Holla Forums is making fun of us again >>>Holla Forums6432936

I see no reason to give this thread a le downvote xD

No, its because all of Holla Forums's OC ultimately is either so low quality it looks like it is from 9gag or it is a rip off of another piece of OC made by a different board.

It's like you newfags never learn.

Which is sad, because I remember when Holla Forums wasn't such a den of newfaggotry itself.
Also,
Hi Holla Forums

It can be if you claim that it was generated all by your sole effort alone, rather than giving credit where it is due.
One look at your catalog and there is already a thread stating that Holla Forums invented the ancap ball, which is untrue.

I'm a newfag because I'm not saging a thread you don't like?
This is why you're getting made fun of by the better boards.

According to Holla Forums, the first is a low quality meme, the second is a high quality meme. Lmao.

Said who?

Who fucking cares who or what created a meme? You're acting like a spoiled child. Why don't you just watermark all the donut steel memes you don't want to see in others' hands?

I never said you were.
Geez, insecure much?

Both posted in that thread, one as an example of how low effort leftypols memes apparently are and the other as a less epic xdddd rebuttal to us

hi Holla Forums

You overtly implied it. Is English not your first language or something?

Holla Forums is the Facebook of Holla Forums

Clearly the only people who don't are the ones who are sour grapes about the fact their respective board is unable to generate any OC due to the community's collective lack of creativity.

No one in that thread said that the second meme was high quality.
The text in the same post was:
">tfw he's not only a commie but also a horse fucker"

If Holla Forums is the Facebook of Holla Forums then Holla Forums is the Tumblr of Holla Forums.

It's what you guys post so, with utter Facebook tier shit like that who are you to make fun of our memes? You just don't like them because you want to not like them due to ideology.

kek
is it yours?
Because you're reading things that aren't there.

You have to go back.

Yeah, we're the sour grapes when half of that thread you posted and the thread you posted here is just pure salt of "MUH MEEEEMEMSSS TTAKE MEY MEMEKS SRS GUISE GIVE ME RESPECCK"

They just want to be noticed.

Hi Holla Forums

All boards on Holla Forums contain Facebook-tier images.
The difference between Holla Forums and Holla Forums is that 5% of posted images on Holla Forums are good OC but every image posted on Holla Forums is utter garbage or from a different board.

I didn't say that.
Tumblr does however have far more actual leftists when compared to other popular social media sites. Maybe a minority in comparison to liberals and socdems, but still size-able.

I'm from the front page.
Also I should probably mention that you sound really butthurt right now.

Just wanted to point out that you did imply he was a newfag.
You're never going to seize the means of production with such a base level understanding of the English language user.

Why else would they try to start irrelevant board drama?

Yeah, so butthurt that I made two threads referring to Holla Forums memes.

Even with an understanding of English, its never going to happen anyway.
Most leftists seemingly lack the ability to complete some of the most basic human tasks, such as washing themselves properly.

I don't think you are quoting the correct person, I'm not the OP of either thread.

Don't blame me for your poor reading comprehension, fam.
Read it again.
I'm sure you'll get it eventually.
I'm sure looking at porn all day on Holla Forums takes a toll on the eyes.

In either case, the fact that you're here still complaining about stolen memes, implying that we've never EVER, God forbid, made any OC, really sheds some light as to metric of proximal "butthurt."

If I'm wrong, post some high quality and worthwhile memetic Holla Forums OC.

Fuck off back to reddit.

no thanks.

I'm not from Holla Forums, but if I see someone being a retard I'm going to point it out. Whether they're from my side or not.
Stop embarrassing us and yourself.

Hilarious

Post OC that has been popular outside of Holla Forums rather than the idea of subjective quality.

Maybe you haven't heard of Holla Forums's numerous successful raids on /r/the_Donald.

Hi Holla Forums

Hi Holla Forums

report submitted
captcha: cuqkold

...

Not from Holla Forums.
Also leftism is inherently a part of anti-anonymity culture.
2channel, Futaba Channel, IBLE, 4chan, Holla Forums, etc. = Right-Wing Dominant

I never said specially that.
I meant perhaps other boards on Holla Forums or similar websites.

Ancap ball was made by 4chan Holla Forums.

Do you have a single fact to back that up?

Embarrassing

Didn't say you were. But you have to go back somewhere.
Sure.

I just did.
Every single sizable anonymity-based website goes right-wing eventually.

[citation needed]

funny
I haven't detected one the whole thread.

So do you have to be shot by a bullet to know that it hurts?

Read:

youtube.com/watch?v=I0WQ-MW2M9E

How does that mean that the left is inherently anti-anonymity? It's like saying fast food restaurants are built by fat people because they tend to congregate there.

So you're admitting that Holla Forums is dangerous?

Dangerously retarded.

kek
this just keeps getting better

This board is such a shitshow it's fun, I should come by more often.

"Anonymous" members are 13 year old Facebook users who pretend to be l33t hax0r.

It happens 100% of the time with every non-dead site though.

We're always laughing at you Holla Forums

As soon as you advocate for racial identity politics, distinguishing posters with IDs as well, you are inherently anti-anonymity even if by default a namefield is blank and you are formally a proponent.

...

Not from Holla Forums.

t. Holla Forums

...

Nigga, point out causation, or you don't have an argument.
Like, nigga, it's not even that hard lel.

You are missing the point. You are saying that 4chan, Holla Forums whatever is majority right-wing and therefore pro-user, however it's precisely the opposite when you are of that right-wing.

Pointing out a causation is an impossible task.
To come to a conclusion, people do tests thousands of times over to demonstrate a link, but inherently it still relies on correlation.
Maybe smoking doesn't actually cause lung cancer and its just pure coincidences every time.
So is refusing the clear link of culture divide when it happens 100% of the time.

The typical Holla Forums user doesn't get to set the board rules.
Also this board is worse than them, seeing that people here use flags and trips unironically.

And the typical Holla Forums user nonethelesss plays in the game of identity politics, which is always inherently anti-anonymity.

First one isn't even a meme, you tard.

Holla Forums confirmed for laughing stock of Holla Forums.

Call me when they have a theory to discuss in the first place.

Not really.
Just find substantial evidence for the cause.

They've done controlled experiments with carcinogens in cigarettes, so poor analogy.

Except, when you throw out all other possible factors and say it's simply "inherently anti-anonymity", it kind of is.

Sorry about your autism. I hear it's a terrible affliction, but Temple Grandin made it work for her.

They don't.
Shitposting is the only blood that fuels them.

We didn't earn most despised board on h8chan for nothing.

This has nothing to do with anonymous online culture. Anonymous online culture entails the rejection of giving out verifiable information about your real life self and the rejection of creating permanent links between which posts each poster makes. Except for posters who take pictures of their real life selves (which goes against anonymous culture, but this board has had threads designated for this before too), all of Holla Forums could be black for all we know, it doesn't matter if they post "I'm white!" since it isn't verifiable.
Yeah, you will find them on the ban list usually.

Subjective
Impossible to prove if it is 100% controlled, other factors could be at play that simply haven't been/aren't observable.

ie anonymous online culture entails the rejection of giving out identities.

...

Also
I thought you said you weren't Holla Forums.

No, it rejects giving out verifiable identities.

You can verify any identity as long as its yours.

Visiting Holla Forums a few times doesn't make me a Holla Forums regular, just as I browsing here a few times doesn't make me a Holla Forums regular.
What I have noticed is that tripfags are basically non-existent on Holla Forums, which I found out is because they get banned.

I meant as in others being able to verify your identity.

This is hilarious. You really need some special kind of autism to act like this. Or be like fucking 12.

In either case, the identity politics isn't something that we want.
Here, something relevant, since you wanted some popular Holla Forums OC too.
Now goodnight, and try not to get too riled up.

Is having stronger associations than others subjective?
Also, if that's the case, then you talked yourself out of an argument to begin with.

Yo, you're not going to find that anywhere, and that argument slices both ways.

sauron? notre dame?

I doubt you have ever read past a maximum of two right-wing books, yet I bet you love to debate right-wingers.

No one outside Holla Forums would use that.

Find me one non-dead anonymity-based site that is left-wing dominant.

Why would anyone read a book about a failed ideology that only edgy liberal teenagers care about?

Subjective :DDD

Provide an example of a board where that image is popular outside of Holla Forums.

All examples are subjective.

Show me the causal relationship :^)

I already stated earlier that it is impossible to 100% prove causation.

Why does Holla Forums read about failed states only liberal socdems care about?
Hitler was a gun control advocate, liberals are gun control advocates. Hitler was pro-abortion, liberals are pro-abortion. Hitler was an animal rights freak, liberals are animal rights freaks. Need I say more?

...

You're retarded.
Nothing you have presented is evidence, you've just stated that there is commonly a right wing presence on anonymous websites.

(Checked)
When someone wants to make fun of Holla Forums.
Checkmate nazis ;^)

Then by your standard, it's also 100 percent impossible to prove the causation between leftism and anti-anonymity.
So you don't have an argument.
Besides, I'm not asking for causation based on certainty, I'm asking it based on scientific standards. It's the same rigor that you are already attempting to apply. It's not that hard, dude. Quit squirming around the argument, and just do it already.

Why are you bringing up Holla Forums in a thread about Holla Forums making fun of Holla Forums?
More irrelevant nonsense? If you want to, I guess.

That's because we're not arguing.

If you're going to call us liberals then you omitting our counter is pretty telling as to how deep the bias goes.

Yes, because Holla Forums isn't one person, and just about no one on there fully worships Hitler as if he was 100% perfect.
Hitler allowed quarter-Jews and whites to mate, which clearly goes against Holla Forums's values.

If you want I can linked webpages that demonstrate that this is the case for all non-dead anonymity-based sites, but I'm sure you are already aware of it.

Yes, therefore the next stage is to go off the basis where the biggest correlation occurs (which in this case is 100% of the time).
Science relies on correlation that happens to occur multiple times when an experiment is reproduced.

...

Any form of Hitler reference leads you right back into liberalism.

Into the trash you go.

...

...

Nice proof.

Who in this thread was pretending to be a "normie"?

No, the next stage is to rule out any other variables, likely by setting up a controlled experiment. Do you even scientific method?
This is highschool level stuff, my man.

Except that this isn't an experiment, number one.
Two, correlation is only useful when it serves a purpose, like finding causation or forming a hypothesis. Congrats, you are at the hypothetical stage.

Anyone who says that Holla Forums memes are too specialised to use outside of Holla Forums.

This is true

Impossible to know if you have ruled out all other variables.
Impossible to know if it is a controlled experiment.

Name an example of a popular board (or website) other than Holla Forums that commonly uses memes that were created by Holla Forums.

Hopefully, none, normie.

Nice

Yes. Every. Single. One.

Also to elaborate on my point about scientific standards, the current scientific consensus is that dark matter exists, despite it actually never being observed before and what is to be considered fringe scientists may be able prove it wrong very soon.

Get a load of this normie.
Pick one, normalfag.

Holla Forums was as well once.
In fact the author of that particular article used a quote from a poster on here as a method of attacking the supposed "alt-right", therefore clearly liberal democracy and the media prefer this board.

What the fuck are you on about now?
Also, if you have someone quoting Holla Forums then you already have the example you asked for prior, and are just arguing in bad faith.

>Holla Forums who is not Holla Forums as always
Naw, you think they'd do that?

I'll see if I can find the article, but the author linked to a post on here to illustrate the "alt-right" in a negative matter.
It wasn't a meme though and it only happened once.

Nice us vs them mentality.

So let's just not attempt to get closer to the causal relationship, and choose the answer that feels right, right?

Might as well go "Feels over reals" then, am i right?

Are you bored of this smoke screen yet?
I mean, I'm having fun watching you try to wriggle out of this, but don't you have anime or porn to jack it to?

WEW LAD

t. totally not Holla Forums

...

...

useful idiots for Holla Forums are just as corrosive, so it doesn't matter.

What's up with Holla Forums and sonic?

Yes, and the result of that would be coming to the conclusion that leftism is overall anti-anonymity culture due to all non-dead anonymity websites being dominated by right-wingers, otherwise what different factors would be causing that to occur?

Even if it only happens once, its still a representation.

Judging by the clear rejection of my statement, it seems as if you are more likely to be from Holla Forums yourself due to users typically having a tribalism-based ideology.

Where did I say that?

Sonic's desire to go fast, as it were, reflects naturally this great upset, or overturning of the republican party. Now, and I say republican, but the democrats are guilty of this too and so on, that we must always be movink forward, but never do we really go anywhere. So too is this election that these seemingly major changes to come are to stay still to come. But, let me say, Trump is scum, though I think this where he will nuke the world and do genocide and whatever I am *sniff* more skeptical of.

Trump will do no such thing. Trump will do nothing, he will be like Obama.

Before you say something like:
you also have to consider that anonymity-based websites in countries where right-wing culture dominates (such as Japan) also demonstrate the same patterns.

Just like how Trump wasn't going to be the candidate for the Republican Party and just like how Trump wasn't going to win the election?

So what

They're just mad that leftypol keeps growing and their shitty echo chamber keeps shrinking

Communism will win

I thought i made it obvious I was being facetious, but I guess I have to spell it out for you.

If you're doing science, one of the the goals should be to get as close to causation as possible. If you throw up your hands the moment you find a single correlation that suits you, that is nothing more than confirmation bias. That's exactly what you are doing right now.

What other possible correlations can be made about this specific topic of user count?
If there is other factors at play that I'm not aware of, please demonstrate them.

They guy is using a generalization fallacy in general:
Imageboards are predominantly right wing.
Imageboards are also anonymous.
Therefore all right wingers are for anonymity.

OR

Anons are predominantly right wing.
Anons are on imageboards.
Therefore all Anons are right-wing imageboards

Nigga, it's not my job to find variables for you to rule out. Do you want me to do your homework too? You're the one who fancies yourself a budding scientist. I'm just explaining the process, because apparently you aren't even aware of that. If you want to be taken seriously, find a way to eliminate the potential for confirmation bias on your part. It's not that hard, just look at evidence with a critical lens from now on. No hard feelings, but christ, use your head, kid. I've got to get some sleep before work, good luck.

also, this