In the historical record of European peoples, the greatest of us married several young brides in succession to found great nations by breeding a population of the fittest. Male YDNA mutates much faster then female DNA, therefore, makes drive genetic improvement.
Historically, males would die at a greater rate then females, which is why there was a genetic selective pressure to produce slightly more males.
Due to modern medicine, lack of conflict and generally easy times and (((HORMONAL BIRTH CONTROL))) we are now experiencing a glut in unfit males, reducing the stock for multiple-female alpha male partnerships.
If young women were allowed to choose their alpha partners earlier in life, there might be an uptick in positive genetics. In addition, Women are now scientifically proven to respond sexually to both genders: a trait which seems to indicate that as women mature, they are are genetically pressured to assist their alpha in securing younger additional mates to spread superior genes.
The Jews don't like this naturalistic approach in line with European tribalism. It's no accident we organized into structures of Kingdoms which prospered and advanced greater then every other society before it.
the Chinese and mongols in history, especially with with Gingis Khan, for example, is another excellent example of this phenomenon in highly successful and advanced societies.
Khan took for himself every woman he desired above the age of puberty and his people celebrated him for it, and the first kings of the Picts, the Kelts and druidic culture was structured with our tribes in this way as well.
The best and brightest of us must found new tribes with more then one mate to combat the lower birth rate of our species against the jewish destruction of our superior genes.
You are right in the sense that in older white socities, where people were more trusting of each other, married much younger then they do now.
But with mohomo'd the pedo goatfucker the pedo goatfucker and kikes roaming around a young marrying age is just absurd. Especially when must kids don't even mature past being kids and stay kids mentally throughout adulthood. Did this really deserve a thread OP?
Luis Reyes
Jews don't like anything natural. In fact they fucking hate nature. That said, if she's not ovulating and capable of bearing children yet, you're a fucking pedo and deserve the rope.
Hudson Anderson
Pedo = attracted to children before they have undergone full puberty (ie, periods) and nobody is advocating for that.
The AOC is 18 because of Jews, shlomo. 14-16 is natural.
Landon Taylor
1. Kill yourself, childfucker. 2. AOC laws cannot be reduced without first fixing social behaviors.
The reason you can’t date and marry a 14-16 year old and you could 100 years ago is the pill and the sexual revolution. Before the sexual revolution: Man reached financial security and is ready to marry. He falls in love with neighbor girl who is 14-16 and starts to court her. The parents think he is a fine fit and let it happen. Since sex has consequences (pregnancy => marriage), there was no element of exploitation involved. The man basically openly signaled that he was willing to feed their daughter until he dies and pay/care for her children emotionally and financially. He marries her, the whole community/villages knows, and everything is fine. The only ones pushing for higher consent and marriage age are feminists who are bitter about being childless, husband-less, suffragettes in their 30s and want to compress the marriage market. Now enter the ‘60s: Sexuality has no consequences anymore. Marriage is devalued. Liberals and hippies already push the boundaries because, “Hey, sex is for fun; why shouldn’t everyone do it?” The majority of society is still in the old mindset, though. Liberals and degenerates start to have sex with children (grooming) just for fun without planing to marry/have children with the girls. They rob the girls of their innocence and trust in relationships, then drop her for a younger girl. Here we see the rise of the concept of child exploitation. In the ‘60s and ‘70s, you had a lot of liberals and artists pushing pedophilia in arts and film since the majority of people still were behind the curve. (A lot of ‘70s movies with casual pedophilia) ‘70s: Pedophilia and drug use are rampant. The family unit is destroyed and young girls turned into nihilist whores because their belief in romantic relationships has been destroyed by liberals who are just out for young flesh without responsibility. ‘80s: By now relationships with young girls has become synonymous with exploitation of young girls since marriage and sex have been devaluated. Christian conservatism is on the rise to put an end to it (Reagan, etc). Consent and marriage ages are pushed even higher, ostensibly to protect children. Now we are in a vicious cycle. Even as a stern traditionalist anti-modern reactionary, you should not embrace lower consent and marriage laws right now. Because in this broken society, it would only lead to abuse by hedonists. Girls would be used up by 16 and turned into nihilistic feminist single moms earlier than even today. Stupid YouTube and Instagram chads would go around having harems of young girls without responsibility. But in a traditional society where sex means marriage–and marriage is binding FOR LIFE–yes, age of consent laws should be as low as is regionally seen acceptable, minimum everywhere of the physical maturity of the girl. There is no sudden change in women when they turn 18. A 16 year old girl is emotionally prepared for marriage, and it always has been that case. I hope this reconciles both parties in this debate. Also, I want to point to J. D. Unwin’s Sex & Culture; the study of all major civilizations and their decline that was instrumental in the writing of Huxley’s “Brave New World.”
James Morales
Time to put this little chestnut to rest. First, you know fuck all about our history. Historians and archaeologists struggle to recreate how people lived in 18th century America, so the idea that Mr. Random Pedophile on the Internet has some special insight into Babylonian nuptials from the Iron Age is absurd. Second, what we do know about these bygone societies suggests that what we now consider underage marriage was softened by the cultures that practiced it. That is to say, a girl who grew up in agrarian France in the Middle Ages knew her whole life she’d be married off at 15 or 16. It was just how life worked; there was no perceived element of wrongdoing attached to it, and if the village pedo got himself a wife who was 13 or so, people may have gossiped but they mostly looked the other way. Thing is, though; if he abused that girl, her father and brothers straightened him out in a day or two. There were no cops back then, so nothing ever got in the way of a good lynching where it was needed. That alone kept Uncle Touchy in line. Third, these were farming societies. In that world, children are a blessing, not a burden. The sooner a girl could start breeding, the richer and happier the whole village would be. Little kids were almost free labor on the farm, and there was no social or economic penalty for girls who started early. Today, of course, a pregnant 16-year-old is almost bound to drop out of school and go on welfare, becoming a burden to us all because a horny 24-year-old couldn’t keep his hands to himself. Fourth, and I think this is the kicker–virtually every historical society had intact nuclear and extended families, and they mostly lived in places where you knew everybody else. Families had very strong bonds in pre-modern societies and people rarely moved around. That stability made it so everybody in town knew each other, which is a powerful disincentive toward predatory sexual behavior. If Lars the Blacksmith ever raped Gabrielle the Virgin, it’s not like he could disappear into the crowd afterward. He’d spend the rest of his life labeled as the village rapist, and he might face serious penalties. At the very least, he could expect to make enemies out of the girl’s family and lose access to the other village girls. In that environment, a father could accurately assess the intentions of an older suitor for his daughter. If a 30-year-old woodsman asked for the farmer’s 14-year-old daughter’s hand in marriage, her father would know right away whether he was a good match. The father could then help his daughter make a smart decision rather than just tossing her to the wolves and hoping for the best. This is not how today’s society works. Even if we allowed underage marriage–even if we insisted on marriage as opposed to pumping and dumping–the “suitor” would still be a stranger with unknowable intentions. He could easily have come from the other side of the country, for all the girl’s family knows, and there’s no way I can see to ensure that the real abusers won’t take advantage of our newfound (((tolerance))) of childfucking. Without stable communities, how can we know the difference between an adult man who genuinely loves and wants to wife a teenaged girl in her prime breeding age and a pervert who wants to use her up?
Ethan Morales
Kill all pedos
Jason Gomez
Mohhamad * lmao at that wordfilter. Op unless the kikes and the less trusting society problem is solved along with the eternal youth minded adults, then you are wrong. Especially when kikes and mohhamad are the ones lining up to fuck 3 year olds and not 14 year olds marrying 14 year olds at a young age.
Christopher Hall
we don't disagree at all. The shills will automatically discredit this.
Jailbait is so prevalent because the natural instinct of males AND the younger now newly matured females is to seek mates of high value, and that means a man who has made it to adulthood and carried on to be successful, which, naturally would be someone a few years to quite a few years older then her.
Let's not forget men remain fertile their entire lives. Women lose it beginning at 30, it's literally bad for the species to have kids later in life.
The healthiest and strongest alpha males I know have had young mothers.
Fuck, look at goddamned Trump's youngest Baron. Kid is barely out of gradeschool and he's a towering height.
Chase Sanchez
fuck off kike.
Lucas Hernandez
Pedo kike leave
Ryan Hughes
You're not going to normalize your semitic fetish here.
Zachary Bell
the entire "sexual revolution" (actually a destruction of traditional sexuality) was started by ugly jewish bra burning hags.
I have no desire to fuck a child and the fact that you think so absolutely proves that the jews have gotten to you.
Although the rest of it is fairly ok - except your rejection of successive wives of young age as your first, second, etc wives begin to mature.
Successful alpha men naturally marry up as time goes on. Only jewish run society has made it taboo to do so while ((married)) to someone else.
There's a reason so many fundamental Christians continue to take multiple wives and the arrangement is generally preferred by the women in it.
Even Trump has had several marrages to increasingly younger women.
Liam Hill
The truth is precisely the opposite. No one is advocating for child sexuality, just that the aoc being raised from 14 to 18 fundamentally is a jewish form of population control of whites.
Why do you think so many niggers have babies at a young age and niggers aren't being arrested for pedoshit? Becuase jewish judges and lawyers accept that nigs and spics fuck young and hide it.
We're so cucked that even talking about 14-18yo's being perfectly fine with fucking 30+yo men is enough to bring out the pitchforks even though it's often the girls initiating the relationships, as they NATURALLY FEEL COMPELLED TO DO.
William Baker
AOC, period, is a jewish construct, a product of sexual (((liberation))).
Before said (((liberation))), most people in their mid-to-late teens married each other as virgins and stayed married until death. Most of the exceptions were widowers, or occasionally, widows. Only a few degenerates, usually the very poor outcasts on the fringes, such as criminals or soldiers or sailors and the whores they consorted with, or the very rich who could afford to flaunt tradition, did otherwise.
The very concept of an age at which you get some magic "box of maturity" that lets you legally and freely fuck anybody you want to without any social repercussion whatsoever is as jewish as all fuck.
Elijah Wilson
Shilling for pedo acceptance
Jose Wright
The age to marry should be 16 and extramarital sexual contact should be outlawed.
Women should be expected to be married by 18 and to be having children by early 20's if not earlier.
Wyatt Parker
This thread is a Jewish construct.
Cameron Stewart
You are a sickfuck
Juan Kelly
oh hey look, 8ch does have people with critical thinking skills and European mentality. Although the "marry for life" shit is thanks to semetic cucked religions based on jewish tales. Jesus was a jew. Our forefathers and viking kings had many wives. The stories of our gods took many wives. It's more natural for us then jewish - christan bullshit.
13+ are not children, therefore, not pedo.
Sure, as long as you're allowed to take consecutive wives.
Found the shill
Found another Semite kike.
Wow, the velocity of this thread is incredible. What are (((they))) afraid of? That we might multiply and ruin the need for ((IMMIGRATION)) or do they just want all our beautiful young women to MKULTRA for their jewish cryptokike political control?
Nicholas Young
Everything is fine when it's not jews doing it. More or less.
Don't rape, don't groom, if you were raised on kike propaganda and have pedo urges keep it in your pants, jerk to loli and shut up. You know, like you were already doing as a responsible white adult despite your heavy brainwashing.
These threads are useless and repetitive. They are always slide threads designed to make us bicker and do our own form of virtue signaling. It's boring to read the same shit over and over. We are all on the same basic page here. Kill child rapists, arrest for life child rapists who assist in rounding up worse offenders, and undo the damages kikes have done do our people. Heil fucking Hitler.
Jonathan Harris
Except they're not. I've already had beautiful white children and I'm trying to find a legal way for my wife to find us a younger second bride to have more. We gather the only way to allow it is if we change the laws or find a white country that allows it and hasn't been cucked by jewish control. I have absolutely no interest in anyone who looks under the age of 16 personally, but I can recognize that some girls are fully matured younger then that, hence the provision of 13+. Girls are also hitting puberty younger for whatever reason. It's probably a gene drive in response to brith control fucking our genetic pool - those that do have kids are more likely to have been accidental births to young mothers, thereby driving down the age of puberty among girls.
Sebastian Ortiz
anything lower than 16 is degen
Christopher Miller
people who push for prepubescent kids are kikes
people who push for used up whore hags are also kikes
You should only fuck girls after the age whence they can safely give birth: when they roughly end puberty.
Mason Russell
18 is the ideal age, because it is the age where (european) women's bodies are almost fully matured and most suited for child birth. SAGE because OP doesn't understand basic anatomy.
Dylan Miller
I should clarify, this isn't a slide thread. I'm encouraging strong white alpha men who are capable of establishing a harem of like minded white women to do so and have more children. Think about how much faster you can multiply when you have more then one wife pregnant at once?
Single partner marriage is a slow death for our race at this point. there is no question that someone like Brock O'Hurn would have a chain of absolutely knockout beautiful young women happy to share his cock among each other.
I generally agree. There are a few girls who unfortunately mature faster these days but they're outliars. No true racially pure white nationalist is advocating for pedoshit. We protect our children, pedoshit is always popularized by jewish fucking big media bullshit, the sexualization of children is their fault.
16+ (mayyybe 14 in extremely rare cases) however is perfectly acceptable .
Xavier Roberts
You are the only one doing brain gymnastics trying to justify your fetish for 13-14 year olds as something beyond sexual. Loser.
Daniel Jackson
No. There's one man for every woman, thus every man should only have one woman, so that all men can have a woman.
Why not just breed your wife some more? She's too old? Well then if you're being honest and are a richfag that can afford 2 wives and 12 chilluns, good for you, but you're probably not going to 'find a legal way to get in 2 marriages'. The second girl should be considered the concubine, the cuckquean, the unterfrau, and she will be legally single.
Nathan Ross
...
Liam Nguyen
I have never once met a girl at the age of 16 (even European) who couldn't successfully give vaginal birth at the age of 16. However, ALL highly intelligent white cranial size has been increasing significantly for some time now, and modern c-section, invented by our scientific advancement have allowed us further intelligence more rapidly despite female bodies not naturally adapting at this time, for what it's worth.
You're a fucking kike.
Except there's not supposed to be. Do you not think men die at a faster rate then women in tribal hunter gatherer societies? There are far too many men. Weak betas must be culled. Perhaps you are a beta and this threatens you? You clearly don't understand physiology. Women have exactly 15 good breeding years in their lifetimes and steadily decline. Men have upwards of 65 to 90 years. This is natural. What you are suggesting is not. Subsequent births takes a tole on the body and most genetically modern women can only handle 2 to 4 without suffering major lifelong issues.
and 4 births is AT LEAST a third of their entire lifetime child bearing potential. Far less if you decide to marry at the more common age of close to 30 that (((SOCIETY))) has convinced you as normal. Idoit. This is common sense.
Justin Mitchell
Yep, I read a large-sample analysis that showed 19 year old mothers had the fewest personal complications and gave birth to the healthiest children relative to younger and older mothers.
Angel Garcia
Can we just stop with these fucking threads? Holy shit, you fuckers post at least a half dozen a week. If you are genuine it's hard to tell because you're sliding the whole god damn board with an argument we've had every fucking day.
Ryan Nelson
THIS IS TRUE - yes. So do you not think women should be allowed a few years of enjoying their marriage and becoming established with a home and a job and some savings before they have kids? That leaves 16-19 at best.
Nicholas Butler
Then maybe we should work to normalize it so those of us who understand this fundamental inequality and jewish manipulation can stop REEEEEing?
Jacob Cox
Polygamy is more natural, but it doesn't work in modern societies because they need all the men to work for them to function, and men won't work to support other men's children. That's why MGTOW is happening now, because with women not staying in marriages the ex husbands wind up in part paying for her to go fuck and have kids with other men. In primate societies, the beta males spend their time trying to take on the alphas for access to females, and that's what happens in polygamist societies. That's why the Religion of Cuck™ic countries are trying to push off their excess men onto other countries. Us having children or not has nothing to do with immigration. The kikes said themselves, its because we "don't work hard enough." i.e we want a living wage and to not have to work 60-80 hrs every week. And breeding like niggers isn't going to help us because we won't get the welfare they do, they will just take our children from us. That shit won't work with modern humans, you'll fucking doom us.
Daniel Moore
Pretty sure it's the same leftist doing it fishing for screencaps. He types the same way and makes the exact same arguments every time.
Jackson Long
Yes normalize pedophilia and child marriage. You kikes keep forgetting where your master told you to shitpost.
This
Adam Green
wat
C-section is inferior to natural birth because the latter causes a massive release of oxytocin, the love neurotransmitter, that solidifies the bond between mother and child. You're making it sound like cutting a baby out of a woman's stomach is going to give him higher IQ because her snatch won't crush his brain cells or something, kek. For every guy that dies in battle, there's a woman that weighs 300lbs. We don't have a surplus of healthy, fertile white women of childbearing age, so stfu. What, 16-31? Sounds about right.
End result: 6 white babies, had from 18-30. I agree 30's are too old, it results in lower quality offspring in general.
Are you telling me this is too much birth for a modern woman to handle? 9 months of pregnancy, 15 or 27 months of rest, 6 times?
Logan Price
Being able to give birth and being able to give birth comfortably are two differnt things. Of course 12 years olds are able to give birth via c section, but they're sacrificing their development in the process. The only people in favor of teenage pregnancies are penis controlled pedophiles.
Dylan Thomas
Actually no. I'm a genetic researcher and biologist, not that it matters. There is an increase in cranium size associated with increased intelligence. Either due to c-section, (or in spite of it) female hip ratios have not increased to deal with increased cranium sizes appropriately in the last 100 years or so. Since we can have healthy children despite this in recent times, it's one genetic pressure for a rapid increase in IQ scores among first world societies. okay, so you go and have 6. I'll have my first 4, then in 10 years or less I'll have 12 since both wives will have had kids and the third one will have had two. Men don't decrease in genetic fitness. Which of us is advancing the white race more?
Who says you need any men to support you at all when you have a self sufficient homestead in a nice, cold wintered, nigger free wooded area with solar, wind, and strapping young sons to help you with the farmland and animals, and to go hunting a couple of times a year?
Or do you propose we live in (((CITIES))) like you?
Kevin Lopez
...
Nathaniel Scott
heil.
Nicholas Clark
It's the Christcuck's fault we can't marry 14-16 year old girls. They ruin everything, fucking semite worshipers.
Ryan Diaz
And christcucks come from kike control methods and ancient jewish texts. Odinism and other traditional euro pagan religion is a pretty appealing alternative if you need a religious excuse to convince females to your cause.
Christopher Bell
Kek. Next you'll start talking about TRS and how we all have to exodus.
Jace Gomez
You don't type like someone from around here, where are you pedo boomer fucks flocking from?
Angel Thomas
I thought we were becoming less intelligent? I'm not discouraging you, but that's going to be an expensive family to support- most men cannot manage all that. If you can, good for you- just try to have at least 3 with each woman, so they are not wasted.
I think my "6 with 1 woman" is more a practical goal for most anons. Even 1 man, 1 woman, and 6 children is quite tough to support on one income in the current economy.
Jayden Parker
We don't need to have an exodus. We just need to permaban all Kikestians on site. And everyone who obeys Kikestian laws, such as "b-but muh aoc being below 18 is degenerate pedophilia". First of all, pedophilia is a kike-invented word to stop the white man from marrying perfectly healthy white girls at their prime child-bearing age. You think your viking ancestors had queasy stomachs about "muh children can't consent" bullshit?
Anthony Sanders
...
Jayden Mitchell
Stopped reading there
William Foster
...
Evan Taylor
And do you have that land, farm, and everything else lined up, because you dont have the kids yet. You sound incredibly naive about the difficulty involved.
Are you going to be able to break into the market to sell your products? If not, how will you pay property taxes? How are you going to get not just one, but multiple women from consumerist society to live on a farm with you? How will you deal with government attempts to take your land? You have got to be a shill to be this dumb. So you're a genetic researcher? Does your dad work at Nintendo as well?
Angel Green
Water is wet & Vampires hate the sun.
Nathaniel Peterson
you can always go to Africa where they have no age of consent and managed to manufacture literally a billion kids
Jason Rodriguez
...
Nathaniel Gomez
You won't recruit any whites to pisslam here achmed.
Aaron Myers
did you know niggers have an inbuilt instinct for raping kids in order to make more raping kids
Caleb Lopez
I don't think AOC laws are irrelevant, we don't need to have children at such young ages anymore because infant mortality has plummeted, thankfully, in the Western world. Besides having to have kids because the first two die, I can't think of any other reason why we lowered them. Now that it isn't an issue, we can let children live as children instead of raise kids of their own.
Logan Fisher
A teenager is still a child. AoC laws exist to stop people from abusing the fact that a young person is easily manipulated.
Wouldn't even be surprised if an actual scientific thesis explained and proved this
Indeed, it's trivial to do freehold type land ownership innawoods these days. Solar panels are cheap, hydroelectric is cheap and can be done with an old washing machine, and car batteries work great and are cheap. DC powers most of our technology these days, and you don't have to hunt too far to find decent internet even in a deep county area. You can sell products online and ship them. A "product" doesn't even have to be a physical good, it can be art or software or working online. Do you even into modern society?
Aaron Bailey
Good god, words cannot describe how I feel right now.
Luke Ramirez
they ordered a niglet directly from west africa to rape their daughter, then turned him loose, +1 nog population, -1 breedable white women
fucking redditors man, even their parents are cucks
Hunter Baker
I feel really bad for the daughtor. The parents deserve everything going at them, but the daughtor is innocent.
If I encounter a family like this I will definitely do my very best to convince them out of it, or at least send their kids to their grandparents so only they (the parents) suffer the blow.
Andrew Rodriguez
I think there is some benefit to breeding a moderate age range between male and female. Not sure the exact difference in age in order to achieve optimal DNA trait transmission. However, this area isn't really investigated in science as far as I have seen. Something similar to a highly mutated male DNA mixing with a non-mutated female DNA maximizing the shift in DNA changes. Not condoning pedophilia, this could probably be done with an 18 yr old female. Just needs to be investigated from a eugenics perspective.
