There's really nothing that can or needs to be done about (((fact checkers))). Anyone with half a brain knows that they're clearly biased bullshit at this point. If they mattered, Trump would not have won, for example.
I would like to know the formal titles for the fallacies that they employ though. The common ones I see them always use are
...
No shit.
I really think some user needs to start a fact checking site.
Call is BS checker, and the first BS check should be to prove snopes is BS
Snopes a great idea, though. They focus on obvious bullshit 99% of the timeinto it.
And then occasionally insert their own propaganda
While Hillary did defend a man accused of raping a 12 year old by using loopholes to secure a better plea bargain, and later laughed about this case, We rate this [MOSTLY FALSE]
Politifact did that with nigger employment numbers
There is a website called politifactbias.com but it is not super active (buit it is still active) The website is good
Ayyyyyy laddywew