The Left and Hate

I noticed the progressive left likes to talk about fighting hate, and how their „love“ will previal. I assume love means the blunt end of a metal bat or a fist, because love of violence is the only love they have been showing.
But lets take a closer look at the core of their message – hate is bad. That in itself is a logical fallacy. Hate is a intrinsic part of a human being. It is an emotion, like love. And just as you cannot order someone to stop or start loving someone, you cannot order to stop/start hating someone. A different side of the same coin. Ironically, the greatest of hate is born from the greatest of love – the more you love something (be it a concept, person or a value) the more you hate those that despoil, defile and harm that which you love. Thus you cannot get rid of hate without getting rid of love too.
Any doctor will tell you that the difference between a cure and poison is the dosage. And that is true. Many cures and medicines ARE poisons or poison-based and could easily kill you in higher dosages. Even vitamins, in extreeme doses can be bad for you. Posions, in small doses, can eb good for you. The same applies to almost everything in life. Dosage is key.
Love, in extreemes, becomes obsession (No, the „but it's not true love“ does not apply. IT's a No True Scotsman Fallacy. The romantic black-white notions of love being good and ONLY good is a lie. Such absolutes do not exist.)
Moderation in all things. Love, hate, empathy, apathy, etc.. A man musn't allow himself to be controlled by any of them. Guided, perhaps. But never to become a slave. REason must be there to keep balance.

Long story short, no matter how one interprets their message, the left comes off as hypocritical bigots – either they routinely trample on their belief (all hate is bad), or they acknowledge only their own right to hate (it's OK for me to hate).

It's interesting how everything is going down. If King Nigger didn't show up and Hillary got elected instead back in 2008 America probably wouldn't be divided or tensions as high today. Stupid nigger just HAD to race bait, HAD to shill for his "son" Trayboon.

Of course the subhumans are appalling hypocrites, that's why they redefine words to exempt themselves from their own standards. Pointing this out seems to do nothing at all though.

You watched this I take it?

No. Everything would have happened exactly the same way. Its all one long script.
Its our job to put as much dirt in the wheels as possible while waking these zombies up.

You cannot argue with a full-on leftist. You just can't. Logic, reason, and facts mean nothing to them. It's a literal religion based on an oppressors/victims narrative. If you disagree with them, for any reason, you're "one of them" and you need to be defeated on behalf of whatever "oppressed" group. They don't hear your arguments. They just hear that you're a non-believer in cultural marxism.


It's a dangerous, violent religion and it must be treated as such. By (((design))) it attracts people of below average intelligence, power, strength, wealth, mating chances etc as it gives them a "gang" to take on their objectively superior humans with. You will never convince a communist pawn because deep down they simply feel threatened by your freedom, and therefore instinctively want to band together and destroy you.

I'm just telling you this before you bother trying to argue with them.

...

Yuri already pointed this out. What we should be doing is convincing the young and still impressionable as they haven't been brainwashed by these commies yet, or the fence sitters.

You cannot argue with a leftist who is so far gone he is nothing but a shell, a caricature of humanity. You can, however, successfully argue with normal people who have been poisoned by leftist ideology. The leftist true believers are a vanishing fraction of the general population, just like us anons. We don't need to convince them, we just need to convince everyone else.

You misunderstand progressive leftists.
The whole point of transhumanism is to facilitate this idea that each individual is a blank slate that can be whatever they want to be. So living "free of hate" is literally something they strive for, even though it is a functional impossibility.

This is why they always reference Harry Potter. They know they can't ever be wizards but they still want to believe in magic and fairy tales because the alternative is to face the facts that we deal with here.

How do you deal with someone who believes in an ideal that they can't accomplish?

Has its roots in Guilt. The Guilt culture.

Shame used to be a lot more prevalent. Shame and embarrassment. Not this guilt where if you fuck up on something, the whole society holds it against you forever.

What's even worse, we're born into this world and taught that we're supposed to be ashamed of our ancestors, while simultaneously they're telling us it's logically 'stupid' to have pride in them. In this equation, those two combined together equate to heritable guilt, without having to say it.

Now they cannot bear the cost of having been wrong about something. They walk on eggshells their whole life to prevent a reaction to their simple natural wants/desire to be a part of their own people. Guilt means a mistake sticks with them forever.

So, if they ever want to say that they've finally overcome hate, they are actually forced to behave as if hate doesn't exist. That is, if they've hated in the past, they can't say they've overcome it.

Part of temporal guilt that never leaves is also that you THINK it always sticks with you in the future, even when you're cold dead.

that sounds like original sin.

You mean being told to be ashamed of ancestors (Adam and Eve) and then being told it's stupid to be proud in your ancestors (that's worldly and not spiritual)?

Actually, nevermind. It's not that it's "stupid" to be proud, it's that it's bad/evil to do it.

Kikes and commies go on and on about love because it's the one thing they'll never have or understand.
They're hateful, spiteful, disgusting, lazy people.

I believe the term "hate", much like other buzzwords are empty accusations/slander. The left uses the power of language and manipulates it until they can redefine the meaning of words or create new words and empower them with certain meanings and connotations that you do not want to be a part of.

Certain buzzwords that I've come across:
>(((Alt-Right)))
A new one seems to be "terrorist" with connotations to white men, I expect it to catch on fairly nicely with the left. A lot of these terms are growing old and will not have any meaning or power since the usage of these terms are getting over-saturated in the "language market". They will have to come up with new terms every couple years or so.

We should collect and study the terminology that they use in order to understand their manipulation methodologies.

Kek, they're projecting their own fear. That also pretty much explains all their other buzzwords, they're all projections.

It's all only ever "anti hate" on paper anyway. You deal with these people in person and they're no different to anybody else. In fact they're just hypocrites because they claim to espouse certain views that they don't even really follow themselves irl.

In the end their behavior only really amounts to signalling and not much else.

Neology
to make some kind of political or rhetorical
point, sometimes, perhaps with an eye to the
Sapir- Whorf hypothesis "theory about
language: the theory that the structure of a
language helps determine how its native
speakers perceive and categorize experience" (Microsoft® Encarta® 2009), e.g., pro- life. Some political neologisms, however, are intended to convey a negative point of view.

evolved from mass media content or used to
describe popular cultural phenomena (these
may be considered a subsection of slang).

Well their ideological beliefs conflict with the progression of such technologies funnily enough. Because by enforcing such a culture they're stagnating any real innovation that would lead to it in their lifetimes. They're too focused on how society should be right now, instead of achieving practical goals that could lead society into a desired direction.

To envision future technologies and achieve actual innovation, it would require an ideologically diverse environment.

No, prejudice is normal as breathing. Every single human on this planet is prejudiced. No exception. It's how our brain works.
It's literally a system to resolve conflicts and fake fast decisions in the absence of direct data.

The thing ive been able to stump many lefties is asking them how they plan to regulate emotion. After all emotion is their playing field. If you force them to associate their advocacy against "hate" with the thing that controls their entire lives; their emotions. They trip themselves up. Once they advocate restricting or regulating emotions, they destroy their own ideology

Just remember there's no such thing as the alt left hahahahaha

This. Progressives have been droning on a long time about "destroying hate" as in literally removing the emotion from human psyche. It's why they try to ban shit like "hate speech", implying that connotation with hate is somehow bad, or say someone commited a hate crime.

All of this stems from the leftist (and often even libertarian) belief that upon birth, a person is tabula rasa – that you can make him believe anything and act any way you want, if you provide the right circumstances. By this logic, they believe that if they manage to create the right circumstances in the current world, they could create a society where nobody is even capable of hate, of being mean to anybody, or even being negative in general. They believe that such a world would be utopia, rather than hell on earth as most right wingers would view such a society.

The problem is you are stuck in the duality of left vs right. 20 years ago, the kind of people who are now in the left, were in the right. And those in the left were saying exactly the same things you are saying, except reversed.

Now (((the sides))) have been reversed, and we keep playing along like the dumb shits we are, instead of looking up at the ones controlling the puppets.

You worthless dumbasses the lot of you.

It's a good mode of attack to reductio it out when you throw technology reasonably expected to arrive in the next few decades, revealing their passive openness to arbitrary transhumanist abominations and the fact they haven't really thought any of it through in any detail. On some level they must realize they are sleepwalking through the end times and can barely fathom any of it.

Tabula rasa and the associationism that came with it seems like a simple prototype of the immediately self-contradictory kind of meta-belief framework in the same class as that embedded in positivism, or in more sophisticated and subtle forms in the varieties of postmodernism and Marxism. It's unsurprising then that the Masons who founded the USA spoke so fondly of Locke's innovations. I think it has something to do with the level of recursion even the most intelligent minds can usually tolerate.

This.

Indeed.


Pic related

That one is always interesting. Masonic imagery of a gang of sodomite lions.

The only thing anyone should take away from your gay ass rant is that is that right-wingers are fucking pussy ass bitches and leftists are the real might-is-right force in politics.