Humorless Extremism vs PRcucking

More and more i'm convinced that the primary shill tactic used against this board is forcing a false dichotomy between failed WN 1.0 tier humorless extremism and the PRcucking that destroyed GamerGate. I don't think that they really care which one we choose since either one would render us powerless. We've been forced to accept the erroneous idea that caring about public perception and "PR" means that we have to compromise our ideals either publicly or privately and thus it's difficult to talk about public relations without being called a PRfag. Dressing well is PR, being eloquent is PR, good memes are PR, being fit in public when representing our ideas is PR. We need to conduct PR by presenting our ideals in a humorous fashion while at the same time being mindful of aesthetics. Get people to accept our positions by making them attractive. PRcucking isn't even good PR because one of the primary ideals that we hold is glorification of strength and if we water down our ideals and cuck out it projects weakness.

Stormfront cucked out and even banned people for saying nigger and everyone still thought of them as super extremists who wanted to kill every single Nigger and Jew. Stormfront's problem was that they were a bunch of low IQ boomers without a sense of humor. I don't want us to fail like they did.

Cuck shill

...

Wrong OP, low-agency shit like this is the primary shill tactic used against this board.

no, we haven't. Your slide thread does have a few good points though, dressing well and being robust in social interactions IS PR. Afterall, you are representing the idea that you want people to join, and if they find you not to live up to the standards you espouse yourself to, you can talk your mouths dry, they will not take you seriously.

sage for slide, you PRfag. No actually, nobody fucking uses this word here. PRcuck is more like it, or how about I just call you a fucking faggot, go back to reddit.

The fact that you think that the alt-kike is WN 2.0 and not Holla Forums reveals your cuck mindset.

wew


fag anglin uses the exact same argument you do in the OP, you don't think we know the enemy?

We self-regulate in the best way possible, which is still bad.
It's stressing, but we manage it in the end of the day and we're Redpilling, that's what counts.

We don't need any (((Alt-Right))) tactics or bullshit, we were on it before and we'll be on it after them.

We don't like jews.

Berating people who do things while doing nothing yourself is low-agency.

You can "expose" a thousand "phony kike movements" and we won't be an inch closer to victory, because doing that accomplishes nothing. It's almost worse than nothing, because it provides the illusion of actually accomplishing something.

Do you know the movie "Pay It Forward"?
That's what we're doing, meanwhile the (((Alt Right))) is destroying everything by getting caught in honeytraps and psyops.

...

That's a nice euphemism for saying you're relying on someone else to do the actual work.

TRS prcucked not too long ago and took down an article entitled in defense of genocide.
They are not willing to discuss any violent means to an end, though i think they put it back up.
Meanwhile antifags do so and practice violence openly.

I find it weord thay for controlled op trs doesnt lime to touch on violence while leftists do.

I'm starting to think this is just a bot responding to keywords. Its just the same posts every thread and seems utterly unable to differentiate between actual altright faggots and people making a point like the OP.

the alt-kike is an anti-white movement led by kikes and faggots, you won't address this and everything you say is just a thinly veiled version of:

you faggots have been using the same tactics here for months, it's not going to work.

No, we're transmitting the message to everyone we know, and these people in turn are doing the same.

The real gains so far have been in Mainstream Conservatism. We're slowing shifting the Overton Window rightwards.

Now fuck off (((Alt Right))), you guys did nothing since your existence.
Giving the "leadership" of a movement to a guy just because of the name of his blog? Is this real? This is stupidity.
Being formless is also much better in the position we're now - being a target is the last thing we want now.

We need to create a replacement for the alt-kike if we've ever going to get anywhere.

OP's argument originated on Fag Anglin's Thai Fuck Shack which is an alt-kike shithole ran by a racemixer pedophile.


Sure, and that replacement can't have faggots, kikes, or niggers running around ruining everything like the alt-kike does.

I'm not arguing for moderating our message in the slightest. Just retaining the humor and memes that made us strong to begin with.

How many of you faggots actually read my post?

This is my belief too, or one extremely committed shitposter. There's a guy on cuckpol who is very similar - same obsessiveness, same image macros, same inability to debate or reason.

I don't like Dicky Spencer or Mike Enoch, but shitposters like this derail productive threads by making everything about them. If you think these guys are shit then move on and help us start our own movement. Don't waste your life obsessing over e-celeb drama.

I think you just fucked up big time by using alt-kike jargon but I overall support your message. Gamergay failed by thinking that diluting the message was the way to have good PR rather than maintaining humor and an uncompromising message.

I doubt it what little I've seen of Anglin indicates that he doesn't give a flying fuck about aesthetics as he's a slob.

What precisely do you take issue with in the OP?

It needs to come naturally. No haste.
Also, "circumstances" - right now a "Trump shift" is happening, Bannon is also moving and European movements are also gaining ground.
I'm not saying we should just keep looking, but getting caught up in the machinations of our enemies like the (((Alt Right))) got in Charlottesville is unacceptable.
Our next moves are still in the digital world doing networking and building infrastructure and alternatives.
Bannon said he would like to create a TV channel - that would be great and would be an opportunity for us, but even Breitbart now is struggling because companies are boycotting Ads to them.

Best course is to think, prepare, redpill and jump on opportunities,

I did, probably the first one to do so. You're right of course, what we do works when it's funny. 'Hitler did nothing wrong' for instance became a meme because it was funny, not because anyone really believed it at the time. But of course humor breaks down taboos, so here we are.

/thread

The last image makes no sense.

Zionism is jewish nationalism.
So of course a nationalist would understand nationalistic impulses.

Honestly hating E-celebs is also cancer in my opinion. The problem with E-celebs is that they make everything about them rather than ideas. It doesn't matter if we're spending thread after thread sucking their cocks or shitting on them they still do damage if the conversation is about them.

Ideally we should completely ignore them and pretend that they don't exist.

"wn1.0/wn2.0" distinction came from a thread on the Fag Anglin's Thai Fuck Shack forum where fag anglin proposed that the alt-kike would be a better WN movement than pierce because "they have the memes and the shitposting" and it basically amounted to "post pepes irl to save the white race" which is fucking retarded since you need to be uncompromising prime examples of men like NordFront not faggots playing games and falling into glowing cia nigger traps like sperglin peinowitz and dickie.

Nothing on your list lad I just noticed the alt-kike lingo and had to say my bit, it usually draws out the you do nothing for the movement ignore the kike behind the curtain shills. have a bump.

I remember us using that terminology way before Anglin.

Sorry if I don't keep up to date with E-celeb faggotry, I prefer to ignore the faggots.

Zionism is jewish imperialism backed up by sick semitic religion, nobody but a mentally ill kike could understand the impulse towards zionism.
Zionism seeks to wage subversive warfare and is a world-domination plot, read the protocols.

An interesting thing about that, from the National Socialists themselves:

III. On the Jewish Question

If we wish to understand the past Jewish influence on the legislation, then we need to know first what specific features characterize the Jews. We need to be aware of the Jewish racial makeup, just as we need to know what this racial makeup means from the perspective of the teaching on the racial-soul [Rassenseelenkunde]. We are never going to solve the Jewish question through rabid “anti-Semitism,” as has been shown to us by Jewish history, not just in Germany, but by the world history as well. The solution to the Jewish question is solely and exclusively possible with a satisfactory fulfilment of the race idea by each race. We shall never fulfill the race idea unless we make the distinction between race and the people ( Rasse und Volk — italics in the text). There is no such thing as the German race, and there is no such thing as the Jewish race. There is the German people, and there is also the Jewish people. It must also be taken into account that the German people has obtained its intrinsic traits from the Nordic race, which is its binding element. The binding element of the Jewish people, however, is not the European race, but a non-European, Oriental race. Given that each race has its intrinsic style, the German people and the Jewish people, due to their different racial makeup, need to make a fundamental distinction from each other. Oftentimes this is not acknowledged. Frequently, only the distinction in a body appearance [Erscheinungsbild; i.e., ‘phenotype’ in English] is taken into account, forgetting that each race possesses, based on its own intrinsic style, its own scale of values. We must be careful not to impose the scale of values of the German people on another people with a completely different racial makeup. Such views lead to adverse effects. National-Socialism is not anti-Semitic; it is a-Semitic” [bold in the text]. (Prof. Dr. Falk Ruttke, F. Wilhelm Univestität, Berlin, “Judentum in Recht” (Jews in the Legislation) in Rasse, Recht und Volk (Race, Law and the People), (Berlin: F. Lehmanns Verlag, 1937), p. 12.