Who Brocialist here?

Who Brocialist here?

1- shit ass
2- shit thread
3- shit b8
4- shit taste in everything

Manarchist, reporting in.

You are both retarded and should leave.

...

...

I think everyone would be happier if men could have multiple wifes, one wife for true romantic love and the other ones for sex.

You should go to the middle east then.

Why is bro being turned into an insult? You know fraternity is actually a virtue. I don't really have anything against SJWs tbh. They don't seem to be doing any harm.

Me 2 b h

You are all petulant children who don't understand basic socialism, much less communism, and make the whole board look like a bunch of stormfags roleplaying communism.

Feminism is equally as retarded as Men's Rights, as both are only solved by Communism. You can't have oppression in a true communist nation.

...

Human arms aren't supposed to be that short

You make me sad, tbh

I only looked at the thumbnail

you just rekt me that image looks awful

Whenever I see anything from the rebuilds I get triggered.

You are a literal cancer on this board.

???

Go back to tumblr

This is the only tolerable form of Socialism. The rest belongs to Communism. Are you trying to deny me cummies?

tumblrite detected.

fuck off and die, you humorless cunt.

Kek

Not a feminist fag, just a true communist. Gender is retarded and irrelevant in a communist society. Men's Rights is cancer. Feminism is cancer. Both efforts are irrelevant under communism.

How is that contradictory?

WHO is THAT semen demon OP????

it was drawn really badly

Identifying ourselves as male or female is stupid because gender is a spook.
I'm not advocating for tumblr tier 90000 flavors of gender, but rallying around 'Men' and 'Women' tags draws lines between groups where they weren't before.
It creates class in a classless society.

Source on dat ass OP.

Iskra Lawrence, a britbong model/idpol spouter

no it doesn't, gender isn't a class

nothing personnel, kid

Ah, but you are not living in a communist society yet, so you are a hypocrite to trust everyone else.
In anycase, I agree, gender is retarded, but what can one do but amuse oneself when there is no sexual relationship?
"The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed
almost from time immemorial."
Community of women is a condition which belongs to bourgeois society now and
which today finds its complete expression in prostitution. And prostitution is based on private property and falls with it. Thus, communist society, instead of introducing community of women, in fact abolishes it. This is equipollent with the goals of feminism.

This tbh

-abolishes
+sublates*

...

...

Are we being raided? What the hell is going on?

Christ, it's just a meme. Calm your shit, you daft cow.

No, we're having fun. Come join!

samefag

This is what Anarcho antifunism is for.

This Anarcho antifun thread move on

To shift the focus a bit. Who here thinks freedom of organization and speech are expandable bourgeois rights?

No, I don't think they're bourgeois rights. They're everyone's rights.

But if we're talking about killing them off, then yeah maybe. Quick question however

what if the bourgeois genuinely want to help us? I.e reaching class conscious etc.

You can't take the fun away from anarchists, that's litterally all they have.

But I don't mean to shit on every aspect of bourgeois society. If you agree that society generates the solutions to it's own contradictions, I think some fundamental bourgeois rights are key to that and can't just be dismissed. The way marriage (gay, straight, polywhateverist) or private properties can be because they perpetuate capit social dynamics.

What I'm afraid off is that we're throwing the baby out with the bathwater with noplatforming. Speech and assembly seem to be one of the red lines you can't cross before your own "Allies" start hopping on the tank train to stalinist town.

Rights are spooky af to begin with, bruh.

It should be important to note that the bourgeoisie are not necessarily the enemy. It's very often the case that those struggling to reorder society come into conflict with the bourgeoisie because the bourgeoisie are the ones who benefit most from the present arrangement of things and are most likely to oppose efforts to overturn it, but they are not a monolithic hivemind that acts in concert to achieve a single end.

Rather, the bourgeoisie are a class of individuals as diverse in their outlooks and attitudes as the proletariat. If a member of the bourgeoisie wishes to advance the cause of socialism earnestly and sincerely, there is no reason to reject them that is not rooted in faulty idealistic reasoning. Of course, one should always be wary of lies and deceptions, but that's never not the case.

If you don't believe in the first place that somebody has a right to govern you, I don't see much of a reason to let them try.

I'm a contractarian, rights is only as valid a notion as the portion of society ready to defend it. Here you're just making a case for nazis to beat on people trying to no-platform them because they disagree that being imposed silence is illegitimate.

Most marxist theorician and leaders are straight out of the bourgeois classes. Historically, because they were the only ones with enough time. You'd have thought that higher living standards would allow the prolos to generate their own leadership but it just led to waves of post-modernist. 1910 St-petersburg welders could just have pissed on printing press and it would have done more good for the cause.

Wtf does this mean? That you're a male socialist?

Seriously though, no one here is actually a stupid fucking tumblrite, right? You all hate identity politics and realize they just exist to divide the lower classes, right?

Retardation is a spook.

Originally it meant you were a white male socialist who was accused of failing to consider the plight of minorities

I genuinly think the drooling masses spouting the rethoric and the shit theorists are well meaning if self-righteous.

The problem is that we know where the financing for those shitty scholars come from and I'm convinced no one is financing to assholes because they hope the investment will help overthrow capital.

Now, as in any age, being a prole means having to sell your labour for a living. Hence, working for most of it. Regardless of how many iphones and refrigerators you can buy for that work, that's still a huge barrier in becoming a full time theory demagogue.

Incidentally, if we take this into account, then perhaps it is the NEETs who will spearhead the revolution.

So is that what op means in this context? Not really something to be proud of, is it?

Brah! Lenin (Clichés amiright?) was bouncing left and right across europe and still found the time to treaty and edit news-paper. A large swath of the western proletariat definitely has the time theorise. I mean the existence of tumblr itself proves my point. They're critically bankrupt but the objective conditions are there.

It's been a stapple shorthand of ID politics to imediately dismiss vertical organisers with a focus on productions dynamics. Many still think those trump limited and symbolic identitarian projects and therefore reclaimed the term ironically.

I'm not sure how OP is using this one to be frank. I'm a muh privileged white guy and honestly when I see the bullshit ID politics tries to peddle I'm usually tempted to say Brocialism is the red tide that floats all boats.

Well we should resist becoming what the opposition strawmans us as.

Yeah never shut off inclusion.
But the problem is to win people to a project that prioritizes common goals rather than community specific ones, you need results because, alone, your rethoric admits their objectives are secondary.

So you might as well get the ball rolling with whatever coalition you can cobble and I'm thinking that's going to mostly be white guys off the bat.

White supremacists never have that problem, i'm pretty jelly.

'gender' is just a way of broadly assigning a set of attributes to somebody. The only retarded thing about it is getting worked up over it.

Man and woman are terms rooted in biology. Good luck ignoring that.

Yeah, the Anglo-Saxons were known for their advanced grasp of biology.

No advanced grasp needed. If it has a peen then 99.9% of the time it's a boy and so unlikely to get pregnant.

So basically what you're saying is that gender roles developed based on assumptions made by people who hadn't had the chance to properly develop their reason yet?

it's kind of great to watch people here react so violently against horseshoe theory unless it applies to MRAs and Feminists.

by great I should clarify depressing and laughable.

spicy

Reddit is pretty shit, 4chan is 13yr old on average. Holla Forums debates semantics.

Where do I go if I want a real convo?

Outside

This. It's understandable, considering how idpol has decimated the left, but if the opposition calls you racist and sexist, the proper response isn't to become racist and sexist

Nice meme friend.

I just said that it was a meme, if I understand the word meme properly a meme is something that is culturally transmitted.

I'm in moscow mate, they a bit touchy on the subject.

kek. Sorry about that m8.

I guess here is best. So are you a trotskyist or stalinist?

Definitely not a tanky but trotskyism means so many things in different national contexts. Many Occupy people would define themselves as trotskyist and that's not my speed.

As far is matters, I'm not against some authoritarian deviations as long as you remain critical and i'm definitely for vertical organisation.

With an ass like that, I can't bring myself to give a fuck.

This is an Iskra Lawrence appreciation thread now

Dayum!
I was on no fap.
I was.

all of us tbh fam

The surplus value of that ass is exploiting me

Here's some more appreciation.

sauce of pic?

Its a meme insult made by assmad feminists who refuse to believe anyone can be leftwing without lashing themselves for having a dick