Hey guys check this out, I was arguing on some retarded idpol fb page and a dude posted this

Hey guys check this out, I was arguing on some retarded idpol fb page and a dude posted this

Damn it I didn't know USSR, Catalonia and so on failed because we didn't account for other people identities!

idpol dies hard

Why?

The guillotine just got ten feet taller!

...

At least everybody knows it'll all end in Ancoms anyways

...

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

feels good man.

STOP

The comic has a point but it's also a little wrong. It's possible for there to be a need to create a new organization because the rest are too sectarian or doomed by LARPers; with 14, though, it's unlikely that all of them are unsalvageable.

I agree with most of your post but I still dislike the complete allergy that can be seen in many places on short-term solutions. Like, what's harder, body cameras for policemen or socialism? We need to be working towards progress we can actually achieve, and doing so we can spread the cause.

Humans have more than 5 senses

Wrong. It's not even a real thing so how are you going to see it?
It's far more complex than the cosmetic differences, so also wrong.

>>>Holla Forums

Funny how they seem to think that focusing on class is a reduction - they don't focus on it at all and yet they would never admit to identity reductionism.
Liberals need to stop pretending to be socialists - not that all do - because they don't actually give a shit about ending class oppression beyond addressing the gap between rich and poor. They have no interest in actually abolishing it, if they did they wouldn't waste their time on idpol while capitalism still exists.

t. liberals everywhere

Body cameras create a massive amount of surveillance data for police departments. The police just turn them off or cover them up if they're going to break the law (as has happened before). It's not even a short-term solution; it's a non-solution.

Make disabling them a crime and put the feeds online for people to look at.

I don't know why this is called as being so stupid to you all.

People will fight and die for an ideology that they believes serves them. One way to serve a person is to make them believe their identity is accepted by the group. This is reasonable, there's a. ton of tribalism.

You guys have never lead anyone otherwise you'd realize it more than worth it to be sensitive if it means great moral and cohesion

You can oppose idpol without getting sucked into it yourself but it requires a high degree of self awareness and a brutal look at your own prejudices and spooks.

Not that anyone on this board does that. Lol

Kek, I can never tell if these people are stupid or just subversive

Don't be retarded. I've explained this before.
If you oppose idpol from group A to group B, that is in the interest of group B, that is idpol.

You triggered they're hypocrisy

Still doesnt make them Spooks, faggot

No.

lol

And you're still wrong.
"Opposing idpol" is not in any way policy-specific. People who identify idpol ITSELF as a problem, rather than a specific sort, reject it categorically. This includes all its forms, A to B and B to A, for arbitrary groups A and B. Interpreting this position as pro-B is the most obvious composition fallacy I've ever encountered.
But the point is moot because it does not follow that something which just so happens to be/turns out in the interest of any arbitrarily defined group whatsoever is pro-that group idpol! To claim so neglects intentionality to a numbingly absurd degree. While a failing capitalist closing a factory in Mexico has similar group impacts to Trump building the wall, namely a loss in jobs for Mexican citizens, there are highly nontrivial differences between the two which this argument is simply unable to account for. Tribalism and an opposed sort of tribalism are tribalist values. Anti-tribalism is not.

i'm creating r/baddialectics just for you my dude

To be fair, Westerners usually don't know shit about why USSR failed because they are still brainwashed by Cold War era propaganda.

Everyone I've known who unironically uses the term "class reductionist" is a cultural reductionist
It's the most surreal thing, as if postmodernism has lobotomized the part of the superstructure that deals with intellectual self-awareness.

But we have a book for that