How come every time the left is butthurt, like in Brexit or 2016 US election...

You Holla Forumsacks clearly don't know shit.
archive.is/ybyu9

You're a cult. I'm laughing. I don't think I can save you but it's so funny.

So this is a Holla Forums bait thread then, huh?

You're the leftist version of OBAMA IS A REPTILIAN MUSLIM COMMUNIST

Fuck off back to reddit

k

Fuck off back to pol.

Not anymore, the elections are over and Sanders started to shit on the Dems again for alienating white voters.

...

I answered you're question. They're doing it because they're rejecting Trump. Trump is a white nationalist, so they're reporting white nationalist propaganda to get their friends angry too.

But why does this concern you. Seems like a pretty specific thing to be morbidly curious about

Socialists are principled opponents of imperialism even. Consider the first world war this imperialist war started out in Europe and it primarily involved white men. Socialists were the main opponents of involvement in this war. As the Zimmerwald manifesto said "Europe is like a gigantic human slaughterhouse." The ruling classes of Europe were content to send millions of white men to die well the socialist movements that represented the working class opposed the war.

Liberals primarily represent the bourgioisie that it to say the elite who make money off of the exploitation of labour and the lumpen proletariat who acquire wealth through criminality. In order to do this they use identity politics as a method, by telling people that they cannot discriminate this benefits the bourgioisie who want to export migrants for cheap labour to reduce wages and the lumpen proletariat (many of who are black, latino, or some other muh oppressed group) who steal from working class people. Socialists on the other hand support the working class - the entire working class - which is completely different from liberals.

The problem is that there is no genuine working class movement in the United States of imperialism due to a long history of suppression. Since the first red scare which happened immediately after the first world war working class movements have been oppressed in the United States. There was a second red scare after the second world war. Afterwards, we have propaganda and the intelligency agencies to suppress any genuine working class movement.

Maybe they're associating white people with white nationalism because perpetuated by white people.

In the same way you conflate all muslims with Islamic terrorism

Imageboards were a mistake

If you're an alt rightist supporting fascism, you're a serf supporting feudalism

You don't seem to confident if you're worried about pussy liberals bitching about your stupid stunts on facebook

Please read the entire post.

Then and now.

Also don't lie about socialist motivation, and don't neglect the tens of millions that died due to socialist imperialism and totalitarianism. In fact, I don't recall capitalists ever having a quota for killing people when taking over a territory as socialists did. Some socialists even went as far as executing everyone with glasses because they "must be intellectuals" and intellectuals are bad.

Fascism and nationalism are both tools to get useful idiots like you to die for the bourgeoisie

...

You're obviously a stupid Jew if you think that. I bet you have thick black hair and a big nose

I did. The whole post is one big straw man mistaking socialists for liberals. Then you say "then why the fuck do you ALWAYS support the same causes" I explained that WE DON'T. Liberals support the bourgeoisie and socialists support the working class.

Its not a lie, socialists are anti-imperialist and socialists opposed world war one even though mostly white men died there - well fascists supported the war. You have no rebuttal to this.

This is completely made up nonsense.

tbh in fairness I don't think you're a real Holla Forums poster, just a shitty troll.

Never heard of this one, elaborate.

Yet I'm the one who is a troll lmao

...

Khmer Rouge was one, look it up.

Nobody here supports the khmer rouge

He is nothing but a egomaniac who ran a populist campaign just so he could become president.

None of the liberals believe that. Why is it so important to that liberals accept Trump

Protip: if you don't want to look like a butthurt tryhard, then don't shit out the entire strawman folder at once
wait, you're anarchist, you are a butturt tryhard by default

...

Ahh okay, sorry about that.

Khmers were fucking funny in their batshittery, but nobody on the left likes them, even the professional Stalin apologetics are not fond of Pol Pot.

I love how nobody has been able to refute the singular point of the OP nor argue any pros that would outweigh being treated like a jew in Nazi Germany. Says a lot about leftism.

See you again in 7 months if I still remember you. You're still around two dozen or so SJWs and not a mover and shaker on the world stage like the real Holla Forums.

*tips*

It is always funny when a right wing SJW like yourself gets triggered by leftypol.

I did, liberals post butt hurt caused by fascists because they hate trump and fascism.

I think you're all scared that they're going to amp themselves up enough to actually do something to you nazis

I was expecting you to "declare" victory after having presented no coherent arguments other than leftism is evil!!!1

There was nothing to argue about to begin with
There was no argument proving this would happen.

Have that (You)

Why do you people communicate like histrionic teenagers?

And what's wrong about killing people? You are a corruption lover. You don't deserve to be alive.
Yes i believe every right winger should be shot. It is that simple.
They are cancer that ruined my country.

Oh yeah, like the riots that never happened after king obongo got elected…twice.

...

what the fuck is the second one even supposed to mean?

this never happens

kys

I don't protest with liberals. We supported brexit or didn't care at best. We also didn't support clinton. And we certainly don't support identity politics.

Holla Forums's attempts to connect us to their liberal boogeymen is getting a little silly at this point.

you're victim complex is just as bad as they people you're criticizing.

Many of the inventions racists like to claim genetic pride in, aren't even theirs, and many of their ancestors aren't as "white" as they deluded themselves into thinking.

It's also sad how he thinks 3000 autistic shitposters is somehow more relevant than 800 autistic shitposters. Like either board is somehow a real force to be reckoned with.

like what?

If their ancestors weren't white than how are they white?

corrupt maggot. You're nothing but a waste of oxygen. You're an ant waited to be squashed.

You seem just a tad bit salty. Do you want to talk about it?

Most of them, and through irrelevant shiting. By the way you guys are philosophically cucks.

They tried but they couldn't organize themselves, remember operation American Spring? Fucking pathetic.

Looks like your own word filters backfired on you, HAHAHA

pick one

I don't want massive third world immigration, I also don't think brown people should be treated like subhumans because they're poor or brown.

what is a "white man"

is it a spook?

I don't want to treat them like subhumans, I just don't want to interact with them at all.

true

You see, white is a color. Europeans have lighter skin than most other people, therefore they are referred to as "white". In a similar fashion sub Saharan Africans have darker skin than other races, therefore they are referred to as "black" people. I'm glad I could help you figure this out its very complicated.

t. world science statistics

If you're going to make a strawman at least have it make sense…

is that an important difference?

yes

Skin color is not an important difference, it's irrelevant. Race is an important difference, different races have separate sets of traits and biological makeups.

how is race important

Are you really that brain damaged?

Different races have different genetic diseases, different bone structures, different hormonal levels and different levels of intelligence.

If you say that "race is not important" then you are denying that biology is important.

wow thats a pretty spooky generalization

It's not a generalization, it's a fact.

you and your feelings belive in them and make them factual?

Different hair colours have different characteristics too. Your point being?

...

No, it can be measured numerically it has nothing to do with feels.

I already made my point, you haven't.

it can? how?

you reached a philosophical dead end

Intelligence can be measured in the form of Autism Level points, umm I guess you measure bones with calipers or something. Actually everything I mentioned can be measured numerically and scientifically.

Is part of being a "pirate" pretending to be retarded and asking inane questions?

oh wow i q has a word filter, nice free speech lol

We are Marx-loving socialists, communists and anarchists. We have nothing in common with liberals, including not being bigots, since most of them are closet xenophobes.

It's literally no different from nonwhites getting put off by conservative rhetoric and its tendency to blame them for societal ills, even when they are somewhat porky and would benefit from it. Divide and conquer. All part of the same status quo apologia.

Because you are retarded and can't tell the difference.

You're free to say anything you like, we're just making fun of you in the process

l.Q. measure knowledge not intelligence as intelligence is fluid

feel free to make the sense of the following prepositions

1.- l.Q. tests measure intelligence, and intelligence is fluid and not related to race or genetics at all, because people's l.Q. score changes if the material conditions change

2.- l.Q. doesn't measure intelligence, therefore we cannot measure intelligence, just knowledge

Logical Jujitsu kiddo, pick your poison

triggered, liberal?

Fuck off retard.

wow, it really makes you think

No, Autism Level measures intelligence.

k

Actually, both are wrong Autism Level measures intelligence It literally stands for Intelligence Quotient. Also, just because nurture plays a role in Intelligence doesn't discount the fact that nature is far more important.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study

try harder faggot.

Be honest

Have you even read the study, or are you just citing it because you've been told it says something you want to believe

No, Autism Level measures intelligence.
ok therefore Intelligence is fluid, not related to race or genetics

top kek

it isn't, lQ testa are affected in both a negative and a positive way by poverty, by a positive change in material conditions, by learning a new language and by the simple advancement of society as a whole, hence the Flynn effect

it isn't

kek

again, if lQ is a valid measurement, then intelligence is fluid, and not related by race alone, since lQ results are modified by a enviromental changes

keep sperging kiddo

Stopped reading there, a sample size this small is not representative of the population.

How come every time pol gets butthurt they come to post comments from retardr on Holla Forums like they have know idea what the difference between a socialist and a liberal are

*farts*

ok therefore Intelligence is fluid, not related to race or genetics

No, I.Q is related to race and genetics. Just because you can improve I.Q with environmental factors doesn't mean that genetics doesn't play a role. Denying that I.Q is related to genetics is something that I would expect out of a retard like you. If you read my source and weren't a completely delusional Idealist you would realize this.

A is affected by B, C, and D. Therefore: It can't be affected by E. Do you have any idea what a logical fallacy is?

for u

Your suggestion this matters on what a person is, or how this classifies a person for political purposes

is utterly academically bankrupt. Do not mix dodgy guess work and suggestion and means, with actual rigor.

That Not Socialism was founded by someone you hate?

If the accounts were not accurate, why would you suddenly care about the truth if he was a Jew? You certainly have selectively cared about the truth before, /poll/

Holy fuck, nice word salad.

...

it isn't as its affected by the environment, the color of my skin is determined by my genetics, sure, it will get darker and darker as generations go buy during millions of years If I live in an area with a lot of sun, but we are talking about me as an individual

they do, and genetics determined that with good education, a positive parenting, good social cohesion and so on you will have a high lQ

not beliving your pesudoscience doesn't make me an idealist

its garbage, lrn 2 dialect

Prove Intelligence is determined by genetics, all you can prove and have been proving is that genetics will determine your lQ will be high if you are rasied in an envrionment with good nurture

I am a Big Guy

No one is saying race doesn't have any impact on I.Q scores. Only that it is near impossible to control for it so that they are the only factor involves in I.Q variation and reach a consensus on how much of an impact they have on I.Q. Additionally, what is the end goal of proving that other races are less intelligent? If it were true that blacks were generally less intelligent than white people what exactly does this achieve?