Movie advocates for an income tax greater than 12%

...

Sweden or Poland?

...

Brother of the former.

lol cuck

...

Hungary?

Taxation is theft.

Income taxes are tantamount to slavery. You are being taxed on the living you earn, your very work is being taxed. Not only that but the taxes you pay on purchasing (or owning) material goods on top of that, which basically amounts to being taxed twice on your income.

Socialists of all flavors will justify this with excuses such as various social programs the government needs the money for, like welfare, or roads, but completely ignore how the individual might want to spend their money. It is effectively stolen and used in ways that are often contrary to the wishes of the citizen that was taxed.

Instead of taxes the government should be forced to compete as the commercial entity it pretends not to be on an even playing field. Instead of abusing its power to maintain a largely corrupt and inefficiently ran monopoly.

this
literally stealing private property at gunpoint a la Karl Marx fuck neocons/neolibs.

Taxation is Social Democratic, not Socialist.

...

You don't know what you're talking about.

No, you don't know what you're talking about.

They are both vanilla even if they are not both the same kind of vanilla. Are you unable to taste the similarity?

income taxes and the programs they fund are completely necessary, anyone questioning them should be hung for treason

wouldn't it be ideal to make the highest income tax bracket 90% (Jew rich) and lower corporate tax so businesses have a ton of money to hire and expand, but if you pay it out to any executive or investor it goes back to the gov't?

The jews would just register their luxury cars and tons of other stuff as company owned or company's expenses and lower their personal wealth estimate just to dodge the highest tax bracket. They already do that in post-soviet countries.

I like the guy's music tbh

Lmao, how sad do you have to be to believe in half of the shit libertards espouse? You'd be better off doing the world a favor and gassing yourself tbh.

What tax rate do Nat Soc prefer?

...

Whichever ensures both: an effective balance or surplus of governmental revenues, and high consumer spending power.

The brother of Sweden is Norway. I think Denmark is actually higher though.

Third Reich taxes were pretty high, but that's not a problem in itself. What matters is what you are left with as a worker and what the money you pay is being spent on. To defend the race is of the highest priority so fine to pay for, but not funding your own destruction and bleeding money to the third world because kikes.

...

I posted

and I would agree with what Germany faced, a world wide conspiracy puppeting the strongest nations on earth, there was no avoiding taxes to build the nation into as strong of one as it could be.

Ideally though I believe that what an individual earns should be theirs. Taxing commodities or services is acceptable, but taxing income (especially on top of those things) is not. I'd advocate for slavery to make up the shortfall even. As long as the slaves are non-white.

...

only time I ever agreed with this weirdo

You are all losers no memeing.

in the west as well, taxes mostly hit the working and middle class anywhere on the planet

are you a communist or just a faggot?

Smh

The real question is who is paying the tax. If you think it's corporations or the wealthy, you better think again.

that must be why the top 20% of earners pay 80% of income taxes

>>>Holla Forums
you're not wanted here, you insecure little shit are hiding your insecurities behind fake smug in order not to be called out on the retarded arguments your opinions are based on.

Rofl, no? Who told you this? They probably should though, considering we would have to return to the pharaohs of ancient Egypt to find a point of comparison to the levels of wealth inequality we currently have right now.

...

i've been found out by a fucking ==NIGGERRRR==

Funny story:
Income taxes started as a tax on businesses - the idea being that if your business was thriving and you had to hire employees outside of family in order to keep the business operating, your prosperity should be taxed.

Some business owner somewhere probably a kike pushed this tax off on to his employees. (It was a bowling alley, IIRC, and it was the pin-setter boys.) If you want to work for me, you'll pay your own tax, essentially. Long story short, it ended up going to court, the lawyer representing the employees shit the bed, and now we all have to file W4s when we start jobs.

But here's the funny part: The W4 is where you authorize the business you work for to withhold those taxes from your pay. You are designating the company as your withholding agent. Businesses - not the IRS - make you fill this out. Why? Because if you don't pay your income tax, the company is liable for it.

There still exists a form (though I've been unable to find it again, and the hdd I had it save on died back in 2006) for an employee to designate No Withholding Agent. If you can find it, fill it out and turn it in to your employer. Probably, they'll tell you to fuck off. But if it's a busy HR dept., they may just file it without looking at it. In which case, at the end of the year, they'll be on the hook for your taxes for that year. More than likely, they'll fire you for it, because they can't legally make you do it any other way. But they don't have to let somebody stick around who is costing them thousands every year, either.

But yeah, it may have all changed now that the tax code has been revamped.

...

washingtonexaminer.com/omb-top-20-pay-95-of-taxes-middle-class-single-digits/article/2638746

it was very widely discussed a few months ago

It's all about being economically flexible, user.