This is pretty fascinating, user. In the first paragraph you posted, , Evola discusses how racism based on biology alone is insufficient, and many times counter-intuitive because "the purity of the external race of an individual is often preserved even when his inner race has dimmed or deteriorated". I completely agree in the sense that many whites are absolute trash in the Modern Day. Now, many here on our Tibetan rice painting enthusiast forum will retort this claim with something like, "Jews ruined us! We would be a bastion of civilization without the Jews!" This is simply untrue, and will be untrue for the foreseeable future. Even the most perfect of European societies have had detractors that are native born of that society. We can see an example in those who mimic German NatSoc cultural ideals on the exterior yet fail to truly embrace its philosophical essence, which directly relates to Evola's concept of inner race. They want an all-white society, yet are nothing more than low-IQ criminals and/or degenerates who would be laughed out of Hitler's Germany.
This brings us to your second paragraph, , where Evola begins to acknowledge that "the leveling unity sought by democracy, 'integrationism', humanitarianism, pseudo-universalism and collectivism" are a "regressive phenomenon". Unity is not efficient because we are diverse creatures, and this diversity drives survival of the fittest. Yet, he speaks of how human races cannot be discussed in the same terms as "horse or cat breeds" because we humans are "not confined to instincts and bios". However, what one can assume is that for every "based" nigger, the overwhelming majority are simply unfit to live within the confines of a high-trust, civilized society. While every person of African descent, even with admixture of European DNA as with black Americans, may not be the typical nigger someone who frequents this board has come to recognize, there is still a recognizable pattern amongst them that cannot be forgiven because of the few that are 'worth their salt', so to speak. This is the paradox, and problem, when discussing strict racism. Just as there are 'good' blacks, there are 'bad' whites, and so on with every other race of humanity. We cannot be compared to the animals because there are wild variations within the stereotypes of the races. So much so that, on an individual level, one cannot accurately ascribe characteristics to a person based on the color of their skin. While on average we can stereotype the races, it fails many times at an individual level. In my opinion, is more or less correct in his view that we need to rekindle the spirit of the "traditional man" as Evola would put it. It goes beyond skin color, religion, creed, political belief, etc. Wanting to exterminate blacks or Jews or anyone else because of mere hatred is completely out of touch with the way a proper man should act. Don't get me wrong here, I want for whites to be separated from the other races just as much as anyone else, but that is not the only issue facing us today. We must reconnect with the Aryan flame still dimly lit within us, and if we cannot, then no amount of racism, no amount of political ideals, and no amount of an all-white society can save us.