Archaeology fossil teeth discovery in Germany could re-write human history

Archaeology fossil teeth discovery in Germany could re-write human history
A 9.7-million-year-old discovery has left a team of German scientists scratching their heads. The teeth seem to belong to a species only known to have appeared in Africa several million years later.
A team of German archaeologists discovered a puzzling set of teeth in the former riverbed of the Rhine, the Museum of Natural History in Mainz announced on Wednesday.
The teeth don't appear to belong to any species discovered in Europe or Asia. They most closely resemble those belonging to the early hominin skeletons of Lucy (Australopithecus afarensis) and Ardi (Ardipithecus ramidus), famously discovered in Ethiopia.
But these new teeth, found in the western German town of Eppelsheim near Mainz, are at least 4 million years older than the African skeletons, which has scientists so puzzled they held off publishing for a year.
A specialist team will be carrying out further tests on the teeth.
Read more: Unearthing the mysteries of the 'battle that created Germany'
'Great mystery'
Photo of the other old tooth (picture-alliance/dpa/Naturhistorischen Museum Mainz)
The teeth are similar to the famous skeletons of Lucy and Ardi, but predate them by several million years
"They are clearly ape-teeth," head of the team Herbert Lutz was quoted as saying by local online news outlet Merkurist (link in German) . "Their characteristics resemble African finds that are four to five million years younger than the fossils excavated in Eppelsheim. This is a tremendous stroke of luck, but also a great mystery."
In the press conference announcing the find, Mainz Mayor Michael Ebling claimed the find would force scientists to reconsider the history of early mankind.
"I don't want to over-dramatize it, but I would hypothesize that we shall have to start rewriting the history of mankind after today," Ebling was quoted as saying.
Regional archaeologist in the state of Rhineland-Palatinate Axel von Berg told news outlets that he was sure the the finds would receive a lot of attention. "This will amaze experts," he told a daily for the Rhine and Main river regions, Allgemeine Zeitung (link in German).

dw.com/en/archaeology-fossil-teeth-discovery-in-germany-could-re-write-human-history/a-41028029

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.fo/kALRx
archive.fo/jmIZa
saeti.org/index6.htm
news.com.au/technology/science/evolution/dna-reveals-new-history-of-who-first-australians-were-with-mystery-of-an-early-human-unearthed/news-story/f55cfc4ee21b4ac8fd866bf53074c7fa
researchgate.net/blog/post/9-7-million-year-old-teeth-fossils-raise-questions-about-human-origin
journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020206
8ch.net/pol/res/10778542.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209460/
newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2011/04/rna-enzyme-makes-another-rna-e.html
sci-news.com/paleontology/article01133-archicebus-achilles-primate-china.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

This is a game changing discovery people

Wait
so
what you'z sayin is
we wudn't kangs?

The first paper on the find will be uploaded to Researchgate in a week's time. The teeth are still being examined in detail, but from the end of October they will be displayed at the Rhineland-Palatinate state exhibition "vorZEITEN" (link in German), after which they will go on display at the Museum of Natural History in Mainz, according to Die Welt (link in German).
The teeth were found by scientists sifting through gravel and sand in the bed of the Ur-Rhine, the former course of the river Rhine. The area has been a hotbed of fossil remains since 1820, when the first ape fossils were found. Since 2001, 25 new species have been discovered.
The teeth were found next to the remains of an extinct genus of horse, that helped them date the teeth.

Would be cool if it were true.

Unlike Holla Forums, we shouldn't be total blithering retards and jump on this immediately.
Science is fucking pozzed to the brim, after all.

Give it some time.

Does that mean negros are several millions years behind in evolution?

"They are clearly ape-teeth," head of the team Herbert Lutz was quoted as saying by local online news outlet Merkurist (link in German) . "Their characteristics resemble African finds that are four to five million years younger than the fossils excavated in Eppelsheim. This is a tremendous stroke of luck, but also a great mystery."
In the press conference announcing the find, Mainz Mayor Michael Ebling claimed the find would force scientists to reconsider the history of early mankind.
"I don't want to over-dramatize it, but I would hypothesize that we shall have to start rewriting the history of mankind after today," Ebling was quoted as saying.
Regional archaeologist in the state of Rhineland-Palatinate Axel von Berg told news outlets that he was sure the the finds would receive a lot of attention. "This will amaze experts," he told a daily for the Rhine and Main river regions, Allgemeine Zeitung (link in German) .

Anyone have that graphic suggesting that niggers are the result of humans mixing with a pre-humen-species?

it's plausable

this is fascinating

have a bump

Hitler was right, again!

Decide for yourselves:
Human history is millions of years old. There are ancient stuffs all over the place and historians are purposefully ignoring the evidence. Ancient carved maps of the entire globe, cogs, wheel, hammer found in coal mines and shoe prints dating millions of years back. Many of these are collecting dust in museum storage buildings. Mars was inhabited millions of years ago and there are remnants of a huge war all over the solar system. Moon is full of wreckage. The sand on Mars is hiding huge buildings. Indian Sanskrit writings claim that the story it tells is millions of years old. Tells bout flying machines, holograms and so on. All over the world the flood story was known and there are countless marks of it on the surface. More and more proof is piling up with time, showing that human history is cyclic. Natural catastrophes wipe out humanity time to time.
I am not going to get into the hollow Earth theory so I'm just gonna say that the theory that white people just popped out of black people is fucking disgusting theory and we came from somewhere else.
Goolag edits out grid pattern from the seafloor (We found Atlantis guys)
archive.fo/kALRx

WE ARE FUCKING GODS AND WE SURVIVED EVERYTHING. The kikes can't hide our ancient past forever. Take my fucking word NASA will doctor the Mars One images and lie about what they find.

Mars satellite pictures. It can be found under the link I've posted.

Almost sounds like the story from the Halo games is real.

Lying kikes that rewrite history BTFO.

Very underrated post. Everyone take a look at this

few of your photos are hoaxes, or rock formations that look like something they aren't. interesting to think about though

looks like shells of nautali or a similiar shelled creature
nope
so what?
Looks like a scam
Just a random carving tbh

None of those look like cities at all, more like terraces from lava flows, the pyramid isn't a pyramid.

And if they WERE cities, then they are the most disorganized "shities" I've ever seen.

And you pull this shit about "SOLAR WAR!"!? wtf dude, go back to Alex Jones and talk about "liberal bankers" funding the Bolsheviks.

Either way it blows it out of the water. You have to remember that "Out of Africa" is just a theory, and like ALL "scientific" theories. They're just guesses at the end of the day. Some are well educated guesses, but others are starting on a basis that is completely wrong from the start. Who is to say evolution, as we're being told, isn't a wrong basis? Either way it blows out there "real" or fake narrative completely, yet again. The truth is they don't know jack shit about human origins and Darwinism is a joke when taken as fact for all life. Evolution has only ever been witnessed on the extremely micro level, nowhere close to the macro in our entire recorded existence.

If you start going into the esoteric as alludes to, you might actually come to a different conclusion. Like the Bible being nothing more than a historic mixture of events in the PAST, not about things today or happening in the future (See: Atlantis and the Exodus theory - Atlantis, Edda, and the Bible on Amazon). Start getting into other practices like channeling/QHHT and there are people who claim it's entirely backwards. The Chimeras the bible refers to, which is what you'd call this mongrel specimens, are actually beings who carry our DNA because that's what man was mixed with.

All this proves more than anything IMO is that the esoteric, the religious, and the scientific are at least on equal grounds. In fact the scientific is falling far quicker than all of them because it's become its own religion onto itself.

...

Keyword: all life

The difference between plant, animal, and human from a consciousness, soul, or evolution standpoint is night and day nowhere comparable. Assuming a planet becomes an animal is as silly as assuming animal became a man. If you think about it, truly think about it, you'd realize how fucking stupid that sounds and people actually believe it.

Darwinism would have you believe that sentient beings resulted from a nearly endless list of "mistakes", I'm sorry but I don't buy that.

You wouldn't imagine how many developers are taking ideas from myths and conspiracies. The entire Treyarch CoD zombies is a full of suggestive material. The Der Riese project the alleged secret "Nazi" Moon mission etc… Thule, Vril Ancient all re-imagined in the game but the normiefags have no idea. Also don't forget the famous "Blank Image" from the official Apollo gallery.

The bell was found in a chunk of coal like a century ago. There is some ancient god on the top of it.
What do you think about google fucking up geographical data? You just don't say a word about that. Interesting.
So if kikes manage to fuck up history to their advantage and omit documents, create fake shit and athnic studies is kike bullshittery after the out of nigger theory, but the long history is unfuckable? Why is that? I would say its the opposite. It's easier to bend.
Thanks for helping.

This. Open mind guys, open mind. This is what we need if we want to discuss archaeology. Mainstream academy is a bunch of crooks who are driven by preconceived agendas and they fit in everything in the wrong places.

Not once the muslims destroy all those buildings and 'stuff'.

Creationism is one hell of a drug.

...

How correct is carbon dating anyways?

I forgot to post the sauce. I really don't want to look dodgy.
Ancient history discussion:
archive.fo/jmIZa
Page where Mars stuff came from:
saeti.org/index6.htm

Kinda lost you in the denying evolution part.

I can confirm this, for about 12 years before I became obsessed with pol and similar shit, I studied all the conspiracy shit.

We have evidence or much older civilizations that were super advanced, weather it wuz aliens n sheeeiiit or just older white civilization we may never know, but (((they))) think whites are a mix of Alien and Human. The jews themselves consider themselves mixed with the gods.

shhhhhiiiiiieeeeeeeeetttttt

Hyborien Ancestor

the heat maps of those areas are interesting, whatever is under there is different material (most likely metals) then the surrounding dirt.

Can someone provide some evidence that states that anatomically modern humans didn't evolve in Africa and then move north around 100,000 years ago, where they then mixed with Neanderthals and Denisovans to create europoids and asians?

I hope you are joking

You are the joke.

Im more inclined to believe a simpler explanation, that the talking-walking fire ape developed out of africa then spread into africa. Being a shitty place for selection pressures, africans never evolved bigger brains on that continent. Whites being the result of ling term confinement to brutal selection pressures of cold polar environments exhibited the most brain growth, followed a distant second by cold weather asiatics (who were helped along later by a dose of white dna again during our many colonizations of prehistoric earth).

Ok, ask yourself this: Where did Pepe come from?

Ideas (the fruiting bodies of inert memes) are subject to Darwinian evolution as much as living things are. Memetic crossover and mutation.

I know you've seen emergent memes born here. They never arise spontaneously, but are products of existing memes and mind topologies.

Kek is real. God is real. God is Kek. Kek is an egregore, a thoughtform. Ideas are alive, and memes are their seeds. Your neocortex is the ribosomal machinery that memes use to metamorph into fruiting bodies and spread.

Here's some

Just what I was looking for. Have some nigger memes.

Don't be an idiot, monkeys and pre-humans are two different things. Look at what has to say.

So we out of Europe now?

If you enter a thread about an anthropological revelation and shit it up with pictures of Mars and similar nonsense, you're going to look worse than "dodgy."
I believe there's a significant portion of our history (your pyramids, artistic and stylistic similarities across continents) that is lost to time and nature, likely forever irretrievable. I dig as much as possible, but there's simply no way to know what is truth and what is either complete fiction or controlled op-style disinfo.

Thanks, OP, for the story. fascinating stuff.

THIS THREAD BROUGHT OUT THE CREATIONISTS

REMEMBER, HEATHENS, THE BANANA PROVES CREATION IT IS SHAPED TO FIT MAN'S HAND AND IS SUCKABLE CHECKMATE

Read as

The oldest skeleton found in African is 7 million years old, the oldest one in Europe is either 8 or 9 million.

The biggest thing to look out for when raising questions about the pozzed "scientist" findings are to look for the money trail of who finances them. For the ones who especially peg on the "global warming" and falsify their data are most likely having a hefty pay check from some jewish financer. Follow the money.

...

And of all places Germany.

The Jews are kvetching now.

I know they are fucktard, reread what I said.

HYPERBOREANS

Don't worry, Hitler is about to come back through Antarctica to help the Khoisans with the race war in South Africa that will fan the flames of the raging fire that is our current culture war.

Yes and no. Yes because they are behind, but at the same time, they aren't behind because they haven't evolved and never will.

Proper term to use is. They are now where we were 10 million years ago and haven't (((progressed))) since.

If they think they can remain a 'people' with ~14 million of themselves on the globe, they better believe that the threat of DNA proven ethnic Germans repopulating their ancient lands will always remain a possibility-and a fundamental threat to them.

I understand this but I was having a discussion with someone who made the claim that modern humans haven't been discovered older than 90,000 years outside of Africa. They made a distinction between the primate ancestors of millions of years ago and Homo Sapiens sapiens that was pretty convincing.

Have to get (((their story))) straight

Bananas are embarrassing for both sides of the argument

What is a modern human? People who make out of Africa claims rarely precise that.

Another nail in the coffin for the OOA theory the somehow became truth

It's good to see /x/ is alive and well. I've noticed that their favored argument against anything evolution is to take it to a retarded extreme like rocks won't become fish given any amount of time. Oh well, this should at least be an interesting thread.

Ive been thinking lately.. What are the chances that various species evolved into similar new species by pure chance? Like what if evolution, instead of say specific organisms leading to new branches of animals, functioned more along the lines of ages.. for instance the age of mammals was the result of various animals developing into rodents entirely independent of each other. Same with the age of monkeys and the age of man. From what research I have done it seems like monkeys popped up on every continent around the same time, too close in chronological relationship for migration to be the explanation.

We didn't result from "mistakes" - the mistakes didn't live long enough to reproduce. We resulted from successes.

Specifically Homo sapiens sapiens

I just find it so hard to believe that Cro-Magnon, the first with art and culture, descended from the African savages who didn't do anything for hundreds of centuries. There has to be more that we're not told about our history.

...

some hominids got tired of living in the savanah ghetto, so they said fuck it, ill walk across the god damn desert, i dont give a shit

long story short, they built civilization

Science is still largely in good nick by the nature of it's method.
You're talking about vague largely hard to prove pseudo-science, the shit that comes from dodgy colleges or get's pushed or promoted by the media (Dr Money for example). That shit is not pushed by scientific articles, it is pushed largely by the mainstream media with little proper sources or facts behind it.

The only issue is when science uses correlations without properly discovering if there's causation.

Do you know anything about Cro-Magnon in Australia? I heard that they were in Australia first long before the abo came and live in Australia.

Do you mean that the ADF lies to our soldiers?

I don't know anything about the ADF lies. Can you please elaborate on the ADF lies please?

disappear completely

It's very puzzling…

Considering the variables, no chance. It's why evolutionary theory seems so bunk to me.

Sahara niggers didn't even cross the desert before other races transported them as slaves. The idea to store water in canisters to survive the walk never occurred to them.

Far more than you can currently imagine, friend.

Not cro-mags, but the abos mixed with some denisovan offshoot when they arrived 70,000 years ago: news.com.au/technology/science/evolution/dna-reveals-new-history-of-who-first-australians-were-with-mystery-of-an-early-human-unearthed/news-story/f55cfc4ee21b4ac8fd866bf53074c7fa

This is a pre-human, species of hominid. Apes/primates fall into this same taxonomic family.

All this means is that there was something like australopithicus in a wider range at an earlier time.

This isn't an ancient aryans thread.

...

Nothing, I'm fairly sure, unless 'The First Australians' aren't actually the first Australians. That was kind of my point.

No, niggers are perfectly adapted to their natural environment.
It's a very common misconception, especially among "we need to evolve" leftists, that the process of evolution has some kind of end goal in mind, and that increased intelligence is the direction it seeks to progress along. This is completely false. The "fittest" organism isn't the one with the longest lifespan, or the highest IQ, or the strongest, it is the one best able to produce offspring with what it has available (it's environment.)
Take any Western country as an example - non-White races are vastly fitter and better suited for survival and reproduction in welfare states, when compared to Whites whose moral qualms about having children "we can't afford" and "contributing to overpopulation" means many have no children at all.
The nigger is not only perfectly adapted to the plains of Africa, it is perfectly adapted to the welfare state (possibly because the Jews designed welfare states to fit the strengths of the negro, ensuring massive non-White population explosion in White countries.)
tl;dr no trait is inherently "more evolved", it all depends on the environment.

The big thibg now is to remember this and tell people about it, dont let it been forgotten.
This find is nothing new, discoverys have been made like this all over Europe befor and then quietly forgotten and shelved.

Yeah if they were living in a vacuum of sub Sahara Africa they would be doing just fine. The problem is the west keeps sending them aid and the east wants all their resources. What we really need is an exclusion zone through the sahara desert that on one is allowed to pass in either direction, that or a genocide.

Also
There is no inherent moral qualms about it, it's propaganda that has gotten us to this point.

I'll remain sceptical until I see more on the dating. All that's mentioned in that article is biostratigraphic dating using a "horse like skeleton" which doesn't sound all that secure.
Not that biostratigraphic dating is useless, but if it's based on one single other species then it's just as likely that that animal species liver later than previously believed

not news

This proves science is, to a large degree utter bullshit. They act like they have unquestionable authority but their flimsy theories are shot down every few decades. Even worse, they have a knowledge filter where anything that goes against the orthodox theory of the decade is repressed and criticized. Even this, the article claims, they sat on it for a year because they couldn't fit it into their idiotic paradigm.

We wuz kong's n' sheit.

NIGGERS BTFO!!!!

...

0 replies.
There are enough scientific studies out there claiming shit like living penguins have been tested to be 40.000 years old. And then they telk you that is wrong. But when they test shit of which the age is unknown they suddenly say it is correct. Its very simple though. Known history only goes back about 7000 years. Before that its all bullshittery, guessing and conjecture.

WE WUZ VIKINGS AND SHIEET

I can't remember the guy's name, but I recall hearing or seeing something on a scientist who had ended up partially excommunicated from the (((scientific community))) for proving that the flood did happen and that all this climate change shit that the media and politicians are peddling is 1) bullshit, and 2) clogging up discussions about the impending natural disasters that could hit us the same way they hit the planet thousands of time before recorded human history.

Take teeth from africa.
Claim you found it in germany

See, we wuz kangz.

>>former riverbed of the Rhine
Asmundarkappabana WHEN?

Most of modern "science" is pseudo-scientific philosophy, including your beloved evolution. That this shit happens on a daily basis and you all still give any of their retarded claims credence is a shame on you. It is even worse when your own confirmation bias blinds you to the farce.

While i agree one should be critic and wise, the theory of organic evolution is a proven mechanism which is observed in nature, quantified (population genetics) and which predicts outcomes.
It is also reasonable and common sense.
It, along with genetic drift, explains most of the modern geographic distribution of animals and plants.

Don't be uneducated. Try to read and understand HARD science (aka science that withstood the test of time, physics and mathematics mostly but occasionally chemistry and biology too).
Don't be ignorant. Educate yourself.
Organic evolution explains even human evolution and history.

lol that looks like a fucking snail to you? snails spiral out like the fibonacci sequence. those clearly have holes for a shaft in the center and only gear teeth on the outside radius. fucking glow in the dark nigger

RG: Do you have any ideas as to how this could happen?

Lutz: It’s possible that, with the morphology of this canine tooth being so similar to more recent examples from Africa, the species could be related. That would mean that a group of primates was in Europe before they were in Africa.

There’s also the phenomenon of convergence, when evolutionary pressure causes the same characteristic to develop in multiple locations. Now the questions is whether it’s possible that’s what happened. There are few thousand kilometers between the species in East Africa and here in Central Europe, and millions of years. Is it possible that this uncannily similar characteristic developed two times, completely independently of one another. So here we are, perplexed. We want to collaborate with other researchers to process these finds, and hopefully in one or two years, we’ll know a lot more about what we’ve got on our hands. It’s definitely a fantastic, exciting story.

researchgate.net/blog/post/9-7-million-year-old-teeth-fossils-raise-questions-about-human-origin

Yes. This is the point. You make do with what you have, until something new pops up and renders your established truth obsolete.
THIS HAS BEEN THE SAME FOR CENTURIES
TECHNOLOGICAL, MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS IS BASED ON THIS METHOD

This is beside the point.

Because this tooth devided the field of archeology, evolutionary genetics and anthropology by 0.

It's not that science is bullshit, it's simply that you cannot actually prove anything.
You can -and this is exactly how science works- make a THEORY that cannot be disproven at the time and wich then is accepted as truth. Untill someone does disprove it becuase of some other advancement, thus negaating your theory and changing the truth.
It's a bit silly, but you do indeed need only one false to make the entire thing false

>>>/gaschamber/

I have mixed feelings.

The Flintstones?
They were white after all.

More like they held off publishing for a year so they could try to figure out how to keep spinning the "everyone is a nigger on the inside" narrative.

Out of Apefrica has been debunked for over a decade now, but the "scientific community" still refuses to print a retraction or correct the record.

Isn't it funny how all these discoveries keep putting intelligent humans further and further back in the timeline, coming closer and closer to accordance with the oral histories, religious texts, and folk mythologies of our people, but science still can't bring itself to admit that maybe their Jew-made materialist horseshit is wrong, and the stories our people felt were important enough to pass down for thousands upon thousands of years might have some substance to them?

Advanced human civilization predates the ice age. That's a fact. But good luck finding any academic willing to admit it. The Antikythera Mechanism proves that knowledge of how to construct working analogue computers is over two thousand years old. The pyramids of Egypt have musical notes and advanced mathematical equations encoded into the angles and dimensions of their structures. This knowledge had to come from somewhere, had to have been invented at some point. You don't create a graphing calculator in a vacuum: you have to know how to create all of the components and understand all of the functions first before you can conceive of a device that combines all of these features together.

Every civilization on earth, white or not, tells stories of the Before People, who were more advanced and highly cultured, but ultimately destroyed themselves with their own arrogance and degenerate ways. And yet no one seems interested in asking why all of these completely disparate subspecies of humanity happen to tell the same stories and describe, in general terms, the same sequence of events.

Antediluvian human civilization is real, and the few who survived it's collapse carried fragments of their knowledge and creations forwards into the ancient world, which we see reflected in the impossibly precise and mathematically encoded architecture of the Egyptians, or the multipurpose analogue computers of the Greeks. To imagine that these creations spontaneously arose from the mind of a single topical genius of the day who then failed completely to pass on their knowledge is absurd. This kind of refined technology, identical to that which we see today in our own creations, is the result of many people over many generations building on top of the innovations of the last, and the scattered and piecemeal nature of it's presence in the farthest reaches of our known history suggests a prehistorical period of far greater advancement that collapsed or was destroyed through some unknown means or cataclysm.

That all nations and all breeds of men tell these stories, on top of everything else associated with the topic, is beyond mere coincidence. Modern science has fallen so far that a basic knowledge of history and a dialectic between two reasonable men can produce more compelling and accurate pictures of our history than all the great robed men in their crystal towers with their hook-nosed Caliphs.

It's only due to dumb Jew "scientists" like (((Jared Diamond))) who get their positions based on bribery, embezzlement, cronyism, nepotism… that dogma states that any hominid "originated" from a specific continent. The rest of the scientific community knows that bipedal nigh-amphibious creatures adapted to all climates and all forms of food (omnivores) are capable of transcontinental movement, and over the course of millions of years (the length of time a species of homo exists) can spread pretty much everywhere. North America likely got invaded by dozens of hominids including Europeans before the Asian horde got there, in fact judging by a biogeographer friend of mine the asian genotype likely arrived on the NA continent last. We simply can't talk about such things because we'll lose our jobs and the information will be buried anyway. Or we put a plastic bag on our head and tie ourselves up Or we accidentally stick ourselves with a needle full of ebola, and depress the plunger fully. Or we tie a rope to a tree, tie the other end around our neck, get in our car, and speed away so fast that when the rope snaps tight our head is cut off. Or crash our car into an oncoming moving train, and have the coroner rule it a heart attack. Or we'll mysteriously come to our lab one day, destroy everything we ever worked on, kill the only other person who knows, then shoot ourselves. Or one day we'll just drop everything, leave office, drive to the Mississippi river, and take a swim with all our clothes on until we drown {poor doc wiley ;_;). Or we'll die with four of our friends within three days due to heart attack, a pure coincidence. Or our daughter is going to kill us with a massive claymore sword. These are all deaths of scientists who questioned, about 100 die suspiciously each year so it's not a full list obviously.

Knowing you're going to "have an accident" if you publish something, is common water cooler talk among (nonjew) scientists. Especially Slavs and Chinks who seem to be the most racially aware and care the least about consequences.

You fucking racists… decades of taking nigger cocks up your mother arses, and still you do not comply.

That tooth belongs to a particular African individual. He had no reasons to travel farther than the banana tree grove, yet, because of his huge masculine appendage - mostly caused by the first silicon dick implant
performed by (((aliens))), was shunned by the whole forest.

Sick of the repercussions following his aleatory bouts of reproduction, and facing single mother cum recipients asking for life-long compensations, he migrated to Europe. It was a short trip, due to the 4th Reich Merkel machines, able to go back in time with ease.

Arriving in Germany, his baggage of bats, shrunken cranial trophies, enemy ears and disemboweled women part raised suspicion (and jealousy) of the border control Mehmet Ali Roachesdosuck, who in the process of defending their borders, took out a teeth or two from the valiant undocumented traveler

Anorganic matter does not evolve into organic matter. "Intelligent" scientists cant produce life in a lab out of anorganic matter. And even if they do ever manage it they will only have proven the theory of "intelligent" design. Be wise and open minded, but dont take a cock up your ass just because you wasted a big chunk of your life studying lies. Darwins book on the evolution of species is a piece of brilliant pseudoscience. Nothing more. Deal with it.

No it hasn't. The overarching theory has never been observed. Loss of genetic information has been observed, not the presupposition that one animal can evolve new information via mutation.

Hardly

Here you are assuming that I am ignorant simply because I reject a baseless theory that extrapolates unrelated biological processes into a support framework for itself. You are the ignorant one when you don't understand that observation and repeatability are the foundations of science. There has never been observed darwinistic process, only a darwinistic interpretation placed on processes that never produce the underlying darwinistic theory. Bacteria immunity to antibiotics for example is not proof of darwinistic evolution anymore than a human becoming resistant to poison, which is possible. The human didn't fucking evolve, they have built in functions already in place to handle resistance the same as bacteria that survive antibiotics. Similarly any of the other touted "proofs" of darwinistic evolution are also not observation of said evolution, but merely have such an interpretation presumed upon them by evolutionary zealots such as yourself who believe in the theory a priori. Hence the confirmation bias that I spoke of.

Yes it has, multiple times, in everything from humans to bacteria.

You have some evidence to cite, right? I'm sure you do, and I am goading you to present it so I can laughingly tear it to pieces.

nch

Perfect explanation why niggers, arabs, and a bunch others over the globe are practical morons.

BBC? A myth. Most niggers are small people, easily conquered by feeble arabs and sold to slavery mostly by arabs and their nigger allies

Genes can be duplicated accidentally during mitosis/meiosis. Because these genes are now duplicated the selection pressure which would prevent one of them from mutating (as it would impair the organism's fitness) is now relaxed. As a result the duplicate can mutate and potentially fulfill another, new, function.

There's an interesting open-access paper on it here: journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020206

Apparently I can't post wtf

OK the most recent example is great tits, which showed a mutation in a gene that hasn't been seen before. This is completely additive, thus defeating your point here

Also why do you write like that, do you think it makes you look smarter? You're using words incorrectly….

Links to stories or obituaries of any of those deaths?

There are ruins of cities a hundred feet below sea level off the coasts of India and Africa. We could probably find them elsewhere, if we bothered to look. There were bronze and iron age civilizations during the Ice Age, and when the great melt happened, they were drowned when the sea level rose, since civilization is always built in the fertile lowlands. Even if everything else is bullshit, those ruins and that timeframe alone proves that there's more to the biblical account of a "vast flood destroying the world" than anything modern science gives credit for.

Babylon and the far, far ancient beginnings of Egypt were themselves created from the broken bones of older societies that predated them, and the scant few survivors from those places.

There have been multiple apocalypses in the past. To believe they are all behind us is the height of folly. This entire line of thinking is from the French Enlightenment, this idea that we are always traveling towards greater heights. That we are always improving, becoming smarter, better, more civilized, more refined. More evolved. Which of course means by definition that we were "worse" in the past, that we were less civil, cruder, more brutal and barbarous. This notion that a Star Trek future of voluntary Communism and total egalitarianism is inevitable, and beyond that we become energy beings endlessly fornicating amongst the stars.

To buy into the notion that time is a line and history is a flight of stairs that we are always climbing upwards on is a new and entirely ahistorical heresy. It is completely motivated by politics, a Freemasonic Jewish philosophy and rhetoric made by kingkillers to justify the casting down of thrones and the accompanying revolutions necessary to fit their ambitions of a new world order.

Science is the practical application of two things: observation and repeatability. Nowhere do we observe the world getting better, and we cannot repeat or replicate the rise of kings or the formation of life from nonlife. We see evolution nowhere, but devolution everywhere. We are not climbing up a flight of stairs, we are falling down a slope into deeper mists of degeneration and decay, our near-vision obscured, no true bottom or end in sight.

The entire purpose of alchemy was for esoterically enlightened proto-liberal men to unlock the secrets of the human essence. Read into their writings even a little, and you will quickly realize that they were never talking about physical substances at all. That was simply a cover. They were trying to turn leaden souls into golden souls, trying to understand the difference between a peasant and a king. They were attempting to distill down the essence of the Divine Right. Naturally, they failed, but instead of changing their own worldview when being proven wrong, they simply decided that the results didn't matter at all. They stopped trying to find evidence to support their views, and began simply doing what they wished and justifying it after the fact. Find the things that support you, and ignore everything else. They're still doing it to this day.

Time is not a line. Time is a circle. We are part of a long cycle, as dependable and knowable as the seasons and the turning of tides. And this cycle both had a beginning at the hands of a creator, and it will have an end when no more good souls can be salvaged from it.

Yes, but not all humans. Some humans have mutations that led to resistance to antibiotics, or viruses, or bacteria, and some others have predisposition to them.
Of course an evolutionary pressure must exist to select those individuals who have them, thus are more "fit" than those that don't.

Random mutations + "wrong" or misspelled duplications in the genome explains new* phenotypes. It takes some time (hundreds, thousands, millions of years) for that new allele to be incorporated into the population, if at all.

*new phenotypes are many times old phenotypes being rediscovered by an organism.
New function is associated with new proteins. New proteins are not completely random, but work at "domain" level, a cluster of many aminoacids are the minimum constitutent of a new function. This explains the supposed incompatibility between "all random mutations" and "new perfectly functional proteins"

The subject is interesting and completely compatible with National Socialism. This field is also the best current theory explaining observed phenomena.

Pretty much this.

Africa didn't produce anything without the spark or ignition from an outside force to perpetuate it.

Africa is the land of bushfire

Once you start the chaos, it erupts, spilling everywhere like an un-contained oil spill.

Some people's genetic blueprint is just far superior overall than others.

It's that simple. We are all different, therefore some are better. Few are best. Even fewer are the elite. Kind of easy to see why hierarchy rewards society with people being the smartest and best looking usually taking over a society.

European genetics are on average, better than African genetics. Hence why this mix is determined to happen in order to destroy and change Europe to a more africanized model of people who are stupider and more easily controlled by life's comforts.

Is called silicon evolution…and yes, for a whole 5000-10000 years of modern human, women had blue hair and flat chest.

Is painful to post drunk, but is more painful to read your garbage.

...

That has already been done. "Lucy", was a total scam to perpetuate the ridiculous "out of africa" theory. These people are trying to destroy history and create a orwellian matrix, where nobody is able to come to any sensible conclusions.

Caught brief snippet of this story on the BBC World Service. The asshurt flowing out of the interviewees over their discredited Out of Afreaka theory was delicious.

This.
Daily reminder that the scientific method is a White invention, and one of our best ones.

pic 3 looks like some kind of sand dollar (creature)

Serious question for any user with training in biology or anthropology: If hominids don't come from Africa, then why are our closest relatives (chimps, orangutans, gorillas, niggers etc.) endemic to that continent?

I'm not surprised.
Sure, user, sure.

Good, now every Jamal and Abdul will have twice the reason to invade Europe.

I don't think you understand what observations are necessary to prove evolution. It isn't looking at genes or mechanisms in place now and writing fanfiction about how those came into place. That's not observing those things evolving.

An unsubstantiated bit of science fiction.
wut
When and where has a new function been observed developing?
When and where has such a thing been observed happening.
WHERE IS THE OBSERVATION? If it's just looking at things that currently exist, that isn't an observation of their development.
I also don't care how compatible evolution is with National Socialism. You don't need evolution in order to preserve your own people or seek the best for them. That the theory appeals to racialists who need some sort of biological excuse for taking care of their extended family doesn't mean shit to me.

Sounds about right.

There's a difference between closest living relative and progenitor.

8ch.net/pol/res/10778542.html
*smacks lips*
AYYO HOL UP
*eats chicken*
U BE SAYIN DAT WE AINT KANGZ?
*sips koolaid*
DAS RASIS
*twerks*

Wir
waren
Germans
'N SHEEIIIIIIIT

You'll never convince them of evolution, these people are retarded. About 30% of Americans are directly controlled by jews through a corruption of christianity called "evangelism".

Great tits are birds, you dolt.

He gave you an example, if you were truthful about being curious you would seek it out and learn what you can from it. Instead you'll feign ignorance and demand to be educated in every single miniscule step of evidence that led to the conclusion of the theory of evolution, which not even a 4 year university course covers.

Evolution vs Christianity is a limited hangout. The reality is, complex adaption into functionally new forms is true, and it is also true that life cannot arise from nonlife.

The claim of spontaneous generation is completely unscientific and has neither been demonstrated nor observed. It is also not repeatable. The most rational explanation for life is that it has fundamentally immaterial origins, i.e. that materialism and atheism are wrong.

Complete the System of German Idealism

Complete the System of German Idealism

Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling he got it.

Out of Africa has gotten majorly blown out three or four times now in the last few years. How more people aren't reexamining it I don't know.

You don't know what endemic means.

If all humans die out except those on the space station, humanity would be endemic to the space station.

kys.

Science moves slow. Darwinian evolution got blown up and revamped starting in 2010 too, we still haven't gotten around to fixing the textbooks.

Sure it can, the definition of life and nonlife is largely semantics, created for purpose of simplifying our understanding of the world.

Wrong.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209460/
These are basic building blocks of RNA. RNA can fold itself into shapes that catalyse production of more RNA.
newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2011/04/rna-enzyme-makes-another-rna-e.html
Parts of it are also hydrophobic, which means it would nicely fit into micelles and liposomes, and there you have a fully enclosed cellular lifeform.

Titan is covered in complex organic molecules, despite there being no life there. Same for many comets. Organic molecules just naturally form in some circumstances, and it's

Ask me how I know you're a Jew.

There are apes in Africa but nowhere else, therefore they are endemic to that continent.

Are you implying that apes evolved somewhere else and then died out everywhere except Africa, like how the camels evolved in North America, migrated to the middle east and then died out in North America? Post evidence pls.

Because you're fucked in the head? There are dozens of definitions in english and 7000 other languages. Even biology has about half a dozen criteria for life, for example sometimes viruses fall under it and sometimes not.

Yes but that doesn't mean they originated from Africa. Endemic =/= originated from. We found ape and hominid bones all over the place dude, even in Australia which is isolated.

Oldest primate fossil is in China.
sci-news.com/paleontology/article01133-archicebus-achilles-primate-china.html

You're right, my mistake. You aren't a Jew. You're a pinko academic.

not him but I remember some suspicious scientist deaths allegedly related to 9-11

...

are they now feeding the beast against their will?