Geo/pol/itico - ICE AGE EDITION

some mo

No. I'm looking for more info to share and gather.

It's a map, of human migrations, during and after the ice age. Possibly [pre-ice age] but I subscribe to the train of thought that most of the people of the, 'high civilization' were killed and the ones to survive were mostly lower rate specimens and hominids, but over time were taught the ways of civilization by those who survived from the high civ.

It's undeniable that there was an ice age. The kike scheme is the covering of how it ended and began.

]

Agreed. Do you think Graham Hancock "Magicians of the Gods" is on the right track. He discusses the feasibility/evidence of a comet striking the north pole. Its all very interesting and the geology involved in the investigation makes sense. What is the motive for covering all this up?

Remember iceage chan?

Awesome questions.

I agree with 80-90% of Graham Hancock on his view of iceage/pre-iceage civs. The evidence is starting to become undeniable as more and more facts and proofs are being discovered every year.

The motive, because of the system. Religion, culture, history… it's all been modified so heavily that the truth is impossible to ever know.

The best we can do now is try to discover the most accurate theory based on what we can prove today (which a lot has been covered up and destroyed thanks to everyone from Edison to the Rothschilds to the Muslims)

Cheq'd

I do.

This is pertinent to this thread

youtube.com/watch?v=aDejwCGdUV8

youtube.com/watch?v=0H5LCLljJho

It wasn't a meteor it was huge amounts of water you faggot. Man kikes have really fucked up history.

Let's pretend it was a meteor. How exactly did it survive entering the atmosphere at what size? If it was too small it would burn up. If it was too large no one would have survived.

It was both

And not alot of people survived, the whole north american continent was one giant WILD FIRE. They talk about it in this vid.

Fucking Dumb Ass.

Where did the water go? How did the fire start? Also webm I don't jewtube here. If I had to guess you would say volcanoes started the fire fine I can accept that. But that doesn't explain where all the water went from the ice sheets. Don't say ocean because it would take a super massive amount of water larger than all on earth currently to cause that level of disruption.

Here is the biggest proof of ancient civilizations.
Gobekli Tepe
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Göbekli_Tepe

Basically its over 12,000 years old, and its like 10 stone henges…

Get a load of this guy. Dr. archeoasterogeographer over here has it all figured out.

It fell as rain across the globe. It filled the oceans and raised the global sea level.

We've probably lost multiple bronze-age civilizations over the aeons, but I don't think we've had an iron-age or further advanced civilization before.

Yet the 12 mathematical constants are encoded in the great pyramid.

archive.is/Dz7wH

will this be the end of niggers?

I enjoy these topics but I can't help but wonder how much longer until kikefy and his hotpockets lock it for arbitrary bullshit.

Atlantis location

Also, do any polymath anons want to give their two cents on the formulas Carl Munck discusses?

No it isn't. It was created on Holla Forums.

Yes I do.

Geological.

Right…..

Obligatory pic from last few Ice Age threads.

Whatcha sliding rabbi?

Yes! I love when I make a thread, go to bed, wake up and go about my day to come back to my thread and see awesome info posts. Appreciate it!

Joe Rogan's podcasts with Graham Hancock and Randy "Geological Floodman" Carlson are awesome. A little slow at times… with Carlson going over the same stuff over and over… but it's all good content if you've never seen it!

some good proofs.. I'm digging for mine as most of my stuff is on my laptop which I'll post too.

There was more Ice than that pic depicts but still 95% accurate. Awesome info.

300 feet

Legit

This user had it right bub.

Was both. At least 1, but no more than 4 major impacts (some think many smaller impacts too) hit the ice glacier in North America. Causing the ice shields to melt rapidly.

Displacing million of tons of water, practically reshaping the coastline of the planet.

300 feet

Yeah… That's a legit fact anons. Asia and Europe saw the biggest changes in their coastal environment, but North America was by far the most devastated by it. Any persons that could have lived there most certainly were wiped out or were forced to migrate south towards central America (when it was a bit more balanced between temperate and tropical then)

...

...

Atlantis was pre-deluge black sea coastal civilization.

When the black sea flooded, displaced indo-european peoples migrated out settling europe, eurasia, india, asia minor, egypt, and parts of north africa

Thank you! This something that I have been looking into… see

As this is what the Chinese say was the location of the deluge

Nice!

I believe this as well as the most likely location for Atlantis. There are tons of possible candidates but I'm still staunch on the Azores being the most likely.

Carl Munck is a badass. Watching these blew my mind, and before this I thought I had it all figured out mathematically.

Def on my top 10 redpill moments was seeing his vids.

Flat Earth theory is for faggots. Hollow Earth is the real red pill. That's why the Nazi's fled to Antarctica after WWII. They found the entrance. It's only a matter of time before they resurface and finish what they started.

One thing we have to keep in mind with ice caps forming, is new geopolitical realities. Most of Scandanavia, Britain, Baltics, and the European Russia will be under the snow. The ingenuity of whites means that most likely, those nations will adapt and survive, but there is the reality that many plebians may not like to live in the experimental icelands.

The nation of Canada would be completely engulfed, but I think because of it's small size, movement of population would be less strengous than maybe 50 million britons, germans, russians, baltics, and scandies.
The US would be most affected among the great lakes and New England, and New York.

I'm basing this all off the last ice age, and so it wouldn't be overnight that these developments occur, but it's something to consider.

And now we have our own King under the Mountain myth. They'll come back when Arthur leaves Avalon.

I'd do anything for actual proof of this being the case. Between hidden Nazi bases in South America and hidden Nazi bases at the poles, shit could be genuinely exciting.

The Story of Atlantis and the Lost Lemuria, by W. Scott-Elliot

gutenberg.org/files/21796/21796-h/21796-h.htm

Last map

Not much out there in the way of hard proof.

This YouTube channel is pretty cool if that interests you: youtube.com/user/818encino/videos

It's by a guy named Robert Sepehr. He has a few good books out there too like "Species with Amnesia: Our Forgotten History" and "Occult Secrets of Vril: Goddess Energy and the Human Potential".

WE

I wish that were true, however exactly what did they start? They were seeking to make Germans better and to grow the Reich (reclaim lost land + some expansion) apart from that exactly what did they need to finish? If this were a true myth they would want to reclaim German(ic)soil & that it.

Something I threw together

I don't think there's a singular "Atlantis". The truth is that there was civilization(s) before the end of the ice, and naturally its cities were built along coasts and major rivers, as all cities tend to be. So when the impact occurred glaciers melted and rapidly flooded the coastlines to the present sea level, everything everywhere was destroyed.

Over time events became myths, and stories morphed over thousands and thousands of years. The Atlantis story that Plato heard from the Egyptians is just one such example. There are others, such as Lemuria, Avalon, Thule, etc. And then there are the various flood myths from around the world as well. These all are probably based in a kernel of truth. It's not necessarily that there was a single literal continent of Atlantis, but that there were lands of ancient coastlines that were all washed away.

...

Interesting ideas. I've heard about hollow earth theory before but honestly know so little about it I can't have an opinion of doubt or acceptance. Redpill me on it if you can.

Hahah agreed.

checked

Yeah, see

I'm still unsure as to an actual location of Atlantis (which is very probable) but could possibly refer to something of a culture of civilization.

I thought a Holla Forumsack scientist discovered ice melting didn't mattered

Double checked! NICE DIGITSSSS!!!! C-C-C-COMBOO

However, those images I've been aware of for some time but honestly can not take them seriously as the geological implications of such massive moments during this time. However NOT IMPOSSIBLE, but very very very improbable.

Are you into Theosophy ?

I thought retardation was a myth. Thank you for proving me wrong user. Appreciate.

I think the idea of finding an "atlantis" is a red herring. We know what the coastlines would have been in 10,000 BC. There are stories all over the world of sunken lost civilization, and the coastlines all over the world were fucked with. The point is that people shouldn't get to hung up on trying to prove that XYZ location was "Atlantis". Atlantis was just one of many variations of the flood myth.

Not sure I follow.

Now that drone tech is reaching better and better capabilities. More and more things are being found and discovered every month. I would give it time.. as we did that hundreds of ruins we've found over the past few hundred years of modern science/modern historical record keeping.

I think if we found a location of what was Atlantis, it could open a lot of unanswered questions and solve a few that we currently have open. Such an idea is worth going for, especially due to the amount of cultures and references we have this this place existed, or at least a culture/tech existed in a 'high culture' state of opulence.

I bet you believe in kike science, like (((relativity))) or (((water levels)))

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4457530/Mini-Ice-Age-wiped-cvilisation-13-000-years-ago.html

Not the best version, but G.Hancock is a great resource. Still an awesome vid.
youtube.com/watch?v=-VUmtCLePL8

This one is long, but good:

youtube.com/watch?v=T5DNvYMtkyk

What did I ever do for you to claim that I'm anti-white? Besides your own retardation and autism.

Go find a flat earth thread and troll them kid.

...

We don't really know how the earth works, not regarding geology nor e.g. climate. Modern science can't explain what the traditions (including theosophical authors) can. The work of Hancock in my opinion points to a radically different history esp. regarding catastrophism.

Since 1888 there has been a great revelation of things that previously was only taught in secret societies, hence works like the Story of Atlantis and the other books by Leadbeater.

After 2025 this will become more and more the mainstream view, but materialists will fight it.

>>>/kennedi/ is more redpilled than this

...

Make the whole earth aryan. Make a National Socialist world, under the guidance of one Führer, and he's going to be 100 times better than Hitler, don't get me wrong Hitler did amazing here, and will always be recognized for it.

But the final goal is the complete and absolute Reich, having only Aryans living in it. It's going to be beautiful lads.

God damn, I'd love to live in a time and place where I could respect the enemy as an equal. Like the Civil War or the Revolutionary, or the Spanish Civil War. A war of ideas, of principles, rather than mundane resources or populations.
Jews even took away our right to die for our beliefs. Now we merely face to pest management.

A lone monument does not a civilization make

There are a lot more than one kid. Do some more research or read the thread before sounding like a child.

whoops wrong image.. was supposed to be update

It's a massive complex of monuments, m8. And actually yes, a monument like this DOES a civilization make. Hunter-gatherers don't make sites like this because they'd be on the move, they wouldn't have the population numbers to undertake the project, they wouldn't have the labor/skill stratification that only occurs AFTER civilization is implemented, etc. You do not get megalithic sites made by people who do not have civilization.

hey rabbi we know jews had nothing to do with building the greatest structure on earth and your entire religion is a lie

You're not the first one to tell me that. Nor are you the first one or the last to mistake a pile of rocks for a monument. If you have any questions of challenges to my criticism, name them. I am almost an expert on the subject because I talk about it so often.

That is not true. Huntergatherers go where the food is. Many areas are so abundant with food that you do not need to travel. See catal huyuk as a good example. Archeological research shows that the early settlers who built the first structures at Gobekli Tepe were hunter gatherers. Their trash heaps show wild varieties of food. Later they show early domesticated food sources. At this time their skeletons show signs of malnutrition & disease.
You're thinking of African Huntergatherers you see on National Geographic. They live on very bad land. Our ancestors inhabited the very best land & lived long & healthy lives.

No for the same reasons I explained before.

Why? Huntergatherers can be just as creative as we are. They're our ancestors. Moving limestone around & carving it isn't as complicated as you might suspect. I have done just that with a two ton granite stone using only a sled & a winch. You could do it too.

I am more than open to the idea of a pre-Holocene civilization. But
1. Gobekli Tepe is not a civilization, it is a monument. An isolated one. Where are the signs of vast cities or even small ones?
2. As you pointed out, no agriculture. Now before you call me a hypocrite, I said that you don't need agriculture to build monuments or move stones around. But you do need it to support complex civilization, cities, & the like. All the evidence indicates that before the Holocene that simply didn't exist.

I am eager to hear of any evidence to the contrary as the notion of my ancestors building civilizations before history tantalizes me. But facts are facts, so lets stick to them please.

Show me any other examples at all of hunter-gatherers creating large-scale megalithic sites.

You ask a very intelligent question and you highlight a very important point; these structures are very rare. I cannot name for you a similar structure built by hunter gatherers because no one has found any yet. So props to you for making a very intelligent point; Gobekli Tepe is (almost) one of a kind.
Nevalı Cori was a good example of a truly ancient settlement built by huntergatherers. It was similar to Gobekli Tepe but not as immense.

However the central problem with the pre-Holocene civilization theory is still
1. Archeological finds indicate that the inhabitants of the (early) villages around Gobekli Tepe ate wild foods & had no agricultural implements or foods. So it is assumed that they were huntergatherers. Only later do these develop. Followed by a rapid decline of these former huntergatherers' health.

2. No other contemporary structures exist that show signs of city living.

Also, there are examples of huntergatherers who lived in rich areas who were able to settle down in permanent communities. For instance the Pacific NorthWest Indian tribes and even some Abo tribes in northern Australia. Of course they never built civilizations but the Pacific NorthWest tribes did create complex chiefdoms and a warrior aristocracy without agriculture. They engaged in the most civilized pastime; warfare with their other tribes.

So it is possible in rich areas to create settled communities & research indicates that early Anatolia was very rich indeed.

There's a major problem in the picture. The problem is how did they got down the entrance without being crushed? People tried to go there and died due to the pressure. Whoever manged to go down there might have advanced technological means to protect them from being crushed by the pressue like a grape.

Strange; the major documentaries that actually talk about this haven’t been posted yet.

Underworld: Flooded Kingdoms of the Ice Age
youtube.com/watch?v=Va0BIqfzpvo
youtube.com/watch?v=wRq56cWLyZQ

Revelation of the Pyramids
youtube.com/watch?v=2fS9ixfQ_no

Hey guys I think I struck a nerve with someone. Remember to save and share everything, the kikemods don't want us discussing our history at all. Hell I'll probably be shadow banned again for pointing this out, but that just further incriminates them (and highlights how thin-skinned the pussies are)

Have you ever encountered anyone who argued with his math though? Last time I posted them some faggot kept screaming about how he bent the numbers and its all bullshit. Naturally, he failed to go into detail.

wow thats cancerous.

when can we just find and kill the mods?

wtlol

I think the common thread is that there WAS a preflood civiliazation but there are discrepencies in the stories. I've heard that atlantis was a black sea coastal civilization before as well as the black sea used to be a lake, did not always have salt water and the flooding created a passage for the mediterranean to mix its water with, corroborating this notion. But then what do you make of other user who post information abut atlantis being literally in the atlantic ocean, possibly the azores, something which Carlson alludes to when he suggests that the two mile deep glacier covering the North american continent evaporating due to meteor strikes, no longer pressed on the continent causing a corresponding sinking of the continental plates opposite the NA continent (in the atlantic ocean), like a seesaw shifting in the other direction.

Just some notes, supposed to be CE not ACE.
CE = Common Era