Opinions On This Image

I think discussion around these differences would be pretty interesting. I've been questioning certain aspects of my socialist beliefs lately in favour of more traditionally right wing concepts such as Paleoconservatism. I'd like to hear other anons' thoughts on the matter.

fuck off

...

Tbh I understand the reason given the attempt at sliding all the time. Maybe I'll ask /polk/. I just thought the ideas were interesting and worthy of discussion. I'm no political expert and imagine many more on here are more well read and experienced than I am.

Kill yourself

Remove yourself

Maybe.

>>>Holla Forums

Since when is debate demoralising? You insinuate your ideas aren't up to scrutiny. If your beliefs are spot on then why would discussing them be demoralising? Man the fuck up pussy.

As if anything in that joke of a graphic was an attempt at honest debate. You're an ass.

the image is jewish nonsense that shows a lack of basic understand of national socialism. leave, shill

Why would you want a free market economy when the MO of capitalists are to accumulate capital regardless of the health of the nation? It make no sense to be a fascist and be a free market capitalist.

This.

How many shekels are you paid to promote the 'free market'?

You should take a look at their board.
>>>/polk/

This image speaks to me. It's basically the sum of what my thoughts have been for the last few weeks on this board.

Absolute fucking astroturfing cancer. Drown yourself.

We /ancap/ now?

The end of 'free market' is anarcho-capitalist-anti-familialism

Basically, you cease serving the biological function of protecting family and race because you're so busy Jewing for shekels you can't bother. Then, language becomes the identifier of your 'genes', and the new frontier is making yourself a galactic Jew that's seeking out new debtors to sell your loans to.

If a Jew could stick a voice box on a horse, they'd loan out money to it so it can perform hard labor and give them a return.

Financing is the natural adaptation of the Jew. Every religion they've created or been involved with has focused on increasing the fitness of the Jew and its financing.

What in the hell happened?

Capital IS the health of the nation, you mook. It is what allows us to weather the storm.

Henry Ford was both.

I think the confusion here is the kike system that they call "capitalism" that is actually completely undermined by the existance of a central bank. That is actually a planned economy, just with fewer levers of control than are asserted in a full communist society. When you look at the US from the end of Reconstruction until 1913, you see the power of real capitalism. The US was not a degenerate nation during that time period. The middle class emerged. Regular people were able to build things that they could keep. That is what built the capital base that allowed us to fight and win wars on the other side of the world.

(((Rothbard)))

thinly veiled D&C thread
SAGE AND REPORT

You're right, we should treat Jews like every other race. They're just innocent capitalists.

Nice non sequitur, user. Wanna visit the gas chamber?

Good question. The only solution I see is to get explicit about membership criteria for participation in that market, i.e. minimum threshold of neanderthal admixture or something similar. That way all business with non-whites will be de-facto illegal. Libertarianism has suffered from the same moral universalism as liberalism in the past, and hence it has gone no where, because it is actually more profitable to exploit debt slaves than to allow them to participate in market (I won't even say "real" market; what we have now are simply not markets being so arbitrarily policed.) Libertarianism NEEDS ingroup membership criteria or else leads straight to the monopolies they hate so much.
tl:dr modern markets try to police their participation in millions of small regulations, but it would probably be more efficient if we gave one simple criterion for rights to participate in that market (i.e. whites only) and deregulate everything else.
Should be obvious that this will require a confederation of white warlords to enforce these conditions of non-participation for whites; libertariansim without fascistic warrior class (whose services are explicitly NOT for profit or hire, and whose only job is to make sure whites, and only whites,, are employed by firms within our territory)

But how about all those innocent and generous land buyers and investors from overseas into your internal economy? You wouldn't want to reject their money, would you? That's not very free-markety :^)

didn't finish my sentence

Holla Forums is a board of peace

The image is somewhat correct.

National socialism works much better than international socialism the government system of all modern countries because you dont give your money away outside the country.
So if they take money off a hardworking person and give it to a lazy person at least that lazy person will spend it in the same country as the hardworking person and stimulate the economy.


Giving it to Africans to spend back in Africa doesnt help your own economy it just puts you in a weaker position relative to the effort you put in.

I think people are totally missing the joke. The "TRUE POL" side of this picture is obviously making fun of these people. It's completely contradictory and fights itself and its ideas.


This is fucking perfect for pointing out how these ideas are completely contradictory. You don't usually see these ideas one right after another, so it's easy to miss how in contrast the idea of needing to remove malicious portions of a community is to the idea of having a free market. This is nearly perfect satire. The biggest problem is how on the nose it becomes with the "chopper" quote. It goes too far in contradicting the previous statement and becomes too obvious. Usually satire rides a line, so this is too much, but it's great otherwise.

Shit-tier d&c, sage'd and reported

It's so simple: you set up a (mostly) free market inside your own country, where only your own citizens can fully participate. E.g. you need to be a citizen to own a company, your monetary system is set up so that non-citizens have a hard time accumulating capital, etc, etc. Meanwhile you have a mercantilist foreign policy, in other words you try to minimize import and maximise export. Although I personally believe that simply minimizing import is better, because if your economy exists only to serve other countries, then you will be dependent on them, just on a different way.

Or it's just an image for retards who think Anarcho-Capitalism isn't just one spectrum-side of the same kike coin of Anarcho-Communism.

I think it's too much for it to be just that.

It's nearly perfect in the sense that it would be shared by people who think that, except I think it goes just a little too far and they might understand it's poking fun at them.

The trips of /thread have spoken.

This just means you haven't thought enough about how shit works.

(((OP's))) image is a strawman not satire, you autistic nigger.

That's a globalist argument for abolishing borders and implementing a single currency, and a keynesian one for implying that forced redistribution is okay because it has societal benefits.