Just a reminder that racial realism is pseudo-scientific bullshit

Also, the Rationalwiki article has a ton of sources to backup its claims. Try harder.

...

Also,

...

...

But it's not? What scientific consensus are you speaking of? There really hasn't been that much research into the topic.

You fucking idiot. Make an argument for yourself, nobody will take you seriously if you just post a link
This is akin to me making a post linking to Wikipedia and saying "refute it faggot"

Fuck off

...

...

Dammit OP post faster I'm getting bored

In short:
- Small genetic variability (even when compared to e.g. wolves or other great apes)
- No defining characteristics for each supposed race – there's no such a thing as clusters of people of the same race, just a continuum of different characteristics that change gradually over the geography
- Even if there were races in humans, the usual race definitions are entirely culture-dependent and not at all based on any modern notion of science

Black people are not from a different species you dumb cunt

...

check out these epic memes i saved earlier today

Much like OP, I'm not going to write my own arguments. The difference is, OP is making a shitty bait thread, and I'm simply not giving much of a fuck about a shitty bait thread.

Actually the scientific consensus is that race is real. In fact, doctors can be sued for malpractice if they treat someone of the wrong race with the wrong medication. A couple papers you read from virtue-signaling western doctors is not consensus of anything. I challenge you to find Chinese reasearchers or Indian ones or any non-western ones really who think race isn't real.

A small genetic variability can make a large amount of difference. Considering how sensitive organisms are to genetic differences leads to this being a non-argument.

The lack of clear boundaries does not netavistock existence, this is a logical fallacy.

But there is? There are clearly defined races with different physical and mental characteristics.

No? In some places there has been inbreeding between two races there may be some overlap, but for the most part there are boundaries, although they may not be crystal clear they exist.

Culture is defined by the people, by race.

What is a "modern notion of science"? Because it seems to me there really is have been no major "modern" inquiries on race.

OK, I will pay you 6 million units of your preferred fiat currency if you can successfully ‘my fair lady’ a Congolese Pygmy into a qualified neurosurgeon.

It might be a bit of a challenge considering that they have a life expectancy well below the age it takes most neurosurgeons to qualify (and the whole average IQ of 54 thing) but:

So you should be able to do it. Right?

What's more "scientific consensus" doesn't mean anything. It used to be scientific consensus that earth was the center of the universe.

This was the first thing I noticed looking at the sources for these neat little infographs.

> Race is not an accurate or productive way to describe human biological variation.

By the way, why should I repeat what is said in the article? I could just say everything there is to say about the subject in my own words, but it would be pointless – most of it is there. Like it or not, Rationalwiki provides a ton of _reputable_ sources on the subject, which you could read if you want. Yet, I haven't seen a serious scientific article anywhere going against what is said there.

I'll gladly accept your link to Wikipedia backing up your point of view, if you have one.

...

What in the fuck are you quoting?

You are really dull aren't you? Why don't you try to make you own argument? I'm arguing with you, not some shitty wiki.

wew, is this b8?

Race=subspecie. Mostly from varying amounts of Neanderthal and Denisovan. What about that is hard for you understand?

Wikipedia just has links to other articles and engages in heavy censorship. You're basically just going to ignore sources you don't like to fit your narrative and ignoring the actual numbers and data in those charts. That's not scientific of you, that's dogmatic.

Stop bumping this lazy thread you retards

STOP BUMPING

Perceived race is correlated with political behaviour to sufficient degree to make it a useful political concept, regardless of deconstruction attempts.

...

see

You mad, jew?

I just want someone, even a shitposting larper to address the Pygmies. No one will go anywhere near them. They are all the proof that is needed that the enforced lies about race are just that, lies.

Elaborate and provide a link, I have only heard of these tiny niggers in passing.

Is op there? I'm about to leave if he doesn't start spouting some more retarded excuses for why he only has to post links to other peoples arguments, who I assume are much smarter then him.

(checking my own dubs)
*than

He's desperately scouring the drunken peasants wiki looking for other people's words to ctrl+v at evil internet racists.

I was going to just fuck off but OP's inability to formulate his own thoughts made me look up Lewontin's fallacy myself. See the 4th pic in my post here .

Lo and behold, there's a wikipedia article on it: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Genetic_Diversity:_Lewontin's_Fallacy

I encourage everyone to look at the "Response to Edwards" section, the supposed rebuttal. A prime example of pilpul.

Checked. I think this just became a dubs thread. Rolling! Don't forget to sage, lads.

(checked)

Double-checked!

oh my

news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071210-pygmy-size.html

phys.org/news/2007-12-pygmies-short.html

Here are some uber normalfag ‘respected’ sources that discuss the differences between them and other subspecies of human.

Some pygmy groups have a life expectancy of 16 years old and a height of four feet, it is laughable to suggest that after a generation in a different environment that they would have children who top five feet and live until 80.

FUCK I FORGET TO SAGE

I think their life expectantly is so low because of the way other nogs treat them though. They abduct them to literally keep as "pets" and rape them and if I remember right one tribe even way preying on them as a food source for a while. It's pretty disgusting, enraging stuff.

The statement that race isn't the best descriptor of groups of genes exhibiting certain behaviors doesn't netavistock the fact that genes matter and that not everyone is equal. In your article, you can see this picture, which clearly outlines the ethnicities (shown as Y-DNA haplogroups) of people around the globe. Which makes so much more sense, since you can say that e.g. both a Brit and a Norwegian are White, but their genetic differences still matter and still are existent as a result of adaptation to their respective environments. Yet, because of overlapping climate, environment, culture, religion etc., some have categorized similar ethnicities as falling under a wider super-category (AKA NOT the only category that exists) that, although less accurately, marks them as similar.

The thing is, many burgers don't know shit about their ancestry because they've mixed their ethnicities the fuck up, therefore falling on the "White" label instead of the true label that matters and has real world effects (e.g. German-American, Dutch-American etc).

But OP, if race doesn't exist how can a holocaust happen? How could the germans even capture or round up the jews to exterminate them if the differences between groups are so small that you cannot even justify race.

If all people being roughly equally intelligent and strong and are genetically essentially replaceable one with the other then why does earth need black people? European and Asiatic people are just as good and will do things essentially in the same way…. can you really call that genocide?