This is a friendly reminder of WHY WE HAVE THE SECOND FUCKING AMENDMENT!
PIC FUCKING RELATED I'M TIRED OF EVERY MEDIA OUTLET IGNORING HISTORY
Send this to your dumbass friends and relatives with a smiley
Sorry for the rant but God fucking damn it we're going to regret giving up our guns
With the phrase "Use it or lose It" it's the best of our rights, as it helps ensure others are followed. We gotta fight this one hard. Meme responsibly and we're golden.
When Putin tells you to do something, ya do it. Don't give up your guns. Never ever.
Who is we and who is giving up their guns you dumb cunt?
Remove Germany from the list and add citations.
Fake Washington quote. Don’t spread it.
I want a job where I just compile megamurder stats all day. Then go on dates and tell the women I work in accounting.
...
Thats funny because everything RT has ever said about guns has been gun grabber kike horseshit.
Isn’t he a yid?
Your jewdar needs fixing
...
If you're a cop, you already regret 2012 like a motherfucker. Now put the gun in your fucking mouth for being a traitor to your leader.
Looking at cuckchan is pissing me off. All those retarded newfaggots there can't argue their way out of a paperbag against the shills. All gun control arguments we've been through thousands of times already and we're not the only ones who came to the conclusion gun control is bullshit
The CDC did a massive study and said gun control didn't work.
The EU did a study and said gun control didn't work.
The National Police did a study on gun control and said it didn't work.
The INTERPOL did a study on gun control and said it didn't work.
The fucking National Academy of Sciences need a study on gun control and said it didn't work.
It just goes on and on.
Even if it did a little, guns in America are a pandora's box. There's no going back now and all the mass shootings are in gun free zones worst rates are in places where gun control is at its highest. It's over.
Nobody outside of Belgium disputes working Congolese to death to build railroads, harvest rubber, an mine every mineral known to man. Right or wrong it happened.
We just have to counter them with infographics. Have any handy? I'm not on my usual computer
Stop you there, faggot.
The only argument I ever make against gun control is, I think, the strongest one possible: Criminals, by definition, are willing to break the law. Law-abiding people, again by definition, are not. Gun control takes weapons that can be used for defense against niggers out of the hands of one group and leaves them in the hands of the other. Loose restrictions on ownership, however, does the exact opposite.
All I want are arguments that give lefties pause before demanding a gun ban
Spreading with Washington as the source shooped out, maybe? Whomever said it; it's a worthy message. Thanks for pointing this out to me. While history is among my top favorite things to study, quotes, especially old ones I'll mix up. Like a Jew and first post. Every. Fucking. Time.
I'm having a look around for some ammo to use on social medias. I humbly ask that anyone's 2A folder, be shared freely. Thank you guys!
What a coincidence. I've been looking for a joke that will make armed robbers not take my wallet.
They don't give a fuck, user. Do you think they're trying to impose gun bans because the logic is impeccable? Or is it because 90% of salt-left niggers are emotional crippled cultists, and the other 10% glow in the fucking dark?
Man, it's a good thing Vegas has such loose laws regarding firearm possession so all those armed citizens could stop that crazed gunman before he killed anyon…
…oh wait.
Another angle of nogunz is increasing the number of "gun-free zones" (despite CCLs) using metal detectors
You reading quora too?
Frank McCown, Answered 1h ago:
le upvote this
The 2A isn't there to stop random faggots, though it does that as well plenty. It exists to stop high ranking faggots.
when will it end?
I'll accept any argument that will penetrate the thick skull of a socialist. Hell, make an argument that gun control is patriarchal and I'll repost
You're trying to reason with things incapable of sentient thought. Why argue against them? Just push the normies in the right direction and the socialist scum don't matter.
Speaking as a former socialist nogunz I'll have to disagree. I have no problem trying to convince Normies either. Whatever is efficacious
Are the lefties in social media ready now to be the new communist party enforcing thought-purity all over America?
The people pushing gun control aren't commies; they're NWO
Poland 1.5mln dead. 45-48
What where wtf. We had some fights with Ukrainians, but gov kills? What bullshit is this.
There was no repression behind the curtain?
Source (i believe):
hawaii.edu
The time for arguments and jokes are over, more or less. It's all a waiting game until we have enough people to actually win this thing, then the shooting starts. The polarization is progressing because the kikes WANT the war too, they think they'll win because they have the tech and the ability to blackmail. They think they'll ride it out in new zealand and switzerland as usual.
The key is for kiwi and swiss anons to be ready for that, for anons the world over to be the standalone immune response that we really need.
We're all just waiting to finally take the war to this virus that has corrupted and crippled our people, our minds, our world, our everything. Take the war to it and expunge it for good.
No more jews.
No more muslims.
No more (((elite))) psychopaths.
Kill them all.
So you concede that it doesn't help with average crimes. Glad to see someone admit it.
…I always love the "we have it to stop governments" argument. It always seems to assume that either civilians can overpower their own military (arguing that their own military is inept, and worse at fighting than poorly armed/trianed) civilians, or they go with the "the military wouldn't fight for the government" counter, which then assumes that the government they need the 2A to fight is… a bunch of politicians walking down the streets?
lol. If your guns can't stop average people from killing each other in massive numbers (which statistics prove, and you just conceded) then they're useless, because they won't be able to stop a tyrannical government lead military, and they aren't needed against a military-less government.
He includes labor camps, starvation, etc.
Mao had his peasants kill all the birds they could, because the birds ate some of the crops. Then after all the birds were dead, there were plagues of insects and massive crop failures, so millions of chinese starved to death.
If Holla Forums wants to do REAL good in the world, we have a simple objective: kill every jew, muslim and "elite" psychopath, then go back to minding our own business aka shitposting.
Gotcha sempai!
The Australian one can be used as a slippery slope of removing rights as well as showing that anything can be used as a weapon.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
regulated = equipped
Since a well equipped militia is necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
they never understand it. the context given is clearly militarily. a well regulatared army isn't an army with a bunch of bylaws. fucking dumbass normalfags. the founding fathers warned against this. dumbass masses raised without a guidance to be let free reign in our society.
one of the easiest ways to get them to understand this is just ask them, if they think it applies to only the military, what's the point of putting it in the bill of rights?
what country has ever explicitly said "our military has the right to bear arms"? And is saying that so important that it would be the second ammendment to the constitution? Like, do they think the founders waited a decade and a half and then were like "oh fuck we totally forgot to give our military the right to have weapons shit we have to fix that"?
that normally get's their almonds activated
Sigh…
Like many words which have been deliberately twisted to change the meaning of the Constitution (like "welfare"), regulated in 1776 meant something different than morons use that term today. It merely means to make regular so that when the states have militias (there were no standing armies), they would have the same command structure and likely the same equipment.
However, this is besides the point because the second amendment only mentions the militia as one of the reason WHY the right of individuals to bear arms must not be infringed. If you know English the meaning becomes clear
Raised without guidance on purpose. You want to know the real reason for our troubles? The jews are a pestilence, sure, but the real reason for our troubles is that over the centuries, our "elites" have time and again sacrificed the long term good of the people in exchange for short term pleasures.
The old wealthy families, the administrators, bureaucrats, politicians, bankers, industrialists, they sold us out centuries ago. Kings and warlords did it too. Charlemagne, William the Conqueror, Cromwell, over and over again whites get sold out by the whites at the top, then other whites who get a few crumbs keep their fellow whites down. Because nobody is scared of whites like fellow whites. They know exactly how dangerous they are. Imagine this scenario: You and a few buddies with rifles versus 100 shitskins similarly armed, and you're on home turf. You think a few nogs or shitskins really pose any credible threat? Of course they don't. It would be long and bloody, but we'd win in the end. No war is over in a weekend.
But who's really keeping whites down?
White cops, white soldiers, white politicians, white bureaucrats, all shortsighted little cucks who care more about their short term comfort than the good of their people. That's the real root of the issue. The jews are the opportunistic infection, but traitor whites are the AIDS in our society.
Traitors before enemies, but jews before either.
...
...
Ginsberg (84) and Kennedy (81) are both old as fuck. If we're lucky, Trump gets two more picks.
what really pisses me off is the situation in California, which affects me when I travel there
Anything to do with california would get struck down by a supreme court with actual justices on it.
It's almost wholly ignored by the shills, but the biggest win for us in getting Trump elected are the supreme court nominations. Imagine Shillary with 2-4 supreme court picks.
Nofuns here, since last week I was gonna get around $500-600 something Friday from my paycheck but now that it happened I don't know if what is gonna be too late.
Laws don't get passed in a week, newfag. Didn't you take civics?
...
No I skimmed through that in senior year mostly took financial/economics
This is your brain on leftism, people.
tl;dw, bills sit in committee for ages, then there's a vote to put it to the floor of the house/senate, then the other chamber has to vote on it too, then the president has to sign it.
It's a long, long, long fucking process.
>aka (((mel bernstein)))
Seems like a pre-'86 hogging kike millionaire to me
wouldn't the main concern be supply/demand and price gouging?
if you're looking for something around that price range, I got an old chilean mauser in 7x57 for ~$450, and it's a good enough round for anything you'd need to shoot at. Even with my poor aim and even poorer vision, I can put ten shots in about two inches at 100 meters, nothing spectacular but certainly serviceable. maybe try to find something like that? depending on where you are, ammo might be tricky to find but you can get into reloading for like $100 if you get a hand press and a neck sizing die/bullet seater die, bullets, powder, and a cheap digital scale
All gun control acts in the west were ALWAYS following a 'event' where massive 'emotional' media drivel was spun to pass it. It laying on a shelf is a severe warning.
There are plenty of places that are actually against price gouging. If you want to get cheap weapons, go to /k/, they'll direct you where you want to go.
Every user should have either a full or intermediate power rifle, and a sidearm. Then spend the rest of your money on ammunition and rangetime.
Does it matter which FFL I put for the transfer? There's plenty of pawn shops and 2 gun shops nearby.
It really matters which FFL you use. Some are cool, some are dicks. Find a local guy in your area, gun shops by and large are run by shekel-grabbing kikes, so look hard for either a shop or just a gunsmith who's white and local. My transfers are half what the shops normally cost because I use a local guy.
I've always wanted Nazi memorabilia and a few weapons, but I wouldn't know where to keep it. Thing I want most is a high qaulity flag but I couldn't put that up.
s-sorry I'm still a n00b to firearms. I will say though, something that really helps with rangetime is to try and see if your state has public shooting ranges. Mine does, two of which I've been to. They're both free of charge, so that cuts out range dues and reloading let's you shoot cheaper than premade ammo.
>commit to going to the range at least once a month personally I go once every other week at most, preferably once a week
honestly the most important things have nothing to do with the gun itself, if you're a noob any gun you get will outshoot you, and when you get to the point it won't you'll know more than me
As for the rifle, imo, judge for where you live I guess. I have a slightly heavier round than the 223/556 standard bc there are mountain lions and black bears where I am, but if you just live in a city maybe go with like an AR?
sage bc not really Holla Forums topic
The left is tweaking demographics with 'immigration' so they's have a solid majority in the country.
Their imminent majority is a key reason for the constant attack on the 2nd amendment. If we're unarmed, government becomes the tool of the new permanent ruling class. If we're armed, it gets messy and the majority might falter and go a bit right.
Fucking good point. 50 dead is nothing compared to millions dead under government tyranny.
Individual people, not million of dead.
If i understand it correctly, he made up 1,5mln dead Germans, when they escaped from red army or were deported. It's some joke.
Regardless of your thoughts on the subject you are emperically wrong there, he did not concede that and in fact stated the opposite.
The "it does that as well plenty" part is him not conceding what you said he conceded.
t. Argumentsfag
you are bait, someone this dumb did not find Holla Forums
Maybe there is something about the history of your own country that isn't commonly admitted
I'm reading about it, yes, it seems germans were dying when they were leaving lands during the war/after when borders changed, it's estimated at 400k, germans say it's higher. It's still bad, sure. But tough, changing of borders wasn't even our idea, and it was done to make ethnic states, so a good idea.
Yet he blocks tor and other vpns.
Let's be honest: the reason that they died was because Poles hated Germans
A guy on kikebook posted this, "Justifying and defending the right to own multiple high-powered, semi-automatic rifles and suggesting, implying or insinuating that gun-laws shouldn't change because "killers kill people, not guns" is lazy, stubborn, ignorant and WRONG."
What's a good way to destroy him?
SURVEILLANCE IS PEDOPHILIA
Look it up.
Were it me I'd call him out on thinking with his limbic system instead of his neocortex, then hit him with facts
No, they werent killed, it was diseases and similar stuff. Germany didnt want to take them too btw.
The military won't fight for the government, until it is majority black/latino. Military whites will then side with their team and be further aided by civilians having arms. Assuming this doesn't happen, the point isn't to possess guns in order to defeat the tyrannical government, but to deter them from sparking bloodshed and let us live in peace. no one actually enjoys mass bloodshed right at their backdoor. Even of the government would win, the struggle required for victory is enough to deter it from beginning.
I did a little bit of researching, the SAFE act passed in New York was exactly a month after Sandy Hook Dec 14 2012 and the safe was passed January 15 2013
Eternal Russkie and most Anglos put the deaths from WW2 on Germany + the 6 gorillian.
No shekels for you, you missed the first post. You do it for free no matter how many (you)s you farm.
Hate to break it to ya my dude but that argument is one that literally everyone and their grandmother makes when the issue of gun control comes up. It obviously doesn't sway the kikes. The better, and more relevant, argument would be to of course bring up how most gun violence are in places with the highest gun control. Where do these assholes always gun for? Public events, schools, federal buildings, crowded areas in gun free zones, etc. Never, not fucking once, has there ever been a gun store, shooting range, weapons depot, hunters bar, or even a sports goods store that's ever been robbed or had a massacre take place at. I can only wonder why
MUH 2nd AMENDMENT MOTHERFUCKERS!
no thanks, my scattergun works just fine
I'm annoyed with the GOPe readily wanting to ban ebil assault bump stocks. The fudd pundits trying to sound intelligent about guns is fucking grating.
Enjoy dying.
I forgot to mention flaking on the HPA. 2018 can't come soon enough. Purge.
there's no reason to engage past 100 yards unless if you're an ebin sniper or providing suppressive fire.
Absolutely no knowledge of military maneuvers confirmed. Enjoy not even hearing the bullet that kills you, kike.
buy a bump stock if you can find one
I was once friends with a /k/ tier furry from AZ (he only ever posted on old /vp/, imageboards are too "hivemindy").
Faggot is pro gun control and jerks off to science,and I FUCKING KNOW he would disregard your post and latch onto any one institution that said otherwise as being "interesting and innovative"
He encouraged gays to donate blood in LV to help, and said to not mention they were gay
i feel like it's supposed to be the implied fourth branch of government. an integral check and balance
Was someone in the concert area going to pull out their sniper rifle and hit the guy on the 32nd floor? If you were on the same floor as the shooter and heard shots being fired in another room, you wouldn't try to break down his door with your pistol in your hand knowing he has an assault rifle on the other side. That's just suicide.
...
Holy fuck, ShariaBlue is making political hay out of a tragedy. I'm shocked, shocked.
Fuck off Holla Forums.
Hey, I'm convicted of a class C felony thats been expunged. I was underage when I did it and was given a differed disposition. Which I completed a few years back. I am getting conflicting reports online about whether or not I can buy a gun.
Some lawyers say that technically, I am not a felon and no official organizations can label me a felon.
Others say I need to petition the state for my rights back.
What should I do now that its happening. I wanna get a gun before shit hits the fan, but I dont wanna risk a strawsale and get charged with a crime.
Ask /k/, or a real lawyer in your state who specializes in firearm matters.
you can try to purchase a gun, and if the check fails then you can appeal it
Counting all the fun other people had?
Too soon?
Yeah, like malnutrition.
Ever seen the movie Land of Mine? It understated reality
wtf
Yes.
Tell him if it bothers him so much then convene a constitutional convention and write a new one.
At the cost of the civilians sparking bloodshed…
That's quite a tradeoff… one I'm glad I don't have to worry about.
Exactly! Having your own gun wouldn't do shit.
Ergo "I need muh guns to defend myself from criminals with guns" is a flawed argument.
…and "I need muh guns to defend myself from my government" is equally so.
speak for yourself Nigger
He's speaking for everyone who's not a cuck
Oh yeah, taking guns away is only temporary, Imagine the look on Chad's face when some scrawny, nose-ringed antifag shows up at his door with a gun informing him that Cletus, Jamal and their families are moving in to his suburban home.
The idea is you take guns away from everyone, then give them only to a minority of political ideologues to enslave, enforce the new commie order.
Pic is a bit dodgy OP.
Death-count in China is based om failure in their medieval agriculture, same goes for the USSR, that only gets that death-count by Solzhenitsyn, who counts every abortion as communist murder.
Same goes for Germany.
Capitalist Greul-propaganda-statistics
-A scholar
Well, at least its accurate labeling.
Holodomor.
Kill yourself Gommie scum.
Updated version.
Another good way to explain to illiterates is to change it up a little:
Who has the right to keep and eat food, the people or a balanced diet?
So the fuck are you proposing then?
My government has a pretty shitty track record against guerrilla forces in wooded areas. Plus, fighter jets and drones can't come knocking on doors… you need men for that. Men can be killed.
I think he was proposing surrendering to the juden,
...
Straw purchase is if someone other than you purchases. You'll have to get a lawyer in your state to clear you regardless. Trying to get a gun while a felon is, surprise, a felony.
Using this.
It's not about convincing the lefties. We know that's a lost cause. It's about convincing apolitical/fence-sitter normalfags. Left uncontested, far too many of them buy the TV's story:
I've had reasonable success engaging and converting these types with real arguments. They never hear this stuff, because obviously the TV doesn't promote it, so we lose by default, but when we actually make our case, we can win.
I find ridicule is the first best option.
Then bring up the fact that the state is not trustworthy. Do they think only Trump should have guns?
...
...
Nice - also using this.
...
...
...
What the hell happened to the dude in the car-theft? He was running, then he just sat down for a second, then decided to go lie down and give up?
Nigger got shot.
...
...
...
That's about all I've got.
You do if someone who isn't a real man is going to try to shoot you. All of the platitudes in the world won't help you much if someone unloads a bullet between your eyes.
Nothing personal, but why don't you just teleport behind them?
Nothing right now. I'm making a point. The fact that you're trying to distract from it shows that you've gotten it. ;)
I'll give you a hint though since you'll probably deny it: before we figure out how to change something, we first need to determine IF it should be changed.
…and it should.
Not sure why they'd need to knock if they're actively trying to kill dissenters. I could be wrong though, was door-knocking a big strategy in other wars overseas?
…and I recall a few historical solutions to heavily wooded areas.
...
hi numale
You're suggesting that maybe they'll kill their citizens indiscriminately and destroy their own land and cities? Maybe but it's not like we've gone full commie yet. They'll be really eager to rule over scorched earth and corpses?
Do you think that an American Civil War would not attract the attention of the whole world? You think that maybe some countries would have an interest in seeing our government overthrown and offer assistance?
They are some crazy motherfuckers. They are basically one of the few groups who tries to actually out jew the SPLC, ADL, ACLU.
Considering they put some serious donations towards groups like the Heller Foundation, they are okay in my book… For now.
What the fuck was that supposed to be?
Holy shit. I think that guy overtook Italy as the world's leading producer of spaghetti.
ALSO A REMINDER TO THOSE ANTI-GUN FAGGOTS
Remind them too that writing in more laws does FUCKING NOTHING for either black market gun deals or the gun hobbyists that will put together shit just for shits and giggles. All it does is get rid of "assured to fire and work" firearms. John Smith who decided to craft a fucking firearm himself and has gotten pretty fucking good at it can bypass all of this shit.
I mean there's a fucking guy in germany that has a youtube channel dedicated to making custom slingshots and using hard candy as an easy alternative ammunition. You can craft shit yourself.
Fuck off Poland. You don't get to steal 5 million ethnic Germans, persecute them, blame yours and the Russian's pogroms on Germany, and then get to pretend because you also hate shitskins too that you are one of us.
You can suck a German dick. Forever.
Smiley you say?
pastebin.com
…Hate to break it to you, but I'm not the one worrying about that happening.
But to make my opponent's arguments for them: sure they would, if they encountered too much resistance, or do you think if their enemies fought back the military would just change their minds and leave?
Is the US military just a bunch of cowards now?
Man, good thing that's not MY argument then.
In fact there's an even better solution to getting rid of guns that addresses Mr John Smith there.
Crime goes down amongst civilians as well.
I always love when gun advocates claim that more guns=less crime, in spite of the fact that the US having the most guns doesn't put them anywhere NEAR the lowest crime.
So yeah… no. Unless you wanna argue that the US just doesn't have enough guns yet…>>10722705
It's niggers killing niggers that gives the US its crime rates if you are dropping the "real talk" and shit. 95% of murders happen in 5% of counties. There's a bit of correlation with densely populated counties, but a stronger one with nigger infested ones, you do the math. And you tell me if gun laws are going to fix that problem. As demonstrated in Chicago.
Even if that were true, so what? It still proves that guns aren't the solution.
In fact your argument is that getting rid of niggers is the solution. Not guns.
The fact that you can't see the difference is really sad.
Also, hello from a country that has less crime, less guns, and comprable racial demographics. Somehow our "niggers" are shooting people less, but surely it can't be because they have less guns.
Maybe we're just better at handling them? lol.
Also where did I ever say ANYTHING about gun laws? You gun advocates are all the same.
Once the "should" argument starts escaping you, you suddenly default to the "how" argument as a red herring. It's really sad. How about before we discuss HOW to get rid of guns, we settle the discussion on IF we should.
…but then you'd have to face the same crumbling arguments you types always use, and clearly never thought through too hard.
TL:DR I never said how I would propose getting rid of them, because I'm currently showing WHY they should. How comes later.
consider my almonds activated
...
Why is this controversial or hard for any of the commies to understand?
Go back to leddit, faggot.
...
I'm not the one that brought them up, genius.
Nice copy-paste strawman. Must be nice to not have to actually think, and just assume everyone has the same argument?
...
Come to reality, you'll enjoy it here.
Come to reality, you'll enjoy it here.
The majority of the gun violence is from gangs. Don't lump in suicides & accidents with gun violence in order to disarm your country,if you do you're no better than the liberal press who moved the corpse of a child to take better pictures to push a political agenda.
Which is reason enough.
Suicides sure, but why not accidents? I don't know about you but I'd love to see as many fewer sources of fatal accidents as I can.
I mean if it comes down to 'person gets accidentally killed by gun' versus 'person lives' I see no reason not to include that. It's still less death.
INB4: "b-but car accidents!"
Yup. Immediately discount the point you can't refute.
By that logic:
Guess you guys have a lot you can't refute then.