Volunteer.

what the fuck is even going on this thread

way to go my friends.

…

Look faggot, its all fun and games to roleplay as your favourite Philosopher, but if you engage is banning me again just because I hurt some tankiddie feelings I will properly give you a reason to ban me

the destruction of the ideological state apparatuses is a necessity for the revolution to take place, read Althusser

so whatever system of exploitation native to the inhabitants of whatever portion of land engage in ISNT capitalism yet the suddenly gets invaded by "degeneracy" makes them colonized and whatever ISN'T reactionary garbage?

Nice fucking shitposting faggot I am not for communalism

damaged feefee's

>>>/gulag/
i'm done.

"Decentralized" is not opposed to a planned economy. Neither is production on a smaller scale, which is pretty much guaranteed to happen in the absence of a monolithic state like we have now. If you can't do economic calculation, you're fucked.

and that fedora fag wants to tell me that it's me who doesn't grasp negation of negation

this is why there were not enough executions and jeschow had the right idea.

it just gets worse and spirals down with these guys

Also ML, quite literally decayed into capitalism.
I don't care, isn't the whole point to set up a system where a dictatorship of the proletariat prevents the exact regression into capitalism that was seen in China, Russia, and the entire eastern bloc.

The USSR was victim to the same crisis that happen in capitalism. A market can't do proper economic calculation, but neither can a completely centralized state. But you seem dogmatic, as if Marx's theories, as valuable as they were, are completely applicable to our society today and no conceptions about what the transitory state should be are valid except the ones crafted by Stalin that regressed into capitalism.

...

No retard. The difference is you are unable to understand the opportunistic behaviour of the capital. Women taking part of the productive process, Workers deciding to engage in different administrative practices, People that do not conform to prejuiced societal roles and so on are not simply another form of capital to mantain control. Capitalism never loses control if just one part of the base-superstructure gets modified

Capitalism WILL be able to manifest itself if we simply strive for an ideological change

However, what your retarded ass doesn't understand is that capitalism WILL continue to manifest if you simply aim to change the base, and this is precisely why the Marxists revolutions of the XX century failed at bringing a global change on the way capital is controlled

Did not Yugoslavia fell because retards like you where complaining about the degeneracy of living with muslims? didn't the same happened to Polands and the baltics, which are now the most russophobes countries on the planet? Isn't the same Ideological superstructure the one that is stopping Holla Forumsyps from becoming class conscious

You are a fool and a farce, Your retarded ideological affection to Daddy Stalin is stopping you from seeing the structure as a whole, because you don't aim at destroying the capitalist mode of production, just to change the base because you are an impotent authoritarian

Oh and I forgot to add

and given the fact that capitalism is able to strive if one part of the base-superstructure doesn't change, simply stating that "degeneracy" is but a dialetical motion taking place is false, as if the superstructure remained in place, capitalism would be able to cling itself to it, destroying any change or modification done to the base

Who is this?!

I used to watch MRN back when he did Mailbag videos. A real shame he set all of them to private.

Kelsey Calemine

sew cute

He's right about some things.
youtube.com/watch?v=Vt9IUbhIjpk

hes a dumb naive kike.

He's not Jewish. He's Saami, so he's literally indigenous.