Genetic Test Results of Ancient Egyptian Mummies

archive.fo/yG1Vx
nature.com/articles/ncomms15694 (the archive doesn't have the supplemental files)

""Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes suggest an increase of Sub-Saharan African ancestry in post-Roman periods""
Published: May, 30 2017

The study was done by the Max Planck Institute, the only large science institute I'm aware of that is mostly unkiked. Much of the groundbreaking research on race is coming from there. They have to constantly unkike the findings of the fraudulent kike researchers elsewhere, and then get labeled as "racist" by every like 'scientific' publication out there. They stopped giving any more fucks after they got attacked for saying niggers have a lower IQ on average. That shit is so self-evident that all pretense of misunderstanding was removed, that they got redpilled on white genocide by the kikes themselves. They now to some degree specialize on 'racist' research because no one else is willing to publish it. Thank you Deutschland.

Nuclear DNA was recovered from 3 mummies at the spot marked on the map. They tried to obtain this DNA from something like 150 mummies, recovered mtDNA from 90 of them, and nuclear from only 3. Officially, this is completely new,  as Zahi Hawass had forbidden DNA collection of mummies. but there are theories of freemasons having cloned mummies in a lab in Israel known to grow clones for killing and harvesting organs. Yes, this is legal in Israel, but only ever mentioned in Israeli papers. The goal was to find commoners and test their relation to the people living in Egypt today.

Part "a" of the chart shows the relationship of the 3 mummies to DNA samples from ancient human remains there are more details on the race/origins of the ancient samples used in the study, if you want to confirm their race and modern humans. The test was done relative to present-day Egyptians. The redder the dot, the closer the relation. A white dot indicates that there is no close relation. Modern Sardinians are the closest people to ancient Egyptians. interestingly, the Basque are one of the closest related today. I suspect if they test against certain modern single individuals, they would get better matches than using 'population averages.'

Part "c" compares present-day Egyptians to the 3 mummies, and they conclude that they burned so much coal that they might as well be niggers.

The image with 4 colorful charts compares the mtDNA of the 90 mummies. They are the blue dots. Their matrilineal DNA is somehow closest to present-day Bedouins and Arabians, particularly of the Levant, but specifically more distant to that of present-day Egyptians. All the mummies came from a single location, so further research may provide different results. The paper gave the impression of being hastily published and with preliminary results. 

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.fo/U3Vwb
independent.co.uk/life-style/history/baboon-mummy-analysis-reveals-eritrea-and-ethiopia-as-location-of-land-of-punt-1954547.html
foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/02/did-chinese-civilization-come-from-ancient-egypt-archeological-debate-at-heart-of-china-national-identity/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

bump

By directly studying ancient DNA from ancient Egyptians, we can test previous hypotheses drawn from analysing modern Egyptian DNA.


>The 90 mitochondrial genomes fulfilling our criteria (>10-fold coverage and

Can we encourage them to test more mummies? They got nuclear DNA from 2% (1/50) mummies, and mitochondrial from 60%! Previously, people were saying it was likely impossible. Now, they even know what sorts of mummies best preserve DNA.

We need them to test the Royals.

So wuz we kangz?

why did the royals claim they were from ethiopia?
why are ethiopians still considered caucasian/caucasoid ?

They brought over tons of slaves, they castrated the men, but the women would have been fair game for concubine slaves.

This is their press-release for non-scientists. Maybe I should've made this the OP instead, but it didn't have as much information or graphics, but does explain the results better.
archive.fo/U3Vwb

The First Genome Data from Ancient Egyptian Mummies
Study finds that ancient Egyptians were most closely related to ancient populations from the Near East
May 30, 2017

Get back in the oven, Shlomo.

Dubs confirm we wuz kangz

This is the description of the fourth image. I accidently nigged the description.


I might as well add all the captions.

Caption of 3rd image

Caption of 2nd image

Caption of 1st image

LOOKS LIKE WE WUZ FOOKIN' 'GYPTIANS LADS

Ta netjer
pic related
always question stats , they could be a trap

independent.co.uk/life-style/history/baboon-mummy-analysis-reveals-eritrea-and-ethiopia-as-location-of-land-of-punt-1954547.html

i believe this is a muti gen psyop

the Jews cloned Pharaohs?????

There is an ancient chinese legend that says China was founded by people from nine rivers that flow north…

foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/02/did-chinese-civilization-come-from-ancient-egypt-archeological-debate-at-heart-of-china-national-identity/

...

Good normalfag friendly video.

WE

Everyone knows that the people of Tarim Basin were European, but if they really were the founders of Chinese society, it would be hidden by the Chinese government. They have a lot of known documents forbidden to commoners and have a lot of reburied tombs. Fir example, they planted forests over their pyramids. It's possible that were hiding who the original people there were.


It's very hypothetical, but it's technically possible and there are a few weird correspondences and publications from the lab that hint at it. They are openly cloning humans though, but they are required to kill them. Perhaps I'll start a thread on that later, after I compile the documents.

This map shows Ethiopia being in nig nog land. Fuck off, Shlomo.

Agree. Consequently, this should show in differences between paternal (yDNA) and maternal (mtDNA) hereditary lines.

2 dubdubs in a row

WE

WUZ


KANGZ

That's the point idiot, modern Ethiopians aren't white or caucasoid and who knows if Ethiopia was ever ruled over by whites when it was lush and green.

The royals claim they were from Ethiopia because they were. The Egyptians established a colony behind where Nubia is called Punt (located in modern day Somalia). The Ancient Egyptians acknowledge this as their original homeland- but keep in mind this was only around 3000BC, the archaeological evidence has shown that the majority of Egyptians lived in the Delta and were indigenous to the region, Punt was merely a colony, a Colony where as I come to understand the Nobility setup and lived because it seemed nice. Punt was eventually destroyed and rebuilt several times over the course of history hence why we don't know its exact location and neither did the Egyptians living in 3000BC, it had to be rediscovered as they were basically cutoff.

The real kicker is the fact that its highly probable that the Egyptians in Punt were genetically different from Nubians hence the border clashes, I had figured that the Egyptians had established many colonies along the Red Sea in order to bypass Nubia via the ocean because the Egyptians ALWAYS hated the Nubians.

We Wuz Nut Kangs Afteralls. Also calling an Ancient Egyptian White is stupid, the word is Tanned. Their Race however was not a Negroid, but I don't think they were Caucasian either, they have qualities that are more distinct than your generic Persian, but the evidence shows that they are genetically of the Levant and the Levant were Middle-Eastern, they were just more Tanned than your average Persian. The Nobility were lighter skinned because they spent most of their time in doors, their artwork even showcases this that nobility are seen as lighter skinned, unless its implied the noble got out a lot in the case of say an Officer in the Army, Soldiers and labourers would be easily the darkest skinned.

People need to get their heads out of the idea that Skin Colour = Race. For the Ancient Egyptians, the skin colour refers to complexion. Their Race is distinct but the large amounts of h1b show that to claim they were Negroids is blatantly false and the evidence doesn't lie.

I'm really pleased to see all this new archaeological evidence and I figure in time we'll see the truth uncovered, and when we finally do, the niggs are going to loose their shit.

Good post. Being a racialist does not mean throwing out any and all differentiations.

WE

Any differences between Copts and Muslim Egyptians?
And what was the source of the African genetic influx, the Arab slave trade? I thought mostly took males and practised castration?

Wait though, what about all of the ancient Egyptians' neighbors acknowledging them as having settled in Egypt from elsewhere, with the greeks pointing out they came from the east, making them slavic in origin originally?

The study shows the ancient Egyptians were sandnigs related to Arabs & Jews, and that they still are, with just a bit more Negro admixture. Look at the third picture. Purple and Orange is white, mustard, red, and green is sand nigger.

Not a shred of evidence. Go back to the buzzfeed comments section and post your fanfics over there.

Also, kek. It shows Greeks and Cypriots clustering with the sand nigs. Look at the purple triangle and stars in the upper left corner of the magnified area.

I was hoping an user that actually understands genetics to explain the findings better. Does the study indicate that Egyptians were European men that bred with Arab women? That's what I understood to be the result.