==(URGENT) N.K. might fire ICBM toward Pacific: Seoul spy agency==

>archive.is/VoWpk
You could have prevented this
>archive.is/BIQZM - BBC Link

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.fo/hB0h3
archive.fo/dQnOb
archive.fo/Wb5dw
archive.is/7VWDR
archive.is/D4XFZ
archive.fo/e70oj
archive.is/l2Qyf
archive.fo/lSqLI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Let this be the one. Nuke San Fransisco or Guam, Kim.

Filthy commies need to be glassed. Fo it, faggot. Fire the missile, let it get shot down, and enjoy the Fire and Fury(tm) that follows.

Our THAAD system isn't built to take down long range missiles, and we can't detect North Korean ww2 planes due to "low profile". Our military is a goddamn joke if you dig deep enough. I genuinely think a war with the norks will result in either a loss or a stalemate. They are a modern imperial Japan, only this time, they have nukes as well.

The last one wasn't even shot down, it broke up a few minutes after passing over Japan.

...

(checked)
Here's to hoping that Fat Kimmy nukes the Bay Area.

the US military has a lot of problems, but youve go to be joking. we could just bomb the shit out of them with B52s and have 3 carrier groups just sitting right there hammering them, and just let the norks literally starve before sending in muh-rines to mop the survivors up.

10546444 (CHECKED)
See you in September.

this is fear porn level bullshit.

They should do an above ground test in a corner of SK. Nukes aren't THAT powerful.

The media would love an actual image/video that they could use.

Opps I meant NK.

Fucking hell, if they actually fire a missile NOW while tensions are running as high as they are my sides will be in orbit.

checked,
GLASS KOREA IS BEST KOREA

>(((BBC)))
America out of Korea, and let us Japan regain control of the Korean peninsula as our colony .

You think (((they))) will let Japan conquer anything? You guys resisted ZOG once with Hitler, and since then Japan has been completely disarmed and beaten down. Are you saying there's still some resistance left?

WE'RE GONNA FUCKING SLAUGHTER EM!

What would happen if they nuked the ocean?
Seriously? Would the west coast be fucked due to poisoned water or would it spread out and do nothing. When there is oil spills leftists always complain about a few thousand fish dying but what would seriously happen the Best Korea tried to fuck over America by Nuking the pacific

Holy shit this is the fifth fear mongering slide thread about meming best korea into nuking someone on the catalog. Gas yourself kike. Nukes are fake. This fear mongering is manufactured bullshit. If anything happens it will be a false flag.

are you the kike that said harvey would miss?

How are nukes fake?

Nukes are fake because they lack a neutron moderator. That is a component used in nuclear reactors to keep the fission reaction going but nukes lack them since they are fake. See the entire thread.

not this faggot again, you dont need a damn neutron moderator because the chain reaction doesn't need to be sustained for very long, a nuclear bomb only uses about 2% of its fissile material for fission, if it used 90% of its fissile material a 1 kiloton nuke would be large enough to destroy the northern hemisphere

Japan surrendered for keks, user.
;^)

kek

Here we go again.
Firstly explain why it only used *insert bullshit percentage you pulled out of your ass* here and do it with math and or sources.
Second explain how the reaction is contained within a small space, without any coolent, and why nuclear reactors don't blow up under the exact same conditions like at cherynobyl.
Finally gas yourself kike.

They need to do an above ground test.

That would scare the world.

Weapons grade material is far more pure than reactor grade material. This ironically means that it is far less radioactive, at least until insertion takes place. Oralloy in particular has a long insertion time.

the reaction isnt contained hence the explosion and radiation
and chernobyl didnt reach criticality

Isn't a nuke just like a reactor that only activates for a split second before overloading? I have no knowledge on this whatsoever but you people seem smart. I know at least 1 of you is but I don't know which one

...

archive.fo/hB0h3 see picture
Where is your proof? Where are measurements we can look at?

Define when the explosion is to happen then. What type of percentage of whatever this "criticality" shit is did chernybobyl reach and can you show me how using math?

Thanks fam

...

Those pictures are a bunch of sweet nothings. They describe how nuclear fission in a nuclear powerplant works and then don't describe any of the other terms. For example how in the fuck do those bombs carry several kilo(thousand) tons of explosives yet what you said here implies that they would destroy the entire earth if they exploded. Which is it and why explain using math or actual fucking sources.

trips of truth
The problem is that a lot of our missile defense on the Pacific hasn't tested so well. Another problem is the "haystacking" problem which they could lob dozens of missiles over and only have nukes on select projectiles, overwhelming the defenses statistically. There's also the fact none of our Jew toys work against non traditional adversaries millennium challenge 02 and that if one of them has an EMP they won't even have to invade. Once all the obama phones turn off and the ebt cards don't work it will tear down from the inside. Thanks niggers.

That's one way of looking at it but it's a bit more complex than that. Reactors are operated in a critical configuration where the fuel absorbs as many neutrons as they loose. Nuclear weapons achieve supercriticality which means that they absorb MORE neutrons than they release for the very brief period of operation. Nuclear materials don't like to be in a supercritical configuration so they disassemble themselves rapidly. The whole trick of nuclear weapon design it to force a sub critical mass or masses into as supercritical configuration as fast as possible to prevent predetonation, i.e. a fizzle. Reactor grade material has too many neutrons so it blows itself apart before it ever reaches optimum configuration.


What the hell do you think caused all those explosions in all those the nuclear tests? Evil jew magic?

I could show you the math but you'd just ask how it works

For japan it was firebombs like (((they))) used on the rest of japan. For ape atoll and area 51 the tests were faked videos using stock explosive test videos.
But but but ciangiger-kun, why is it more pure if it has less uranium neutrons to react with? I.E why does more pure uranium have less neutrons then reactor grade(low purity) uranium? You contradicted youself there you faggot liar.

It was low enriched uranium, in the form of uranium dioxide inside zirconium cladding. Some of the fuel reacted with the cladding during the accident, depending on the direction away from the plant (the wind changed dirrection at least once during the accident the redox state of the fuel fragments does differ.

When the fuel reacts with the cladding it forms ZrO2 and the uranium dioxide is reduced. In some cases a mixed Zr/U phase can be formed.

Show Holla Forums the math. What do you think jewgle is for if some idiot doesn't understand the math or terms used?

Do you also believe the Earth is flat?

flat earthers are disinfo.

The earth is not flat you stupid cianigger faggot.

Literally what does that have to do with the purity of uranium?
Also now explain Fukushima.

alright have fun

You were blown the fuck out in that thread multiple times. Why would you link it?

Too many neutrons "poison" the reaction and cause predetonation. For example this is why you have to use HEU/Oralloy for gun type assemblies, plutonium is too radioactive for such a slow assembly method. Technically you CAN make a gun-type plutonium bomb but it is so inefficient that it's a terrible waste of Pu.

He's disinfo. Just report and hide his posts

Beautiful we are actual getting somewhere for once. Let's debunk these one by one.
Image one is literally just describing nuclear fission without taking into account things like coolant and heat neccessary for the reaction. Image two is some type of nuclear bomb design I have not seen before. But is has some major flaws. For example beryllium is not a good reflector of neutrons for the reaction. See kikepedia's entry on nuclear reactors. Another would be there is no description of the time neccessary for the reaction. Third why is plutonium being used as a spark plug? literally wtf it is not that magnetic or conductive of a material unless under very fucking special conditions see archive.fo/dQnOb . The rest of the images just describe the atom splitting proccess.
You are running out of lies cianigger-kun. Why not just tell the truth?

Disnfo Ppl. say stuff like that to give the term "con theorist " Power.

You are not explaining why physically less pure uranium has more atoms/neutrons then more pure uranium as you said here

Good luck with that, bignose.

That's fucking great. Best korea makes awesome music to celebrate launch of a rocket. gg.

It has to do with spontaneous fission and several other things. Here read this VERY carefully several times before posting further.


It's a "spark plug" in a metaphorical sense not a literal spark plug. This is "Hillary Clinton didn't use a corrosive chemical on her servers" tier reasoning.

I get the feeling the NK is the Nazi Germany of today. Plenty of stories about Kim being a crazy little dictator, but who actually knows? They are advancing scientifically and culturally it seems from your video.

We need to find out the truth about North Korea.

...

READ NIGGA, READ!

Unrelated to your debate, but reading this makes me feel like an actual retard, but at the same time, it makes me feel good that there are people on Holla Forums smart enough to understand this shit

hey retard you didnt give any mathematical equations proving the given equations wrong

North Korea, Russia and the Chinese will fuck Americas military up. I'd like to read the headlines that 3 carrier battle groups have been nuked and sunk. Fuck this (((jew))) infested country.

also you are literally retarded

A neutron reflector is any material that reflects neutrons. This refers to elastic scattering rather than to a specular reflection. The material may be graphite, beryllium, steel, tungsten carbide, or other materials. A neutron reflector can make an otherwise subcritical mass of fissile material critical, or increase the amount of nuclear fission that a critical or supercritical mass will undergo. Such an effect was exhibited twice in accidents involving the Demon Core, a subcritical plutonium pit that went critical in two separate fatal incidents when the pit's surface was momentarily surrounded by too much neutron reflective material.

Holy shit this just gets back to my original arguement cianigger. At the bottom of the page and I quote.
Uranium can not be used as a neutron moderator as it would just react along with the other materials like in a nuclear reactor. Tungsten makes for a shitty moderator at that see archive.fo/Wb5dw .
Keep digging your own lies if you dare.

YOU DONT NEED A FUCKING NEUTRON MODERATOR
YOURE NOT POWERING A CITY WITH A CONTROLLED REACTION
YOU ARE DESTROYING A CITY WITH A CHAIN REACTION
chain reaction=/=controlled reaction

No you are retarded because beryllium is a useless moderator as it is a nuclear reactent like uranium you faggot. Where are the fucking sources on the 'demon core' bullshit you are spouting now and what does it have to do with any of this?

...

you literal retard

archive.is/7VWDR
archive.is/D4XFZ

Wow what is the fact you lied about not needing a neutron moderator here yet the page you quote says you do. How (((oddd))).
By the way if you had actualy read the page you would have seen that beryillum makes a shitty neutron moderator compared to hydrogen/water. And that it is no longer used in any nuclear powerplants for that exact reason. Exactly like I said.

That's a bonus.
You are mistaking a moderator with a reflector.

you dont need one for a nuclear weapon you need one for a nuclear reactor
beryillum is a neutron multiplier


9
4Be + n → 2(4
2He) + 2n


9
4Be + 4
2He → 12
6C + n , where 4
2He is an alpha particle and 12
6C is a carbon-12 nucleus.

Fucking comic book shit right here

...

I know this already, nukes are fake. But nuclear reactors are a real thing.

back to square one

Do you fucking know where you are?

If nuclear weapons are fake then nuclear reactors are fake too. They are predicated on the same underlying principles.

It's always like this with shills. You prove their bullshit wrong step by step, only to have them revert to their initial position.

yeah

Checked
PLEASE HIT SF KIM PLEASE HIT BERKELY PLEASE HIT SEATTLE

No they aren't you dipshit there are working nuclear reactors all over the fucking world you can visit and see with your own eyes.

No one but MAYBE a few pilots saw the fucking fire bombing of japan. The citizens of the time were killed, confused, or propaganzied too and against. Nuclear bombs are one of the greatest deceptions in all of human history. Literal (((empires))) stand on the lie. But you can't have both powerplants and the nuke. It is impossible. Guess which one we can prove isn't a (((holywood))) effect though?

So I suppose Heisenberg was just retarded and was working on nothing

Not into the reactor core where the actual reaction takes place. For all you know all "nuclear reactors" are actually just geothermal power plants and the "fuel rods" are just there for show. Prove otherwise.

(((Heidenberg))) was a kike. So yes he is a liar.
Literal quote from kikepedia archive.fo/e70oj

so that's why they kept him because he was jewish makes sense now

A German historian has claimed in a new book that Nazi scientists successfully tested a tactical nuclear weapon in the last months of World War II.

Rainer Karlsch said that new research in Soviet and also Western archives, along with measurements carried out at one of the test sites, provided evidence for the existence of the weapon.

"The important thing in my book is the finding that the Germans had an atomic reactor near Berlin which was running for a short while, perhaps some days or weeks," he told the BBC.

"The second important finding was the atomic tests carried out in Thuringia and on the Baltic Sea."

Mr Karlsch describes what the Germans had as a "hybrid tactical nuclear weapon" much smaller than those dropped on Hiroshima or Nagasaki.

'Bright light'

He said the last test, carried out in Thuringia on 3 March 1945, destroyed an area of about 500 sq m, killing several hundred prisoners of war and concentration camp inmates.

The weapons were never used because they were not yet ready for mass production. There were also problems with delivery and detonation systems.

"We haven't heard about this before because only small groups of scientists were involved, and a lot of the documents were classified after they were captured by the Allies," said Karlsch.

"I found documents in Russian and Western archives, as well as in private German ones."

One of these is a memo from a Russian spy, brought to the attention of Stalin just days after the last test. It cites "reliable sources" as reporting "two huge explosions" on the night of 3 March.

Karlsch also cites German eyewitnesses as reporting light so bright that for a second it was possible to read a newspaper, accompanied by a sudden blast of wind.

The eyewitnesses, who were interviewed on the subject by the East German authorities in the early 1960s, also said they suffered nose-bleeds, headaches, and nausea for days afterwards.

Karlsch also pointed to measurements carried out recently at the test site that found radioactive isotopes.
archive.is/l2Qyf

REMINDER
Holla Forums has always stood for anti-ZOG forces, which includes North Korea. If you support intervention you're a neocohen faggot that should go back to cuckchan or reddit.

>(((germans)))
>(((Rainer Karlsch))) archive.fo/lSqLI
Sure chaim. Wana prove they were really germans or that anything coming out of your mouth isn't a lie?

surely just a coincidence after the fall of berlin we had breakthroughs in nuclear bombs
and tell me why it would behoove anybody to claim they developed the bomb before the usa when all taught history says the opposite?

...

no argument?
still waiting on you to post mathematical formulas disproving the physics of a super criticality event

Then fucking move there if you're so interested

Why does it look like the "gun" he is about to fire has a plug in it's barrel? And is that bailing wire holding the barrel to the grip?

It's some sort of cap gun used in a carnival game.