The Loathsome American Book That Inspired Hitler

In response to the deadly riots in Charlottesville, Virginia, this month, President Donald Trump said, “We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence on many sides. On many sides.” Trump’s failure to directly condemn white supremacists and neo-Nazis came on the heels of his travel ban on people from seven Muslim-predominant countries, and his desire to build a wall on our southern border to keep out the “bad hombres.”

Though it has dominated headlines, few are noticing that identical events followed a book published 100 years ago. It was arguably the most dangerous scientific treatise ever written. And in it is the one phenomenon that ties all of these events together.

In 1916, Madison Grant, a New York City conservationist and lawyer, published The Passing of the Great Race. It was an extension of popular eugenic theories first proposed by Francis Galton, a British scientist and half-cousin of Charles Darwin. Galton believed that selective breeding shouldn’t be limited to animals. He argued that if we could breed faster horses, we should be able to breed better people, too. He claimed that traits like intelligence, loyalty, bravery, and honesty were also inherited.

In The Passing of the Great Race, Grant took Galton’s theories one step further. Using population movements, facial features, and pseudoscience, Grant argued that undesirable traits were passed not only from one family member to another, but within certain ethnic backgrounds and religious groups.

America, he argued, was committing “race suicide.” No longer were immigrants coming from “desirable” parts of northwestern Europe like the British Isles, Scandinavia, and Germany; they were coming from lesser countries in Southern and Eastern Europe. First published in the spring of 1916, The Passing of the Great Race was reprinted in 1922, 1923, 1924, 1926, 1930, 1932, and 1936, selling more than a million copies—arguably, one of the most popular scientific tracts in history.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.org/search.php?query=the passing of the great race
media.8ch.net/pdfs/src/1433916801343-0.pdf
etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/osu1253574143/inline
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lothrop_Stoddard
pages.pomona.edu/~vis04747/h110r/readings/The_revolt_against_civilization.pdf
forgottenbooks.com/en/download/TheRisingTideofColorAgainstWhiteWorldSupremacy_10068225.pdf
archive.org/details/newworldislam01stodgoog
amren.com/news/2016/10/a-warning-from-the-past-lothrop-stoddard-pro-white/
archive.fo/bAlQq
jaymans.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/the-liberalconservative-baby-gap-time-depth/
theroot.com/articles/culture/2014/11/birth_rates_and_the_recession_has_a_black_generation_been_wiped_out.html
epi.org/blog/black-birth-rate-converges-white-rate/
frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/muslim-fertility-rates-dropping-faster-than-western-fertility-rates/
independent.co.uk/news/jews-could-die-out-by-next-century-1319030.html
independent.ie/world-news/americas/american-jews-in-danger-of-dying-out-survey-shows-25932714.html
mega.co.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4858552/Survey-White-Christians-minority-US-population.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

In 1917—one year after Grant published his book—Congress passed a law banning “all idiots, imbeciles, feebleminded persons, epileptics, insane persons, [and] persons of constitutional psychopathic inferiority” from entering the U.S. During deliberations, one congressman read directly from The Passing of the Great Race. As a consequence, about 1,500 immigrants a year were denied entrance. One ardent eugenicist wrote a letter to Grant urging him to build a Great Wall: “Can we build a wall high enough around this country so as to keep out these cheaper races; or will it be a feeble dam, leaving it to our descendants to abandon the country to blacks, browns, and yellows.”

In 1921, Congress passed the Emergency Quota Act, which limited the number of immigrants to no more than 3 percent of the number of people originally from that country residing in America. In the year prior, some 800,000 immigrants entered the United States; the year after it was enacted, that number was reduced to 300,000.

In 1924, Congress passed the Immigration Restriction Act, which limited Africans and banned Arabs and Asians outright. After 1924, the number of immigrants permitted to enter the United States every year was cut to 20,000.

In 1929, Congress passed the National Origins Act, further restricting immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe.

Because of these laws, more immigrants came into the United States in 1907 alone than during the entire next quarter-century.

Madison Grant was thrilled. “[This is] one of the greatest steps forward in the history of this country,” he said, according to Jonathan Peter Spiro’s book, Defending the Master Race: Conservation, Eugenics, and the Legacy of Madison Grant. “We have closed the doors just in time to prevent our Nordic population from being overrun by the lower races.” The director of Ellis Island, the entry point for most European immigrants, commented that immigrants were starting to look more like Americans.

Ten years after The Passing of the Great Race was published, it was translated into German, the language in which a disgruntled corporal—recently imprisoned for his part in a riot in Bavaria—read it. After finishing it, he sent a letter to Madison Grant. “This book is my Bible,” he wrote. The soldier later included whole sections of Grant’s book in his own book, Mein Kampf. What Grant had called the Nordic race, Adolf Hitler called the Aryan race.

To say that The Passing of the Great Race had influenced Mein Kampf would be an understatement; in some sections, Hitler had virtually plagiarized Grant’s book. For example, in The Passing of the Great Race, Grant wrote, “It has taken us 50 years to learn that speaking English, wearing good clothes, and going to school and to church does not transform a Negro into a white man.” In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote, “But it is a scarcely conceivable fallacy of thought to believe that a Negro or a Chinese, let us say, will turn into a German because he learns German and is willing to speak the German language.”

In 1936, three years after Adolf Hitler came to power, the Nazi party listed The Passing of the Great Race as essential reading. Grant’s “race suicide”—a fear that his Nordic race would be diluted out by “inferior” races—had become ethnic genocide. “National Socialism is nothing but applied biology,” said Rudolf Hess, Hitler’s deputy Führer. During the next decade, “race purity” would reach its hideous, illogical end. Although neo-Nazis and white supremacists still laud The Passing of the Great Race in their literature and on their websites, the book has faded into darkness. Its lesson—that we are all members of one race, the human race—shouldn’t.

Interesting. Got a pdf?

>>>/pdfs/1662
Fucking newfag.

/pdfs/'s link is broken. Maybe it's still a sequel from the 1st of April.
Here it is in the Archive:
archive.org/search.php?query=the passing of the great race

Nigger, the essential Holla Forums library is dozens of not hundreds of entries long. My book backlog is longer than my Holla Forums backlog was back in the day. Get off my balls.

Man, if only we could have a sort of Literature Thread here on Holla Forums to help newfags along..

Inb4 an illiterate turkroach screeching muh boooooooks.

but then what inspired that book?

Glad to hear it's such a dangerous book. | just bought it online, an original edition from way back, looking forward to reading it, along with Lothrop Stodard's "The Rising Tide of Colour Against White World Supremacy" and "Into the Darkness: Nazi Germany Today".

...

...

Kikes still managed to fuck it all up.

Great book, but it focuses too little on the bad qualities of Jews.

This American book had the more impact.

Probably the same turkroach that banned me when I mentioned during the barceloba trucking thread that Spaniards were generally nice but not the Aryan bedrock of our country that northwest Europeans were. Someone in the mod team is a brown eye with serious butthurt at the lighteye master race.

What happened?

You say?

Muh capitalism happened. While having the good sense to restrict immigration from non Nordic countries, they did not extend this courtesy to rich Jews. You got a fat bank account you gotta be a respectable person right? Contribute to the community and shit? And look here, this Jew has done so much for this city! The rest is the same story as it's always been.

There is no "human race". It is a myth pushed by universalist religions and Marxist charlatans. If we apply the same standards as are applied to every other living organism on the planet to humans, it becomes glaringly obvious that there are several different species and subspecies of living hominid alive on the planet today.

I absolutely want our enemy to publicly sperg about authors like Grant and Guenther to bring them back to light, but where is your source OP?

Count Arthur de Gobineau "On the Inequality of Human Races", 1856
Houston Stewart Chamberlain "The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century", 1911

Apparently it was Gobineau who first introduced the zoological concepts of degeneration and crossbreeding into the racialist lexicon.

On a side note; Grant was widely acclaimed, during his life, as the greatest conservationist of his time, he introduced a number of State-wide wildlife protection bills including one in Alaska, founded the Bronx Zoo and single-handedly saved the buffalo from extinction. However, as with many anti-semites, he was completely memory holed from mainstream eco-history by the jew. I looked into it quite a bit and its actually shocking - most documentaries on the subject don't even mention him.

It's frightening in a way how right he was, and how far we've fallen as a country since then.

Eugenics is literally the most "Progressive" policy and was promoted by the actual progressives of the day instead of today's regressives calling themselves progressive. Hell, keeping niggers out of society was a Progressive ideal by democrats such as Woodrow Wilson and FDR. In many ways, had eugenics succeeded we might have actually lived in a Jetsonian future.

The only arguments were "moral" ones, which are in reality immoral. No matter how morally objectionable one thinks it is, the reality is that it is very humane. The main reasons are simple for one we technically already practice it in a limited manner through health screenings and of course the infamous Planned Parenthood policy. It's just a fact, some people just should not have children and if they did it would be cruel and unusual to the child to be and the disastrous consequences that child of poor upbringing will wreck on society as a whole. Most young people today don't want kids to begin with, which means they are already technically on board, but a problem exists where trash breeds wildly as we see in the third world and the best and brightest do not. This brings down the average of humanity greatly and harms the best, harms everyone. We know now that IQ is mostly genetic, it's something even mainstream science accepts now despite the tyranny of political correctness destroying free science. But let's make this clear, eugenics is not murder. It's even less murder than abortion is, depending on your opinion on that issue, because it just never happened at all.

Next is that it holds back humanity to reject eugenics because it is of mutual omni-benefit. Humanity's advancement is generally the result of a few geniuses throughout history sharing their inventions and discoveries with all mankind but they've been limited in number for as far as time can tell. Now imagine if we had more, much more. Think of how much benefit they can do for all of us, we'd have been in a post-scarcity space age society long ago. To reject eugenics is insanity. To flood the world with so much undesirables and suffering is insanity. We must accept eugenics as quickly as possible or else we'll lose out to those that will pick it up, like the Chinese who are quickly becoming the leaders in it. At that point it will all be over, because given their history it can be assured the Chinese will use their brilliant eugenic assets in malicious ways that are harmful to mankind rather than universally beneficial.

Bring the discussion to >>>/polk/10809 when this thread's inevitably anchored.

Naw, the only arguments were (((moral))) ones. Specifically christcucks. These pious faggots argued for every single degenerate policy change in the history of America and Europe.

Sigh. History started before the 1960s faggot; the catholic church in America was singlehandedly responsible for keeping the jews in check and nudity out of (((hollywood))) movies from the 1930s to the mid-60s. They were also, until that time, staunchly opposed to birth control and abortion obviously. Don't even get me started on gay marriage. The Evangelicals were in bed with the kikes every step of the way. Now all of western christianity is essentially pozzed out of its mind but to claim that they, as a bloc, argued 'for every single degenerate policy change' is asinine. Like every institution, the catholic church was subverted.

This. This right here was where the jews sperged out and started their campaign to spread misinformation about race and IQ. It had EVERYTHING to with immigration and the fact that jews (and their pet shitskins) were excluded from entering America.

The following quotes are from Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald (a must read!)
>Jewish influence on the social sciences has extended far beyond Boas and the American Anthropological Association. Hollinger notes “the transformation of the ethnoreligious demography of American academic life by Jews” in the period from the 1930s to the 1960s, as well as the Jewish influence on trends toward the secularization of American society and in advancing an ideal of cosmopolitanism


>Kamin (1974a,b) and Gould (1981/1996a) have been in the forefront of spreading disinformation about the role of IQ testing in the immigration debates of the 1920s. Snyderman and Herrnstein (1983; see also Samelson 1982) show that Kamin and Gould misrepresented H. H. Goddard’s (1917) study of the IQ of Jewish immigrants as indicating that “83 percent of the Jews, 80 percent of the Hungarians, 79 percent of the Italians, and 87 percent of the Russians were ‘feeble-minded’

tl;dr

Newfag here.

Redpill me on the JQ not being counterproductive, considering ZOG rule.

Read this then go eat a dick.

The WCTU's work extended across a range of efforts to bring about personal and social moral reform. In the 1880s it worked on creating legislation to protect working girls from the exploitation of men, including raising Age of Consent laws.[9] It also focused on keeping Sundays as Sabbath days and restrict frivolous activities. In 1901 the WCTU said that golf should not be allowed on Sundays.[10]

The WCTU also wanted to aid immigrants coming into the United States through "Americanization" activities. Between 1900 and 1920, much of their budget was given to their center on Ellis Island, which helped to start the Americanization process. The WCTU promoted the idea that immigrants were more prone to alcoholism than Native Americans, focusing particularly on Irish and German immigrant communities as the source of the problem.[citation needed]

The WCTU was also concerned about trying to alleviate poverty, through abstinence from alcohol. Through journal articles, the WCTU tried to prove that abstinence would help people move up in life. A fictional story in one of their journal articles illustrates this fact:

Ned has applied for a job, but he is not chosen. He finds that the potential employer has judged him to be like his Uncle Jack. Jack is a kindly man but he spends his money on drink and cigarettes. Ned has also been seen drinking and smoking. The employer thinks that Ned Fisher lacks the necessary traits of industriousness which he associates with abstinence and self-control.[9]

There's a quote in there somewhere too lazy to ctrl-F sry about the massive kvetching when it was suggested that potential immigrants should be screened to make sure they - wait for it - actually have skills.
OY VEY
Paraphrasing here of course, but the jewish response was along the lines of 'this utilitarian view of immigration is repulsive and dehumanizing, and promotes the idea of immigrants as mere tools to be used and thrown away'

replies with example of christian group not promoting degeneracy

So which one is it, nigger? Have these 'pious faggots argued for every single degenerate policy change in the history of America and Europe' or is the truth more nuanced?

Did you even read my post? They wanted to ban golf on Sundays, raised the age of consent, and they worked to help IMMIGRANTS come to America. They are a liberal political women's CHRISTIAN organization. Who do you think wrote all those sad sob stories asking for the liberation of black slaves? Do you even remember the Quaker women? Christcucks are cucks. Yes, EVERYSINGLE degenerate policy change in Europe is ultimately the responsibility of a largely cucked christian population that capitulates because what would baby Jeebus do?! Think of those pooor childs! Which group voted against the National Socialists in Germany? The Catholics. Eat that dick.

AT LAST I TRULY SEE GOOD POST

Pre-1920s immigrants were mainly white, fuckwit. Also, how is raising the age of consent, and promoting abstinence from alcohol 'degenerate'?
Golf should be b& 8 days a week tbh
To be fair, what are the odds that this organization you are railing against was Protestant, and not Catholic which was my original point in the first place.
Are you against sobriety and purity user? Tsk-tsk.
Ftfy. Learn to differentiate between actual doctrine and organizations that can be infiltrated and manipulated in order to align itself with the ZOG agenda.
Not going to deny that, they were simply being consistent with their universalist beliefs. Christianity has never been and will never be, if it is following its own orthodoxy, racialist. When did I claim that the christian churches were a perennial and absolute beacon of pro-white advocacy? You're diverting from the actual topic. I was simply disagreeing that christianity was responsible 'for every single degenerate policy change' and provide some counter-examples. That was a retarded and unfounded claim in the first place.

Well at least you are starting to show some cracks now. The whole point of accusing them of being degenerate in policy IS the universalist nature of Christianity. Being universalist means Christians will always betray the nation in favor of a Semitic religion. Pretty fucking cucky to me. So this is going to color how Christians approach EVERY political decision. Why do Christians consult their pope on which president to vote for?


I can and I do. Behind every bad decision in European history you will find Christcuckery bowing to the eternal Merchant. Sure, there are greedy kings and corrupt lords throughout history, but they used this religion to justify their bullshit everytime and the cucks ALWAYS fell for it. Christianity was a mistake. It was a poison created to destroy western civilization.

High quality posts. Just remember to fillter the torfags having an off topic and unproductive argument.

The entire concept of nation state developed entirely under Christianity.

Hi, obvious BAN EVADING kike shill. Reported.

He's probably arguing with himself in an attempt to derail the thread. Filter and ignore, don't respond to him.

there are no coincidences

...

Are you fucking stupid or something?

And in the history before 1960 any pope that tried to gas the kikes, race war now were proclaimed to be antipopes and shoahcost gibs were given to their poor jewish victims.

>>entirely
What is Hittites, Carthage, Rome, Athens, Sparta, Corinthia, Macedonia, Celtica, Galaica, Manx, Eire, Babylon, Egypt, Sumeria, China, Polynesia, or even Doggerland? There is basically no difference between Christianity and the Hellenic Cult system, since that's where it derived it's pathos comes from that place.

When it comes to Germanics they didn't have that exact concept of nation, their concept of "nation" was a shared race of people not of land, tribes were made up of these peoples on the spot, so when the people moved they were still Germanic. Above though all these other groups were very dedicated to the concept of nationhood in the way you would know it and protecting it from outside influences, much more than today, especially from some kind of "Pope" not even of their own blood making demands and listening to missions of Jews. The reason the Germanics used to break from Rome, again.

Further your clip is only an example of the ancient struggle between Celtic and Germanic peoples. The Celtic druids very early took Christianity to find an ally in Rome to fight the Germanic reform upon them, the Germanics had to take on Christianity but slowly have been changing it into their own like Protestantism, even today Germanics still refuse to use Deus but instead use one of their old deities, God, slowly working out of the vortex as is their way. A people do not change unless they are wiped out, this is why genocide works and why the Jews are evermore around then before.

MFW I have a 1916 physical copy of the book.

I've never really understood (outside of anger by those who would consider themselves to be not adequate) the backlash against the idea of eugenics. We understand that differences exist. We understand that it exists in other animals; we understand that if we were a cop, we'd -on average- much rather have a German shepherd beside us than we would would want a chihuahua. Whether anyone will say it aloud, we all know that your average Japanese person is a lot more intelligent and capable of creating civilization than your average aboriginal in Australia. If we take out the idea of human life and look at technology, don't we practice eugenics? Why aren't we still using computer processors that were released 25 years ago? Why, in 25 years will processors released today no longer be used? Why did we even start using computers in the first place when we had pens, paper and the post office already?

By trying to make everything as equal as possible we're slowing ourselves down and holding ourselves back. Lowering standards just so that "everyone gets to be there" isn't good. We all know the firefighter example; it's fine if a woman wants to apply but she had better be able to lift XYZ amount of weight. Doesn't the NBA select based off of things like physical traits? Where are my 5'1" Chinese players? There should be a new rule preventing the 6'10" guy from blocking his shots since he has such a height advantage.

Scan and upload it as a .PDF?

Why haven't we been labeling anti-racists and evolution deniers?

Checked.

From House of Names:
The ancient and distinguished German surname Kluth is derived from the old Germanic term "Klotz," meaning "awkward, clumsy." The name was most likely initially bestowed as a nickname, either on someone who was clumsy or in an ironic way on someone who was exceptionally graceful.

media.8ch.net/pdfs/src/1433916801343-0.pdf

Choke on it, lazyfag.

Capped. Well done user.

Because liberals think that humankind has ascended above all the laws of nature, and that they must form and create their own "humanitarian" laws that only apply to us humans, since we are so much more special than everything else.
Why? I don't know. There isn't a concrete reason for them to think this way, no evidence to support that man has overcome nature, and no evidence to support that defying nature's laws is a noble act.
I assume it's part hubris, part fear of inadequacy.

Part one as also.

...

Because apparently it's "racist and discriminatory blah blah blah"

Here let me rip an actual fucking quote that I cannot for the life of me make up

But it is. And that's fine. I'm not saying that one should just go and kill everyone else, but let's not merge everything into less than the sum of its parts. I'm saying that discrimination is okay in that we should be looking for and trying to promote the best traits. The average fastball in the MLB keeps getting harder as pitchers get stronger and bigger; at the turn of the century it was rare to see a pitch hit 100mph and now you can find a pitcher on nearly every team who can hit it. As I said earlier, why aren't we using computer processors from 25 years ago? Why would I want someone with an IQ of 120 to breed with someone who is in the 90s? I want better people, not just more people. I want better pitchers, not just another guy who can wear a uniform. I want faster processors, not just one that can work like it did a quarter of a century ago when we have the ability to do better.

Hell, I say all of this as someone who would not pass my own desired requirements for a multitude of reasons. I do, however, hand some desire for the future to be better than it's looking to be.

This is a sad post.

After the jews took control, we are going back in terms of civilization instead of advancing.

wouldn't a basic way of selling eugenics to the scientifically illiterate be something akin to
"are you attracted to health or disease, fit or fat, intelligent or retardation, virility or impotence, fertile or menopausal, vitality or mortality?"

All the same ID. What did he mean by this?

We are certainly a product of selective reproduction, one of the key developments of the Neoltihic Period is the practise of the domestication of animals and plants, programmes of selective reproduction that produce sought after physical and behavioural modifications, that facilitates the exploitation of these species and increases the potential of one's own.


Whilst as i said this is one of the key aspects of Neolithic development, the evidence from the earliest Neolithic period suggests that this was a gradual process at several key sites that only occured once other social factors were in place, that other criteria had to set this in motion within those communities.


What is never considered is that those human societies themselves were first made aware of the potential of selective reproduction due to their being a product of such, a study of Catalhoyuk suggested as much.


etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/osu1253574143/inline

While this might seem like D&C, it is actually true.

Many of them did reject eugenics on muh bible grounds.


Exactly! Give retards a chance to breed and to exist.
Not quiet, the catholic church was itself always a subversion of White society.
The very name, catholic, means universal.

The irony there is the entire basis of Israel was selective reproduction which they learnt the benefits of due to proximity were the practise was developed, the entire premise of a chosen people.

In the Genesis story it is the daughters of Laban, and two concubines, who provided the matriarchal lineage of Israel, Laban literally translates as 'white', and the suggestion then is of intermarriage between a branch of the Northern Semites, to which Laban belonged, and the 'whites' of the region through taking of wives, which is seen in the lineage of the daughters of Laban, Rachel and Leah, interwoven with the birthing of the sons of Israel is the tale of the division of the flocks, Laban, Mr White, will keep the whole white livestock, whilst Jacob/Israel will keep the speckled or wholly brown, thus Israel will have admixture with the white, to extend the allegory, but will never be white as such, as the patriarchal element is Semitic.

Mit DNA analysis of Jewish people supports this story, in that the Mit DNA is considered to trace back to four different women of European type origin (though unlikely they were ever in Europe rather Syria), whilst male DNA is Semitic.


Thus the biblical narrative, and the actual genetic evidence, supports the concern with creating a people of a particular type, and the importance that was attatched to retaining this genetic basis, in terms of not taking the wives of other Semitic tribes after the establishment for the basis of Israel.


What the Hebrews in essence did was graft themselves into the people and importantly the traditions, of the core Neolithic region.

you sound very reasonable user
please never forget when dealing with enemies/ non-whites that you are not dealing with reasonable people
they either cannot, or refuse to be, reasonable
reason is the sole province of the european man

Ahaha i thought this the moment the thread caught my eye.

You know, sometimes i just start binge-reading because i'm afraid that if i don't get enough literature i'll end up like Imkikey, truly a fate worse than death.

Random blurred corners near end of book make it a garbage copy. Archive org has one without that shit.

Christians rolled out with swords and shields, traveled miles and miles, some of them on foot, and fought in the scorching desert heat for their fellow Christians.

Fucking gas yourself you fedora kike.

They also did pillage their own areas as well. Issue is that it's too easy to subvert and that as Hitler said, they would go begging for votes from kikes who would end up going against them.

sage for off topic

Check out the books by his right hand man Lothrop Stoddard. This guy predicted WW2, The rise of Wahabi Islam and the population boom in the third world. Keep in mind he wrote these books in the 1920's

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lothrop_Stoddard

The Revolt Against Civilization (the Menace of the Underman)
pages.pomona.edu/~vis04747/h110r/readings/The_revolt_against_civilization.pdf

The Rising Tide of Color (Against White World Supremacy)
forgottenbooks.com/en/download/TheRisingTideofColorAgainstWhiteWorldSupremacy_10068225.pdf

The New world of Islam
archive.org/details/newworldislam01stodgoog

Christianity was NSDAP approved, they believed in something that they called 'Positive Christianity'.

Interesting. Danke.

SHOOT YOURSELF IN THE FUCKING THROAT WITH A SHOTGUN YOU ABSOLUTE ASS FAGGOT
nigger

This always makes me mad.

It's all there. Nothing new.

We were warned. No one listened.

"This evil book inspired Hitler"
"Record sales reported for obscure American science op-ed."

Before the 16th century Europe had a civilization no better than Asia’s, but the years 1500 to 1900 marked the “white flood.” This period began with Columbus in 1492 and was established in 1497 with Vasco da Gama’s discovery of a route to India. Stoddard believed these discoveries not only opened new lands to Europeans, but had a profound psychological effect as well. The white man went from static “dead-end” to dynamic discovery:

The thought that this supremacy could end, “never entered the head of one white man in a thousand,” wrote Stoddard. Indeed, in 1920 whites were the most numerous race on earth. Comprising one-third of humanity, they occupied 40 percent of the globe, and controlled 90 percent. He called white expansion “the most prodigious phenomenon in all recorded history . . . Never before has a race acquired such combined preponderance of numbers and dominion.” Though most whites could not foresee it, Stoddard warned that hegemony was about to be challenged.

Only white solidarity could stop the rising tide of color, but the First World War destroyed this solidarity and showed the colored world that whites were vulnerable through internal discord. Just as the Peloponnesian War was the suicide of Greek civilization (“the saddest page in history,” writes Stoddard) the Great War threatened to mark the end of white supremacy.

“The war was nothing short of a headlong plunge into race suicide,” wrote Stoddard. He estimates it took 40,000,000 lives including civilians. Moreover, the conflict had a severe dysgenic effect, with the best young men of Europe dying without passing on their genes. The least fit — the cowardly and physically or mentally deficient — were left behind to propagate. Thus in 1920, at the time Stoddard wrote, the heart of the white world lay in ruins. Europe was financially and physically broken, it’s racial solidarity shattered, the flower of its youth dead on the battlefield — it stood at the same crossroads as the Greeks following their fratricidal war. The decisions made then would determine the fate of the white world.

Stoddard visited NS Deutschland & wrote an interesting book about it, "Into the Darkness".

The pendulum swings to and fro. The further we swung to our goal, the farther we swung back to remind us that all of this was planned. As our future unfolds, the past reforms to match the pattern set by the future. The seers are only remembered once their foresight becomes true, but had nothing they saw ever became our future, they remain forgotten.

To change the future, change the past. To change the past, change the future. Where once Holla Forums was obscure and posting Doom Paul, it posted a smug frog to challenge the grim foreboding reality that lay ahead. Now that reality has changed and revealed horrors new and old, so will Holla Forums remember Doom Paul, for soon after comes the smug frog.

To continue the cycle of Doom and Smug is to remain locked in a cyclic loop. The way forward is the Smug. Every step taken leaves behind the Doom. Thus completes the cycle. Like a chain link, where each loop is a link, it takes back around. Where we leave the loop is where we forge a new chain.

Every time I see that vacant, stupid light-bulb headed somali fuck I want to murder every nigger in the world.

I feel your pain brother. Tragedy is an understatement to describe these two wars. :(

...

So what? There is no magical equality even amonst white people…

I got redpilled about five years ago. At that point, I understood that most likely, nothing could be done to salvage the situation and that the best thing to do would be to redpill as many other people as I can.


After reading this today, I realized something. There is none of that, now - only a desire for conflict and an inexplicable urge to murder. Can't wait till the US starts a major war outside it's continent, because that's when there'll be a chance to overthrow the ZOG once and for all. And the best part is - (((they))) can't hope to kill America like Germany because no land borders. Sage for the blogpost.

...

Amren did a good article regarding Stoddard.
amren.com/news/2016/10/a-warning-from-the-past-lothrop-stoddard-pro-white/

EQUALITY IS A FALSE GOD

inb4 deleted

So ‘coming to the same natural conclusions from scientific observation’ is ‘plagiarism’ now?

dude…
archive.fo/bAlQq

Anyone else getting this message?

We must come together if we are to survive the coming brown tide and go onward to the stars. Never let your memes be only dreams.

Double-dubs checked

inb4 someone accuses you of being an endchan poster just because you carry proof of Holla Forums mod kikery.

Don't jinx us.

...

...

Reported for saving and re-uploading thumbnails.

They want to create a new system around humans for the purpose of controlling humans, their ideal system is a humanocentric one where only the things that can be used to support the system are kept, anything that isn't immediately useful to them exists on borrowed time until they destroy it to make room for more humans or resources to make and maintain humans, and come they find out they need any of those things they destroyed later, they figure to use something artificial to replace it.

Their machine burns the same cogs as fuel as are used to build it. There is no appreciation for the things that exist naturally, as nothing but their system and their control to them is sacred. This is why they only complain about things after it becomes a problem for them and not beforehand. They will expand indefinitely until it becomes unsustainable.

This is a quality thread

Good one. The Brits are some of the most genetically degenerated trash in Europe.

Yet created the greatest empire since Rome. Let me guess you belong to one of the less ideal races?

Brits had it easy. Island-based thallasocracy, machine-gunning niggers and using D&C tactics refined by three centuries of inbreeding with Jews. The Spanish, now, those were really tough, given their starting point and circumstances. I would rank the Brits third or fourth place in overall Euro-historic hardcoreness, after Spain, Germany and (perhaps) France.

reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

If only he knew how bad things really are.

Wew lad don't let that inferiority complex cloud your mind to much faggot.

Good Book

hover over the 'same' ID faggot
then remove yourself from life

they are already losing size

...

laws preventing the immigration of the insane, criminals, retards, illiterate etc had been on the books almost from day 1. this dirty kike is a liar no surprise there

kek

Institutionally-mandated eugenics suffers from one of the many flaws found in Communism - checking those who wield the power. Centralizing power attracts corrupt men like flies to shit. Eugenics as a cultural principle is and has been a staple of every tribe & civilization. Its nothing more than the fittest procreating to produce fitter offspring.
The definition of "fit" is missing in this discourse. Do we define fit as tall & strong? higher IQ? resistance to disease? "Fit" in the mountains of Peru means capability to function in thin-air environments. "Fit" in the Polynesian Islands means capability to dive underwater for 5 minutes.
Here is a big fucking RED PILL for all of us - "Fit" in this age means operating the mechanisms of societal control effectively. It means influencing public opinion, units of exchange, capability to organize, and most importantly - THE CAPABILITY TO RESIST THOUGHT CONTROL. Holla Forums embodies the last attribute the strongest, but we are a tiny fraction of the population. The prima-facie evidence is clear - The "fittest" in these categories are the (((people))) who control them. This was not so in the Bronze age when might meant right. If we indeed return to an era where might means right, the "fittest" will be more closely aligned to the characteristics of our readers.
We mock the negro with statements like "we wuz kangs". Yet the dirty little truth rarely faced is that we were conquerors & builders of civilization and today we are not. Today’s world doesn’t operate with the same KPIs which brought the white man to power for centuries. We are not adapting, and thus we are dying.

So I suppose your tens of millions of based niggers and muds are more ideal than the other "lesser" European races? Hardly a coincidence that the "superior" European races are the ones welcoming and aiding the invaders whIle the less ideal European races are the ones resisting. Not to mention that the British empire gave their empire to said shitskins, and in the cases of Rhodesia and South Africa they flat out attacked their former colonies. Go fuck yourself shit-for-brains

Interesting.

Actually we(whites of a rightist inclination) are the only ones surviving in industrial society. For all their apparent social success the opposition is dying and is forced to import hordes of shitskins who themselves start dying the second they are exposed to modernity. The modern environment is poison and only the resistant are surviving.

Liberals aren't breeding anymore and temperament and predilections to certain political positions are very much inheritable, the 2010 US survey and Europoll 2011 both found that 93%+ of individuals had the same political and religious affiliation as their parents once they were older than 25. Indicating some form of heritable trait is being passed on.

White Democrats in America now have a birthrate of 0.9, blacks have a birthrate of 1.4, jews are even worse at 0.8, and spics sit at 1.6. White republicans are between 2.6 and 2.9 depending on whose numbers you use.

If we stopped all immigration to the United States today by 2050 only 20% of individuals in the US will be descended from habitual Democrat voters or self described liberals and only 7% will be black.
jaymans.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/the-liberalconservative-baby-gap-time-depth/
theroot.com/articles/culture/2014/11/birth_rates_and_the_recession_has_a_black_generation_been_wiped_out.html
epi.org/blog/black-birth-rate-converges-white-rate/

And mudslime birthrates are dropping like stone even in Shitstainistan.
frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/muslim-fertility-rates-dropping-faster-than-western-fertility-rates/

Jews are also dying by inches. independent.co.uk/news/jews-could-die-out-by-next-century-1319030.html
independent.ie/world-news/americas/american-jews-in-danger-of-dying-out-survey-shows-25932714.html

This filth has always hidden within the white race, and also the NE Asians if you've seen their birthrates. These people lived off the cultural largesse of our traditional societies, Christianity for example forced these faggots to marry, be productive, breed and keep their retarded thoughts to themselves lest they be shunned for their disgusting sins. And back then the environment gave them no choice but to behavior in an adaptive manner or die. When they "freed" themselves from that social control the social standards of each generation declined since they were no longer being enforced by an outside social structure or the environment. And now it has come to this. Libtards and shitskins in America have divorce rates of 70% while white "conservatives"(defined in surveys are registered republicans) have divorce rates of 4-8% which is still way too high. Libtards have birthrates below 1 while conservatives have 3 or so kids. Libtards live in their dirty cities with their dogs and cats while conservatives live largely as their ancestors did in rural areas and very small cities. White males produce 74% of the GDP and account for 92% of those employed in manufacturing or resource extraction. White males do all the dangerous and hard work. This is what happens when fear of punishment and strife are not utilized as proper agents of social control. This is the inevitable result of allowing weak willed men, kikes, and cunts to decide the destiny of mankind.

We've seen bullshit like the libtards before, the Cathars were excepting of homosexuality, vice of all sorts, and even murder. They encouraged people not to breed, and thought that because the world was filthy and fallen nobody should have children and that no authority should control them because it was temporal, except for the Cathar Elect of course. Sound familiar? How many times has a libtard bitched to you about overpopulation and how you are selfish for bringing children into a world were they suffer, you are selfish for not adopting a little nignog because muh overpopulation, you are selfish for doing anything biologically adaptive and placing your family before shitskins you've never met. And when you point out that we could just stop feeding the shitskins and billions would die off in the first ten years they have no material rebuttal they and only sputter and stammer "W-W-WACIST!"

This is the same sickness we as a race have always had. The Catholic Church organized the extermination of all adult Cathars under the request of France and the German states because these faggots were trying to destroy society. But they didn't purge enough it seems, the Cathars were never that big and the Inquisition was created to prevent another heresy of that sort. And it did, and it only cost 4,500 lives at most over an 800 year period to do it. The Inquisition essentially invented modern investigative law because they weren't a secular court looking for scapegoats to throw to the outraged mob. They were actually trying to stop heresy.

But it was a mistake and yes any NatSoc plan of forcing these fags to act like humans would also be a mistake. We should just let all those who don't have a predisposition to survive die off, ZA VINAL ZOLUTION IV YOU VILL!

Stfu, moron. This is the same copy-paste BS about Cathars that I saw in another thread. Stop polluting, read a book for once and lurk more.

Is he wrong?

I hate to disappoint you, but we actually do. Look into how the IME works and what physical parts it's made up from.
Sage for off-topic.

Yes, the Cathars take the second place on the enemies' oy vey list right after the Third Reich. I don't even understand why one would engage in slander, nobody cares about them anyways, it was too long ago and almost nothing remained due the staggering efforts of christcucks.

Eat shit.

How? I've heard nothing but defense of the cathars and any other "marginalized" or "victimized" group from the kikes and their allies. I've never read an account by a kike which denigrated them.

Also I provide a single fucking example of proto-liberal faggotry(could have used the Roundheads and their Puritan descendants in America just as easily) and you proceed to dismiss demographic data. If there is any kikey reasoning going on it here it is on the part of the faggot who tries to disprove an argument with a refutation of an ancillary point given as an anecdotal example.

Stay mad, christcuck. You can't even read German, so your comparative analysis is lacking. There was a lot of research being done during the Third Reich. I trust them more than some traitorous french or english.

>>10558447 >>10558462
wew

I can read medieval minuscule and then translate that. Also the amount of source material has increased greatly since the 40s to the point that we know know far more about any period of the middle ages than antiquity, mostly because they used vellum by about 450AD.

But sure you're nebulous "research" going on in Natsoc germany blows me right out of the water. Also independent German cantons would have no reason to be hostile of an expansive France which suppressed a separatist faction in one of its own provinces, no possible political bias at all in a German record. The point is to read records of all the parties and try to make an accurate model after eliminating potential bias.

Why should they? They're all dead. Only a very small amount of people is interested in this stuff. The Cathats elevated anti-semitism to the status of a theological doctrine backed by a vast cosmology. Jehova was seen as a false god. And Jehova is the tribal deity of… guess who.

Triggerd "white'' american detected

The Roman Empire was too long ago too, but you can always make comparisons to that period to today

Reported for being a kike shill.

Kikes will use anything and everything to fuck whites and make up anything they can to defame white civilization in any form during any era. They made up the fucking trail of tears about a bunch of dead injun tribes and nobody gives a fuck about injuns even in the USA.

The Cathars did no such thing, their entire argument was philosophically non-sensical gnostic shit. Their argument wasn't that kikes were trash but that "God" which they saw as the demiurge was a big meanie for making the world have any suffering in it. And like the gnostics they kicked their retarded liberal can down the road. Oh the Demiurge was created by Sophia who was created by the REAL GODHEAD, completely missing the point that the omnipotent godhead would still be wholly and solely responsible for all the outcomes of fate anyway. The buck has to stop at somebody's desk if their is an omnipotent god. Their entire justification for their theology was shit from the start. And the way this manifested as behavior was verifiably maldaptive shit, ie they discouraged breeding and any investment in the material world at all.

And there weren't even any kike enclaves in the areas the Cathars controlled that I am aware of so it isn't like they went around burning them on pyres or throwing them into the sea like the Peoples Crusade did. You are extrapolating "gas the kikes" from whiny liberal bullshit about how a god must not only be a benificent patron who is good for its followers at the end of all things but must also be a total pussy. The same shit we see with "christian" liberals today. Which was my entire point, to draw a comparison between them and infer that similar behavioral predispositions might be manifesting in the absence of social coercion which suppressed this retarded shit.

I know all this mainstream BS, you don't need to write an essay. That's exactly what kikes want you to believe. And that's why they eradicated the Cathars so thoroughly. You can shove the Church up your ass.

How and to what end? Why would the kikes care about a schism in Christianity by a bunch of neo-gnostic faggots who held extremely limited power and thus posed no threat to them even if they had hated kikes? An assertion which I can't find any evidence to support.

Are you just fucking with me? Look kikes have done a lot of shit, but it doesn't look like they had anything to do with the Cathars.

I miss the Holla Forums monthly books threads. My reading backlog is huge thanks in part to those.

Here's the archive of featured books if anybody is interested:
mega.co.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg

Not by any stretch.

This seems like the best thread to ask since for whatever reason we don't have a book thread going at the moment. What are the Holla Forums approved translations of Nietzsche? So far I've found the Stanford translations which seem great, but they are incomplete.

stopped reading


you haven't learned shit, go back

DAILY REMINDER THAT WRONGTHINK IS NOT TOLERATED HERE
8ch is better than the leftists because…..hang on a sec here….lemme think….oh wait it's a CIA controlled echo chamber just like reddit and everything else.

Ay hol yo

Uz Telling me

You wuz Rational and sheeeeit

He probably thought the Anglos as the epitome of the Nordic race. This is as ridiculous as it get.

>extremist tendencies; the former producing such monstrous aberrations as Pan-Germanism
So, Germany disregarding “the significance of race and solidarity of the white world” when first England and then the USA attacks Germany.

Stoddard belonged with Wilson to the American war party, to wage war against Germany to the benefit of England and France. The same party who considered Americans of German extraction as traitors because they wouldn’t support the former colonial masters of the USA, France and England’s war against the homeland of their ancestors (which had never any military conflict with the USA before).

Rhodes.

Selling us “shabbes goy international” as Nordic race warriors.

>Unfortunately the aspiration remained a dream. The ill-balanced tendencies of the late nineteenth century were against it, and they ultimately prevailed. The abnormal growth of national-imperialism, in particular, wrought fatal havoc. The exponents of imperialistic propagandas like Pan-Germanism and Pan-Slavism put forth literally boundless pretensions, planning the domination of the entire planet by their special brand of national-imperialism. Such men had scant regard for race-lines. 

The Anglokikes total lack of introspection and self-awareness.
“Scant regard for race-lines” of an alliance of globalist drug pusher in coalition with an ascending Asiatic power, maned with negros and mongolids sent to crush and exterminate the Germans. An Anglo-French alliance starting a rape warfare against Germany of previous unknown dimensions.
Which country was it, except from Russia which demanded the creation of a fictional state, “Czechoslovakia” in German territory, yes that was overt the USA main war agenda.

“WHITE SOLIDARITY” indeed!

Nordic blood preponderates only in the northwest, and is merely veneered over the rest of Germany, especially in the upper classes.

Bejamin Disraeli and Lord Rothschild would agree.


43 percent, White Christians are now minority in USA
However, white Christians, once predominant in the country's religious life, now comprise only 43 percent of the population, according to the Public Religion Research Institute, or PRRI, a polling organization based in Washington.

Four decades ago, about eight in 10 Americans were white Christians.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4858552/Survey-White-Christians-minority-US-population.html

I hope it was it worth, to beat “the Hun”, Anglos.

Downloading this to read tonight. Bump.

Read the classics, then you won't need to read Nietzsche at all. It's no fun anyways to constantly try and sift the good stuff from jewish BS. And you won't need to do mental gymnastics to find some "hidden" meaning inside kosher passages.

Thanks for the suggestion, but I am already well versed in the classics. As far as I'm aware the only kosher interpretations of Nietzsche are derived from Kaufman's work and he is, as expected, a confirmed kike. Just looking for additional insight as what to avoid since I could have skipped something.