The Jewish Cult

You don't need Talmud, Protocals, 'satanism', Sabateans, or Kabbalah to understand the JQ. It's all right here in the Old Testement if you know how to read it. Jews are the esoteric Levitical priesthood and the tribe of Judah seperated itself from Israel and Mosaic law. They admit in the OT even if it's a false history, it is their motivational doctrine of ethnic cleansing, immorality, and world domination.

THE END OF ISRAEL

Part 1:

About five hundred years before the event of 458 BC, or nearly three thousand years ago today, the brief and troubled association between Judah and the Israelites ("the children of Israel") came to an end. Israel rejected the chosen people creed which was beginning to take shape in Judah and went its own way. (The adoption of the name "Israel" by the Zionist state which was set up in Palestine in 1948 was transparent false pretence).

The events which led to the short-lived, unhappy union covered earlier centuries. The mythological or legendary period of Moses was followed by one in Canaan during which "Israel" was the strong, cohesive and recognizable entity, the northern confederation of the ten tribes. Judah (to which the very small tribe of Benjamin attached itself) was a petty chiefdom in the south.

Judah, from which today's Zionism comes down, was a tribe of ill repute. Judah sold his brother Joseph, the most beloved son of Jacob-called-Israel, to the Ishmaelites for twenty pieces of silver (as Judas, the only Judean among the disciples, much later betrayed Jesus for thirty pieces of silver), and then founded the tribe in incest, (Genesis 37-38). The priestly scribes who wrote this Scriptural account centuries afterwards had made themselves the masters of Judah and as they altered the oral tradition, whenever it suited them, the question prompts itself: why were they at pains to preserve, or possibly even to insert, this attribution of incestuous beginnings and a treacherous nature to the very people who, they said, were the chosen of God? The thing is mysterious, like much else in the Levitical Scriptures, and only the inner sect could supply an answer.

Anyway, those Scriptures and today's authorities agree about the separateness of "Israel" and "Judah". In the Old Testament Israel is often called "the house of Joseph", in pointed distinction from "the house of Judah". The Jewish Encyclopaedia says, ''Joseph and Judah typify two distinct lines of descent" and adds (as already cited) that Judah was "in all likelihood a non-Israelitish tribe". The Encyclopaedia Britannica says that Judaism developed long after the Israelites had merged themselves with mankind, and that the true relationship of the two peoples is best expressed in the phrase, "The Israelites were not Jews". Historically, Judah was to survive for a little while and to bring forth Judaism, which begat Zionism. Israel was to disappear as an entity, and it all came about in this way:

The little tribe in the south, Judah, became identified with the landless tribe, that of the Levites. These hereditary priests, who claimed that their office had been bestowed on them by Jehovah on Mount Sinai, were the true fathers of Judaism. They wandered among the tribes, preaching that the war of one was the war of all, and Jehovah's war. Their aim was power and they strove for a theocracy, a state in which God is the sovereign and religion the law. During the period of the Judges they achieved their aim to some extent, for they naturally [7] were the Judges. What they, and isolated Judah, most needed was union with Israel. Israel, which distrusted this lawgiving priesthood, would not hear of unification unless it were under a king; all the surrounding peoples had kings.

The Levites grasped this opportunity. They saw that if a king were appointed the ruling class would supply the nominee, and they were the ruling class. Samuel, at their head, set up a puppet monarchy, behind which the priesthood wielded true power; this was achieved through the stipulation that the king should reign only for life, which meant that he would not be able to found a dynasty. Samuel chose a young Benjaminite peasant, Saul, who had made some name in tribal warfare and, presumably, was thought likely to be tractable (the choice of a Benjaminite suggests that Israel would not consider any man of Judah for the kingship). The unified kingdom of Israel then began; in truth it survived but this one reign, Saul's.

Other urls found in this thread:

ttsreader.com/
biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm
overlordsofchaos.com/html/jesus_was_not_a_jew.html
assemblyoftrueisrael.com/TruthPage/JesuswasNotAJew.htm
hardons-blog.blogspot.de/2013/12/who-are-jews.html
christianitybeliefs.org/end-times-deceptions/the-star-of-david-deception/
patriot.dk/ravage.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syriac_Orthodox_Church
archive.org/details/cpart
archive.org/details/SyriacDocuments
newsletter.atla.com/2017/syriacregisters/
ww2gravestone.com/people/degrelle-leon-joseph-marie-ignace/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Léon_Degrelle
independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-leon-degrelle-1368399.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentecost
strugglesforexistence.com/?p=article_p&id=13
biblica.com/resources/bible-faqs/in-what-language-was-the-bible-first-written/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes
twitter.com/gantman/status/908465334709051392
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Part 2:

In Saul's fate (or in the account given of it in the later Scriptures) the ominous nature of Judaism, as it was to be given shape, may be discerned. He was commanded to begin the holy war by attacking the Amalekites "and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass". He destroyed "man and woman, infant and suckling", but spared King-Agag and the best of the sheep, oxen, yearlings and lambs. For this he was excommunicated by Samuel, who secretly chose one David, of Judah, to be Saul's successor. Thereafter Saul vainly strove by zeal in "utter destruction" to appease the Levites, and then by attempting David's life to save his throne. At last he killed himself.

Possibly none of this happened; it is the account given in the Book of Samuel, which the Levites produced centuries later. Whether it is true or allegorical, the importance lies in the plain implication: Jehovah demanded literal obedience when he commanded "utter destruction", and mercy or pity were capital offences. This lesson is driven home in many other depictments of events which were possibly historical and possibly imaginary.

This was really the end, three thousand years ago, of the united kingdom, for Israel would not accept the man of Judah, David, as king. Dr. Kastein says that "the rest of Israel ignored him" and proclaimed Saul's son, Ishbosheth, king, whereon the re-division into Israel and Judah "really took place". According to Samuel, Ishbosheth was killed and his head was sent to David, who thereon restored a nominal union and made Jerusalem his capital. He never again truly united the kingdom or the tribes; he founded a dynasty which survived one more reign.

Formal Judaism holds to this day that the Messianic consummation will come about under a worldly king of "the house of David"; and racial exclusion is the first tenet of formal Judaism (and the law of the land in the Zionist state). The origins of the dynasty founded by David are thus of direct relevance to this narrative.

[8]
Racial discrimination and segregation were clearly unknown to the tribespeople in those days of the association between Israel and Judah, for the Old Testament says that David, the Judahite, from his roof, saw "a very beautiful woman" bathing, commanded her to him and made her with child, and then had her husband, a Hittite, sent into the front battle-line with orders that he be killed. When he was dead David added the woman, Bathsheba, to his wives, and her second son by him became the next king, Solomon (this story of David and Bathsheba, as related in the Old Testament, was bowdlerized in a Hollywood-made moving picture of our day).

Such was the racial descent of Solomon, the last king of the riven confederacy, according to the Levitical scribes. He began his reign with three murders, including that of his brother, and vainly sought to save his dynasty by the Habsburg method, marriage, though on grander scale. He married princesses from Egypt and many neighbouring tribes and had hundreds of lesser wives, so that in his day, too, racial segregation must have been unknown. He built the temple and established a hereditary high priesthood.

That was the story, concluded in 937 BC, of the short association between Israel and Judah. When Solomon died the incompatible associates finally split, and in the north Israel resumed its independent life. Dr Kastein says:

"The two states had no more in common, for good or evil, than any other two countries with a common frontier. From time to time they waged war against each other or made treaties, but they were entirely separate. The Israelites ceased to believe that they had a destiny apart from their neighbours and King Jeroboam made separation from Judah as complete in the religious as in the political sense". Then, of the Judahites, Dr. Kastein adds, "they decided that they were destined to develop as a race apart. . . they demanded an order of existence fundamentally different from that of the people about them. These were differences which allowed of no process of assimilation to others. They demanded separation, absolute differentiation. "

Thus the cause of the breach and separation is made clear. Israel believed that its destiny lay with involvement in mankind, and rejected Judah on the very grounds which recurrently, in the ensuing three thousand years, caused other peoples to turn in alarm, resentment and repudiation from Judaism. Judah "demanded separation, absolute differentiation". (However, Dr. Kastein, though he says "Judah", means "the Levites". How could even the tribespeople of Judah, at that stage, have demanded "separation, absolute differentiation", when Solomon had had a thousand wives?)

Part Three

It was the Levites, with their racial creed, that Israel rejected. The next two hundred years, during which Israel and Judah existed separately, and often in enmity, but side by side, are filled with the voices of the Hebrew "prophets", arraigning the Levites and the creed which they were constructing. These voices still call to mankind out of the tribal darkness which beclouds much of the Old [9] Testament, for they scarified the creed which was in the making just as Jesus scarified it seven or eight hundred years later, when it was long established, at the Temple in Jerusalem.

These men were nearly all Israelites; most of them were Josephites. They were on the road to the oneGod of all-peoples and to participation in mankind. They were not unique among men in this: soon the Buddha, in India, was to oppose his Sermon at Benares and his Five Commands of Uprightness to the creed of Brahma, the creator of caste-segregation, and to the worship of idols. They were in truth Israelite remonstrants against the Levitical teaching which was to become identified with the name of Judah. The name "Hebrew prophets" is inapt because they made no pretence to power of divination and were angered by the description ("I was no prophet, neither was I a prophet's son", Amos). They were protestants in their time and gave simple warning of the calculable consequences of the racial creed; their warning remains valid today.

The claims of the Levite priesthood moved them to these protests, particularly the priestly c1aim to the firstborn ("That which openeth the womb is mine," Exodus), and the priestly insistence on sacrificial rites. The Israelite expostulants (to whom this "so-called law of Moses" was unknown, according to Mr. Montefiore) saw no virtue in the bloodying of priests, the endless sacrifice of animals and the "burnt offerings", the "sweet savour" of which was supposed to please Jehovah. They rebuked the priestly doctrine of slaying and enslaving "the heathen". God, they cried, desired moral behaviour, neighbourly conduct and justice towards the poor, the fatherless, the widow and the oppressed, not blood sacrifices and hatred of the heathen.

These protests provide the first forelight of the dawn which came some eight hundred years later.

Part Four:

They find themselves in strange company among the injunctions to massacre in which the Old Testament abounds. The strange thing is that these remonstrances survived the compilation, when Israel was gone and the Levites, supreme in Judah, wrote down the Scriptures.

Today's student cannot explain, for instance, why King David suffers Nathan publicly to rebuke him for taking Uriah's wife and having Uriah murdered. Possibly among the later scribes who compiled the historical narrative, long after Israel and the Israelite expostulants were gone, were some of their mind, who contrived in this way to continue their protest.

Conversely, these benevolent and enlightened passages are often followed by fanatical ones, attributed to the same man, which cancel them, or put the opposite in their place. The only reasonable explanation is that these are interpolations later made, to bring the heretics into line with Levitical dogma.

Whatever the explanation, these Israelite protests against the heresy of Judah have an ageless appeal and form the monument to vanished Israel. They force their way, like little blades of truth, between the dark stones of tribal saga. They pointed the way to the rising and widening road of common involvement in [10] mankind and away from the tribal abyss.

Elijah and Elisha both worked in Israel, and Amos spoke solely to the Josephites. He in particular attacked the blood sacrifices and priestly rites: "I hate, I despise your feasts and I take no delight in your solemn assemblies. Yea, though ye offer me burnt offerings and your meal offerings, I will not accept them. Neither will I regard the peace offerings of your fat beasts. Take thou away from me the noise of thy songs" (the Levites' chanted liturgies) "and let me not hear the melody of thy viols. But let judgment run as water and righteousness as a mighty stream". And then the immortal rebuke to the "peculiar people" doctrine: "Are ye not as the children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel, saith the Lord".

Hosea, another Israelite, says, "I desired mercy and not sacrifice, and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings". Hosea exhorts to the practice of "justice and righteousness", "loving kindness and compassion and faithfulness", not discrimination and contempt.

Part Five

In Micah's time the Levites apparently still demanded the sacrifice of all the firstborn to Jehovah:

"Wherewith shall I come before the Lord and bow myself before God on high? Shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old? Will the Lord be pleased with thousands of rams or with ten thousands of rivers of oil. Shall I give my firstborn for my transgressions, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul? It hath been told to thee, O man, what is good and what the Lord doth require of thee: only to do justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with thy God" .

These men contended for the soul of the tribespeople during the two centuries when Israel and Judah existed side by side, and sometimes at daggers drawn. During this period the Levites, earlier distributed among the twelve tribes, were driven more and more to congregate in tiny Judah and in Jerusalem, and to concentrate their energies on the Judahites.

Then, in 721 BC, Israel was attacked and conquered by Assyria and the Israelites were carried into captivity. Judah was spared for that moment and for another century remained an insignificant vassal, first of Assyria and then of Egypt, and the stronghold of the Levitical sect.

At that point "the children of Israel" disappear from history and if promises made to them are to be redeemed, this redemption must evidently be from among the ranks of mankind, in which they became involved and merged. Given the prevalent westward trend among the movements of peoples during the last twenty-seven hundred years, it is probable that much of their blood has gone into the European and American peoples.

The Judaist claim, on the other hand, is that Israel was totally and deservedly "lost", because it rejected the Levitical creed and chose "rapprochement with neighbouring peoples". Dr. Kastein, whose words these are, nearly twenty-seven [11] centuries later ardently rejoiced, on that very account, in their downfall: "The ten northern tribes, with their separate development, had drifted so far from their kindred in the south that the chronicle of their fall takes the form of a brief bald statement of fact unrelieved by any expression of grief. No epic poem, no dirge, no sympathy marked the hour of their downfall".

Part Six

The student of the controversy of Zion has to plod far before he begins to unveil its mysteries, but very soon discovers that in all things it speaks with two tongues, one for "the heathen" and one for the initiates.

The Levites of that ancient time did not, and today's Zionists do not believe that the Israelites "vanished without leaving a trace" (as Dr. Kastein says). They were pronounced "dead", in the way that a Jew marrying out of the fold today is pronounced dead (for instance, Dr. John Goldstein); they were excommunicated and only in that sense "vanished".

Peoples do not become extinct; the North American Indians, the Australian Blackfellows, the New Zealand Maoris, the South African Bantu and others are the proofs of that. For that matter, the Israelites could not have been "taken away captive", had they been physically exterminated. Their blood and thought survive in mankind, somewhere, today.

Israel remained separate from Judah of its own will, and for the very reasons which ever since have aroused the mistrust and misgiving of other peoples. The Israelites "were not Jews"; the Judahites were "in all likelihood non-Israelitish".

The true meaning of the assertion that Israel "disappeared" is to be found in the later Talmud, which says: "The ten tribes have no share in the world to come". Thus, "the children of Israel" are banned from heaven by the ruling sect of Judah because they refused to exclude themselves from mankind on earth.

The Chief Rabbi of the British Empire in 1918, the Very Rev. J.H. Hertz, in answer to an enquiry on this point said explicitly, "The people known at present as Jews are descendants of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin with a certain number of descendants of the tribe of Levi". This statement makes perfectly clear that "Israel" had no part in what has become Judaism (no authority, Judaist or other, would support the claim made to blood-descent from Judah, for the Jews of today, but this is of little account).

Therefore the use of the name "Israel" by the Zionist state which was created in Palestine in this century is in the nature of a forgery. Some strong reason must have dictated the use of the name of a people who were not Jews and would have none of the creed which has become Judaism. One tenable theory suggests itself. The Zionist state was set up with the connivance of the great nations of the West, which is also the area of Christendom. The calculation may have been that these peoples would be comforted in their consciences if they could be led to believe that they were fulfilling Biblical prophecy and God's promise to "Israel", at whatever cost in the "destruction" of innocent peoples.

If that was the motive for the misuse of the name "Israel", the expedient may for the time being have been successful; the multitude was ever easily "persuaded". However, truth will out in the long run, as the surviving remonstrances of the Israelite prophets show.

If the Zionist state of 1948 could lay claim to any name whatever taken from far antiquity, this could only be "Judah", as this chapter has shown.

Section 2: THE LEVITES AND THE LAW

During the hundred years that followed the Assyrian conquest of Israel, the Levites in Judah began to compile the written Law. In 621 BC they produced Deuteronomy and read it to the people in the temple at Jerusalem.

This was the birth of "the Mosaic law", which Moses, if he ever lived, never knew. It is called the Mosaic law because it is attributed to him, but the authorities agree that it was the product of the Levites, who then and later repeatedly made Moses (and for that matter, Jehovah) say what suited them. Its correct description would be "the Levitical law" or "the Judaic law".

Deuteronomy is to formal Judaism and Zionism what the Communist Manifesto was to the destructive revolution of our century. It is the basis of the Torah ("the Law") contained in the Pentateuch, which itself forms the raw material of the Talmud, which again gave birth to those "commentaries" and commentarieson-commentaries which together constitute the Judaic "law".

Therefore Deuteronomy is also the basis of the political programme, of worldly dominion over nations despoiled and enslaved, which has been largely realized in the West during this Twentieth Century. Deuteronomy is of direct relevancy to the events of our day, and much of the confusion surrounding them disperses if they are studied in its light.

It was read, in 621 BC, to so small an audience in so small a place that its great effects for the whole world, through the following centuries into our time, are by contrast the more striking.

Section 2, Part 2:

Before Deuteronomy was compiled only the "oral tradition" of what God said to Moses existed. The Levites claimed to be the consecrated guardians of this tradition and the tribespeople had to take their word for it (their pretensions in this respect chiefly caused the anger of the Israelite "prophets"). If anything had been written down before Deuteronomy was read, such manuscripts were fragmentary and in priestly keeping, and as little known to the primitive tribesmen as the Greek poets to Kentucky hillsfolk today.

That Deuteronomy was different from anything that had been known or understood before is implicit in its name, which means "Second Law". Deuteronomy, in fact, was Levitical Judaism, first revealed; the Israelites (as already shown) "were not Jews" and had never known this "Law".

Significantly, Deuteronomy which appears as the fifth book of today's Bible, with an air of growing naturally out of the previous ones, was the first book to be completed as a whole. Though Genesis and Exodus provide the historical background and mount for it, they were later produced by the Levites, and Leviticus and Numbers, the other books of the Torah, were compiled even later.

Deuteronomy stood the earlier tradition on its head, if it was in harmony with the moral commandments. However, the Levites were within their self-granted right in making any changes they chose, for they held that they were divinely [14] authorized to amend the Law, as orally revealed by God to Moses, in order to meet "the constantly changing conditions of existence in the spirit of traditional teaching" (Dr. Kastein).

For that matter, they also claimed that Moses had received at Sinai a secret oral Torah, which must never be committed to writing. In view of the later inclusion of the Old Testament in one volume with the Christian New Testament, and the average Gentile's assumption that he thus has before his eyes the whole of "the Mosaic Law", this qualification is of permanent interest.

D. REED :: The Controversy of Zion
— 18 —
The Talmud, as quoted by Dr. Funk, says, "God foresaw that one day a time would come when the Heathen would possess themselves of the Torah and would say to Israel, 'We, too, are sons of God'. Then will the Lord say: 'Only he who knows my secrets is my son'. And what are the secrets of God? The oral teachings" .

The few people who heard Deuteronomy read in 621 BC, and then first learned what "the Mosaic Law" was to be, were told that the manuscripts had been "discovered". Today's Judaist authorities dismiss this and agree that Deuteronomy was the independent work of the Levites in isolated Judah after Judah's rejection by the Israelites and the conquest of Israel.

Now that's a wall of text. Bumping while I read

Lastly

Karl Marx: The Jewish Question:

Let us break the theological framing of the question. For us the question of Jewish capacity for emancipation becomes the question of which element in society must be overcome in order to abolish Judaism. For the Jews capacity for emancipation depends on the Jews' relation to the emancipation of our whole enslaved world.
Let us look at the real Jew of our time; not the Jew of the Sabbath, whom Bauer considers, but the Jew of everyday life.
What is the Jew's foundation in our world? Material necessity, private advantage.
What is the object of the Jew's worship in this world? Usury. What is his worldly god? Money.
Very well then; emancipation from usury and money, that is, from practical, real Judaism, would constitute the emancipation of our time.
The organization of society so as to abolish the preconditions of usury, and hence its possibility, would render the Jew impossible. His religious conviction would dissolve like a stale miasma under the pressure of the real life of the community. On the other hand, should the Jew recognize his materialistic nature as valueless and work for its abolition, he would be working for simple human emancipation and the shedding of his development to date, thus rejecting the highest practical expression of human self-alienation.
[Page 38] Thus we recognize in Judaism generally an anti-social element which has reached its present strength through a historical development in which the Jews eagerly collaborated. Jewish emancipation means, ultimately, the emancipation of humanity from Judaism.
The Jew has already emancipated himself in the Jewish way: "The Jew, who is, for example, merely tolerated in Vienna, determines by his money power the fate of the entire German Empire. The Jew, who is without rights in the smallest German state, decides the fate of Europe…
"While corporations and guilds are closed to the Jew or are not yet favorable to him, the daring of private industry mocks the obstinacy of medieval institutions." (The Jewish Question.)

Part Two:

This is no isolated fact. The Jew has emancipated himself in the Jewish fashion not only by acquiring money power but through money's having become (with him or without him) the world power and the Jewish spirit's having become the practical spirit of the Christian peoples. The Jews have emancipated themselves to the extent that Christians have become Jews.
[Page 39] "The pious and politically free inhabitant of New England," reports Colonel Hamilton, "is a kind of Laocoon who makes not the slightest effort to free himself from the snakes which are strangling him. Mammon is the God of these people: they worship him not only with their lips but with all the powers of their bodies and soul. The earth in their eyes is nothing but one great stock exchange and they are convinced that they have no other mission here below than to become richer than their neighbors. Usury has taken hold of all their thoughts, excitement derives from some change in its object. When they travel, they carry their office or store, so to speak, with them on their backs and speak of nothing but interest and profits and if they turn their eyes for an instant from their own business it is only to turn them to the business of others."
Indeed, the materialistic rule of the Jew over the Christian world has in the United States reached such everyday acceptability that the propagation of the Gospels, the teaching of Christianity itself, has become an article of commerce, and the bankrupt merchant deals in Gospels just as the enriched gospeler deals in business. "Tel que vous le voyez à la tête d'une congrégation respectable a commencé par être marchand; son commerce étant tombé, il s'est fait ministre; cet autre a débuté par le sacerdoce, mais des qu'il a eu quelque somme d'argent à la disposition, il a laissé la chaire pour le négoce. Aux yeux d'un grand nombre, le ministère religieux est une véritable carrière industrielle." ("The man who is now leading a respectable congregation may have started out as a merchant; his [Page 40] business having failed, he became a minister. Another started out as a minister; but as soon as he accumulated some money; he left the pulpit and went into business. In the eyes of many people, religious ministry is a genuine business career.") (Beaumont, op. cit.)
Bauer holds that it is a fiction to state that the Jew is deprived of political rights while in practice he wields enormous power and exercises wholesale a political influence whose retail use is denied him.
The contradiction between this actual political power and Jews' political rights is the universal contradiction between politics and the power of money. Theoretically, the first stands over the second; in practice it has become its slave.
Judaism has maintained itself alongside Christianity not only as a religious criticism of Christianity, and as an official questioner as to its religious origin, but also because the materialistic spirit of Judaism has kept itself alive in Christian society and achieved there its highest expression. The Jew who remains a special member of bourgeois society is only a special phenomenon of Judaism within that society.
Judaism has maintained itself not in spite of, but because of, history.
Bourgeois society continuously brings forth the Jew from its own entrails.
What was the essential foundation of the Jewish religion? Practical needs, egotism.
The monotheism of the Jew is therefore actually a [Page 41] polytheism of many needs, and it makes even renunciation the object of divine law. Practical need, egotism, is the underlying principle of bourgeois society and is recognizable as such immediately this society sets up its own political state. The god of practical needs and private interest is money.
Money is the zealous one God of Israel, beside which no other God may stand. Money degrades all the gods of mankind and turns them into commodities. Money is the universal and self-constituted value set upon all things. It has therefore robbed the whole world, of both nature and man, of its original value. Money is the essence of man's life and work, which have become alienated from him. This alien monster rules him and he worships it.
The God of the Jews has become secularized and is now a worldly God. The bill of exchange is the Jew's real God. His God is the illusory bill of exchange.

Part Three

What is stated as theory in Jewish religion, namely, contempt for theory, art, history and man as an end in himself, is an actual and conscious point of view, held to be virtuous by the man of money. Even the relations between the sexes, between man and woman, become an object of commerce. The woman is auctioned off. The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the true nationality of the merchant, of the man of money.

The law of the Jew, lacking all solid foundation, is only a religious caricature of morality and of law in general, but it provides the formal rites in which the world of property clothes its transactions.

Jewish Jesuitism – that practical Jesuitism which in the Talmud, as Bauer shows, deals with the clever circumvention by the world of private interest of the laws that rule it – is the chief art of that world.

One more redpill. John Lennon on the Socialism of Baby Boomers – and their hero worship. In relation we can see how the Jew took advantage of a childish generation to end Western Civilization.

Figured I'd dump this stuff before the internet gets totally shoa'd

It's good to see the MTV Awards starting Paris Jackson getting bumped endlessly and this sinking into oblivion. Oh well…

TV watching and planning rallies with the CIA is funner than learning I guess.

That is what they do.

Very interesting read. I've always thought we should expose the origins of Judaism more. The sheer depths of their lies and manipulations is insane.

"Racism"
The Curious Beginnings of a Useless Word

part one

The Oxford English Dictionary is a multivolume reference work that is one of Western scholarship's most remarkable achievements – the standard dictionary of the English language on what are known as "historical principles." Unlike most dictionaries, the OED also provides information on the first historical appearance and usage of words. The range of the erudition in the OED is often astounding, but for American Renaissance readers, one of its most interesting entries is for the word "racism."
According to the second edition (1989) of the OED, the earliest known usage of the word "racism" in English occurred in a 1936 book by the American "fascist," Lawrence Dennis, The Coming American Fascism. The second usage of the term in English that the OED records is in the title of a book originally written in German in 1933 and 1934 but translated into English and first published in 1938 – Racism by Magnus Hirschfeld, translated by Eden and Cedar Paul. Since Hirschfeld died in 1935, before the publication of Dennis' book the following year, and had already used the word extensively in the text and title of his own book, it seems only fair to recognize him rather than Dennis as the originator of the word "racism." In the case of the word "racist" as an adjective, the OED ascribes the first known usage to Hirschfeld himself. Who was Magnus Hirschfeld and what did he have to tell us about "racism"?
Magnus Hirschfeld (1868-1935) was a German-Jewish medical scientist whose major work was in the field of what came to be known as "sexology" – the scientific study of sex. Like Havelock Ellis in England and Alfred Kinsey in the United States, Hirschfeld was not only among the first to collect systematic information about sexuality but also was an apostle of sexual "liberation." His major work was a study of homosexuality, but he also published many other books, monographs, and articles dealing with sex. He wrote a five-volume treatise on "sexology" as well as some 150 other works and helped write and produce five films on the subject.
It is fair to say that his works were intended to send a message – that traditional Christian and bourgeois sexual morality was repressive, irrational, and hypocritical, and that emancipation would be a major step forward. His admiring translators, Eden and Cedar Paul, in their introduction to Racism, write of his "unwearying championship of the cause of persons who, because their sexual hormonic functioning is of an unusual type, are persecuted by their more fortunate fellow-mortals." Long before the "sexual revolution" of the 1960s, Magnus Hirschfeld was crusading for the "normalization" of homosexuality and other abnormal sexual behavior.
Hirschfeld was the founder of an Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin and helped organize "sexology" on an international scale. In 1922, he was physically attacked and almost killed by anti-Semites in Munich. In May, 1933, the Nazis closed down his "Institute of Sexual Science" and Hirschfeld fled to France, where he lived until his death in 1935.

part two


Racism is largely devoted to a highly polemical "refutation" of some of the main racial ideologies and theories of the 19th and 20th centuries. The writers whom Hirschfeld criticized, aside from his favorite target of the National Socialists themselves, were figures like Arthur de Gobineau, Vacher de La-Pouge, Houston Stewart Chamberlain, and others generally denounced today as "pseudo-scientists." In fact, that is an inappropriate term. Some of them were not trying to write as scientists at all but rather as political theorists, while others are better described as pre-scientific writers on race who worked with inadequate information, concepts, methodology, and terminology. While Hirschfeld may have been correct in rejecting their more egregious errors, his sneering at them for these mistakes is rather like ridiculing Copernicus and Kepler because they continued to accept some erroneous ideas from medieval astronomy.
Even when Hirschfeld is right in his critique of the early race theorists, it is often because he has chosen easy targets. His "refutation" of "racism" is largely centered on irrelevant common-places that even extreme exponents of racial differences might readily acknowledge – that all human beings are part of the same species and can interbreed, that blood transfusions can take place between races, that "there is no such thing as a pure race," that the races are identical in the vast majority of physical characteristics, that cephalic index is not a meaningful measurement of intelligence or character, etc. Yet his "scientific" evidence is often merely anecdotal or simply his own opinion asserted as unquestioned truth.

part three

In another section, he recounts the names of those he considers the 70 most outstanding figures in world history and announces that "all such lists, when made without bias, will show that persons of genius and persons of outstanding talent are not set apart from the ruck by any colour of their eyes, by a peculiar shape of the skull or the nose, by any 'ethnological' characteristics whatever. What is decisive in human beings is not race but individuality." It does not seem to occur to Hirschfeld that all but about 8 or 9 of the 70 world-historical figures on his list are white Europeans. There are no Negroes and only two Asians (Confucius and Sun Yat Sen).
It is interesting that for all his contempt for "racism," Hirschfeld never once mentions IQ studies or the considerable psychometric evidence about race and intelligence that was already available even in the 1930s. Most of Hirschfeld's polemic is aimed at the proponents of intra-European racial differences (Nordics, Alpines, Mediterraneans, Dinarics, etc.) and not at differences between whites and other major races (though he steadfastly denies such differences as well). Curiously, he never cites the work of Franz Boas and his disciples against "racism," though that work was available in Europe at the time, nor does he invoke the ideas of the Frankfurt School, though Hirschfeld's own claim that "racism" is rooted in fear, loss of self-esteem, and other social and psychological pathologies resembles the ideas the Frankfurt School was formulating.
Nor, despite Hirschfeld's own Jewish background and the Nazi threat to Jews, does he seem preoccupied with anti-Semitism; in one or two passages he criticizes Jews themselves for their own ethnocentrism and faults Zionism for having created a new "race hatred" between Jews and Arabs. Moreover, Hirschfeld is a stout defender of eugenics, though not on racial lines, and he even has a brief chapter exploring a distinction he calls "Gobinism or Galtonism" – that is, attacking the ideas of French "racist" Arthur de Gobineau and defending those of Francis Galton, who coined the word "eugenics" and pioneered its development. Today most critics of "racism" would lump Galton and Gobineau together rather than distinguish between them.
As a serious critique of the view that socially significant natural differences between the races exist, Hirschfeld's book is a failure, and even as a polemic against some of the more politicized and unverified claims about race made a century or more ago, it is weak. The importance of the book is not so much its content, however, as what it tells us about the word "racism" and how the enemies of white racial consciousness have developed and deployed it for their own purposes.
Hirschfeld describes his own political ideals as "Pan-Humanism," a version of political, cultural, and racial universalism. The Pauls themselves write, "we think that the readers of Racism will detect a very definite orientation to the Left… [Hirschfeld] was one who fully realized that sexual reform is impossible without a preliminary economic and political revolution."
In Racism, Hirschfeld offers what is essentially a definition of "Pan-Humanism": "The individual, however close the ties of neighborhood, companionship, family, a common lot, language, education, and the environment of nation and country, can find only one dependable unity within which to seek a permanent spiritual kinship – that of humanity-at-large, that of the whole human race." With one exception, he is unsparing in his denunciations of the ethnocentric loyalties of nations, races, and cultures: "Always and everywhere, except in Soviet Russia, xenophobia, xenophobia, xenophobia." Later, he informs us, "It may be too early to speak, but perhaps the problem of nationalities and races has already been solved on one-sixth of the land-surface of the globe [i.e., Stalin's Russia]."

Part Four

"Racism", therefore, is a term originating on the left, and has been so defined and loaded with meanings the left wants it to have that it cannot now be used by the supporters of white racial consciousness for any constructive purpose. Anyone who uses the term to describe himself or his own views has already allowed himself to be maneuvered onto his opponents' ground and has already lost the debate. He may try to define the word differently, but he will need to spend most of his time explaining that he does not mean by it what everyone else means. As a term useful for communicating ideas that the serious supporters of white racial consciousness wish to communicate, the term is useless, and it was intended by those who developed it that it be useless for that purpose.
But understanding the origins of the word "racism" in Hirschfeld's polemic also makes clear the uselessness of the word for any other purpose. No one seems ever to have used the word to describe his own ideas or ideas with which he agrees; its only application has been by the enemies of the ideas it purports to describe, and hence it has no objective meaning apart from its polemical usage. If no one calls his own ideas "racism" and its only application is to a body of ideas considered to be untrue and evil, then it has no use other than as a kind of fancy curse word, the purpose of which is simply to demonize anyone who expresses the ideas it is supposed to describe.
It is clear that Magnus Hirschfeld himself harbored deep ideological, professional, and personal animosities against those to whom he applied the word, and those animosities may have extended to the entire society that throughout his career he associated with sexual repression and which he wanted replaced by a kind of global communism under the label of "Pan-Humanism." Whatever the flaws or virtues of his polemic against "racism," his own opposition to racial consciousness was neither entirely rational nor disinterested. It is time that the enemies of racial, national, and cultural consciousness like Hirschfeld and the Frankfurt School cease to be able to claim a monopoly on rationality and sanity and that the obsessions and motivations that seem to shape their own ideologies and political behavior be subjected to the same scrutiny they apply to the societies and peoples whom their thinking could destroy.

Part Four

"Racism", therefore, is a term originating on the left, and has been so defined and loaded with meanings the left wants it to have that it cannot now be used by the supporters of white racial consciousness for any constructive purpose. Anyone who uses the term to describe himself or his own views has already allowed himself to be maneuvered onto his opponents' ground and has already lost the debate. He may try to define the word differently, but he will need to spend most of his time explaining that he does not mean by it what everyone else means. As a term useful for communicating ideas that the serious supporters of white racial consciousness wish to communicate, the term is useless, and it was intended by those who developed it that it be useless for that purpose.
But understanding the origins of the word "racism" in Hirschfeld's polemic also makes clear the uselessness of the word for any other purpose. No one seems ever to have used the word to describe his own ideas or ideas with which he agrees; its only application has been by the enemies of the ideas it purports to describe, and hence it has no objective meaning apart from its polemical usage. If no one calls his own ideas "racism" and its only application is to a body of ideas considered to be untrue and evil, then it has no use other than as a kind of fancy curse word, the purpose of which is simply to demonize anyone who expresses the ideas it is supposed to describe.
It is clear that Magnus Hirschfeld himself harbored deep ideological, professional, and personal animosities against those to whom he applied the word, and those animosities may have extended to the entire society that throughout his career he associated with sexual repression and which he wanted replaced by a kind of global communism under the label of "Pan-Humanism." Whatever the flaws or virtues of his polemic against "racism," his own opposition to racial consciousness was neither entirely rational nor disinterested. It is time that the enemies of racial, national, and cultural consciousness like Hirschfeld and the Frankfurt School cease to be able to claim a monopoly on rationality and sanity and that the obsessions and motivations that seem to shape their own ideologies and political behavior be subjected to the same scrutiny they apply to the societies and peoples whom their thinking could destroy.

So what the fuck is your point anyway?

In any case, I believe that the Jewish Question needs to be expanded to the Semitic Question, such that all of the tribes of Israel as well as the other barbarians of North Africa and the Middle East are included. This would then apply to the Jews of Europe whether one believes they are truly of Israel or mere converts to a Semitic religion. The Semitic Question also applies to Christianity, another Semitic religion responsible for much of the degeneracy of the modern era.

Semetic was invented in the 1830s by racial scientists. That's my fucking point. They are a cult and this is their motivation.

Jesus was the first true anti-Semite. They killed him, they bragged about it, they hate Christians and God and the whole package. Historically, Christians have always hated the Jews and were responsible for constantly exiling them from European countries. The subversion of religion is fairly recent, and it's one of those things we could easily take back and use to our advantage.

No he wasn't. He wasn't anti anything, he was a Messianic Rabbi. He was of the tribe of Judah and Levi according to Mary's lineage, the very group we now call "Semitic" – but he did follow Mosaic law and rejected the Levitical heresy.

Pharisees were not Levitical themselves as they sided with Rome, race mixing with their elite. That's why this thread is important because it doesn't fit in the normal D/C narratives of Christians vs Pagans vs Jews but of Judah vs Israelites and what motivated modern Jews to be so fucking tribal crazy and DESTRUCTIVE

You should explain further and add your own commentary, because you've done nothing but copy and paste material which is already generally known.


Yeshua was not an anti-Semite, Yeshua is a mythological combination of several hundred years worth of rebel figures who were all Semites fighting against occupation of Semitic lands. Christianity has NEVER been a decent religion; it has been a proto-Marxist cult focused on the subversion and destruction of non-Semitic cultures from the beginning. European converts were race traitors who abandoned the noble ideals of their ancestors resulting in the degeneration of European cultures to the point that foreign leeches came to establish a pan-European hegemony through the Catholic Church. The tyrannical nature of that hegemony has been so great that every nation has rebelled against the control of Christianity, and yet every Christian sect to follow has been no different in their subservience to Semitic interests.

It is impossible to create a better future for Europeans without extinguishing the false religion of Christianity. There will be no removal of foreigners from our lands until people can be made to stop worshiping foreigners and foreign ideals.


All of the tribes of Israel are barbaric subhumans unfit for this world. Modern "Jews" are no different from Judeans, Israelites, Canaanites, North African mongrels, or the tribes who would be called Mohammedan now. All of the races are tribalistic and all of the races besides Europoids are destructive.

Bump mannee

Bump for posterity

archive.is/OWTJQ
archived again because by the time I can read this wall of text, this thread will already be shoaed

Go back to cuckchan.

Shill harder, kike.

Stop fucking whining. This is a study it mythological narrative that people miss. You would do better to use it as a redpill to Christians. Telling them "Jews are from Turkey" or whatever doesn't work.

I really have to wonder if you understand how little sense your accusation makes.


I don't think anyone on Holla Forums has failed to see how the Semitic religions mirror the manifest evil of the Semites themselves. It's not that your information is wrong, but it isn't new. Just copying and pasting walls of text is dangerously close to being a worthless slide thread. Open up and lead a discussion on this material.

Short Hand for lazy plebs:

This is the meaning of this thread.

A. it shows you the very mythical bases of Judaism, long before the Talmud was manufactured.

B. You tell Christians in plain terms"
1. Judah sells his brother to the Egyptians
2. Judah separates from Israel and Moses by habitually disobeying God's laws (inventing their own), as all the prophets say over and over.
3. God sends Judah a savior, Jesus, and they killed him for calling them out on their money lending and not following Moses's laws.
4. Jews now rule through money lending and force us to fight for Israel, which is really just Judah 2.0. They still follow their own invented laws and not Moses.
5. Jews reject anyone who isn't Jewish as they have in EVERY book in the Bible.

C. For non-Christians you tell them
1. The entire religion is about tribal supremacy, killing people and enslaving in order to dominate. That it's literally unlawful and punishable by death from above not to destroy, rape, steal and lie according to the old testament.


Why is this important?

You don't need to go all over the place with "communism" or "Illuminati" or "satanism" or anything. You just need to point out these facts to redpill people on the JQ. There is no denying the basics of the Torah. If they are "reformed" Jews, it is still part of their basic beliefs to lead through war and overpowering.

Included in thread is
1. Karl Marx on the Jews and Capitalism (usury)
2. Jon Lennon of the Beatles talks about Boomer Socialism
3. The history of the word racism a Jewish invention by a "sexlogist"

Holy shit, is he showing self-awareness?

there you go faggot

Nice strawman. Shill harder.

It is far better to tell Christians the truth, that their religion is based on the fiction of a foreign race of barbarians and their adherence to it is the root of all degeneracy in our societies. You cannot cure them of their illness by speaking to them in the terms of the enemy. Such an explanation will only lead them further down the path of being subverted by the image of a foreign savior.

I still have to wonder, what is the point of posting this on Holla Forums? You're preaching to the choir on the origins of Judaism and the evils of its followers. Are you trying to make something to be stickied as reference? I'd argue it isn't even worth it since you've limited yourself to the quicksand of "Jews" (a rather nebulous term at this point which means very little if limited to the most precise definition of the tribe of Judah) instead of the broader problem of the entirety of the Semitic evils.


What is it you think I am shilling for if not a return to purity of European ethnostates in every regard?

you're a faggot, countersage

Perhaps you could try discussing the topic of the thread to make it worthy of being bumped instead of being another empty (1).

I normally lurk threads like these but I can give you as many verses from the Bible that say otherwise.

bumpin. tossed OPs walls of text into a TTS site ttsreader.com/

You think they don't hear that all the time on TV, genius?
That's like saying it's far better to tell Taylor Swift that you think she's hot and then ask for her phone number. You want people to reject you and to stop listening then just come at them hard like that. I'm sure you'll feel real proud and brave but it's not going anywhere.

He called himself a conservative by the 1980s. Don't know why

Commissary to the Gentiles

The First to See the Possibilities of War by Propaganda - by Marcus Eli Ravage

You Christians worry and complain about the Jew's influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a menace to your orderly development; it confuses your impulses; it defeats your purposes; it muddles up your destiny. I do not altogether see the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it seems to me a matter of indifference what the remote origin and professed creed of the governing clique is. The influence, on the other hand, is certainly there, and it is vastly greater and more insidious than you appear to realize. That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. We are conscious of the injury we did you when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. Suppose, we say tremblingly, you should wake up to the fact that your religion, your education, your morals, your social, governmental and legal systems, are fundamentally of our making! And then you specify, and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion-picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The got, we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our
crimes. We cannot make it out. Either you do not know or you have not the courage to charge us with those deeds for which there is at least a shadow of evidence and which an intelligent judge and jury could examine without impatience. Why bandy about unconvincing trifles when you might so easily indict us for serious and provable offenses? Why throw up to us a patent and clumsy forgery such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion when you might as well confront us with the Revelation of St. John? Why talk about Marx and Trotski when you have Jesus of Nazareth and Paul of Tarsus to confound us with?

Part 2
You call us subverters, agitators, revolution-mongers. It is the truth, and I cower at your discovery. It could be shown with only the slightest straining and juggling of the facts that we have been at the bottom of all the major revolutions in your history. We undoubtedly had a sizable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and it is simply a fact that we were the prime movers in the bourgeois democratic revolutions of the century before the last, both in France and America. If we were not, we did not know our own interests. But do you point your accusing finger at us and charge us with these heinous and recorded crimes? Not at all! You fantastically lay at our door the recent greatWar and the upheaval in Russia, which have done not only the most injury to the Jews themselves but which a school-boy could have foreseen would have that result. But even these plots and revolutions are as nothing compared with the great conspiracy which we engineered at the beginning of this era and which was destined to make the creed of a Jewish sect the religion of the Western world. The Reformation was not designed in malice purely. It squared us with an ancient enemy and restored our Bible to its place of honor in Christendom. The Republican revolutions of the eighteenth century freed us of our agelong political and social disabilities. They benefited us, but they did you no harm. On the contrary, they prospered and expanded you. You owe your preeminence in the world to them. But the upheaval which brought Christianity into Europe was —or at least may easily be shown to have been—planned and executed by Jews as an act of revenge against a great Gentile state. And when you talk about Jewish conspiracies I cannot for the world understand why you do not mention the destruction of Rome and the whole civilization of antiquity concentrated under her banners, at the hands of Jewish Christianity. It is unbelievable, but you Christians do not seem to know where your religion came from, nor how, nor why. Your historians, with one great exception, do not tell you. The documents in the case, which are part of your Bible, you chant over but do not read. We have done our work too thoroughly; you believe our propaganda too implicitly. The coming of Christianity is to you not an ordinary historical event growing out of other events of the time; it is the fulfilment of a dvine Jewish prophecy—with suitable amendments of your own. It did not, as you see it, destroy a great Gentile civilization and a great Gentile empire with which Jewry was at war; it did not plunge mankind into barbarism and darkness for a thousand years; it came to bring salvation to the Gentile world! Yet here, if ever, was a great subversive movement, hatched in Palestine, spread by Jewish agitators, financed by Jewish money, taught in Jewish pamphlets and broadsides, at a time when Jewry and Rome were in a death-struggle, and ending in the collapse of the great Gentile empire.
You do not even see it, though an intelligent child, unbefuddled by theological magic, could tell you what it is all about after a hasty reading of the simple record. And then you go on prattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence? And, mind you, no less an author than Gibbon long ago tried to enlighten you. It is now a century and a half since "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" let the cat out of the bag. Gibbon, not being a parson dabbling in history, did not try to account for the end of a great era by inventing fatuous nonsense about the vice and degradation of Rome, about the decay of morals and faith in an empire which was at that very time in the midst of its most glorious creative period. How could he? He was living in the Augustan Age in London which—in spite of nearly two thousand years since the coming of Christian salvation—was as good a replica of Augustan Rome in the matter of refined lewdness as the foggy islanders could make it. No, Gibbon was a race-conscious Gentile and an admirer of the culture of the pagan West, as well as a historian with brains and eyes. Therefore he had no difficulty laying his finger on the malady that had rotted and wasted away the noble edifice of antique civilization. He put Christianity down—the law which went forth from Zion and the word of God from Jerusalem—as the central cause of the decline and fall of Rome and all she represented. So far so good.

Part 3

But Gibbon did not go far enough. He was born and died, you see, a century before the invention of scientific anti-Semitism. He left wholly out of account the element of deliberation. He saw an alien creed sweeping out of the East and overwhelming the fair lands of the West. It never occurred to him that it was precisely to this destructive end that the whole scheme of salvation was dedicated. Yet the facts are as plain as you please. Let me in very brief recount the tale, unembroidered by miracle, prophecy or magic. For a good perspective, I shall have to go back a space. The action conveniently falls into four parts, rising to a climax in the third. The time, when the first curtain rises, is roughly 65 b.c. Dramatis persons are, minor parts aside, Judea and Rome. Judea is a tiny kingdom off the Eastern Mediterranean. For five centuries it has been hardly more than a geographical expression. Again and again it has been overrun and destroyed and its population carried into exile or slavery by its powerful neighbors. Nominally independent, it is now as unstable as ever and on the edge of civil war. The empire of the West, with her nucleus in the City Republic of Rome, while not yet mistress of the world, is speedily heading that way. She is acknowledged the one great military power of the time as well as the heir of Greece and the center of civilization. Up to the present the two states have had little or no contact with one another. Then without solicitation on her part Rome was suddenly asked to take a hand in Judean affairs. A dispute had arisen between two brothers over the succession to the petty throne, and the Roman general Pompey, who happened to be in Damascus winding up bigger matters, was called upon to arbitrate between the claimants. With the simple directness of a republican soldier, Pompey exiled one of the brothers, tossed the chief priesthood to his rival, and abolished the kingly dignity altogether. Not to put too fine a point on it, Pompey's mediation amounted in effect to making Judea a Roman dependency. The Jews, not unnaturally perhaps, objected; and Rome, to conciliate them and to conform to local prejudice, restored the royal office. She appointed, that is, a king of her own choosing. He was the son of an excise-man, an Idumean by race, named Herod. But the Jews were not placated, and continued making trouble. Rome thought it very ungrateful of them. All this is merely a prelude, and is introduced into the action to make clear what follows. Jewish discontent grew to disaffection and open revolt when their Gentile masters began importing into Jerusalem the blessings of Western culture. Graven images, athletic games, Greek drama, and gladiatorial shows were not to the Jewish taste. The pious resented them as an offense in the nostrils of Jehovah, even though the resident officials patiently explained they were meant for the entertainment and edification of the non-Jewish garrison. The Judeans resisted with especial strenuousness the advent of the efficient Roman tax-gatherer. Above all, they wanted back a king of their own race and their own royal line. Among the masses the rebellion took the form of a revival of the old belief in a Messiah, a divinely appointed savior who was to redeem his people from the foreign yoke and make Judea supreme among the nations. Claimants to the mission were not wanting. In Galilee, one Judas led a rather formidable insurrection, which enlisted much popular support. John, called the Baptist, operated in the Jordan country. He was followed by an
other north-country man, Jesus of Nazareth. All three were masters of the technique of couching incendiary political sedition in harmless theological phrases. All three used the same signal of revolt —"The time is at hand." And all three were speedily apprehended and executed, both Galileans by crucifixion. Personal qualities aside, Jesus of Nazareth was, like his predecessors, a political agitator engaged in liberating his country from the foreign oppressor. There is even considerable evidence that he entertained an ambition to become king of an independent Judea. He claimed, or his biographers later claimed for him, descent from the ancient royal line of David. But his paternity is somewhat confused. The same writers who traced the origin of his mother's husband back to the psalmist-king also pictured Jesus as the son of Jehovah, and admitted that Joseph was not his father. It seems, however, that Jesus before long realized the hopelessness of his political mission and turned his oratorical gifts and his great popularity with the masses in quite another direction.

Part 4

He began preaching a primitive form of populism, socialism and pacifism. The effect of this change in his program was to gain him the hostility of the substantial, propertied classes, the priests and patriots generally, and to reduce his following to the poor, the laboring mass and the slaves. After his death these lowly disciples formed themselves into a communistic brotherhood. A sermon their late leader had once delivered upon a hillside summed up for them the essence of his teachings, and they made it their rule of life. It was a philosophy calculated to appeal profoundly to humble people. It comforted those who suffered here on earth with promised rewards beyond the grave. It made virtues of the necessities of the weak. Men without hope in the future were admonished to take no thought for the morrow. Men too helpless to resent insult or injury were taught to resist not evil. Men condemned to lifelong drudgery and indigence were assured of the dignity of labor and of poverty. The meek, the despised, the disinherited, the downtrodden, were—in the hereafter—to be the elect and favored of God. The worldly, the ambitious, the rich and powerful, were to be denied admission to heaven. The upshot, then, of Jesus' mission was a new sect in Judea. It was neither the first nor the last. Judea, like modern America, was a fertile soil for strange creeds. The Ebionim —the paupers, as they called themselves—did not regard their beliefs as a new religion. Jews they had been born, and Jews they remained. The teachings of their master were rather in the nature of a social philosophy, an ethic of conduct, a way of life. To modern Christians, who never tire of asking why the Jews did not accept Jesus and his teachings, I can only answer that for a long time none but Jews did. To be surprised that the whole Jewish people did not turn Ebionim is about as intelligent as to expect all Americans to join the Unitarians or the Baptists or the Christian Scientists.
In ordinary times little attention would have been paid to the ragged brotherhood. Slaves and laborers for the most part, their meekness might even have been encouraged by the solider classes. But with the country in the midst of a struggle with a foreign foe, the unworldly philosophy took on a dangerous aspect. It was a creed of disillusion, resignation and defeat. It threatened to undermine the morale of the nation's fighting men in time of war. This blessing of the peacemakers, this turning of the other cheek, this non-resistance, this love your enemy, looked like a deliberate attempt to paralyze the national will in a crisis and assure victory to the foe. So it is not surprising that the Jewish authorities began persecuting the Ebionim. Their meetings were invaded and dispersed, their leaders were clapped into jail, their doctrines were proscribed. It looked for awhile as if the sect would be speedily wiped out. Then, unexpectedly, the curtain rose on act three, and events look a sudden new turn.

Part Five

Perhaps the bitterest foe of the sectaries was one Saul, a maker of tents. A native of Tarsus and thus a man of some education in Greek culture, he despised the new teachings for their unworldliness and their remoteness from life. A patriotic Jew, he dreaded their effect on the national cause. A traveled man, versed in several languages, he was ideally suited for the task of going about among the scattered Jewish communities to counteract the spread of their socialistic pacifistic doctrines. The leaders in Jerusalem appointed him chief persecutor to the Ebionim. He was on his way to Damascus one day to arrest a group of the sectaries when a novel idea came to him. In the quaint phrase of the Book of Acts he saw a vision. He saw as a matter of fact, two. He perceived, to begin with, how utterly hopeless were the chances of little Judea winning out in an armed conflict against the greatest military power in the world. Second, and more important, it came to him that the vagabond creed which he had been repressing might be forged into an irresistible weapon against the formidable foe. Pacifism, non-resistance, resignation, love, were dangerous teachings at home. Spread among the enemy's legions, they might break down their discipline and thus yet bring victory to Jerusalem. Saul, in a word, was probably the first man to see the possibilities of conducting war by propaganda. He journeyed on to Damascus, and there to the amazement alike of his friends and of those he had gone to suppress, he announced his conversion to the faith and applied for admission to the brotherhood. On his return to Jerusalem he laid his new strategy before the startled Elders of Zion. After much debate and searching of souls, it was adopted. More resistance was offered by the leaders of the Ebionim of the capital. They were mistrustful of his motives, and they feared that his proposal to strip the faith of its ancient Jewish observances and practices so as to make it acceptable to Gentiles would fill the fraternity with alien half-converts, and dilute its strength. But in the end he won them over, too. And so Saul, the fiercest persecutor of Jesus' fol
lowers, became Paul, the Apostle to the Gentiles. And so, incidentally, began the spread into the pagan lands of the West, an entirely new Oriental religion. Unfortunately for Paul's plan, the new strategy worked much too well. His revamped and rather alluring theology made converts faster than he had dared hope, or than he even wished. His idea it should be kept in mind, was at this stage purely defensive. He had as yet no thought of evangelizing the world; he only hoped to discourage the enemy. With that accomplished, and the Roman garrisons out of Palestine, he was prepared to call a truce. But the slaves and oppressed of the Empire, the wretched conscripts, and the starving proletariat of the capital itself, found as much solace in the adapted Pauline version of the creed as the poor Jews before them had found in the original teachings of their crucified master. The result of this unforseen success was to open the enemy's eyes to what was going on. Disturbing reports of insubordination among the troops began pouring into Rome from the army chiefs in Palestine and elsewhere. Instead of giving the imperial authorities pause, the new tactics only stiffened their determination. Rome swooped down upon Jerusalem with fire and sword, and after a fierce siege which lasted four years, she
destroyed the nest of the agitation (70 a.d.). At least she thought she had destroyed it. The historians of the time leave us in no doubt as to the aims of Rome. They tell us that Nero sent Vespasian and his son Titus with definite and explicit orders to annihilate Palestine and Christianity together. To the Romans, Christianity meant nothing more than Judaism militant, anyhow, an interpretation which does not seem far from the facts. As to Nero's wish, he had at least half of it realized for him. Palestine was so thoroughly annihilated that it has remained a political ruin to this day. But Christianity was not so easily destroyed. Indeed, it was only after the fall of Jerusalem that Paul's program developed to the full. Hitherto, as I have said, his tactic had been merely to frighten off the conqueror, in the manner of Moses plaguing the Pharaohs. He had gone along cautiously and hesitantly, taking care not to arouse the powerful foe. He was willing to dangle his novel weapon before the foe's nose, and let him feel its edge, but he shrank from thrusting it in full force. Now that the worst had happened and Judea had nothing further to lose, he flung scruples to the wind and carried the war into the enemy's country. The goal now was nothing less than to humble Rome as she had humbled Jerusalem, to wipe her off the map as she had wiped out Judea.

Part 6

If Paul's own writings fail to convince you of this interpretation of his activities, I invite your attention to his more candid associate John. Where Paul, operating within the shadow of the imperial palace and half the time a prisoner in Roman jails, is obliged to deal in parable and veiled hints, John, addressing himself to disaffected Asiatics, can afford the luxury of plain speaking. At any rate, his pamphlet entitled "Revelation" is, in truth, a revelation of what the whole astonishing business is about. Rome, fancifully called Babylon, is minutely described in the language of sputtering hate, as the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth, as the woman drunken with the blood of saints (Christians and Jews), as the oppressor of "peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues" and—to remove all doubt of her identity—as "that great city which reigneth over the kings of the earth." An angel triumphantly cries, "Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen." Then follows an orgiastic picture of ruin. Commerce and industry and maritime trade are at an end. Art and music and "the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride" are silenced. Darkness and desolation lie like a pall upon the scene. The gentle Christian conquerors wallow in blood up to the bridles of their horses. "Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her." And what is the end and purpose of all this chaos and devastation? John is not too reticent to tell us. For he closes his pious prophecy with a vision of the glories of the new—that is, the restored—Jerusalem: not any allegorical fantasy, I pray you, but literally Jerusalem, the capital of a great reunited kingdom of "the twelve tribes of the children of Israel." Could any one ask for anything plainer? Of course, no civilization could forever hold out against this kind of assault. By the year 200 the efforts of Paul and John and their successors had made such headway among all classes of Roman society that Christianity had become the dominant cult throughout the empire. Meantime, as Paul had shrewdly foreseen, Roman morale and discipline had quite broken down, so that more and more the imperial legions, once the terror of the world and the backbone of Western culture, went down to defeat before barbarian invaders. In the year 326 the emperor Constantine, hoping to check the insidious malady, submitted to conversion and proclaimed Christianity the official religion. It was too late. After him the emperor Julian tried to resort once more to suppression. But neither resistance nor concession were of any use. The Roman body politic had become thoroughly wormeaten with Palestinian propaganda. Paul had triumphed. This at least is how, were I an anti-Semite in search of a credible sample of subversive Jewish conspiracy, I would interpret the advent of a modified Jewish creed into the Western world.

NUKE JERUSALEM

anti slide

In the modern, publicly obtainable, rewritten (((Bible))), sure.
But not tin the original texts in (originally) Aramaic and then Greek.

>who do (((they))) hate & want gone from the earth?
whites
>who do (((they))) hate even more with such an intense burning passion it's almost unfathomable?
jesus

Matthew 15:24.

But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs. And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.

Is this what the Aryan man is? A dog that eats crumbs that fall from the table of Jews, their "masters"? The true hero of the biblical narrative is the roman soldier who had the privilege of fastening that kike to a piece of wood.

the house of israel, split from the house of judah, as described in this very thread
yet it was the house of judah that remained during his time - the ones he flipped tables on and drove out with a whip
i don't assume he was the type who just gave to anyone who asked - when someone did so much as touch his garment, he felt what happened and confronted him, so clearly one couldn't just take without permission either
it is difficult to draw any logical conclusions based on that passage aside from the attitude towards Canaanites, what is more significant imo is just who these 10 lost tribes really are and what happened to them
just based on the attitudes of judah 2.0 as this user said, i'm pretty sure they know

>In the modern, publicly obtainable, rewritten (((Bible))), sure.

Jesus was a Rabbi in the Greek too. And it was never written in Aramaic because it was written for the goy.

Jesus was a nazarene, a galilean, a gentile. Not a semite, descendant of shem son of noah.
Jesus was NOT a "jew" period.
biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm
overlordsofchaos.com/html/jesus_was_not_a_jew.html
assemblyoftrueisrael.com/TruthPage/JesuswasNotAJew.htm

"jews" are edomites, not semites. technically no such thing as a "jew" - either a judaite (judean, tribe of jacob) or an edomite (descendant of esau jacob's brother, who mated with hittites and caananites). Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 (KJV)
hardons-blog.blogspot.de/2013/12/who-are-jews.html

christianitybeliefs.org/end-times-deceptions/the-star-of-david-deception/

my autism is getting to me.
meant to say: Jesus was a gentile AND a semite.
its late, im tired.

LOL!

I don't understand fucking anything anymore. Is there such a thing as a red line one starts to see at some point of researching the OT and NT ? Everytime I get into it, I found so many conflicting narratives and overlapping meanings…

That's how mind control works user.
Complexity causes insanity, it brings out a person's genetic personality disorders. So they seek simplicity and essentially choose a narrative and blind themselves to others.

Only those who are Ubermensch are able to handle the whole truth.

Bow down to me goy.
Our tribal customs have become the core of your moral code. Our tribal laws have furnished the basic groundwork of all your august constitutions and legal systems. Our legends and our folk-tales are the sacred lore which you croon to your infants. Our poets have filled your hymnals and your prayer-books. Our national history has become an indispensable part of the learning of your pastors and priests and scholars. Our Kings, our statesmen, our prophets, our warriors are your heroes. Our ancient little country is your Holy Land. Our national literature is your Holy Bible. What our people thought and taught has become inextricable woven into your very speech and tradition, until no one among you can be called educated who is not familiar with our racial heritage.
Jewish artisans and Jewish fishermen are your teachers and your saints, with countless statues carved in their image and innumerable cathedrals raised to their memories. A Jewish maiden is your ideal of motherhood and womanhood. A Jewish rebel-prophet is the central figure in your religious worship. We have pulled down your idols, cast aside your racial inheritance, and substituted for them our God and our traditions. No conquest in history can even remotely compare with this clean sweep of our conquest over you.
patriot.dk/ravage.html

Yeah, in the modern copies available to the public, but not the (((well kept))) originals.
Pic related.

He wasn't a semite at all, he was white and tall, blue eyes, as described by local testimony, the kikes have played the same game by spreading the kosher narrative of "Hitler with brown eyes", they have done this for millennia.
Also, he was an Essene, and no, Essenes weren't semites nor jews like they want to make you believe, Essenes originate from the north, millennia before Christ, they were northerners that traveled teaching people of other lands what they knew and learned from said people, starting from the north, then going to Egypt and then to India (Kashmir), and then they returned doing the same route, this travel lasted 7 years.

JUDEN

...

Have any of you looked into the Levantine churches and their documents? If I were to lean towards any claim to the true apostolic line of succession I'd be first looking at the Syriac Orthodox Church of Antioch or related branches, given they still do the liturgy in the (almost) long dead language that would have probably been Christ's tongue, Syriac-Aramaic. (I think they found a few small villages who still speak it a couple of years ago.) I'll look into it but I'm learning Hebrew first ;^). They also got fucked up by the Syrian war, with "militants" disappearing two of the Aleppo archbishops in 2013.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syriac_Orthodox_Church
Some documents:
archive.org/details/cpart
archive.org/details/SyriacDocuments
newsletter.atla.com/2017/syriacregisters/

And reported for obvious kike shill.

Woah look at these out of context verses! I had a feeling this was gonna be an anti-Christian circle jerk but wow.

God made the whole world and all the people who believe in the New Covenant Israel. The Romans then destroyed Israel and cast the Jews out as punishment for killing their messiah. Jews are still butthurt about this.

The Story of the woman with the possessed daughter is proof that the gentiles will attain salvation through faith in Jesus and he didn't just come to save the Jews.

John 4:22 is just telling the Samaritan woman to stop worshiping a pagan god.

Romans 10:12 is telling the Jews they are not some super special race and all people can be saved and reach God.

Communism is anti-Christian. Communism promises utopia on earth while Christianity knows this is impossible for nature is cruel and men are fallible. The very creed of Communism is a rejection of God and his authority in which all men are subject.

Equality of the body does not exist in this world that is a twisting of the scriptures for worldly goals that are rarely noble. Salvation and and unity can only be achieved through faith in God, Jesus Christ and the ever present living Holy Spirit that resides in all of us.

In death the faithful who performed good works in life, who lived by the law set out by our Lord and hold on to the faith against all worldly attempts to break it shall find themselves in the Kingdom of Heaven with God the Father Almighty. The atheist, the apostate, and those who blasphemy our Lord out of pettiness will spend eternity cast out gravely aware of the crimes they have committed against him.

Jesus is the singular biggest enemy of the NWO since He claims to be the Jewish messiah. The end goal of the secular/pseudo-atheist/zionist plan is to bring forth a different messiah, at which point the false Jews who claim to be Biblical jews (but are not)–this synagogue of Satan–will try to install a global zionist tyranny with Jerusalem as the world capital. They hate nothing more than Christianity, since Christianity condemns their every deed. They have committed countless unspeakable atrocities–human experiments in the name of scientific progress, secret agencies going around murdering innocents, the planning and execution of genocides, wars waged to enrich themselves, killing millions of civilians in the process, turning healthy Christian societies into barbaric, sexually degenerate cesspools of immorality. The atrocities they have committed upon the world are beyond counting and their brutality and ruthlessness in obtaining their goals has no comparison anywhere. There has never been a more perfect global tyranny than that of today, where a small group of ‘elite’ global rulers control every single aspect of our lives while at the same time making everyone believe that this is freedom. Their NWO is 1984 on steroids. And Christianity has predicted all of this. The prophecies concerning these developments can be found in the New Testament–most importantly, in the book of Revelations where their entire mark of the beast plan to economically enslave the world has been laid out in detail. As is their ultimate fate–and although most of them are deceived and believe they are actually the good guys and that they can persevere and win a war against God–deep inside they know that they are walking on the broad path of damnation and that there is only one end to their journey: eternal torment in the fires of Hell.
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets and stonest them that are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold your house is left unto you desolate.
– Matthew 23:37,38
Then answered all the people (Jews) and said, “His blood be on us and on our children”
– Matthew 27:25
But take heed to yourselves: for they shall deliver you to councils, and in the synagogues ye shall be beaten.
– Mark 13:9
Ye are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. Which of you convinceth me of sin? And I say the truth, why do you not believe me? He that is of God heareth God’s words, ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.
– John 8:43-47
Stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost as your fathers did, so you do. Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? and they have slain them which showed before of the coming of the Just One; of whom ye have been now the betrayers and murderers.
– Acts 7:51-53
It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing you put it from you and judge yourself unworthy of everlasting life, we turn to the Gentiles.
– Acts 13:45-51
But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised: And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage: To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue with you.
– Galatians 2:3-5
For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision, whose mourns must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake… wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith: not giving heed to Jewish fables and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
– Titus 1:10-14
The Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus and their own prophets, and have persecuted us: and they please not God and are contrary to all men: forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins always: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.
– 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16
Behold I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews and are not but do lie; behold I will make them to come and worship before thy feet…
– Revelation 3:9
So Jewish.

...

Most films about Christ are independently funded, you absolute fucking kike.

Anything Hollywood has done about Jesus has been perverted and anti-Christian.

Go suck your rabbi's herpetic dick you disinfo-spreading retard.

I've seen all of these on (((TV))). You're obviously a Jew trying to derail exposing your cult!

They play them around Christmas and Easter for $$$RATINGS$$$, then return to their regular Christ-bashing anti-white programming.

5 of those aren't Hollyjew movies, 1 is based on a movie from the 50's and Lord of the Rings is more of a Christian film then it. The other two probably contain heresy out the ass. Huh the Passion of the Christ is not on that list… is it because Mel had to lie to the actors auditioning about what the movie was or is it because Mel told the actor playing Jesus if you do this movie you'll probably never work in Kikewood again?


On what the History Channel? Or a Christian network? Because that's the only place I've seen them shown.

Global report.

Refusing to read the thread and then globally reporting anons for disagreeing with you "Jesus is the only thing that will stop the AntiChrist!" Where the fuck do you scumbags come from?
READ IT!

Hey I reported nobody however this is Holla Forums and

Marcus Eli Ravage was a Jewish American immigrant

Marcus Eli Ravage was a Jewish American immigrant

MARCUS ELI RAVAGE WAS JEWISH

How about you don't post Jewish lies. Don't worry I'll read it just for you.

So much hate.

/ pic unrelated
// really

Fuck off, you're the same ponyfag cancerous poster from /k/, go back to reddit

Spreading disinfo and defying against obvious truths is a fuckton different than a mere disagreement.

You can't oppose the synagogue of satan while believing that Jesus is a jewish conspiracy. The talmud and modern judaism were built upon the rejection of Christ.

Why did you post a 6 page thing about a Jew being a Jew and claiming you own nothing Goyim. All his claims are bullshit. Rome was collapsing long before Christianity took over and the empire survived through the Byzantine Empire and the Kingdom of the Franks which were both white christian empires.

Also don't misquote Samuel Adams you idiot.

The right to freedom is the gift of God Almighty….The rights of the Colonists as Christians may be best understood by reading, and carefully studying the institutes of the great Lawgiver and head of the Christian Church: which are to be found clearly written and promuligated in the New Testament.
Samuel Adams

But if the superior is not allowed to rule the inferior, what "law of nature" is he talking about?

...

He's talking about the Christian God. Sam who was DEVOUTLY Christian.

I … rely upon the merits of Jesus Christ for a pardon of all my sins.
Samuel Adams

The name of the Lord (says the Scripture) is a strong tower; thither the righteous flee and are safe (Proverbs 18:10). Let us secure His favor and He will lead us through the journey of this life and at length receive us to a better.
Samuel Adams

We have this day restored the Sovereign to Whom all men ought to be obedient. He reigns in heaven and from the rising to the setting of the sun, let His kingdom come.
Samuel Adams

Meritocracy as opposed to Christian monarchy?

For without cause they hid their net for me; without cause they dug a pit for my life.
Let destruction come upon him when he does not know it! And let the net that he hid ensnare him; let him fall into it—to his destruction!
Psalms 35 7-8

Don't let my treacherous enemies rejoice over my defeat. Don't let those who hate me without cause gloat over my sorrow.
They don't talk of peace; they plot against innocent people who mind their own business.
Psalm 35:19-20


Socrates and Plato reasoned there was one God through geometry and shit. Their philosophies are deeply ingrained into Church philosophy. The Church Fathers who took over after the Apostles died were Greeks and Romans who used their understanding of Greek philosophy to shape Christianity and give it legitimacy through logic and reason.

what the hell is the whole truth? i doubt anyone who thinks to have achieved it is even close.

Faith in God… that's all I've got if you want spiritual truth.


Also what trouble are you having with conflicting narratives? Ask /christian/ if you are having to much trouble.

That's retarded and the Christians actually murdered Platonists. They had to escape to the Persian courts after Plato's school which lasted like 800 years was burned down by Christians.


Why do you doubt that? I'll tell you why. Because your like 20 something years old and because the world is so big and scary you think everyone is an idiot like you. This comforts you, but it's a teenagers opinion.

The whole truth was practically laid out by OP. It's not that hard to figure out mind control once you accept that you're being mind fucked.
See this guy:
This is pure mind control.

Pythagoras came to the same conclusion too.

That: Objectivism > subjectivity.

As an addendum: The God of the Christians is objective and because He's the creator, is in essence Objectivism Itself. It can be argued that Christians worship Objectivism as their God.

Tell me what you believe in spiritually then user. My time here on Holla Forums and delving into the spiritual side of things led me to the conclusions I have reached.

Wow Christians burned down a building 119 years before they existed. AMAZING!

All you've done is shill your kike religion and try to ruin the thread by getting it bump locked. The Acedemy existed after Romans invaded you idiot. Why do you think Rome kept Greek philosophy alive?

STOP IT!

Thanks for the notes.

Oh no I am poking holes in your narative hurr durr.

Philosophers continued to teach Platonism in Athens during the Roman era, but it was not until the early 5th century (c. 410) that a revived Academy was established by some leading Neoplatonists.

Constantine assumed the empire as a tetrarch in 306. He conducted many wars against the other tetrarchs. Firstly he defeated Maxentius in 312. In 313, he issued the Edict of Milan, which granted liberty for Christians to profess their religion.[123] Constantine was converted to Christianity, enforcing the Christian faith. He began the Christianization of the Empire and of Europe – a process concluded by the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages.

Are you Jewish by chance because you lie like one.

You just disproved your earlier comment you fucking idiot. And then Constantine died and the next Emporer purged Christians you fucking idiot. But it was too late as the Jews had already wormed their way into the high society of Rome and killed off all the temple priests under Constantine so there was no way to revive it. Yes, Early Christians were Jews. Christianity was a revenge plot from the start.

I knew you were copying text from wikipedia to pushyour worship of a jewish Rabbi as creator of existence. But you ignored when Plato's Acedemy was shut down and the platonists had to flee by this kike posing as Roman to serve his Christian interests. All philosophy was killed after that and Europe fell into the dark age.

But what you really want is to bumplock thread because it exposes the Jewish cult.

Stop twisting history around so much. The Western Empire was fucking broke by the time Constantine took control and restored some level of order. Then European pagans sacked the shit out of West Rome until it could no longer stand leading to the collapse of Rome. East Rome survived and flourished hundreds of years after this under Christianity. Platonic philosophy survived despite the closing of the neoplatonic academy. Which was a shadow of the former glory it once was. You blame everything on Christianity when it is more clear you have no idea what you are talking about and just attacking it because "MUH DEAD KIKE ON STICK" even though he was arrested, tortured and killed by the Jews for preaching against their Jewish ways. Even if you are not a Jew you argue and act like a Jew.

Also I don't want this thread bumplocked if it was bumplocked no one could see how disingenuous and malicious you are. If I could bring even one member of Holla Forums back into the faith this would be an amazing success but I highly doubt that will happen. The user of Holla Forums aren't stupid they are National Socialist through and through they reject Christianity because National Socialism and Christianity are incompatible. One demands total service to the race the other total service to God both Christians and Nat Soc realize you cannot have it both ways as unfortunate as it is because we do share many principles regarding morality and loyalty.

...

Intentional misunderstanding implies high levels of cognitive dissonance. Plausible explanations

He is the creator of all things so he is the God of all. The Egyptians had a theory there is one God people began considering there was one God long before Jesus or the Jews left Palestine. He revealed himself to the people who desire nothing more then to enslave, control and destroy to teach them the way into heaven. God knew they would fail but he is a God of Mercy so he gave them many MANY chances. Decides to give them one more shot and reveal his true self as the God of All not just the God of the Jews. Becomes all man and all God and teaches them the way to heaven and life everlasting. They imprison, torture, and have him crucified for this. Returns from the dead and tells his followers go and teach the gentiles the way into heaven. Gives a final prophecy to John about the end days when people will become apostate and blasphemy him and the Synagogue of Satan will reveal itself. All the Apostles agree if you are Jewish you have no place in heaven unless you convert.

Matthew 15:21-28. Jesus was also called Rabbi by Peter in Mark 9:5, Mary Magdalene in John 20:16 and Nicodemus in John 3:2.


So you admit you're not a National Socialist, and are in fact trying to turn people away from National Socialism? Mo converts fo dat outreach?


You mean it names a very specific type of jew that wasn't zealous enough about following the mosaic law?
Daily reminder that the original apostles, with possibly the exception of Peter, did not minister to the goyim. This is because Jesus directly told them not to. Paul, who never actually met Jesus outside of self-proclaimed visions in the desert, started the ball rolling on that.
Such as?
People like the pious Charlemagne, who essentially created modern European jewry by giving them a monopoly over usury and allowing them to marry into his people?
Revelations is a relatively late addition. Some of the traditional branches don't even accept it as particularly canon.
You mean convert the jews to worship him and bring forth a kingdom ruled out of Jerusalem?
Never said God is jewish. I said that the god you worship is jewish, because he is.
Sounds like a really good idea to let the most fallible people in the world be his prophets! I see no problem there
When exactly did he do that
Proof?
Again, Revelations isn't agreed upon.
Most of the apostles agreed that you need to be a jew to get to heaven in the first place. Look up what happened when Paul got a little too unorthodox in preaching to the goyim and the shitstorm it caused when he said that they didn't need to mutilate themselves or follow mosaic law. Even Peter believed this. James ultimately settled on letting the goyim follow a variant of the Noahide Laws to be ger toshav, but it should be noted that the original apostles (the people that actually met and interacted with Jesus) didn't offer the goyim salvation in the first place until Paul (who never met Jesus) came along.

Off subject and a lie. You threw that lie in for no reason. And it went back to paganism after (((Constantine))). East Rome would of thrived for 2000 more years if not for killing its culture with Judean communism.
After Jewish Christians and their ANTIFA converts murdered them all off they ran to Iran like I said. Like your fucking wikipedia article said.
Tits or GTFO
In otherwords you're hear to entrap people and demoralize them back into mental slavery. And you'll tell any lie you can to do it.
Translation you want to bluepill NatSoc to betray their race and will "globally report" anyone who disagrees with you and jump IPs to agree with yourself

Jews do not believe in the Old Testament. They follow the Torah (the books of Moses, the first five books of the Old Testament) and the Talmud (a 36 volume collection of traditions, rules and a completely revised history from what is found in the Old Testament and appeared sometime around 400 AD).

Yaweh in the Old Testament was not your typical tribal god, He was the God of righteousness. He frequently told the ancient Hebrews that they were a wicked, stubborn and degenerate people and that He only became their God in order to provide and example to the world of how anybody could be redeemed by following His law. He punished them when they were wicked and only rewarded them when they were righteous.

After the death of Christ and the spread of Christianity, Judaism was in trouble. Everybody was converting so they had to scrap the Old Testament, scrap the God of righteousness, scrap the history of their people and rewrite it. The result is the Talmud and the worship of a tribal god who unconditionally loves the Jews, only loves the Jews, did I mention he loves Jews? and unconditionally hates anybody that isn't Jewish. This is your standard tribal god that we see being invented over and over again by various failed civilizations, but on steroids.

A lot of Holla Forumsacks don't understand this distinction, Christians (at least in theory) and Jews do not worship the same God. Jews, zionist Christians, and "Hebrew Roots" Christians all worship a tribal god that the Jews invented well after the death of Christ.

These beta male Christcuck weirdos can't even hear their own voice or read their own words. It's kind of scary. The worst part is they worship a book and never read it. They just skim for comfy qoutes like it's a halmark card. It was one thing if we lived in the 1800s or whatever but now we have access to books and electricity and can read, so there is no reason for this behavior except trying to make people anti-racist on Holla Forums and controlling the herds of white people who fall for this sickness so they will meme the Jews are magical and important – giving power to their tribe while we try to make animals are equal and marry them off to our dauthers like Paster Anderson (Marching to Zion) does.

The "Old Testament" refers to the entire collection of 39 books from Genesis to Malachi.

So, no, Jews do not believe in the Old Testament. I don't know why you're having trouble with this.

TRANSLATION YOU ARE AFRAID PEOPLE WILL READ STUFF IN THIS THREAD THAT IS NOT PART YOUR SUPER SPECIAL INTERPRETATION SO YOU RED TEXT THEM WHAT THEY SHOULD THINK


Revelations is accepted by the CathoDox Orthobro confirm this for me. Modernist are the ones who say don't worry about revelations and try to claim it is allegory or something. Apostles were supposed to go in every directing and teach so you had Peter go to Rome, Thomas went and tried to teach the Indians to stop shitting in the streets, one went to Egypt, I think Mark made it all the way to the UK or something they were supposed to preach to the whole world Europe is where it really stuck.

I never said a thing bad about Nat Soc I respect it I just can't accept it Hitler did absolutely nothing wrong and the Pope failed to follow simple orders from God leading to the spread of Russian Communism and Cultural Marxism. The same way Hitler felt about Catholics and his respect for them is what I feel for the Nat Soc. Also before someone post that image of of Catholics not voting for Nazi's let me point out Germany had a Catholic Party that all the Catholics voted for. Hitler was in a race with like 6 candidates who all had a shot of winning.


You talking about VITAMIN K!

Time for Bread Pills.

Kek
KEK. Yeah, the god who told HIS people to go off and genocide goyim for him isn't a tribal god.
By your own metric, he failed.
And they were righteous only if they killed enough goyim. In fact, they were wicked if they didn't!
You mean after the Romans gassed them and their temple in the first shoah
So, he's the same god of the old and new testaments?

Except they do, Christians just take it one step further by acknowledging Jesus as yahweh's messiah.
You mean the same god you're worshipping, the same god that by your own scripture called you a dog and refused to share his knowledge with you and said he came only for the jews? Oh wait, that's only the new testament! Do we really have to go into the old?

Oh here is a good one on the Star of Moloch.

A video on the god the Jews actually worship.

Haven't checked Anderson for a while but holy shit.

Look at Pastor Anderson's Church – all these beautiful multie racial mixing. No wonder he marries white girls to niggers

Oh boy its you again.

The Canaanites were purged because they were wicked. God similarly, and explicitly, allowed other civilizations, such as the Assyrians and Babylonians, to kill the ancient Hebrews and punish them for their wickedness. This is found in the Old Testament but removed from the Talmud.


The Hebrews failed to keep His law, yes.


You're being silly user. The Talmud directly contradicts (and was meant to replace) the God of the Old Testament. These are two separate gods, one who punishes people for their wickedness, one who punishes people for not being Jewish.


Then why do the Jews reject Christ if they are all following the same God?


Jesus was testing a woman's faith and ultimately granted her request and healed her. You are taking scripture out of context.

user I think I can count the minorities on both hands!

Based Steven literally names the Jew in this video.

Steven explains how the Jews don't follow the Old Testament and instead follow the Talmud.

Steven calls out Christcucks and reads from the Talmud about how the Jews say Jesus is in hell burning in shit for what he preached.

Funny how this didn't happen until after the Council of Jerusalem. Almost like Jesus told them to "not go in the way of the gentiles" or something and Mark 16:15 was a Pauline addition after he imposed his will over the apostles (who, you know, actually met to and talked with Yashua)…
Why are you here?
So, disdainful toleration with a view towards eventual elimination?

Seems pretty convenient, if you ask me
Why should I follow a failure?
The Talmud is commentary on the OT by rabbis. It's not a work in and of itself. And again, their wickedness is usually not killing enough goyim or generally being half-decent people.
Because Jesus didn't gas the Romans, thus failing their requirements of being the messiah.
So you, an Aryan man, are okay with being called a dog and grovelling at your jew master's feet for "scraps" because it's a "test of faith"? And this is what you want for all Aryan people? Do be dogs at the jews table?

There's a dude in the bible named Ashkenaz. He was the son of Japheth, who was one of Noah's three sons to survive the flood. Isreal descends from Abram who was from Shem's lineage, one of Noah's other sons. I suspect the Ashkenazi Jews descend from Ashkenaz but I could be wrong.

You're close, but it's the opposite. Ashkenazi jews are called that because the jews believe the general area around France/Germany/Poland to be populated by descendants of Ashkenaz, hence the jews from those areas are known as Ashkenazi as a territorial distinction.

Well, when the Canaanites were sacrificing their children on the altars to Molech, practicing sodomy and oppressing the poor, they suddenly got their shit kicked in.

When the Hebrews were sacrificing their children on the altars to Molech, practicing sodomy and oppressing the poor, they also suddenly got their shit kicked in.

It doesn't sound like race or tribalism was what God punished.


You shouldn't. That's why the old covenant was abolished and the Hebrews are no longer God's people.

...

By the jews
Not really
"Think not I am come to abolish the Law, but fulfill it"
The law being fulfilled doesn't mean it's abolished. The apostles knew this before Paul forced his view of it on them in desperation for converts.
>

Jesus Christ Himself declares that they are lost. The fig tree, all the parables, the mountain sermon, His speeches with Pharisees, His stance on Rabbis. Heck, the Good Samaritan proves all of Judaism wrong.

And Christianity had a terrible effect on the Jews as they were all Jews spreading it to Jews. So Saul/Paul was hunting them.

But then he realized, "Hey, instead of killing them we should be using this to demoralize the Roman legions and slaves because if it works on Jews it can work on the goy". He was the first real propaganda Jew.


And the rest is history… Or rather we're history because of this early communism called Christianity.

kek

His main problem is with their hypocrisy. He never said the Law is abolished, and he never said that his message is for all. He came for the "lost sheep of Israel".

This guy gets it.

I'm sorry that historical events conflict with your world view.


Nobody can follow the law, Nobody has lived without sin except Jesus. That was the whole point of the old covenant. That is how Jesus fulfilled the law.


Once they're coverted they're no longer Jews, they're Christians. That doesn't make any sense.

You can state "muh Paul" all you want, he wrote one third of the New Testament, his word is accepted as divinely inspired and thus makes up a core of the Christian faith.


Good goy! Believe those Jewish Rabbis! It's just a commentary of the OT! They would never lie to you! The OT totally talks about how Jesus is burning in a pool of his own excrement for all of eternity! The OT keeps going on and on about non-Jews being cattle! Israel truly is our greatest ally!


Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Jesus straight up stated that works (following the law) will not get you into heaven. Again, nobody can follow the law. The law was made to condemn, not to redeem.


You have decided that the New Testament is all about Jew worship and that anything that disagrees with this is "untrustworthy". Even when the NT explicitly states the opposite over and over again. There's really no point in continuing this conversation if that's the case.

And yet jews still live
Somehow all those people in the OT could follow it were able to follow it well enough
Pic related
Hence why it's false
Key word here being commentary
Actually, yes.
It certainly seems that way for your sect.

How did you extract that out of the passage? Are you saying that your god's own law is iniquity?
Pic related
Yes, jews are untrustworthy. But not this totally BASED jewish tentmaker who had a vision in the desert of this other totally BASED jew he never met and then proceeded to change all of his teachings while overruling other totally BASED jews who actually met and spent time with the guy.
There was no point in it in the first place. You yourself admitted that you're not a National Socialist, that National Socialism is mutually exclusive to Christianity and that you are here to bluepill people out of National Socialism. I am just here providing a counterbalance to and pointing out the stupidity of your semitic cult.

Pic

You are literally a pharisee in 2017.

You are either sofa king lost, or you are a shill

I mean, he isn't necessarily incorrect.
Also


Where the fuck did you come from? Gaia?

I'm starting to think blacks are the true Jews. The curses described in Deuteronomy 28 seems to fit blacks better than it fits modern day Jews in my opinion. There's old paintings throughout Europe of the black madonna and child. I first heard about it in the early 90s but the people I asked all said nah. If you look up black hebrew isrealites the first thing you will probably come across is militant 'groids who think whites will be their slaves when they take over the world but that kind of smells like controlled opposition to me. I don't know for sure, but I think it's a possibility worth looking into.

Finally, an interesting thread, Jesus Christ!

...

This is a super interesting thread, I do consider myself NatSoc, but I also am in the process of becoming Catholic. I think NatSoc is the ideal form of human government, but human governments are doomed to fail since this is a fallen world. If anyone says that you can't be Christian and NatSoc, I'd have you tell that to Leon Degrelle.

Catholics are Marxists now. They were NatSoc for a few years, while voting against it when it started. Before that they were monarchists. Now they're Marxists.

And they've always been pedos

= pedo mafia

...

Degrelle asked for a pagan burial at the end of his life. Even he eventually recognised the inherent weakness of christianity.

We need our own center of the Earth.

Where should it be?

redpilled at the end of the parasite's mind control

The source for that is Serrano, correct?

Excellent read, arguments too

Shilled to Jesus because he was a philosemite and gave his shekels to their synagogues
Samaritans are half jewish. Besides, pretty sure the story of the Good Samaritan was a shaming tactic to make the jews consider that they're worse than goyim if they act in certain ways. It would've struck a nerve.
Peter was really the only apostle that gave a shit about the goyim. And Peter wanted them to follow the Law, aka become jews. Be my guest if you want to do so, but that's pretty much conversion at that point. Which brings me back to my original point: why should we trust jewish scriptures? Why should we believe jewish mythologies? We here all know that the jews are untrustworthy oven dodgers, that there are NO good jews and never were. Why should we trust that which is fundamentally alien and untrustworthy?

Sweden.

By their fruit they shall be known. You have to ignore a lot of good to ignore Christ.

Excellent cop-out
Wtf I love the jewish god and jewish messiah now

I see people debating the shit out of this verse in Matthew 15 saying that it proves Jesus was pro-Gentile, without actually posting the full quote:

21Then Jesus left Galilee and went north to the region of Tyre and Sidon. 22A Gentilee woman who lived there came to him, pleading, “Have mercy on me, O Lord, Son of David! For my daughter is possessed by a demon that torments her severely.”
23But Jesus gave her no reply, not even a word. Then his disciples urged him to send her away. “Tell her to go away,” they said. “She is bothering us with all her begging.”
24Then Jesus said to the woman, “I was sent only to help God’s lost sheep—the people of Israel.”
25But she came and worshiped him, pleading again, “Lord, help me!”
26Jesus responded, “It isn’t right to take food from the children and throw it to the dogs.”
27She replied, “That’s true, Lord, but even dogs are allowed to eat the scraps that fall beneath their masters’ table.”
28“Dear woman,” Jesus said to her, “your faith is great. Your request is granted.” And her daughter was instantly healed.

…….


Sounds like a good goy accepting Jewish supremacy to me.

How often do you see people getting sick because of literal demons entering their bodies, anyway? Every bit of this is outright childish.

Except he was cremated according to every source I found. Further, his politics were ultra catholic.

I get that you don't like Christianity, it doesn't need to be in every thread. The repetitions of the same attacks without any real thought is really annoying.

Then you claim that your single line of text is 'important' or somehow well thought out despite the complete lack of reasoning like a fucking buzzfeed article.

ww2gravestone.com/people/degrelle-leon-joseph-marie-ignace/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Léon_Degrelle
independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-leon-degrelle-1368399.html


Wasn't raised Christian so less in the know than many, but some cursory searching tells me otherwise along with some basic knowledge gained over Holla Forums.
The Centurion repented over his guilt.
Israel was the spiritual idea and jews were Judeans according to all translations notes of the bible.
jews didn't even exist back then, the pharisees (guys to set Jesus up for his execution) were proto-jews, the talmud wasn't even a whole series at that point, but was the corruption of the laws. The laws were corrupted by man (pharisees) for earthly gain which is why Jesus had to be on earth.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentecost

Making a distinction of Judean vs Jew, as if they're completely different things, reeks of semantics. To Jesus is attributed descent from David and he goes around speaking in Roman Palestine.

The Pharisees were accused by him of putting ritual, greed and hierarchy above the laws of his people, but the goal was to unite the Jews. Those fortune cookie verses of come-togetherness were meant for Jews.

strugglesforexistence.com/?p=article_p&id=13

Snippet:

It All Comes Out In The End

Paul's historical revisionism aside, Jesus' plan, his message, and his prophecy are reissued in the Revelation to John (RSV):

He who conquers and who keeps my works until the end, I [Jesus] will give him power over the nations and he shall rule them with a rod of iron, as when earthen pots are broken in pieces, even as I myself have received power from my Father (2:26-27) … And I [John] heard the number of the sealed, a hundred and forty-four thousand sealed, out of every tribe of the sons of Israel (7:4) … they were told not to harm the grass of the earth or any green growth or any tree, but only those of mankind who have not the seal of God upon their foreheads; they were allowed to torture them for five months, but not to kill them (9:4-5).

Jesus' angels could not kill the goyim because they were needed to occupy the countries that would pay tribute to Israel when the Kingdom of David was restored. But apparently, in contrast to the Canaanite woman who was on her knees to save her daughter, the goyim would need a bit of softening up.

Jesus was to have his own rod of iron, and because his hands would be occupied with that, a sort of stiletto sword would come out of his mouth (19:14-16):

From his mouth issues a sharp sword with which to smite the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron; he will tread the wine press of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has a name inscribed, King of kings and Lord
of lords.

It is the miracle of the holy trinity - Jesus' ability to be both a god and a man - that enabled him to be simultaneously David's heir on earth (King of kings) and the ascendant god in heaven (Lord of lords). The difficulty of where this would leave him vis-a-vis his father is resolved by the article of faith that they were one and the same.

More than a few men of the cloth have been bothered by parishioners who take it upon themselves to engage in unsupervised reading of the Book of Revelation. The forward-looking concern is this: 144,000 may have looked like a hefty number 2000 years ago, but haven't all of those slots been filled by now? Is there still room in Kingdom Come? Unfortunately, this question completely misconstrues Jesus' message. The Kingdom is not taking reservation from gentile Christians or even from Jewish Jews. All slots are reserved for a small subset of original in-group members - Israeli Jews for Jesus. The Good News is that many seats are still available, probably about 143,000.

The original covenant was an exclusive contract. Although he occasionally threatened to destroy them for insufficient fealty, the god of the Israelites never wavered in his insistence that they were his chosen people. The new covenant was for Jews who would follow the messiah and recreate the empire of the original chosen people. Jesus would have turned over in his grave if he had known that Paul would be taking his plan to the pigs.

from the previous article:

He wanted to make Isaiah's dream come true (see Matthew 3:3; 4:4; 8:17; 12:17; 13:14; Mark 1:2; Luke 3:4-6; John 1:23; 12:38-41) - to bring the Kingdom of God to earth, to fulfill his god's promise to Abraham … a less innocent promise than it is generally interpreted to be because the word "bless" in Genesis 26:4 is euphemistically translated. The transliterated Hebrew word is "barak" which is a primary word meaning to kneel (for barak translated kneel down or kneel, see Genesis 24:11; II Chronicles 6:13; Psalms 95:6; for barak translated as curse or cursed, see Job 1:5; 1: 11; 2:5; 2:9). A person, or nation, is "blessed" consequent to acknowledging subordination, by kneeling before the god, person, or nation that confers the blessing (italics and brackets added, RSV; see also Genesis 12:2-3; 18:18; 22:18; 28:14 and 26:4):

"I will multiply your descendants as the stars of heaven, and will give to your descendants all these lands; and by your descendants all the nations of the earth shall bless [kneel] themselves."

But under the requirement of having to kneel before Rome, Kingdom Come was not a practical idea for 1st century Jews. Nor was it, in any moral sense, a good idea. Indeed, it was a dangerous idea for Jesus' own in-group. It especially threatened those who had made an accommodation with the Romans - those who had knelt before Rome and were receiving the bulk of the blessings - and they had Jesus crucified for promoting it.

Rewriting the Script

So where did Christian universalism come from? It came from the Israelite Saul, who changed his name to Paul, and pronounced himself to be his Messiah's apostle to the gentiles. Like Paul's name change, his universalization of Jesus' message was more than a little convenient, since Paul
had been kicked out of Israel and found himself irretrievably among gentiles. In addition to being an exigent personal accommodation, Paul's offer of honorary in-group status to out-group members was inextricably linked to the message that Israel's Messiah would be back very soon - certainly within a couple of years, probably within a few months, and quite possibly within a few weeks. In other words, the offer was good for a limited time only.

Paul's message, and that of his colleague Peter, included: don't get married; if you are married, don't have children … maintain the status quo even if you are an oppressed slave or an oppressed woman, even if you suffer beatings, behave submissively, because Jesus will be back any day and everything will change … withstand your suffering, no matter how unjust, be good, and he will take care of you when he gets here … etc. For example (I Peter 2:18-21; see also I Corinthians 7:24-40; Timothy 6:1-2; Titus 2:9-10; and I Peter 3:1-6):

Servants, be submissive to your masters with all respect, not only to the kind and gentle but also to the overbearing. For one is approved if, mindful of God, he endures pain while suffering unjustly. For what credit is it, if when you do wrong and are beaten for it you take it patiently? But if when you do right and suffer for it you take it patiently, you have God's approval. For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example that you should follow in his steps.

That is, if your master beats you for an offense that you did not commit, this is your opportunity to be Christ-like. Just take it, have faith, and you will soon be rewarded. Peter and Paul were the characters who appear in modern cartoons as bedraggled naysayers holding signs that warn Repent! The End Is Near. Reading these injunctions in the context of the perceived immediacy of the pending apocalypse suggests that if one could go back in time to tell gentile converts that the returning Messiah would be late by at least 2,000 years, they would have put these prototype Christian missionaries on the first boat back to Israel.

I understand the implication of what your saying but disagree on the merit if the observation. It's a difficult distinction but ultimately a very important one.
Judean predates jew as a term and is used to denote the area in which a large number of people existed.
jew was a translation that was then coopted by everyone's favorite tribe.

It obviously wasn't meant solely for the inhabitants of the region as shown by the two posts you make following this:


Citing translations is now convenient for your argument.
biblica.com/resources/bible-faqs/in-what-language-was-the-bible-first-written/
The new testament was written in Greek, not Hebrew and the translations that you are saying call for 'submission' have been so thoroughly debunked as to not even be relevant to the discussion (notably: turn the other cheek meaning 'be smart').

Paul's actual quote on the issue of having children is this:
25 Now about virgins: I have no command from the Lord, but I give a judgment as one who by the Lord’s mercy is trustworthy. 26 Because of the present crisis, I think that it is good for a man to remain as he is. 27 Are you pledged to a woman? Do not seek to be released. Are you free from such a commitment? Do not look for a wife. 28 But if you do marry, you have not sinned; and if a virgin marries, she has not sinned. But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this.
(I don't really know how to cite bible passages but this is Corinthians 7, beginning at line 25)

My understanding is that Paul totally was the type to have a sandwich board saying REPENT but did not actually know what was going on in terms of when Jesus was actually coming back. He even says a lot of his recorded words are opinions and not fact.

Most of Christians themselves dont know or read it, only hear their kosher approved pastors and bishops say about jews, while getting drunk and bewitched even more with nonsense that isnt or contrdicts the Bible.
Jews are "half-blind" and took a deep sip from Mystery Babylon's wine, they worship Saturn/Moloch/Asterote while saying its God with a clean face towards the goyim.
Let alone equally blind Holla Forumsacks, that can only see half of the problem. That jews are just using their Kabala to make Adam Kadmon, that they learned from other cultures as part of their stubbornness towards God, by igniting the flame of sin in the people hearts till society gets in such "drunkness" state that it becomes impracticable on its own and unity through a fierce "king" most likely not human thanks to transjewmanists and /clang/ or /x/ becomes the only viable solution. Kikes or any cult that preach about a dying/dead/slain/in pieces/sleeping/in abyss type of god that needs our works/help or go up in levels to do revive, with promises of miracles or knowledge or great leadership in exchange.

Read a Bible that didnt get neutered, a KJV, and avoid pozz infested churches. (Read Galatians, at least. It isnt the first time christians falls to jewish/false prophet talk and do heresies abominable to God.)
It was already being warned about this kind of bullshit(another gospel/Jesus/spirit), its setup to "unity" people as predicted in Revelations by creating a distorted version of Christ.

So you deny that Jesus was a descendant of David, and that David was a jew? You deny that Jesus taught in the jewish lands at jewish synagogues on jewish holidays all the while referencing a jewish god and jewish scriptures?

was that before or after the jews killed him?

...

look, rabbi
prophets have been sent to you (((chosen))) TIME AND TIME AGAIN and all you faggots do is drive them out or kill them, and then kvetch over your sorry ass condition as a result
so the Almighty Himself decides no more middlemen - He comes in the flesh to you DIRECTLY, performs miracles, exposes and utterly destroys your rhetoric, and yet you still persist, getting all assmad, plotting, plotting, and finally kill him because you are so fucking prideful you can't stand the truth
SO
since you can't be arsed to listen
and obey anything except your own unnatural desires and whims
He has decided to offer His grace on the very people you hate the most, we goyim, and we know it fucking burns you up inside
His blood is on YOUR HANDS and on the hands of every descendant

...

When you ask a "WN" Christian if Jesus was a kike then he'll say no, because the kikes as we know them today didn't exist back then.

Then you ask the same guy in another thread why we should bother with Christianity, and they'll say that the kikes fear Jesus and that they killed him and that Christians are their greatest enemies and the group they fear the most.

In other words.
To a "WN" Christian, kikes of today are both Christkillers and a completely new species of jew that wasn't around when Jesus lived.

there are "jews" that follow torah and still reject their own messiah - those existed then and still do

there are also "jews" who never followed torah, in fact they make up their own schemes to follow and always have - the synagogue of satan, the "christkiller" as you put it - they also existed then and now

bringing "WN" into it at all is pure pilpul and completely immaterial to the discussion

So, Jesus was of genetic kike stock?
You know? The important thing.
Or are your some sort of civic nationalist cuck?

I never used the word kike, keep up

Which is a roundabout way of saying that they're all jews
You seem to think we have a problem with some jews and a certain other BASED type is okay because they acknowledged their jew messiah and #notalljews

He was the Almighty in the flesh
yet you remain focused on the material over the spiritual
no lessons learned
no wisdom gained from any of it at all
not from Messiah, not from any of your prophets
the Almighty makes proud those He wishes to humble
so while (((you))) think you are living like kings now (though should be in mourning) it is only the setup for the ultimate fall
this is a common theme throughout yet it seems to be totally lost
like a bad lawyer that can think they can rhetoric their way out of any jam they get into

So, was he a kike or was he an European?

He was neither
HE WAS ALL

All jewish flesh, yes.

you do realize that after He was risen, none of His own even recognized Him?
that He appeared differently to different people as it was written?
of course you do

Oh I realize they played the name game and co since pretty much forever.
As well as being wandering infiltrators.

I do know my kike 101s after all.

sure, sure
yet you place all of the blame at the feet of the wandering jew
instead of on yourselves for allowing them to infest yourselves with their degeneracy
if you are so obstinately stubborn that you fail to grasp this simple concept - that the (((jew))) only inflicts itself on you if you allow it - for your fucking 30 shekels of silver, for your (((freedom))) to act like complete animals thus destroying the civilizations you try to build - then perhaps you need to reflect a little bit more on who is ultimately responsible for the sorry state the world has devolved into

Who's doing the pilpul now?
Just because jesus was a kike, and yahweh is a kike god, and christians having been the most devoted philosemites I still blame dumb golems who buy into that shit.

...

On a scale on 1 to 10 how mad are you right now that you can't even read 2 sentence long posts anymore?

Also, there's plenty of christians that flat out state that without "christian morality' they would go total apeshit.

I am inclined to believe that, seeing how triggering the kike aspect of jesus is to you.

What's up, Señor Common Filth?

>(((they))) don't have a complete stranglehold on all forms of information and media, with the exception of fringe bastions like this site
Daily reminder none of this would be happening if not for the SUPER PIOUS and BASED Charlemagne of the HOLY Roman Empire who let them in in the first place

time to die, kike.

on a scale of 1 to 10, how mad are you that, despite all your rantings, you are just as much a part of the fucking problem as everyone else yet you seem to think you are so above it all
we got ourselves a saint here fellas


how did it get to be that way?
you act as if it just magically happened overnight
there are an awful lot of people, the ones put up on a pedestal here, that dropped the ball on this one
but no, don't take personal responsibility, just blame the (((jew)))

Pretty simple. Christians gave jews free reign over their country's financial systems, which they then used to control their rulers and thus enact legislation further judaizing the country. They also used this wealth to create large propaganda machines ala Bernays and push a culturally destructive agenda to dilute the founder stock (with the goal of fitting in among a nation of foreigners and thus continuing the jewish group evolutionary strategy) and create a culture of unrestricted capitalism with lowered trade barriers (to be able to control more of the world's capital from their bases of operation abroad). All of this with the ultimate end goal of reigning over a rootless, stupid, and interchangeable brown subhuman mass in the framework of a world government ruled out of Israel.
It took centuries, sure. Beginning with Emperor Constantine and culminating with the defeat of the Third Reich. We are now standing among the ruins, we just don't realize it yet.
Like?
>but no, don't take personal responsibility, just blame the (((jew)))
So if your sworn enemy slits your throat in the night, then it's your fault for sleeping?

if you have an obvious sworn enemy roaming about, as you state, you are fully aware of him and should probably set a watch until that faggot is caught & dealt with
or you could just lack diligence, throw caution to the wind, and hit the sack because that's a lot less hassle

REMINDER:

There was no Holohocaust in the 1960s.

A natural result of NOT subscribing to a religion that considers each and every member of your species a total failure.

Yeah, but apparently Christianity didn't manage to protect them from that, either.

Thing is, Christianity taught us to "love our enemy". That and the fact that Christianity is 100% rooted in jewish mythology, with jewish characters, jewish apostles, a jewish god, and a jewish messiah means that "antisemitism is foreign to Christianity; we are all Semites spiritually" (actual quote from a pope). We have a sworn enemy, but were blinded by his psyop.

The funny thing was that the guy in the webm is a Christian, too.

They told me we need to rebrand our movement as the Northern Israel. With tribes

It is truly smart. They have IQ about 300 (each).

Think about it: how fresh, how out-of-the-purple-norm it would be. White Israel. btw Israel translates as 'he who fights with the demiurge', abrahamist's g-d.

so now we've shifted the blame again - instead of following the basic rules laid out that helped create those great european nations we all now lament, let's place the blame on christianity itself, not on the people who allowed themselves to slowly slide into literal babylon
since the very fucking beginning man has been one big story of shifting the blame and killing the messenger
it's become so commonplace in this fucking world that it leaves very little doubt that at least those parts are unequivocally true

I try not to rob The Lord of his vengeance. Don't want to pull out good wheat with the tares.

No, we've acknowledged a crippling weakness
Christianity was a huge part of the problem by being founded by jews.
Daily reminder the shilling against Babylon is because they rekt the jews so hard they're still bitching about it millennia later.
According to your jewish mythology
Or it maybe true that we have a problem and you refuse to see it in favor of Yahweh and Yashua's cult


Actually its 632 or some shit, pretty much all of Leviticus. Your jewish spiritual fathers just chose those the goyim are most likely to follow and those that remain necessary for goyim to be ger toshav, namely the Noahide Laws
According to your own based jew Saul, they were
Didn't work out like that, did it?
>

we sure have

I see what you did there.


You really had me for a while, partner.

it's a consequence
i thought everyone here hates the NWO?
seems like you're all willing to do what it takes to rebuild that tower

...

I'm not much of a hater. All these things must come to pass. I don't love the world all that much.

well, that's the title they ascribe to themselves
just like bruce caitlyn or bradley chelsea
may as well just roll with it, right?

quality post

Translation: I'm not willing to do my duty fight for my people because the jews told me to not worry about the world

It's good for breaking the redpill to normies, but otherwise inaccurate and a typical jewish deflection like 'da ilerminaty'. How many Alex Jones-tier retards actually believe that the REAL™ problem is the Queen of England or reptilians or some other nonsense?

the real problem remains where it always has since the beginning - within oneself

Is that you Jesus?

God's in control. When he decides the shit is going to hit the fan there is nothing anyone can do to stop it. Not all Jews rejected Christ.

Correct. Early Christians were all Jews, spreading it to Rome and destroying European heritage, tradition, faith, loyalty to the State.

Things are still pretty good here across the pond. I never been to Europe, that sucks.

so many examples of people being mere instruments for a greater purpose
hardening the hearts of the proud and tempering the hearts of the righteous

Your entire culture doesn't exist. You're just slave to Roman Judiasm

Jew talk for slave

ha ha ha
bless your soul
do you really think you're in control?

The lover of life's not a sinner
The ending is just a beginner
The closer you get to the meaning
the sooner you'll know that you're dreaming

we create our own prisons

Yes, I don't have to "pray to God" to do shit for me because I'm not a spineless faggot. If you want something done right, do it yourself. I don't usually comment on religious matters but it's annoying how Christian are always bending over and praying for God to save them. I have better things to do than live on my knees.

Your god is dead and no one cares
If there is a hell, I'll see you there

how's that been working out for you?
and btw, christians don't just rest on their laurels and expect some santa figure to hand them everything on a silver platter
discipline and self-control provide immense benefits compared to rampant hedonism and dog-eat-dog philosophy
but you already knew that
do as thou wilt, right?

soon

Christians are the most immoral cult outside of Judiasm/Islam on the planet. The only thing that made them more than Semitic niggers was the Aryan DNA they infected. They always pray to sky daddy for shit and they always do what they want, then ask to be forgiven and get off on it.

WTF is this?

sooner than we realize

...

So many fedoras in this thread, daily reminder that every time they (atheists) got the power they kill more people than any other thing in this planet.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes

Not even marxistpedia can hide it and they try too hard.

Daily reminder that fedoras have a fuckton of religions "to hate" but they always attack christianity.

Daily reminder that communism and atheism are mentioned in the protocols as weapons to destroy christianity and subdue goys.

Daily reminder that most talmudists are fedoras.

Read a book about history, check the source of the lies on media, check the ones pushing cultural marxism, atheists are worse than niggers and muslims together, just check star trek, the dream of any atheist, they are living a commie fantasy, check star trek lore if you dont believe me.

soon

I love this song.

Communism is part of the Jewish religion you stupid fuck.

This is what a commie or a cultural marxists will say. Rememeber that commies and atheist are the biggest murderers in this planet, they are the source of the left.

Banning communism, banning atheism or banning talmudism is the same thing and back in time than ban was the origin of renaissance.

enjoy

I know, why the ad hominem, shill or just a kid trying to get attention?

I hate this song


It's the opposite of what they'll say. But Holla Forums knows the truth.

soon

kek
let's hope

you can count on it
i ain't tellin' you no lie

Overrated pretentious fedora garbage, but still the best thing coming out of MTV, even have vynil rips.

According to Revelations its pretty soon, but it isnt just "the end", its longer than long cat.

soon

Serious question, why are you posting all the things i have in my hard disk as flacs?

sir, you know

Very interesting. The Jews' history is like a fantasy villain laughing maniacally and rubbing his hands together in a dark tower.

QUICK PLEASE

who has the document with every time the jews were kicked out of a country? I need it to redpill a girl, she's about to go full 14/88.

...

When redpilling a woman, you must remember two things.
1. Your personal adherence to your own stated ideology is often more important than just telling her about it. You need to be a desirable man, and that means LIVING your beliefs.
2. Anything you want to tell her directly, you have to contextualize within the framework of her own life. How does it personally effect HER as a woman? Jews want to keep her from having children. That gets every woman’s blood boiling. Jews want to tell women what they are and aren’t good at doing rather than letting them choose their lifestyles on their own (9-5 grind rather than homemaker and raising children). Jews want women to be enslaved to work for them alongside men, rather than be socialites in their own neighborhoods, cooking, and cleaning like they enjoy. Et cetera.

Oh, someone has done up a newer one with both the reason for expulsion each time as well as citations for them. It’s up to 350-some-odd instances now, I think. I don’t even have the newest one.

thanks guys. I needed the second one, as it's by far more extensive. I lost my old computer and all my redpills found on it.

do you happen to have the rest

This one has 300+ listed

The first 5 are fake. They come from the (((Bible))) but jews didn't exist before 300BCE

...

...

Fucking idiots on here these days, I swear to god it's pathetic.

Story time on Holla Forums. Pull up a chair.

Once upon a time, right around the 16th century BC, a poor, impoverished, bedraggled people staggered into Egypt. They had been cruelly persecuted in their own lands, where now there was famine, they told the Egyptians. Egypt, being wealthy and confident, accepted them as refugees. How could anybody have been so cruel to these friendly Hyksos! The Egyptians gave the Hyksos land in the lush Nile Delta, and one of them even became the first minister of the Pharaoh for his skill in interpreting dreams.

One night, the Pharaoh had a bad dream. In it, seven fat cattle were eaten by seven lean cattle. Then, seven fat sheaves of wheat were likewise eaten by seven scrawny sheaves. The Hyksos counsellor told Pharaoh this was a prophetic dream, and that after seven fat years, Egypt would be stricken with famine. The only way to escape this fate would be to put the adviser, whose name was Josephus, in charge of the economy; to create a kind of Egyptian Federal Reserve of grain, if you will.

Pharaoh agreed, and Josephus radically redesigned the Egyptian economy. Formerly, farmers had been something like serfs or landed peasants. Some were knocking on the door of being well-off. Now, the common Egyptian had to concede his land belonged to the Crown. He had to buy seed from the government at a price fixed by Josephus. Then he had to plant exactly what he was told, the way he was told, and he paid through the nose for irrigation. When the crops came in, the farmer had to sell it all to the government at government-approved prices, then he had to return the seed he had "bought" before the planting season. If he wanted to brew beer, the way his ancestors had since the dawn of time, he needed to buy the ingredients from the government at fixed prices, get a special brewer's permit, and sell it to the government at government prices. All this was done at a civil court, which had the power to execute him on a whim. Then he paid taxes.

Sure enough, famine inexplicably struck the land, though not in the Hyksos areas, for some odd reason. After centuries of living side-by-side with the Hyksos, and having finally gotten wise to their tricks, the common Egyptians rose in revolt and drove out the 15th Dynasty. On the way back to their native Palestine, the escaping Hyksos took half the wealth of Egypt. Then they wrote a long book about how the Egyptians had persecuted them. Then they conquered the Levant with unprecedented brutality. Then literally every single civilization in the entire area collapsed. . . except for Egypt, which had no Hyksos left alive inside of it.

Does any of this sound familiar, my fellow goyim?

Bonus paranoia: Pic related is the scarab of a Hyksos king, Apophis. If that name sounds familiar, it's also the name given to the asteroid that will shortly be passing closer than our satellites and maybe hitting Earth soon.

Stopped reading right there.

Hyksos werne't Hebrews you moron. Stop going to bible study and coming here with your low IQ pleb shit

Nice image, nice reads user, thanks.

Thank you for the rabbinic opinion. Holla Forums is whites-only though, so I'm afraid you'll have to go back to Tel Aviv

Christian Cognitive Dissonance

sounds like communism. Sauce?

I'm not big on Kike-mythology but I'm pretty sure the story that (((they))) tell isn't that they ran Egypt.

Yeah it is. They take over the grain storage (taxation) through Joseph (coat of many colors fag)… Then generations later then end up as slaves so G((((')))D starting killing hordes of people, including people living in Israel to make way for them.

I guess that part never gets into the movies/Rugrats-Passover-Special.

Gas yourself while reading ecce homo using :;.,–
Why not read his personal notes fr 1888 at the same time.
Do you even read, nigger-kike?

Oh, Nietzsche did btw IDOLIZE Marx.
Kikes and their idols…

Not ran, ruined, as robbed and raped.

HAHA, nice try /christian/. You said that same sentance about Lincoln and Hitler.

Tsss, can have been told at the copenhagen meeting.
JUST LIKE HE IDOLISED WAGNER IN HIS EARLY YEARS
This was actually a nail in the eye for Ham.

...

...

/christian/ works for the antichrist

Because you are a kike who can't think for himself.

Its a video

cry baby boomers tried to restart the revolution under Clinton/Bush/Obama

...

oh my god
this is immeasurably funny

I don't believe any institution can successfully dictate what's good and bad besides fundamental truths we should try to live by.

The moment "Pope" figurehead the II comments on something politically it should be his personal opinion. Clearly it show who's the wiser from this cherry pick.

Also, christianity as I have seen it in action has the fundamental values of a good life written down for you, and in effect it shows how the most humble and caring people are the ones we want to be in touch with the most, and clearly, not because we wish to take advantage of them.

The means towards the same end: Peace, love and faith. That's basically what christianity is all about. Period. Having faith means everything when you try to do something in a certain spirit. Being able to show compassion towards anyone will compel them to help you in return, just as people in need only can restore their faith in their human nature and get them on their feet again when we help them out of compassion. Also, being in peace with yourself is probably the most fundamental thing to be in this world if you wish to make a difference, at all.

Reading parts of the old testament has in its own way been a semi-red pill , but the real deal, the strongest moves anyone can have done, to me, are the actions done in the same spirit as what Jesus did. Why bother doing lowly acts towards other people, at all? It's also harder to believe everything in the new testament is made up than everything happened exactly like how it's written.

I have seen some shit, guys. And you won't believe it even if I tried explaining it. The power of the source is real. Unlike the energy vampires and evil spirits, who also are Gods servants, you really do want to turn towards the light when you reach those moments… Blessings.

fred is that you

The fundemental values of slave morality and explotation. This is why your churches always dominate your stupid little lives, except for the few who read the bible and they're almost always driven insane by it.

You can't have a moral religion that teach evil spirits are infecting your decisions and your mind. It's not only a cop-out it's a cause of schizophrenic behavior.

The Rabbi god was not moral and either were the Jews in the books. Slaves just appear moral while their leaders rape you. Then they blame the devil.

The fundemental values of slave morality and explotation. This is why your churches always dominate your stupid little lives, except for the few who read the bible and they're almost always driven insane by it.

You can't have a moral religion that teach evil spirits are infecting your decisions and your mind. It's not only a cop-out it's a cause of schizophrenic behavior.

The Rabbi god was not moral and either were the Jews in the books. Slaves just appear moral while their leaders rape you. Then they blame the devil.

...

I wonder if this could be called a white pill.

Freud wanted to make psychology a new religion. Imagine how that church dominates 'your stupid little lives' (clearly said out of dominance).

If you haven't experienced love you can't say for sure what is good.

Welcome to the shitzophrenic world, brah.

Claiming I am a slave means you know who is behind the enslavement. I believe your ego mind enslaves you more than you probably know, since I time after time have been shown how I was led astray from my path by it, down the hellish road of pain. Sure, the NWO and all those people surely want to control everything, but guess what's controlling them? Hmm? Why do some of them dabble with evil spirits..? Heck, they just fucking WANT to. Child sacrifices, eating their adrenochrome fresh and other dark woes are their 'speciality'. Tight child sphincters. Yummy.

Read up on Jung. Also, believing/practicing in how spirits can control you, besides the extreme elites, obviously was a thing of the dark times, or past and in some of the non-urbanized parts of Earth. If you went back to live in the forests you'd probably experience otherwise, or rather, how spirits, in essence, are real 'nuff. Read on.

Why the human spirit is a kinda real thing, and possibly the only thing truly to be called 'real', is because the physical world is a manifestation of the deeper works. DNA, for instance is kinda miraculous how it can amass energies, since energies, or vibrations, are 'information'.. Communication on a deeper level is possible, but not with a closed mind. (Remember, because, I know everything!!!) Some people do dark works witch basically is your ego mind doing bad energy works for you and those around you. They probably get a kick out of it.

Imagine you're already in possession, or as I call it, have the responsibility of the most advanced machinery possible. Imagine you now are told to believe you're only capable of hitting nails in a board by those who're programming this hamster wheel of a system we are brought up in.

Imagine GOD is the program, programmer and source of all things, including how energy chooses to manifest.

Imagine how your bodily vessel is capable of doing things, if "Big daddy G" controlled you, and not some Ooga Booga African bush-spirit, or as the hindus call it, demon entity from the lower worlds.

Think about why Jews degenerate physically. Think then about what they, in essence, practice: Usury and worshipping the material world instead of singing songs of praise and return to the source of all things, only to come back a healed and better person. Not everyone can let go like that.. They probably believe they have their reasons, or in reality, just don't know what to do, since they've forgotten where they came from - their heart. Are you trying to improve this world, raise it's vibration, or whatever you wish to make a real difference, angels, or whatever word for divine entities will appear. The hindus call those Devas.

The suffering is real, though.

Have a nice day.

Christfag here. I've been going through a crisis of faith for about 4 years. All I've ever wanted was the truth, and for my own reasons, my truth was Christ and the God of the Bible. I have become irreversibly hardwired for Christianity and I have also become entrenched in the rabbithole so severely that in my fall from grace, I have become rejected by God and the truth of the rabbithole. The more I learn and understand, I become severely conflicted with confusion like a disease because eventually I will have to make a choice. I want to pursue the truth but the more I learn, the more conflicted I feel. My fear of going to hell for eternity is deeply rooted within me. How can I shake this fear of death so that I can go deeper? I have awaken to a new truth and because I love truth, I will persue it, but because my mind is completely bound by the idea of dying forever, I can't keep persuing it with a clear conscience. I cant properly articulate what Im feeling. How can I lose my fear of going to hell? I know it sounds stupid to many of you, but I can't shake it.

Do they issue you kikes some kind of standard manual and image pack or are you just one really busy little beaver posting on dozens or hundreds of sites at once?

So heres my 2 cents. I think a lot of you assume all christians are cucked. You are right about probabaly 90 percent. It is sad. But there are those of us who believe in supercessionism. In other words, the New Testament negates the Old Testament. In Revalations, the jews of today are called the Synagogue of Satan. Every single thing we think of as defenerate, is because the Lord told us it was in His Word. Hitler was Christian, so anyone who is purposely anti-Christian is no better than that fag Richard Spencer, and have no buisness calling yourself a true NatSoc. There is no arguing this, it was the Fürher himself who said "our movement is Christian". Nazism ISNT about hate, its about bringing our people out of the gutter, and atheism is the number one reason we are in that gutter. If you dont have God to answer to, you may as well be a degenerate trannyfag. The Jews want you to turn on the Lord. Dont be fooled user!

this guy really wants to know if you are a jew hater…. you know what to do =D I know nypa its just shitposting fun.

twitter.com/gantman/status/908465334709051392

KILLLLLL

Fear is a Ego trick. Death is something that can be compared to birth and more than anything a mental state of being. Energy does not dissapear, and even when we finally die for real, the only one capable of reaching out to us when this earth no longer holds us down God, or the source, as I also call it, is the only one capable of holding us lovingly. I believe that whatever test we are undergoing the best outcome will come when we discard our fear and let God do his works. Fear of 'going to hell' is, in effect, made real by the fear itself (!). The fear of falling lower is exactly what it is - falling lower. This is why, and believe me, I have been struggling with a lot, and especially fear, the old saying that goes "the only thing to fear is fear itself" literally is true.

When you realize this, you can negate it, because whatever made you anxious was the thought of fear itself, and there it went down the drain again.

Why fear? Fear is bad. Is hell bad? Hell is a state of being. Bad state of being. You don't want that. Why believe you need to that then? Is fear real? Does the fear of something make it real? That's completely up to you.

Believing in 'Hell' as divine judgement, is also a transitioning, I believe. A phase. Once I was set upon the thought that some of my actions and mistakes demanded retribution. It was also just an Ego trick. Manifested fear, basically. I began looking for my verdict so much I actually, almost consciously and intentionally began storm riding to finally get struck by lightning. Only then I realized I had been blessed with the gift of life and I was stupid to think otherwise.

The power and love of God is never ending. We just get into the shade and get confused.