Do you care about net neutrality?

Will you allow corporate fuckers fuck you in the ass even harder?
battleforthenet.com/july12/

Fuck off Holla Forums.

Fucking idiot.

Kikes should never be hold the keys to communication.

No one cares about your kike shit. No one cares about your kike doublethink, either. Net neutrality is the opposite of what kikes say it is unless they know you know it's them.

OP never mentioned Jews dumbass, he said
Someone start a new thread calling out jews in the op and delete this one.

Also this.
All sites are controlled by Jews, they'd just be assfucking each other, it'll be great.

You faggots are such fucking quitters

This also means more website blocking.
What if they block fucking Holla Forums?
This is the kind of shit SJW's wish they could do.

Holy shit, retard.

For as EXTREMELY convoluted as the jews have made both the discussion and and DEFINITION OF "net neutrality" over the years, you're being very transparent.

watching or caring about (((entertainment))).
Let them do it,silicon valley tech companies are bunch of commies anyway so who cares.

Refer to

Jim is the biggest Jew of all, Holla Forums needs an exodus anyways.

You're either illiterate or a retard.

The Gov never did anything to punish ISP's when they gave them billions to create fiber optics and the gov should not be allowed to control the Internet, at the same time ISP's are absolute trash and without net neutrality it will get worse.
It comes down to that the Internet is already in a shit situation becasue I dont want the Internet labeled as a utility so the gov can gain more power over it but at the same time it allows ISP's to give as slow connection possible and never providing good Internet speeds with shit pricing.

This.
My issue is that OP is a fag, delete this thread and start another.

Not an argument.

Hi Mollyjew!

Yeah I agree that OP is a pretty big fag and its a shit thread. This thread was over before it started.

Lost cause. The right leaning see it as an attack on Capitalism (as with regulating power frequencies to 50hz, evul gubermint!!) and the left thinks a truly neutral network enables so called hate speech. I don't care about it, my country is seated between five others with formidable connectivity and only one, two hops to other areas with a suspiciously high VPN density.

This is not really a argument. Yes the cable companies are too large. No we should not turn them into goberment regulated utilities. It would make better sense to prosecute them with anti trust laws. Competition will bring better products to consumers.

BINGO
What they are trying to pass is net censorship.

Where is the line drawn between regulation and enforcement of a broken law?

The Jew is actually pushing net neutrality, dumbshit. That is why it is astroturfed by Soros on reddit and faceberg .

net neutrality is communism.

if the corporations get more money this means more capitalism which is always a good thing.

if every streaming provider is slowed down except for one, this only means this provider is the smartest one and should be supported.

...

NAh trump will just use it for our enemies. The chans are untouchable.

No, it doesn't. ISPs do not want to get in the business of content regulation because it opens them up to liability if they claim to be able to block objectionable content and somebody's kid still manages to get access to porn. This is why they're so insistent about making sure laws like the DMCA have safe harbor provisions for them. They are interested in two things that net neutrality currently prevents:
1. Giving their own content priority (for ISPs with other branches that produce content, like Comcast)
2. Controlling bandwidth hogs like Netflix.
The only place that there's serious risk for ISP interference causing damage to us is torrent traffic, and with normalfags shifting mostly to streaming even that doesn't seem all that likely. It's open for debate whether ISPs should be allowed to do these two things (I tend to think they probably shouldn't, but a better solution than net neutrality is breaking up some of the bigger players like Comcast). However, it should be clear that there isn't much risk of changes in this particular bit of law affecting us. If we're going to be attacked it will be from another direction.

Except through subversion done of the owner of the website they're on and the moderators of the boards themselves. OOPS!