How do we fucking PURGE these people?

How do we fucking PURGE these people?

Other urls found in this thread:

mutualaiddot.wordpress.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

We don't need to purge them, they will wither away once workers become class conscious

Organize, educate & agitate user

You created this, you can no longer control it.


If you actually believe this you're word thinker who's probably already too far gone to even grasp holistic reasoning.

That's how working class liberals think, the "liberal" elite don't believe in any of that shit, it's just histrionics to divide us all.

If you can't persuade them of pursuing an alternative political alignment then you can't really do much else.

Don't pretend only liberals do this

We build Gulags in Alaska and send them there.

How did we create our ideological opponents? They're no more similar to us than rightcucks.

We haven't been able to even express our views in public without getting lynched for more than a few decades. Cold War paranoia let it fester unchecked.

You're a liberal too.
Holism is irrelevant in this context, counts against it, and the rarefied conception of meaning it employs only serves to confuse identification and intelligible attribution of contentful attitudes.

I'm so sorry to do this but mutualaiddot.wordpress.com/

Their origins lie in maoism and marxism more broadly. Marx might not have expletively wrote about it (Engels was a proto-SJW though) but it all flows directly from it's dichtonomies and sentiments. Working class vs bourgoise just faded away into an officially held leitmotiv because those are abstractions that are not reflective of the really existing consioussness of class, race, gender, culture and all that other stuff. Dialecticsismagix, marxism negated itself and you're stuck holding up the cast off shell as the True Ideology.


Meaning follows from use, the map is not the territority, accusing me of using holistic thinking to cause confusion is like saying that I'm sowing confusion for stating that russia is not a surface of pink paper because it looks that way on my world map.

Read Korzybski and Wittgenstein and try taking a look at marxism from outside it's own context.

That is not at all what I am doing, in fact I'm accusing you of just the opposite. Lrn2LanguageGames.

...

Holistic think is the opposite of using fixed categories and definitions, as your .jpg does. Seems that you just don't like what I said and therefor deem it non-holistic.

The same could be said of your comment before and now.

In other words, retards were too stupid to understand what they were reading.

Not our problem. We could have dealt with it, but if we spoke up in public: 100 GORILLIONS YOU MONSTER

It's not a matter of blame, you cultural christian.


Not really, unless you take holistic thinking as a buzzword like critical thinking.


And was marx too stupid to understand hegel then?

There was never a person alive who wasn't too stupid to understand Hegel. :^)

It shouldn't be a buzzword, but you're going to make it out to be in the way you're using. But anyway, what's wrong with buzzwords? Seems like you fixed category and definition you're giving to it and also appending lack of real usefulness when precisely that is why it is a buzzword anyway.

Everyone is too stupid to understand Hegel.

Shit, I gotta work on making some more, then.

...

not really, socialism was created out of liberalism, and later became its own branch after adopting anti-humanist philosophy.

The art of the deal is an excellent book on the application of dialectics in making deals.

The problem with buzzwords is that they drag language down into a collection of adjectives that only really signify emotions, examples being: rational, critical thinking, miso.gynistic, with the dictionary definition remaining as a fall back. The article that has been going rounds on something called the motte and bailey strategy exemplifies this process. Another example would be strings that have come to characterize leftist thinking, Trump is a racist, sexist, woman hateri.c, bigoted, ableist, istististist.. you don't see this tendency in right-wingers, when speaking of Clinton, they don't use strings like "feminist, socialist, liberal, cronyist, abortionist".

If you're of the opinion that my post on marxism and sjw's was not holistic, go ahead and explain. (Note: you disagreeing with it doesn't mean that it doesn't qualify as holistic)

Socialism has always relied on humanism in it's appeals.

You can't "purge" them because, in a way, this is the tone of nearly all progressive politics (socialist or not) today, so unfortunately we're the guests in their house.

What we should do, urgently, is to help knit together all dissenting voices, and that maybe will be able to provide a basis for growth.

So find every anti-Identitarian socialist in your area and start study and debate groups, find every anti-Identitarian milieu in social media and network with them, find an anti-Identitarian organization and join them, etc. Union, cohesion and discipline are the only things that can save the class-conscious Left now, because the reactions to this election shows that there's literally nothing that will shake the Social Justice people out of their official narrative.

If Clinton had won this entire worldview would be worn out by 2018, but now that they have an open racist to fight, it will be stronger than ever.

Not really, socialism relies on its appeal to humanity, not humanism. Socialism uses materialist philosophy, to justify its principles, and juxtaposes it with the unsustainable accumulation of capital. Socialism doesn't view humans as the center of all, but a constantly evolving machine that will relocate, and reorganize itself based on its material conditions.

Not what I was referring to. Again, nice show that you don't really know how Language Games work and just like to spout of some notes you took on a philosopher you just read as if it actually were that relevant.

Actually, I do. I've seen this plenty of times. It happened for Obama too as "socialist, Islamist, liberal, multiculturalist, anti-whitist, et c et c"
You're dishonest and boring.

I can't take this seriously. There's no one in the world this willfully ignorant, not even Holla Forums.

Don't forget globalist.

what the fuck am i reading

lel the irony and the stupidity

Socialism has its roots from the french revolution you mongoloid.

"Holistic" seems to be your favorite buzzword, then.

The philosophical works on socialism characterizing the world as inhuman machinery doesn't mean that it's appeal lay in that.

You did refer to that post, contesting my use of the term holistic.


He might have been called of that, but it isn't done in strings like leftists typically do.


You're petty and narrow.

lrn2read

Don't know how, but it's necessary. Someone will need to pick up the slack when the white proletariat learns that being superior to other races won't make their boss stop treating them like shit.

Did you even read him?

The post was quoted, but not every content therein was referenced and discussed in light of the word. If it was I would have mentioned Marx and SJWs.
Again, I've seen it done, several occasions. It's not hard to couple adjectives together when your ideology opposes someone or something.

Yes it is. Have you never watched Alex Jones before? You aren't making an argument, you're making assertions. Until this faggot is ready to contrast the left and the right using examples, from both sides don't respond to his shitty bait. Go on Holla Forums faggot, and see how many people are complaining about "globalist Jewish Marxist" as in -IST". As was said before and I'll parrot: you're dishonest and boring.

I thought I was reading a tumblr-post by a trigglypuff who got disowned by her family, but then I checked and double-checked to find out that engels really wrote "On the family".

You claimed I used holistic thinking to cause confusion, and interpreted my response to this as me claiming that you said I was thinking holistic, while I never did so and in fact meant that you accused me of wrongfully using the term holistic.


Most likely. When you compare right-wing media with left-wing media however, and the reactions in the comments, on twitter and other social media, you can clearly see that the use of such string is almost entirely a left-wing phenomenon.


I did. He mostly just says "globalists" or "globalist elite", it's just a repetitive but it's not done in strings.

It's hopeless trying to explain it to you even when I quote you verbatim… Oh well.

Name one Marxist philosopher who attacks people using these strings liberals do. And then you have to argue exactly why strings are somehow less idpol than buzzwords by themselves used incessently.

Also, quote Engels. Go ahead quote him. He's no SJW. There's no point where he's not talking about the family in terms of class.

Actually, Trump LOST white voters relative to last go round (58% compared to 59% who voted for Romney), and the majority of white folks voting Republican is the rule.

But, then, by mentioning this boring fact, I am already lumped into the lie-brul hessjaydoubleyou elitist clique, so what does it matter.
You and the dipshit who made that shitty comic need to be purged.

Silly OP, you don't purge people, you educate them.

No, rightcucks also do it, except they are the burgers on top wondering why the muslims hate them.

I've always hated that saying. Reminds me of the feudal landlord treating his serfs as simple minded drones.

You are actually correct. I saw the data and it turns it trump didnt really gain much votes compared to mitt romney, but hillary alienated just so many people that they never bothered to vote.