872 active users (newfriends)

UNACCEPTABLE!!

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OF8-9w2bPDw
youtube.com/watch?v=f1F-zysTjWg
mega.nz/#F!DJdkhYTR!gNrR2Hm7we5O0dyfwBHG0g
libgen.io/book/index.php?md5=59BF50B9C0FB98F8FDA03CAA28902AED
youtube.com/watch?v=0j-eJtyngp4
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB1uqxcCESK6B1juh_wnKoxftZCcqA1go
scribd.com/document/326449049/Anwar-Shaikh-Capitalism-Competition-Crisis
youtube.com/watch?v=BYVes44hcJg

Starting with Jodi Dean.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

ELIMINATE THE RICH
TAKING ALL OF THEIR STUFF
that might seem dramatic :^)

...

...

history dump

...

...

...

...

...

niggas

...

...

Parenti dump

...

...

...

Kapitalism101 dump

...

dump your RDW folder, comrade, I'll supplement the gaps

Do you have Kapitalism_101_muh_coops.webm (or similar))?

That's the only RDW video I have.
You can go ahead and dump everything you have.

gimmah sumah timah, comrah niggahs

...

saved


cont. K.101 dump

[flood detected]

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

For the record, jodi dean is a fucking idiot.

...

...

ENLIGHTEN US!!!!

...

Sick disourse tbh. Why don't you tell us why she rusltes your heinie instead of just telling us she does?

how so?

...

...

/k101

Adrian Johnston dump commence

...

Anyone who is a actively uses psychoanalysis and postmodernism (mostly psychoanalysis) as a foundation for their theories should not be taken seriously in any way. Now Freud cigar, i know ive had this conversation with you before and i have no intention of doing it again so ill just summarize what would happen.

"Psychoanalysis isn't scientific,none of it can be proven"
"Even if it cant be proven scientifically its still right"

Just kinda repeat that for a few posts and you'll get the gist.

Someone post that webm with the wolf man talking about the republican socialists.

That's the best one.

...

cumin soon

its already posted

I'm comforted that no matter how large we get, I can always depend on a few things.

I'm glad that you restate your same-old-same-old argument, so allow me to address it the same way I usually do.

I'm sorry to inform you (again) that these are non-compatible categories. Psychoanalysis predates post-modernism by a few decades. You are welcome to clarify this point.

There are a lot of human activities that are essentially non-scientific: art, democracy, communication, love, politics, subjectivity, and so on… Does this mean that we should restrict ourselves to keep STFU about them, or does this mean that we should develop ways (as it has been done) to properly address them?

The epistemological standing of science itself "can't be proven" without philosophy itself. Does this mean that science is shite? Far from it.

The aforementioned human activities "objectively exist", they are right in their own domains as far as they are concerned. What a critical human being should do is to look at their theories (take for instance, "democracy's") and look at its (historical) outcomes: tragedy.

I invite you to tell us how we should judge these human activities based on your superior intellect.

Please dump all your Wolff webms so you i can subtitle them.

...

...

...

will do

...

...

...

RDW

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

/RDW

what should be next?
Chomsky or Zizek?

Do you have any psychoanalysis?

Zizek is god chomsky is academia establishment liberal anarchist

I do, but sadly (paradoxically) I'm behind on the psychoanalysis webm front. However I can share some good links for ya:

youtube.com/watch?v=OF8-9w2bPDw
youtube.com/watch?v=f1F-zysTjWg

Study guide: 1997 → 2007 → 1995:
mega.nz/#F!DJdkhYTR!gNrR2Hm7we5O0dyfwBHG0g

...

dumping Chomsky then

:^)

...

...

...

...

Damn, that first point is one great critique, She managed to word something I've felt gnawing for a while.
I don't think it's a complete justification of representational statehood, but it certainly kills that critique, and also kills the magic that many anarchists treat direct democracy with.
Like - I'm an anarchist myself - but a lot of the time when I see people write about direct democracy they seem to just replace the liberal ideology of the liberal representational democracy, with direct democracy and treat it with the same ideological reverence. You know, the people who go "liberal democracy isn't real democracy" and talk about direct democracy as real democracy.

I still think that horizontal democracy is preferable to representational, but it needs to be treated as a tool, the same way the state is seen by marxists. This means that critique of direct democracy should be material, rather than ideological critiques.

So I have a leftist friend who decides his positions on issues with one test. Does the issue have serious consequences? If the answer is yes he defers to Chomsky, if the answer is no he defers to Zizek.

Have you got the source on the second webm? Parenti is a great speaker

I'm really glad about your reaction, comrade.

(Leninist, btw.)

If you are new to these webms, please keep us updated bout your reactions, k?


nig, do yourself a flavor and youtube search it

...

/Chomsky

...

getting shpoorkhy in here

...

Question to all niggers: what next?

BADIOU, ZIZEK, OR JAMESON?

It sounds like your friend has it backwards tbqh

Show me the Ziz.

my nigga

ask me erotically and I might

don't knock it

it's this sort of thing that convinced me to stay in Holla Forums

Jameson TBH.

Uhm…
Please, daddy, pump me full of your hot, sticky Žižek…

...

Jameson it is, but plz, check out Jodi Dean BTFO'ing his speech that I'm going to dump here:
libgen.io/book/index.php?md5=59BF50B9C0FB98F8FDA03CAA28902AED

(aprox 15 pages)


shiiet, fuck that, Zizek it is!

...

...

...

...

Yay, I win!

Holy shit, how has a fucking audio recording of bernie sanders not yet been abused for propaganda of either side? Or has it and I've just not seen it?
Also that premonitory comment about leaders is pretty wild considering he died just around when Stalin came to power.

I was lured in by your oozing throbbing pussy ready to take my theory ;_;

...

...

...

...

stop teasing me, woman

you already got what you wanted
or did you?! O_o

...

...

...

...

feel so alone here ;;;____;;;

Seldom am I sated. Some will stand and wait astounded for my ravenous appetite to burn out and some will give up and try to by guided free.

vagina dentata

...

...

...

...

...

IMPORDAND

...

...

...

...

...

...

Zizek showed up in a dream a couple of nights ago.

I don't know how I feel about that.

As far as psychoanalysis is concerned your feelings on the matter are secondary if not irrelevant. What matters is your vocal recollection of the events in your dream, and how they betray your consciousness.

...

...

I don't see how Zizek appearing in my dream betrays my consciousness.

You misunderstand. Zizek, the figure, in your dream is maybe of zero importance. The way you tell your dream to your psychoanalyst is where your unconscious might betray you.

/zizek

what next?

BADIOU OR JAMESON??

jameson

k
plz consider:

...

...

...

...

...

/Jameson

dumping Badiou (as read by Bruno Bosteels)

...

...

...

...

/Badiou

I wonder how long the total webms here?

Thank you, freudfag and all others

need to make more, tbh

Where is that webm taken from exactly? I want to watch the whole thing

youtube.com/watch?v=0j-eJtyngp4

Thanks, I'm actually pretty obsessed with Zizek in some kind of neurotic way. I have an archive of Zizek recordings thats huge, pic related. I fear if no one saved them they would be deleted and be never be recovered, thus no one in the future would be able to watch them.

...

That is truly obsessive, but also kinda useful. Any ideas how to turn it into use? Maybe upload them? Torrent? Send it to mariborchan.si ?

idk, enjoy your symptom


enjoy your otter

btw, since we are bumping

the method I used to find the original lecture was:
1) dl webm
2) screencap its first frame (pic related)
3) upload it to google image search
4) browse, search, browse
5) find youtube link

just wanted you to know

Should host a torrent for all that.

Well I think my fear is well founded, some years ago mariborchan had a recording which he was the only one who had it and uploaded on an old iteration of his website. It was not reuploaded when he restarted his website (for whatever reason idk) I even emailed him twice asking what happened to it with no reply. But I think I found a copy/fragment of the talk, however it seems not to be fully listenable to for me as it stops midway. Can you listen to it and see if it plays
all the way through (its only 20 minutes), if it does can you download it? It doesn't seem to be directly linkable so just google search "return of christ zizek meineplaylist" and try it out. pic related

I actually go to an Lacanian analyst every week but I have never mentioned this obsession to him. Rather embarrassed by it.


I've never hosted a torrent before, I have good internet connection but I live in Australia and we don't have unlimited internet connection. Will it take long to make and will it affect my internet adversely?

I cba to turn these into webms because this series is long as fuck, but Anwar Shaikh's lectures on Marxian Economics are some of the best out there.

youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB1uqxcCESK6B1juh_wnKoxftZCcqA1go

It should be noted that this series is a supplement for his book by the same title, which can be found here scribd.com/document/326449049/Anwar-Shaikh-Capitalism-Competition-Crisis

Do it yourself u lazy commie.

Weird and buggy site. It does skip longer lectures exactly after 20 minutes.

Dude, just tell him/her.


this looks bredi gud

Got some more webms here in my pocket.

...

...

...

...

Huh for me it only plays for around 11 minutes or so and then it skips to some shitty radio ads and songs, can you record the 20 minutes and upload it somewhere

I'll post some obscure Zizek recordings I found in return.


I will

Which one?

"Slavoj Zizek with John Milbank - The Return of Christ?"

skips after 10 minutes

How did we get such a surge?

We are coming, buckos!

the elections. if you missed out:
Holla Forums came here to gather our "liberal tears" just to find that we were just as much enjoying them

Do you have that Zizek one about obscene nationalist enjoyment? The one where at the beginning it's a middle aged woman and man obsessively saying 'TRUMP'S GON' WIN'.

youtube.com/watch?v=BYVes44hcJg

More Parenti. This one is especially good for a lot of people here on leftypol

Bump because theory is important

Holy shit. That is so sick.

We're all Holla Forumsacks here to laugh at you. Sorry.

Not really, I'm new and Holla Forums curious.

Is there a way to save every file here instead of having to save one by one?

there's some dank shit in this here thread bra

soak it in

What's the source on these?

Thanks for the dank webms, comrades. I'll be visiting this thread a lot in the near future.

Dunno, sorry fam.

Thanks for sending the Wolff

...

...

...

...

...

Bump with meh webm.