TRADITIONALISM CAN'T COEXIST WITG EQUAL RIGHTS

The problem though is that automation will take primary and secondary jobs first, which are dominated by men. Drivers, factory workers, farming, building, labourers etc. will be the first to go. Maybe some restaurants will include automation too, meaning no waiters and waitresses.

This too. We need to let our population crunch play out naturally, but the Jews are not letting that happen. Debt up to our necks and immigration mean we cannot have a soft reset of society.

It has far more to do with the type of people in the society than the amount of them. If it were white people being imported you would not see such a huge impact on white birthrates happen. It's the fact that it's niggers and shitskins that does this. White people subconciously do not want to bring children into the world when they are surrounded by savages. It's a deep rooted evolutionary safety mechanism. Get rid of all the goddamn shitskins and niggers and you would see birth rates rise, guaranteed. Sage because OP is a fucking retard.

Highly doubtful. If automation did that, then these laborers would be out of the economic pool and thus robots that replaced them become useless. Robots don't spend money. Also automation still requires supervision and maintenance. It's probably going to increase productivity by creating more opportunities for factories to make product and thus profit, rather than decrease jobs. Besides, have you ever seen those automated drivers? Lawsuits and thefts waiting to happen. Farming automation is near impossible because it requires adjustment to changing factors. It would probably take billions of lines of code to accurately respond to any situation. It's just not worth it. At most it will be farmer's aid. Heuristic jobs cannot be replaced by automation, only aided.

I heard that the japs literally lost the interests in sex and couple life so is this true?

Bollocks. It's the fact that whites are being programmed not to do it. Look at the birth rate post WW2. Look at it, it's fucked. What changed? You know what happened to the culture. And look at Africa. Their birth rate is so high due to all that ((foreign aid)) that will never fix their problems because they will always instantly breed themselves to the point of starvation again.
That money could be going to white kids, but it's not. Taxing people into oblivion really does fuck birthrates, Hungary recently proved that by changing incentives they can raise their fertility rate.

But one of the biggest incentives is that of status; women want men 'better' than them. Equal rights actually does destroy fertility because women want a man better than them, but after college/university they're so high status that the dating pool massively shrinks. I'm an Ausfag, and women here are complaining of a man drought. There's no real man drought, they just don't register blue collar men/tradies as dateable material, in spite of the fact that tradesmen have some of the most stable jobs ever.

...

Jap culture is so schizophrenic it's hard to tell what's going on. A lot of them want to be traditionalist but I don't even know what the fuck. I think the whole women & status thing is playing into it there too. They've also been fucked by (((capitalism))) because they're naturally hardworking; both men and women are being worked into a daze.

Oh yeah and the post WW2 destruction of their culture means that there's no manners for how men & women meet and start a relationship, meaning all those guys that need some kind of etiquette rules to follow to know what to do are now terrified. Especially since being told 'no' is a BIG DEAL because the women is of status equal to yours now, rather than her just begin a woman. Japanese culture still does care way too much about saving face & hierarchy. Being snubbed is serious.

Those fields are dominated by men because they have been categorically denied opportunities in higher education (which begets tertiary jobs) by affirmative action policies which are a product of the same feminist agenda.

You're overstretching the abilities of automation a bit. The point is not total supplantation of human workers, but rather the multiplication of productivity. Automation means that one person can manage ten farms where before it would take dozens. That's a lot of people out of a job either way. I also guarantee you that the pool of workers required to service the machines is much smaller than the one the machines replaced.

Traditionalist modes of living will result in birth rates that are in alignment with carrying capacity. Living in a modern metropolitan area, even with conservative ideals, is not a traditionalist mode of living and will result in the maladaption of individuals. However, if anyone can solve the problems of cities, it would be the Nips. They're some of the few people actually doing research into things such as how much exposure to natural settings is needed for mental health (research which will be perverted in the West to "how much tree oil has to be pumped through the AC of an office to keep the wage slaves at optimal functioning"). Still, their eventual trajectory will likely be a redistribution of population from urban to rural areas. Such a solution works for both their economic and societal problems.

Of course, the same applies for us. Post-industrial farmsteading is the way to go for the majority of the population.

I agree with your bit on automation. What the problem is, in addition to what you said, is that automation eliminates low-level mid-salary jobs.
Some Holla Forumsacks have a fantasy of all white men being genuises who are born with mechanical inclination, but the truth is white people need those unskilled labor jobs. Not every white man can perform a job like maintaining the automation machinery. Let's face it. Some white people are dumb and can only perform labor-intensive jobs or maybe they just enjoy manual labor. What becomes of them?
Automation is bad for everyone except the kikes at the top of the food chain. They get more profits and less overhead while the jobs the white men perform are eliminated.
We need those $12/hr jobs. People depend on them. It might not be a lot of money, but you have 18 year old kids who need jobs that don't have work experience. People enjoy those jobs.

tbh this did make them a world power and allowed them to fuck over the Chinks and nearly conquer all of Eastern Asia

Yes, but nothing is stopping this lot of peopel to start creating their own dozens of farms. Depending on how cheap it is it could be done by one man or several men sharing machines. Entrepeneurship is not about starting off as some CEO of worldwide bank. Small businesses exist and so do intermediate ones. Besides, the excess production also creates incentive of creating jobs that were not heard of before. Consider this, now that cars are widespread you have traffic police, city planners, street lights maintenance, road maintenance, road workers, engineers/administration/designers making sure that each car sells well. It created incentive for massive delivery companies to get created as opposed to mail by horses. Transportation business is much more efficient with taxis and buses than it was with horse carriages. How many jobs is that? Are you saying it's less than when the horses were common mode of transport? Many of these jobs do not require skill. Skill requirement is probably lower than riding a horse for several hundred miles without it dying on the way for many of them. The thing with automation is that even though in average, let's say factory, the amount of workers decreased, the amount of factories increased. Scalability created need for new professions.

Let's try another example - computers. Massive proliferation of computers allowed for precision and scale not achievable ever before. You have some form of computer almost anywhere. Did it kill jobs? Yes, it killed jobs where a secretary was supposed to manually copy a script 30 times. On the other hand it allowed for lesser skilled individuals to work in companies which previously required lots of careful database keeping to prevent loss. For example in insurance, banking, generally any office job. These people are not particularly skilled at all. What's more, it created more jobs through IT which in itself is a trade. You have several types of designers that do not even deal with programming to make sure the app product is streamlined to the user like in iphone shit. Computerized items allowed for even stranger professions to take hold like you have professional food reviewers, you have e-celeb, e-sports cancer and stuff like that. Ever thought that would become a job? These are not skilled jobs. You see, market has to find a way to employ these estranged people because they are the largest source of money. If they don't have money, then lots of consumer companies can't make money in current system. Companies would have to turn into some insular ancapist dream state.

I think that human contact is important in jobs. Consider food industry for a moment. So since last couple decades you have preservatives that make food last a lot, substances that kill many diseases and insects to make sure the yield is higher but it all came at a cost. The food became flavorless and bad for you. Why is there a resurgence of need for organically grown food? Massive too. Legal requirements for being classified as organic aside, people do want alternatives for their own reasons. Full scale automation is going to decline in consumer sector because of that. No one will want to play guess games with a robot over what socks they want to buy. You can't ask a robot whether this suit looks good on you and expect a genuine answer, if any. Human contact is very important in business imo and it will stay that way. Talking to a robot is just creepy and soulless. Like you have this robot restaurant in Japan. People generally go only once because then novelty wears off and they don't come back. They generally mention that lack of human element is not desirable. If automation does take place like in your bleak dreams, market will likely seek corrections by creating companies with full-human staff and promote these as such. I know I'd go to one of these exclusively in a heartbeat if the alternative was dealing with a bunch of plastic.

Japanese falling birth rates are NOT caused by traditionalism (if they were, they would have been extinct centuries ago). Rather they are suffering under their central bank policy which reallocates purchasing power away from productive capital (the source of young people's wages) and into assets (the things the rich and the old own). The result has been that it has become extremely difficult to start a new family unit. You simply can't afford to buy a space for your family to live. Instead, they have to live in literal coffins.

Evola knew that the two are incompatible. That's why he argued for removing "equality" and universal suffrage, including democracy. I for one wish to live under a system of rule by heroic cybernetic Aryan aristocrats who answer to no men.

anyone have the graph that lines up japanese women with jobs and japanese fertility? I forgot to save it last time. Regardless the problem with japan is the same problem in the west it has nothing to do with their traditions the issue with birthrates is because they trick little girls into wanting a career instead of wanting to be a mother and housewife like they're supposed to

Fertility is low and deviancy is high because of crowding!
Calhoun, J. B. (1962). Population density and social pathology. Scientific American, 206(3), 139–148.

Immigration will only make the problem worse!

shlomo?

In this vid he makes a point gov needs to care about men and not women to save civilization. I agree with that premise as if white men were given proper compenation they can raise stable families.