Are all our rights going to be taken away in the next few years?

Are all our rights going to be taken away in the next few years?

Rights are a spook.

what the fuck do you mean the next few years?
you already lost your right to privacy, due process, and speech. Trump is just going to accelerate what's already going on.

True.

remind me again which ones we still have

what rights?

You can't take away something that is not real.

Rights are just a spook.

If you need the permission of the state in order to do something, you were never free to do it to begin with.

Thanks to you faggots we already have people going to jail for saying mean things about protected minorities. What do you care about rights?

That's not true actually. You just can't call someone a nigger and then beat the shit out of them.

Jobs are allowed to fire you, constitutionally for saying racial/homophobic slurs.

...

...

Leftists in Europe have made it pretty much illegal to say anything racist or do anything that might upset minorities, even if they're currently in the process of raping your daughter.

Pretty funny how leftists have never been able to into literature and general reading comprehension.

...

rights are just le spooks matey

I think I found the perfect oxymoron of an ideology for you, my teenage friend.

What a shock.

...

Literally read the first sentence of the Wikipedia article on communism.

communist society is stateless, both commies and anarchists want the same thing.
The main difference between communists and anarchists is about tactics, and the most popular anarchist tendency is anarcho-communism.

What rights have you got? The right to choose your dictator from the 2 bourgoiesie approved? The choice for freedom of expression until its deemed hatespeech or you are silenced by the CIA? The right to "work"? Healthcare? Education? Decency of living? Safety and happiness? Clean drinking water? Food? The right to unionisation and political organisation?

Americans don't have any of these. In all honesty, what rights do you think you have?

With Not Socialism, at least we can say that the one time it was implemented it worked extremely well until the globalist capitalist and communist cabal closed in on it.
Stay triggered, commie-cucks

...

Well maybe you shouldnt have tried exterminating all the jews, roma, gays, handicapped, have plans for exterminating all the slavs, and taken people from your "same volk different country" as slaves to work in your factories after bombing their historical cities to bits, and use their women as sex slaves for an insane eugenics program. People tend to not like things like these.

...

You still haven't made a single argument besides the occasional stamen and "communism failed" do you honestly think we all haven't heard this before?
(Property is violence btw, propertarian)

Strawman*

Hitler's Germany worked so well that it collapsed in 12 years because you were dumb enough to create a permanent war economy and still lose the fucking war

Trans bathroom in a couple of states?

wew

Top kek

What happens when someone breaks the law, buddy?

Communism failed is a pretty good argument, especially considering that its rate of failure is hovering right around 100.00%

It only 'collapsed' because it was fighting 12 different countries at once, it was the first country to get out of the depression after Hitler took over, something that the Capitalists and Commies had to deal with all throughout the 30s. Hitler actually knew the proper to run an economy, which a labor-based currency where Jews can't inflate the currency through the bank and spread fun in any other industry.

Just under national 'socialism's failure rate then

Even if you didnt "kill" all those "jews", all the other things did happen and my grandparents personally experienced them.

also

Except for the fact that it didn't fail, its economy was better than any other in the world at the time, whereas, Soviet Russia was busy starving 40 million peasants to death, your favorite class that you claim to be looking out for.

we're talking about the most commonly accepted definition of communism-stateless, classless, and moneyless-all of which exist under anarchism too.
it literally is
then maybe hitler shouldn't have declared war on all those countries

You're thinking of china there mate, get your blak bok of gommunism propaganda piece right.

HAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHA I found an actual kike on Holla Forums, this one is a keeper. So how many times did gramma Silverstein survive getting gassed on the Holocoster? Did any of your relatives become a bar of soap or lampshade by chance?

You cant fucking read can you. I was referring to the bombing of my country and the enslavement of of my greatgrandfather, you utter moron. 100% "germanic" and "aryan" yet not good enough to be part of ze master race right? Give back my bike.

Kankermoffen

Paternal Half Kike here.

I'm not technically Jewish because my mom is not jewish. My great grandparents immigrated from the Ukraine decades before Nazi Germany ever came about. Am I cancer?

Then who enforces the rules, buddy? Nobody will cooperate without central leadership and when Communism employs central leadership to try to work like in Russia and China, millions of people end up being slaughtered for hoarding grain because Communism's shitty central planning can't ever redistribute the food back to all the peasants who are working for little to nothing.
Hitler only declared war on Poland because they were massacring ethnic Germans there, then, the war went from there. It was only a matter of time before the capitalists and communist teamed up on him, knowing he was too strong for them and their Jewish masters.

No wonder leftists are amoral cultural relativists.

Sounds like you're mad that your grandparents's were so cucked that they couldn't serve in the reich, and now here you are, with your genetic dead-end genes, trying to argue for Communism on a Siberian Babushka picture board. I've seen the "faces of leftypol" threads, it's no wonder you guys have no hope for anything that doesn't come from a cucked worldview. I pity you.

Short answer: yes. Long answer: also yes.

Don't listen to that guy, Jewish reform starts with you and Trump ironically.

if it didn't fail where is nazi germany today?

no response?

checkmate

Where is Soviet Russia today? How are Vietnam and China doing? How great is Cuba?
We've already been over that.
The difference between the 3rd Reich and these failures of countries is that the 3rd Reich was doing great economically and their people's lives greatly improved and fun was removed, whereas, these Communist countries weren't in any major wars, especially not any involving multiple major powers like with Germany, and they were absolute shit. They had nothing holding them back from success besides their own ideology. Hitler created a state that was self-sufficient without capitalists or communists, Cuba and Russia and China barely got by without Capitalist trade.

Holla Forums proving their maturity as usual.

The same thing that happens in every other anarchist society.


The Soviet Union was not in a depression in the 30s. On the contrary, industrial output more than quadrupled during Stalin's first two five-year plans, and it was in the middle of a third one when Hitler panicked and launched Barbarosa before the Brits were finished.

...

no we haven't, you're just spouting memes and dismissing everything that was said ITT because it doesn't fit your ideology
considering that Hitler was funded by American and German capitalists and his "sufficient" economy was built on slave labor and barely lasted a decade I'm going to call bullshit

What do you think the word "capitalist" means? We have already established that you do not know what "communist" means.

You really need to open a history book.

Why are german nazis still assblasted that they got it handed to them by the Soviets? It's been about 90 years.

People do whatever they want and there is no law and order, of course. When they try to enforce rules, they end up slaughtering millions like in the prime examples of Communism in the 20th century, so either way, your ideology is extremely prone to real genocide.

That was because of Stalin's 5 year plans which were noted for not working at all, they faked their economic numbers while at the same time, some of the greatest state oppression and starvation afflicted 10s of millions of peasants in the Russian countryside.

At least you didn't resort to calling my argument a spook.
It didn't rely on slave labor though, and as I said earlier, it was the first out of the great depression which the Jews caused on purpose.

I'm referring to capitalists as in countries like America and Britain, Not Socialism in of itself is a capitalist ideology but with limits to keep companies from exploiting the people and spreading fun and keeps banks from fucking with the currency and Jews from doing any of that which they are extremely prone to doing as well. Not Socialism actually has nothing to do with Marxist socialism, Hitler used the word Socialism to get the masses to give his party a chance.

Did Russia or China have to take on America, Canada, Britain, France, Australia, and Eastern Europe all at once?

tens of millions of peasants my ass, even Robert Conquest had to walk that claim back.
And i'm not even a stalinist but you cannot argue that the five year plans weren't successful at industrializing the country. Russia pre-Stalin was still mostly a peasant economy, after Stalin it became an industrialized powerhouse

yes it did you ignorant cumskin.
pick one fag