Gays Rekt

Ian Walker
Ian Walker

Most people believe that the Catholic Church is homophobic – that is to say that it does not recognise the fact that some people are 'born gay' and should therefore be allowed to marry and adopt children. The hostility to gay marriage is, of course, the official Catholic position.

But appearances can deceive.There is a perfectly simple reason for the Vatican's reluctance to go along with the 'born gay' hoax: It knows that it is untrue! The Vatican has vast empirical knowledge of homosexuality due to the fact that it is itself a veritable gay club!

Where were you when this Irish-Hoxhaist madman BTFO faggotry forever? Is he our guy?

Other urls found in this thread:

ahtribune.com/in-depth/1165-sexual-revolution.html
rt.com/news/356848-study-sexual-orientation-fixed/
deep.mastersfamily.org/2016-08/lawrence-mayer-and-paul-mchugh-douchebags-day/
independent.co.uk/news/science/scientific-peer-reviews-are-a-sacred-cow-ready-to-be-slaughtered-says-former-editor-of-bmj-10196077.html
theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/22/addicted-to-chemsex-gay-drugs-film
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
blogs.scientificamerican.com/bering-in-mind/something-queer-about-that-face/
nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/report-lesbian-gay-bi-adults-face-higher-substance-abuse-rates-n671876?cid=sm_tw
psychologytoday.com/blog/hide-and-seek/201509/when-homosexuality-stopped-being-mental-disorder
yahoo.com/news/american-scientists-world-homosexuality-isn-t-mental-illness-231030468.html?ref=gs
ahtribune.com/in-depth/1014-homosexuality.html
archive.is/B8UJv
wmbriggs.com/post/5118/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_(psychology)

Kevin Powell
Kevin Powell

sauce: ahtribune.com/in-depth/1165-sexual-revolution.html

Luke Mitchell
Luke Mitchell

Not liking dicks
What are you, faggot?

Isaiah Torres
Isaiah Torres

one off
twice
Kek confirms that you are a faggot

Michael Sanders
Michael Sanders

Catholicism is a gay club
I graduated in a private Catholic secondary school. One guy who was living in the dormitory was being bullied at late night by his peers and he just wanted to catch some z's, so he angrily rushed to the teacher's office, clouded by his emotions he even forgot to knock on the door, opened it and said with haste "they won't let me sleep ::-(" just to find the priests watching gay porn together sitting on the same couch, jerking off each other.

I remember my theology teacher admitting to us that he thinks women have no soul, they are clearly inferior.

We had a music teacher who was the biggest latent faggot you've ever seen, really into nationalism muh heritage and such. Last time I heard of him he was joining a fascist paramilitary group.

Great memories!

Jayden Reyes
Jayden Reyes

Wow I can't believe that the sauce proves that Marxists and Christians are one of the same

Christian Roberts
Christian Roberts

i know, right?

Austin Adams
Austin Adams

Right… I think the church's rejection of homosexuality comes from the same type of response that causes a self-hating fag to overcompensate and become a gay basher. Also if the Vatican starts accepting gay people they'll eventually have to start giving equal rights to women which they definitely do not want to do.

Jaxson Brown
Jaxson Brown

the fact that people today still think someone is "born gay" just goes to show the agregious degree to which people in general are uneducated on the matter of socialization. Gays are created through socialization. Being gay is certainly not a choice, but the creation of gays certainly could be understood and controlled if a society so desired.

Elijah Howard
Elijah Howard

Of course the Catholic Church isn't homophobic. Everyone knew this when we found out their priests were molesting little boys.

Adrian Brown
Adrian Brown

little boys are pre-gender
technicallu they r not homosexuall

Christian Taylor
Christian Taylor

an"fems" believe this

Ryan Walker
Ryan Walker

Qualified psychologists tried to "cure" gays for decades. Thanks to that there is now a load of peer reviewed research showing that it's basically impossible to manipulate human sexuality.
Where's your evidence that they're wrong?

Sebastian Nelson
Sebastian Nelson

Thanks to that there is now a load of peer reviewed research showing that it's basically impossible to manipulate human sexuality.

Then why is the current consensus that sexuality, and gender, are both choices?

Carter Ramirez
Carter Ramirez

That isn't the consensus among scientists. Tumblr are not scientists.

Andrew Diaz
Andrew Diaz

rt.com/news/356848-study-sexual-orientation-fixed/
The John Hopkins study argues that sexual orientation is not fixed at birth, so if anything at least it can be said there's dispute about this among scientists.

Bentley Reyes
Bentley Reyes

religion is the opiate of the masses, only the most delusional and fucked people can hold these contradictions in their head.

Angel Smith
Angel Smith

These scientists are considered to be fringe by most of the psychiatric community. In particular, the reliability and accuracy of their work is heavily disputed.

deep.mastersfamily.org/2016-08/lawrence-mayer-and-paul-mchugh-douchebags-day/

Mind you that RT is basically a mouthpiece of the Russian government, which panders a lot to Orthodox sentiments.

Gabriel Nelson
Gabriel Nelson

Sure, my point is that we have no way to control it and the experiments to do so would be deeply unethical. Scientists already did a bunch of unethical experiments on adults and got nowhere. You can't advocate doing the same to kids in the hope that you figure out a way to "cure" something which isn't a problem in the first place. It's like experimenting on kids to find out how to prevent them from growing up with ginger hair. At least it could be argued that many of the adults involved in the gay-cure experiments were consenting.

Ayden Sanders
Ayden Sanders

"We looked at the data, and concluded that because we believe McHugh is a homophobic bigot, he's probably wrong about everything"

muh peer review
independent.co.uk/news/science/scientific-peer-reviews-are-a-sacred-cow-ready-to-be-slaughtered-says-former-editor-of-bmj-10196077.html

Also wondering how long they're just going to blame "discrimination" on why homosexuals are still far more likely to abuse drugs, act promiscuously, and kill themselves than heterosexuals

Charles Hall
Charles Hall

"discrimination" on why homosexuals are still far more likely to abuse drugs, act promiscuously, and kill themselves than heterosexuals

You can make the argument for why that is. Can you make the argument that there is a gene for being gay, acting promiscuous, and killing themselves at the same time? Because if that's biological gene therapy me the fuck up

But anyways, what's funny to me is that there is never this demographic breakdown on the internet of people who spend their time at home. Or further, the mentally ill on the internet, as opposed to "the mentally ill" in the public you don't agree with.

Oliver Cox
Oliver Cox

Also, there's a really fundamental flaw with this research:
You can't prove that sexuality isn't set at birth because you can't measure the sexuality of very young children. It's abundantly clear from decades of research that adult sexuality is pretty much fixed, and no data can be collected for children. The only valid conclusion is that it's fixed some time at or before puberty. I don't think it matters when exactly it is fixed, because it would be deeply unethical to punish people for their entire lives based on "choices" they made as babies.

As far as I can tell that "research" is just a lot of conjecture and linguistic trickery.

Also wondering how long they're just going to blame "discrimination" on why homosexuals are still far more likely to abuse drugs, act promiscuously, and kill themselves than heterosexuals
What's your alternative explanation? That they're inherently evil people?

Blake Lewis
Blake Lewis

muh peer review
You and this clickbait journalist fuckhead are beyond stupid.

Aaron Young
Aaron Young

Oh, and if you're going to write a rebuttal, it's better to write about the numerous glaring flaws in the actual research rather than opening with a "douchebag alert" and crying about how horrible the authors are. Leave that as plan B, in case you can't find any obvious flaws in the research.

Cameron Thompson
Cameron Thompson

Can you make the argument that there is a gene for being gay, acting promiscuous, and killing themselves at the same time?

See below

What's your alternative explanation? That they're inherently evil people?

Well I wouldn't say inherently evil, just possessed by demonic servants of Satan.

Snark aside, there's clearly something that's gone wrong in their personal/social development that's lead them to act in such a fashion, from reckless promiscuity that has resulted in homosexual men contracting never-before-diagnosed-in-human infections, or the predominance of relationships with significant differences in age.

Not an argument.

Easton Baker
Easton Baker

Dude, men are just naturally promiscuous. When they're attracted to other men, all that changes is that they are able to act on those desires where straight men are unable to because women don't want to fuck as often. Mystery solved.

Jason King
Jason King

And the problem is it can't be discussed, because people just don't want to accept that there may be something fundamentally wrong about that behaviour.

Miguel was in the middle of a three-day sex and drug binge when he looked at Grindr and saw an advert asking for people to participate in a film about sex and drug binges. “I hooked up with a guy,” he says, “and then we contacted them.” Soon a cameraman was filming him injecting drugs.

theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/22/addicted-to-chemsex-gay-drugs-film

Dude, men are just naturally promiscuous.
*downs poppers and gets ass-fucked by fifty other guys on the weekend*

Zachary Allen
Zachary Allen

Leave that as plan B, in case you can't find any obvious flaws in the research.
You just stated that peer review is somehow wrong because anyone can publish an academic paper, even though the scientific community at large doesn't give a shit what most of them say anyway because of sheer volume. In reality, the fact that people do like the scientific implications of these two men is why anyone listens to them, not the other way around.

Cherry picking convenient statements and repeating personal feelings ad nauseam is all they have while actual evidence of pathology exists, genetic or not.

Not an argument.
What is presented without logic or reason can be refuted without it.

Connor Wood
Connor Wood

Different person. I posted and .

Jaxon Morgan
Jaxon Morgan

there's clearly something that's gone wrong in their personal/social development that's lead them to act in such a fashion

You can say that about anyone who uses the internet all the time that leads them to make a series of mistakes, like you. But, you don't criticize yourself far enough or that demographic far enough for the engagement of these tactics to be taken that seriously.

If we break down, demographics, you'll find a shockingly large number of people who use the internet all the time who are addicted to one or more prescription drug, or are prescribed a number of psychiatric drugs.

See the language I used there? It's the same dog whistle shit you just did.

And you know what else, I can make a baseless assumption without context afterwards as well.

There might have been something wrong in your personal/social development.

And it can't be discussed.

Connor Wilson
Connor Wilson

Yes, there are numerous studies that can attest to the fact that guys want to fuck basically all the time, any time, no matter the circumstances. Imagine what it would be like to be attracted to people who think exactly the same way instead of women.

If VD wasn't a think then gays would probably be purged just because of hetero envy.

Jayden Kelly
Jayden Kelly

gays would probably be purged just because of hetero envy.
Tbh I have a pretty strong sex drive and my gf wants to have sex more then I do. Maybe she's just the anomaly or maybe it has to do with her background idk

Jack Cox
Jack Cox

You can say that about anyone who uses the internet all the time that leads them to make a series of mistakes, like you. But, you don't criticize yourself far enough or that demographic far enough for the engagement of these tactics to be taken that seriously.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

I wasn't arguing that the NEET life is morally superior, in fact you can and I would happily make exactly the same argument.

The difference is that in one fashion or another society does deem NEETs to be acting in an unhealthy fashion. There's no hagiographies in the mainstream media about how being an anime-watching university drop-out NEET is a perfectly valid lifestyle choice.

Really, I'm not sure what you're arguing - "being a broken, developmentally-stunted individual is okay if there are other groups of broken, developmentally-stunted individuals"?

Imagine what it would be like to be attracted to people who think exactly the same way instead of women.

But we're not, an arguing hypotheticals like that is pointless
"Dude, what if genetically-engineered cat girls existed?"

Colton Cook
Colton Cook

there's clearly something that's gone wrong in their personal/social development
Yes, I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess it's something which starts with "C" and ends with "apitalism".

More seriously, most of it can be explained by the different sex drives of men and women. A person's social life is a function of both their own personality and the personality of the people they're sexually attracted to. In the simplest terms it explains why gay men go to gay bars more than straight men, but it also explains increased promiscuity.

Actually, it's worth taking a step back in this debate because I think the two sides are arguing from completely different axioms.

I find it most useful to consider things in terms of solutions. That is to say, it doesn't matter what the situation is - the only thing worth considering is how to make it better.

The most significant consequence of this is that I don't think it matters if there is something inherently "evil" in gay people. Even if the crazy religious people are right and they literally had a demon inside them telling them to do terrible things, that would be a problem without a solution. There is absolutely no ethical way to make things better in that situation.
In the same way, I don't care about aggregate statistics of drug abuse and promiscuity. Even if those were bad things, which is quite a spooky assumption, there would be no way to tackle it without causing massive collateral damage to innocent people. Aggregate statistics simply do not represent individuals.

Now, if you're going to respond, please respond with a proposal for how to make things better rather than a complain about how things are.

Oliver Jones
Oliver Jones

Stirner
its fixed sometime at or before puberty
Whose really spooked here?

Jose Ward
Jose Ward

The difference is that in one fashion or another society does deem NEETs to be acting in an unhealthy fashion. There's no hagiographies in the mainstream media about how being an anime-watching university drop-out NEET is a perfectly valid lifestyle choice.

The fact this argument is devolving into what the mainstream media thinks about neets away from the point I was making is really showing off what your purpose here in making this argument.

Really, I'm not sure what you're arguing - "being a broken, developmentally-stunted individual is okay if there are other groups of broken, developmentally-stunted individuals"?

That you don't put the same energy into looking for why something is the way it is, then labeling anything that is, "it", and leaving it at that and using loaded language while criticizing peer review

Hunter King
Hunter King

"being a broken, developmentally-stunted individual is okay if there are other groups of broken, developmentally-stunted individuals"?
Those are all utterly subjective metrics. There is no objectively correct way to live your life. What matters is average long-term happiness.

Jose Wood
Jose Wood

So what, some people are gross and irresponsible? Have you really never met an unpleasant woman in your life? Something being reprehensible to you does not make it objectively bad: homosexuality is, by currently accepted psychiatric standards, not a mental disorder, and for reasons that should be obvious to anyone who actually researches the matter instead of digging for bias-confirming links. The two figures mentioned earlier openly reject this standard, which means if you agree with them, you disagree with the psychiatric community in general.

Does this make you objectively wrong? Of course not. But as far as actual evidence goes, their contention that homosexuality is a conscious subcultural decision is effectively a straw man of all non-genetic human behavior.

Easton Murphy
Easton Murphy

But we're not, an arguing hypotheticals like that is pointless
It's not hypotheticals, that's literally what it's like to be gay. Are you autistic?

Hudson Cooper
Hudson Cooper

tfw a cocain sniffing, promiscuouse suicidal terrorist that does poppers and is the centre in every weekly orgy.
My god i am exposed!

I'm not a sjw or anything but can we perma this /pol/ack allready?

Jordan Morgan
Jordan Morgan

There is absolutely no ethical way to make things better in that situation.

No-one's saying "gays are evil, praise Jebus", just that something may have happened that is linked to both the homosexuality and the reckless behaviour.

blogs.scientificamerican.com/bering-in-mind/something-queer-about-that-face/

The fact that people can reasonably guess by someone's face alone whether that person is homosexual or heterosexual indicates that homosexuality is tied to something in development.

In the same way, I don't care about aggregate statistics of drug abuse and promiscuity

"Yes, these people are acting in a self-destructive and reckless manner, but that's no indication there are underlying behavioural issues. I for one like to get drunk in public places and provoke fights with strangers, don't judge me you spooky bigot"

But again, the fact that exclusive heterosexual relationships still persist in significant numbers even after the massive changes in sexual morality since the '60s indicates its different.

This isn't the '50s, heterosexual men don't need to propose marriage to get a girl to sleep with them

Grayson Flores
Grayson Flores

"Yes, these people are acting in a self-destructive and reckless manner, but that's no indication there are underlying behavioural issues. I for one like to get drunk in public places and provoke fights with strangers, don't judge me you spooky bigot"

I would point out that you have presented no evidence that most gays act like this, but I think you are aware and don't care about proof.

Nolan Myers
Nolan Myers

Yes, these people are acting in a self-destructive and reckless manner

What are you going to do about it? Alienate them?

Gee, I'm sure that didn't start this process in the first place, and it won't confirm your already existant confirmation biases when it gets worse.

You offer problems with no solution. You just point out problems and say "SEE"

Elijah Kelly
Elijah Kelly

Also, "self-destructive and reckless" is largely arbitrary. It could be used to describe the majority of people in some relevant sense.

Carter Gray
Carter Gray

resulted in homosexual men contracting never-before-diagnosed-in-human infections
What did he mean by this? AIDs is also found in breeders and needle sharing.

Hudson Collins
Hudson Collins

What a stupid thread. I was raised in a protestant home. I was homeschooled. I had no friends, no tv, no video games, no music and no books that were not pre-approved by my extremely sheltering parents (no, really, my Dad thought Star Wars and Superheroes were the return of the nephilim).

And you know the crazy thing? Despite not once ever witnessing any homosexuality whatsoever, I still knew from as far back as I can remember I liked boys more than girls. It wasn't until I was 15 and gained internet access that I knew what being gay even was.

Adrian Parker
Adrian Parker

Also, AIDS was created by the CIA to destroy communities from within, like crack.

Xavier Fisher
Xavier Fisher

Nearly 40 percent of those who identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual (LGB) claimed to have used illicit drugs in the past year, compared to 17 percent of those who identify as straight. LGB adults also reported higher rates of drinking and cigarette use and were "more than twice as likely as sexual majority adults to have experienced any kind of mental illness in the past year."

nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/report-lesbian-gay-bi-adults-face-higher-substance-abuse-rates-n671876?cid=sm_tw

You offer problems with no solution. You just point out problems and say "SEE"

I'm offering a problem in the hopes that others can find a solution, unlike most scientists who thanks to their own latent "homophobia" are pretty happy to let homosexuals abuse drugs and contract AIDS so long as they don't have to hear about it at work the next morning

Which is better than "Yes, we know homosexuals are more likely to engage in risky behaviour, but that's just because of discrimination I guess"

Jordan Robinson
Jordan Robinson

I'm offering a problem in the hopes that others can find a solution

No you're not, you're basically offering up problems to be a contrarian.

Mason Wood
Mason Wood

"Engaging in risky behaviour and higher rates of suicide and mental illness? What's the problem, again?"

John Gomez
John Gomez

"Engaging in risky behaviour and higher rates of suicide and mental illness? What's the problem, again?"

Like I said you're pointing out the problem and hoping the solution will come by pointing out the problem repeatedly. For nothing else but this specific demographic because they butt fuck and you don't like it.

You're being a contrarian because I only see your social activism concentrated in these three identity politics areas: race, sex, and sexuality.

Three divisive things literally everyone and their mother has a tabloid level of understanding about, you seemingly have as well

Zachary Jackson
Zachary Jackson

A. Not mental illness, stop reading 1940's christian propoganda

B. The suicides are from living in a world that hates them. How would you like to hear countless stories of governments executing, imprisoning, maiming and condoning the persecution of people like you? How would you like to turn on the tv and see some religious nut talking about how evil you are, to which the congregation all says words of agreement? How would you like it if you heard countless stories of kids being disowned, abused or sent to brainwashing camps by their parents for being like you? How would you like it if you overheard random people talk about how disgusting and vile your kind is, sometimes right to your face because they don't know you're that kind and they expect you to agree with them?

Can you imagine what that does to the psyche? To be treated like a subhuman enemy of the earth just for loving differently?

Who wouldn't want to kill themselves facing a world like that?

Christopher Thompson
Christopher Thompson

I have a better solution. Haven cities muh safe space are already proven to work, so we just create lgbt communes, then provide transportation to them if they so desire to live where they will always be welcome.

Christopher Cook
Christopher Cook

implying homosexuality is a mental disease

psychologytoday.com/blog/hide-and-seek/201509/when-homosexuality-stopped-being-mental-disorder

yahoo.com/news/american-scientists-world-homosexuality-isn-t-mental-illness-231030468.html?ref=gs

Jack Hill
Jack Hill

Bet you can't post that on /pol/ without getting permabanned.

Dylan Flores
Dylan Flores

Hard to imagine a more cultural Marxist, p-hacking, fake science study than the one described in this picture.

Lincoln Wilson
Lincoln Wilson

For the same reason a straight person would.

Christian Baker
Christian Baker

Eh, found it on leftybooru, along with this gem.

Samuel Carter
Samuel Carter

i-it called me stupid so it's gotta be fake!

Ayden Stewart
Ayden Stewart

Since you do not seem to consider AIDS conspiracy theories beyond the pale, I'd like to gauge what you think about Gearoid's thoughts on the subject:

The decision to remove homosexuality form the list of psychological disorders was not based on science but rather the successful take-over of the American Psychological Association by an increasingly assertive uranian lobby. By the mid eighties, however, 'liberation' had led to some serious lifestyle diseases among uranian men. A new disease ravaged America's uranian community: Gay Related Immune-deficiency (GRID).

Studies by Dr Peter Duesberg of the University of California showed a clear correlation between the use of poppers and other drugs, chronic lack of sleep and proper nutrition and extreme forms of sexual promiscuity as the etiology of the disease. GRID was a lifestyle epidemic.But the powerful uranian lobby intervened and the gay disease was miraculously transformed into AIDS( Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). The homosexual epidemic conveniently morphed into an 'African disease'. That cover-up and the scientific fraud used to effect it, would have catastrophic consequences for the health of the world's toiling masses, particularly the people of the Southern Hemisphere.

Today, the multi-billion dollar AIDS industry serves to mask the fact that the biggest killer in Africa is malnutrition due to capitalist-induced poverty, not the sexual activity of Africans. Were it not for the ubiquity of the uranian lobby in corporate media, most people would be familiar with the research of scientists such as Dr Stefan Lanka, Dr. David Rasnick and or Nobel-prize winning biochemist Kary Banks Mullis, among many others. The fact that the public is never told about such scientists is because their research produced the 'wrong' results. As Mullis put it "Science is being practised by people who are dependent on being paid for what they are going to find out," Scientific research which proves the unhealthy nature of ruling class sexual practices is not going to get funding from that class.Former African president Thabo Mbeki was ridiculed and demonised by the Western liberal press for inviting dissident biologists to a conference in South Africa in 2000 on the etiology of AIDS. Retroviral drugs are poison; they are murdering thousands of children every year. The uranian lobby is responsible for genocide!

ahtribune.com/in-depth/1014-homosexuality.html

Dominic Adams
Dominic Adams

Uranian men
Well, the cause here isn't the homosexuality, it's clearly radiation poisoning.

Carson Barnes
Carson Barnes

McHugh
You can ignore any drivel written by this man
source: medstudent

Isaiah Rodriguez
Isaiah Rodriguez

homosexuals are still far more likely to abuse drugs, act promiscuously, and kill themselves than heterosexuals

Correlation is not causation you retard. Have you ever considered that drug abuse and suicide may be caused by discrimination faced, or experiences with family?
promiscuity
No shit, they are men. As if straight men wouldn't fuck every semi-attractive woman that approached them. Gay men are more sexually promiscuous because they are men, and BECAUSE men have such high libidos, statistically. God damn, you're a retard.

Robert Watson
Robert Watson

I +1 this.

Logan Kelly
Logan Kelly

Have you ever considered that drug abuse and suicide may be caused by discrimination faced
You know I want to be a good leftist and believe this, I come from a pretty conservative state so I've seen the moral hysteria about this first-hand but then I see shit like this and it kills it for me: archive.is/B8UJv

Gay rights has so obviously become the cause célèbre of liberal humanitarian imperialism that its not even subtle anymore and I'm honestly wondering if there's even anything worth saving about the LGBT movement anymore.

I know we're Holla Forums and we're against idpol for the good of the Left and the vulgar ess jay dubew bashing of the alt-Right–so despite what redditors say about us we're generally accepting of marginalized identities.

The whole ridiculousness of the LGBT is getting to me like the fact that we have a whole political movement based on the kind of sex someone enjoys, e.g. Cletus enjoys playing with his friend Jamal's cock after school, and now they need a political movement.

Is there really anything more idpol then that? At least with the special snowflake spergs and autismos who make being neuro-atypical into an identity and campaign for more NEETbux the majority of the medical establishment recognizes there is something really wrong with them.

Jordan Watson
Jordan Watson

The celebration of sexual preference as an identity is idpol, yes.

Blake James
Blake James

The fact that people can reasonably guess by someone's face alone whether that person is homosexual or heterosexual indicates that homosexuality is tied to something in development.
That sounds like pretty solid evidence that it's genetic and fixed at birth to me.

I'm offering a problem in the hopes that others can find a solution
No, you seem to be offering a "problem" in a pathetic attempt to provoke moral panic and anti-gay sentiments.
The most obvious solution is to legalize drugs and put more funding into AIDS research, but I'm guessing you won't like either of those ideas because they "degenerate" or something.

Gabriel Robinson
Gabriel Robinson

found the gay
into the gulag you go you idpol cocksucker

we don't need miserable pile of shits like you bringing down our cause

or do you want to go in the front lines like the cannon fodder that you are??

Gabriel Morales
Gabriel Morales

hahaa I like you nigger this a good bread you are causing some butthurt no pun intended

cletus and jamals cockplay party le-mao

interesting

Hunter Watson
Hunter Watson

so it's gotta be fake
No, just Jewish.

Blake Collins
Blake Collins

You know that you stick out like a sore thumb right?

Xavier Fisher
Xavier Fisher

that pic
Although the data presented here do not directly address the question of why they did not show signs of self-oriented behavior, we speculate that these are false negative responses
Of course they do.

I know but so does that study. Linked to two leftists who hate whitey. Surely nothing could be afoot. Kristof Dhont of Ghent University, Belgium, and Gordon Hodson of Brock University. Here's an actual statistician dismantling their BS "statistical" piece on racism being linked with low Autism Level.

wmbriggs.com/post/5118/

Levi Jones
Levi Jones

So wait, children who could tell the exact volume of glasses at a glance, hated black people?

You're basically saying racists are more intelligent.

Blake Stewart
Blake Stewart

Lmaooooo /pol/ confirmed for not knowing basic math

Cooper Adams
Cooper Adams

That would mean he doesn't know how to read, dumbass.

Jaxson Hughes
Jaxson Hughes

Forgot to mention Wray Herbert is the one who wrote the article that referenced Hodson's and Kristof's fallacious study.

Tyler Long
Tyler Long

"Conservation" = Being unable to see that both glasses hold the same water.

No conservation = Being able to see that both glasses hold the same water.

No conservation = more racist.

More racist = Being able to see that both glasses hold the same water.

More racist = more accurate.

David Edwards
David Edwards

Retard.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_(psychology)
Conservation tasks test a child’s ability to see that some properties are conserved or invariant after an object undergoes physical transformation.
Let me explain that for you.
Conservation = being able to see that both glasses hold the same water.
No conservation = being unable to see that both glasses hold the same water
Less conservation -> more racism
Fucking dumbass can't even comprehend basic sentences

Asher Thompson
Asher Thompson

No,
"Conservation" = Being able to see that both glasses hold the same water.

Owen Walker
Owen Walker

Then why are you getting mad at me, this person made the image wrong.

Fucking dumbass can't even comprehend basic sentences
I can comprehend them, but your butt buddy over there seems to lack the ability to WRITE them and express himself.

Grayson Robinson
Grayson Robinson

conservative statistician hates the fact his ideology is roughly correlated with low Autism Level
writes poorly structured critique
Scroll down to the last comment in the article, the dude gets BTFO and doesn't even respond to that much more detailed and devastating critique of his critique (but he was perfectly fine to respond to an offhand comment on an image board - I wonder why).

James Butler
James Butler

youre not sherlock holmes faggot also sherlock was shit Father Brown way better, infidel. I can call someone a nigger and not be from /pol, nigger

the fucking chutzpah of such an accusation, seriously

Mason Perez
Mason Perez

anyone that takes part in any kind of "glasss of water" study is a nigger

Michael Butler
Michael Butler

On the other hand, electrically disabling or weakening the function of the amygdala, the part of the brain used for assessing threats, makes people more likely to support left-wing ideologies, and more accepting of immigrants.

Isaac Davis
Isaac Davis

k

Cooper Clark
Cooper Clark

that is to say that it does not recognise the fact that some people are 'born gay' and should therefore be allowed to marry and adopt children.
just because they aren't born gay doesn't mean they shouldn't have rights too.

I remember my theology teacher admitting to us that he thinks women have no soul, they are clearly inferior.
women are different from men tbh. he was just saying that in his own religious way.

Also if the Vatican starts accepting gay people they'll eventually have to start giving equal rights to women which they definitely do not want to do.
why would they need to?

James Myers
James Myers

oh youre autistic didnt know sorry thank you for your spectrum disorder

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit