Catherine

Well, when it's in a Western game, it's usually to obnoxiously seek approval from the player. Japs tend to play it off humorously. Whether it lands or not, it at least it's not as bad the former.

Speaking of that, do you tell Katherine the truth about Catherine if you go for that ending? I remember wanting to say no to both, but I didn't want to leave Katherine with the impression that she was cheated on.

Isn't he a tranny rather than a trap? The dude that had sex with him surely would have noticed if there was a dick there.

I'm guessing he fucked her while giving her a reach-around like a true gentleman.
And traps are gay as fuck, and the ultimate test of manhood. Are you a man enough to fuck a trap, or are you a sissy afraid of the dick?

The truth? You mean cheating on her? Pretty much the only things that change the ending of the game are what your alignment is and your answers to the final confessional questions.

I'd fuck a cute boipussy no problem, but I'm pretty sure the only real trap that exists is Bailey Jay or whatever his/her name is.

wew

Check your toe privilege shitlord.

You don't have to hate women to go your own way but it helps

atlus will never release all their games on PC

Welp, this user is not getting invited to the wedding.

I like the True Cheater ending. It was fucking metal! Vincent rules the underworld with all the pussy he could ever want!

yeah, but Vincent doesn't like men either. That's the only other requirement for MGTOW

Guess who's not getting invited to the glorious demon party

The only good part of the game was drinking in the bar. I dreaded having to do the blocks section, although maybe that helped with my immersion.

The bar is easily the comfiest bar in any game I've ever played

Or

He must swing a mean dick.

dick pays rent boiiii

johnny dresses formally, but toby is straight up wearing a jumpsuit for fucks sake

bars that are actually comfy go out of business pretty quickly

At least he isn't wearing a fucking fedora like Orlando always is.

i liked orlando despite his idiot hat

What are you talking about man? In my city there are tons of pubs that are super comfy like that.

in my city, if your bar can't keep it wall to wall for half the week you're dead in under a year

More comfy bars need to have food other than the generic bar food. The reason a lot of old fashion pubs do so well is because people want to relax and grab a shepards pie and drink.

Oh, well that's a lack of business, not being comfy. You can have a lot of people and still be comfy.

the overhead in my town for bars and restaurants is pretty high so they go full clusterfuck in the tourist season, its a drag if you want to have a drink outside of the house in the summer time

That's pretty lame, man. It's really one of the only things I actually like about this city, is that if me and my friends want a beer at a comfy pub with good food, we've got a shit load of options.

i'm envious. also bars close at 1am where i live and liqour stores close at 10pm, and you aren't allowed to sell alcohol in convenience stores here, strange shit especially when most of this cities income comes from bleeding tourists who are used to later closing times

What third world country do you live in?

Sounds like Utah.

Rhode Island

That's due to expense in Large cities
Maybe move to a 10,000 person city

New South Wales, Australia

great the goddess is mine then

Yeah that sounds a little silly to have such restrictive laws in a tourist heavy place. Even around here, we get jack shit for tourism, but bars close at 2:30 with tollerance until 3am, and the liquor stores close at 2 I believe, but you're paying inflated costs at night.

I don't know how to feel about trannies in video games

tbh I don't know how to feel about them in real life

I don't know how I feel about being one either

but I do think I'd rather just not think about it at all, and if that means all tranny character representation disappears from all media that's fine with me

everyone here finds it silly, the out of towners always complain because for them their night usually starts at 1am where they hail from

i'm convinced this place makes everyone just boring and retarded myself included cuz its a bitch to escape from

Fucking degenerate.

I hear that. Even with more lax liquor laws in comparison, this place is fucking dull as all hell.

kill me

it worked in catherine because it was a twist that works within the universe, throwing trannies into a game for no reason is just baiting for brownie points from progressive dipshits

being one means you were born with crossed wires in your brain, not really your fault but you have potential to be an annoying twat because of it

She rides a Subaru so it doesn't matter.

Being gay or being a Tranny is all due to having really messed up hormones
Doesn't help we're being pumped full of xenoestrogens

...

are you extremely hypersimplifying that or do you just think that hormones are a lot more powerful than they are

you can skip the stairs if you did it on gold trophy and just focus on bar or you can just download save

...

Wouldn't let me post both, but here's Exhibit B

...

Oh look, meaningless buzzwords. Found the tumblr tranny! If you want a "hypersimple" solution to your dilemma, there's always an easy way out, faggot.

what

NOPE

It's a choice. Like all sin, it's a conscious decision.

Sodomites and those with same-sex urges don't get to excuse their sexual perversion any more than the foot-rapists.

And by that I mean actual feet rapists, not men who find women's feet attractive or even men who fetishize women's feet (also disgusting) but actual feet rapists. Think I heard about a massage therapist getting caught like that in high school. Decades ago now, though.

Either way, sin is sin and God doesn't send mentally retarded people to hellfire because they're retarded. He sends spiritually disordered, willfully prideful sinners to hellfire.

or in other words, pic related

You better be doing this """""""""ironically""""""""" because
THAT IS NOT A WORD

You do understand that a pervert telling others they are perverts is the greatest turn-on for them, right?

This isn't "settling" any dispute; you are echoing the oral masturbation of degenerates who find great pleasure and self-affirmation in telling others they are equally as degenerate as they are.

Or put simply:
SODOMITES AND QUIRKS GET THEIR JOLLIES FROM THIS ATTENTION

STARVE THEM

STARVE THE DEGENERATES

Disgusted.

Grossly disgusted.
Also a bit sad, so reach out to them in love to help them see the light apart from their vile evil they are ensnared in.

And if they don't listen then move on.

But at all times it is a disgusting thing.

Why? Why would you want to be a tranny?
I'm not going to make fun of you, I'm actually being serious here.

It's alright if you're gay, user. I don't care if you jerk it to ladyboys. This is a place of freedom. You can be yourself here, my faggot friend.

I don't know about him, but I had a phase in life when I seriously considered it (I decided against in the end, thank God), because I have a gender bending fetish and the whole idea sounded hot as fuck, making me rock hard just thinking about it.

In the end, I decided I won't let my sexual urges dictate who I am, and that rather ruining my life and health, I'll settle for beating it off to hentai.

Sorry bub that's not how it works.

Your fetish is shit, but at least you have common sense.

...

it hurts a lot.

weebs shits and their story centered almost no gameplay games full of gay agenda pushing

worse than sjws

Doesn't that webm mean you eventually join the degenerates?

That was a disappointing post, user. Try again.

Hallelujah! I'm very glad to hear that, user!
>because I have a gender bending fetish and the whole idea sounded hot as fuck, making me rock hard just thinking about it.
Try to refrain from indulging in that, friend. The actual definition of a fetish is:

FETISH: 1 an object regarded with awe as being the embodiment or habitation of a potent spirit or as having magical potency.
2. any object, idea, etc., eliciting unquestioning reverence, respect, or devotion:
to make a fetish of high grades.
3. Psychology. ''any object or nongenital part of the body that causes a habitual erotic response or fixation.

All together, a "fetish" is actually sexual idolatry, placing preference and affection on sexual perversion.

I had a "fetish" too, user. It was monster rape porn for hentai and JAV rape porn. Porn is derived from the Greek word πορνεία or "porneia" which means "sexual immorality". Taking this further:

[E. Morselli in "Baldwin Dictionary of Philosophy," 1901]

Apparently originating around 1801, FETISH essentially means "worship of fetishes," from fetish + -ism. Expanded in use by Auguste Comte (French philosopher) taking it to denote a general type of primitive religion (animism).
In the purely psycho-sexual sense, first recorded 1897 in writings of Henry Havelock Ellis (1859-1939).

Now do you see? Fetish is literally the carnal worship, the idolization of sexual perversion.
And yet we have been trained to believe this term is no different than "what I like".

It is a dangerous thing to have a fetish, a dangerous and self-destructive thing. I am very glad you removed yourself from it in the real sense–that is, from the sense of actual human beings and self–and left it for the drawings of fiction.

Moving our pornographic predilections to hentai and fictional work is one great step towards removing the fetters of our "fetishes" from us and quite sincerely becoming freed from what is essentially an addiction. If not an addiction, then certainly a poisonous habit.

YAY! You're very nearly there, you know; made in the image of God, you bear understanding that your sexual perversion is NOT right and NOT to be taken into reality, let alone applied to your self!

Most anons give up, you know, choosing to butcher themselves spiritually and physically to
become the girls they love
which is why you see so much promotion of sodomy and "fuccboi" filth around these days–they are men who have given up and given in. Never give in.

There's a lot of other things I would like to show you, but you can see them for yourself if you'd like.
Here's a MegaLink (and no, it's not dolphin porn. This would be the grandest long-con to set up dolphin porn, wouldn't it? haha):
mega.nz/#F!9YB2EJ5A!mfVFn6AbXk9lBLM18V02Wg

May God bless you securely with the light of freeing salvation and truth in Christ Jesus.

Now, back to vidya

>Then I saw a great white throne and Him who sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away. And there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books. The sea gave up the dead who were in it, and Death and Hades delivered up the dead who were in them. And they were judged, each one according to his works.
- Revelation 20:11-13

>"I will deliver you from all your uncleannesses. I will call for the grain and multiply it, and bring no famine upon you."
- Ezekiel 36:29

>For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.
- ROMANS 1: 18-23

SHOW me where God ever condemns a man for being mentally retarded. It's like God condemning a man because he has no legs! You cannot find a single piece of Scripture where God condemns a man who is mentally disabled for being mentally disabled.

I'm sure there are autistic and schizophrenic people in hell, but they are there by their choice and not by their defects.

fuck off you prude

If she sucks your dick, treat them like a chick.
If they used to have a dick, run away quick.

stop being gay Holla Forums.

Salt.
He's completely right.

Thanks for the post, user. The moment when I considered giving in was when I became friends (completely non-sexually, just plain old friendship) with a tranny. Naturally, (s)he kept trying to convince me to "take the plunge" and it was kinda working, but then (s)he took the dick operation and it fucked with him bad. You you could see that whatever instant happiness or bliss he was expecting from it didn't come; he stayed just as wanting as ever, although he'd never admit it. In turn, he started giving in to perversion of unprecedented magnitudes. Constanly talking about sex and shit, how it feels great to play with his tits, how he's now sticking a twelve inch dildo there… It was fairly disgusting, even more so when he talked that garbage in public. Seeing all this shit was a better turn off from the whole tranny idea than any other argument ever could. I think the saddest thing about it all is that he convinced at least two (very, very probably even more) other people to start taking estrogen and all that shit as well.

Heh. In my case it's actually the process, not an object

I see you're a very religious person, so let me ask you a question:
How do I know which religion is the correct one? I've thought a long time about theism and atheism, and concluded that the existence of God is much more probable than his non-existance, but that just threw me in front of another dilemma. First, being european, I of course turned to catholicism, but I cannot in any way condone the actions of the new pope, and I don't think he even acts in accordance with Bible. I was about to simply switch to Orthodoxy, but then I realised that the only reason I ever picked christianity in the first place was because it was culturally close and I liked it, not because I had any proof of its divine truth. I mean how can I tell that Christianity is THE religion? It has a holy book describing miracles, but so does half a dozen other religions. Picking a religion according to personal prefference is nonsense – I'd just be indulging my own sense of morality. So, according to what should I pick it?

Why is she always a futa in all the porn of her?

you don't, there's been religions before Christianity and probably many before those. you literally have a better chance at winning the lottery than choosing the right one.

or you can just join islam and blow yourself up

sexchangeregret.com/
That man emasculated himself over utter perversion, and once he realized the irreparable damage he caused he sank deeper into sin in a futile flee from despair.

haha It was the same for me: not a specific object but an action. Still, it's the same thing

I'll do this in the next post

Wrong and pathetic. I'll explain in the next post, but you can also check out this video while I'm typing

Cold Case Christianity

there is clearly no bias in this post or the followup you will provide

Because even Nips and weebs know that the gaping, surgery-engineered wound kept open with drugs that post-op trannies have as a pathetic excuse for a vagina is fucking horrifying, and would rather accept being faggots than deal with that shit, if they can't stop liking trannies either way.

Of course, the obvious solution is "stay away from fucking trannies because they're mentally-ill abominations, either go full cunt-blaster, full cock-sucker or full double-whammy (with multiple people, i.e. being with a guy and a girl at the same time) already, don't straddle the line with one fucked-up freak", but many obvious and clearly-beneficial solutions get ignored like that.

...

That's a funny question. It actually made me chuckle when I read it out loud. I'm in a similar situation where I know I'm a Christian and firmly believe in God and the teachings of Christ, but I loathe the establishment that is the Catholic Church and this pseudo WH4K nonsense being thrown around here from time to time. I'm currently looking into Baptist and Methodist churches in my area. Eh. Maybe I'll check out those Mormans down the way. I hear they throw great parties.

Evidence, study, and a sincere desire to know God

It always does, friend, but it's a necessary dilemma. Better to live the examined life, for all its troubles, than the unexamined life. Also, atheism and Darwinian evolution is not scientifically sound either.
You were right to consider this, user, since Catholicism is false doctrine and not true biblical faith in God.
Vid related

Also, inb4 a Catholicanon comes in swinging about "protties"– to be a biblical Trinitarian is to be a biblical Christian, to be a biblical Christian is to have trust in the absolute truth of God and test all things against the absolute truth of Scripture, His word. NASB, NKJV, ESV etc. the Bible is the Word of God and to it all things must kneel just as all things must kneel to God Himself. If your worldview is not rooted firmly in the Scripture then you will falter heavily and be led astray.

Also inb4 "but Macabees" etc. – Apocrypha is for another thread. This is already somewhat off-topic; we can debate that at /christian/

Also heavily false doctrine
That is most certainly a bad issue, but sadly it's not rare. You are not alone, user; in fact, I called myself a Christian for over a decade before actually coming to Christ in truth and being saved.
Just because someone professes Christ doesn't mean they do so in earnest. Most who profess to be Christians today are not.

Ah! But THIS is where we look to evidences like historicity and reliability.
Historicity:
At last count there are over 5,800 Greek NT manuscripts and also 10,000 New Testament (NT) manuscripts in languages like Coptic, Syriac, Latin and Arabic. Additional 10,000 manuscripts quoting passages from the NT, and we have their writings too. From those writings we can reconstruct the entire NT precisely. Only 2 books (Judge & 2 John) were not quoted before 100 AD, but after this they are all quoted.
These manuscripts equate to millions of passages of text. It's because we have so many manuscripts and sources that we can determine the differences and reconstruct the originals with a high degree of accuracy. The more manuscripts we find, the more proven the texts of the New Testament are.

Why is this important? Because the New Testament, especially the Gospels, are all first-hand and second-hand accounts of everything regarding the day, time, works and death (and rising) of Jesus Christ, who is the focal point of Christianity as He is quite literally God Himself.

- There was a time when historians thought Jesus was a myth, and even the "great" Richard Dawkins was foolish enough to spout such idiocy in our day–which he had to retract because, you know, evidence
- There was a time when Pilot was said to be fake
- There was a time when they said Romans did not practice crucifixion
- There was a time when they said the events and peoples of the New Testament were all but a farce, and yet literally everything in the accounts of the New Testament have been tried and proven with further historical research, whereas those "new discoveries" disproving Scripture are always disproven and, often, proven to be fakes like so:
latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-jesus-wife-forgery-sexism-20140516-story.html

Why is all this important? Because even the cosmic signs during Christ's crucifixion are attested to by historical records from people who were not Christian, and many who were enemies of Christians!

And why is even that important? NO OTHER RELIGION IS THIS CONSISTENT AND HISTORICALLY SOUND! Check that out!

According to the very real desire within you for truth, righteousness and purpose.
According to the hunger for focus and desire to stay away from aimlessness and corruption.
According to God, user. Sounds silly, at first, but it's true.

Here, have a read of this:
biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans 1&version=ESV
biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John 1&version=NASB

...

>asking for no bias after saying that there is objectively no way of knowing if Christianity is reliable and that the lottery is better chanced than choosing the right religion
m8
Also, did you even click on the video? I bet you refuse to, or you think it's too long

...

It's been a long time since I played but I think it goes like this…

Because he was taking virile men away from REAL woman that can have children and thus the villain which wants to prevent a decrease in population wants him dead.

I'll elaborate:

Judaism
Judaism is NOT pre-Christian but post-Christian. It follows what is known as the Babylonian (or other) Talmud which is doctrinally inconsistent and utterly heretical. See video for a perfect example of this.

Judaism also has at its epicenter the Zohar (aka Holy Zohar) which is a second century doctrine of insane blasphemy that is exalted for "being written in an exalted style of Aramaic", yet when it was first being introduced it was actually widely rejected by the Judaist (practiioner of Judaism) and rabbinical majority…until the Kabbalha followers adopted it from an apparently wealthy man, and through them it permeated all of Judaism generations later.

You can find more information here 8ch.net/christian/res/227408.html#227432

However, even if the Pharisees of today followed the exact religion of the Pharisees during Jesus's day, they would STILL be anti-Scripture. Why? Because their teachings and hypocracy was literally a burden and spiritually a curse of chains on all who sought God, allowing merchants in the holy temple (which is now destroyed, as Jesus predicted), saying that it's better to swear on the gold of the temple than on the temple itself, demanding all tyrannical authority over the religious followers to the point of striking fear into them if they spoke back, etc.

You can read more on that here:
biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew 23&version=NKJV

how fucking backwards

I do not dispute the historicity of the New Testament; I simply have doubts over its divinity. Many religions have had figures using miracles.

Let's take the Abrahamic religions as an example. First, we got the Old Testament, which was written by a LOT of different jews over a very long period of time (to say that they were all prophets of some sort seems rather unlikely), and while the contents may be historically accurate, it doesn't mean the author himself didn't make a mistake. Moving on from there, we have Christianity and New Testament, which, however, seems to offer an entirely different representation of God. In the Old Testament, God directly smites and kills and otherwise murders countless people, in favour of his favourite race. In the New Testament, God is very, very indirect, in the sense that we no longer see giant pillars of fire and the like, and is also heavily pacifist and humanist, something that I can't really see in the Old Testament. Already, we have two prophets that acted very differently - while Moses, with the power of god, fucked Egypt's shit up in epic proportions, Jesus just turned the other cheek and let the Romans crucify him and many of his followers without ever as much as harming one. There seems to be a clear dissonance in messages in what is supposed to be a single religion (as christianity recognises the Old Testament). Then Islam enters the fray, ALSO recognising Moses and Jesus, ALSO having its own prophet that ALSO performed miracles, who ALSO has a book, and who ALSO seems to say something entirely different from the other two. Now, which one is correct?

Jesus Christ who cares? Become an atheist already and spend time on important things like videogames.

Religion. Not even once.

I really don't understand how any aryan man could stomach the worship of an ethnic jew, or take as his holy book a collection of tales from the levant.

You did the right choice, user. You should not let your fetishes dictate what you are. However, the real problem here is not that you were unsure about your gender, but that (I'm sure) you did not look for psychiatric help anywhere. Even if you don't suffer from gender dysphoria, the simple fact that you were ready (or at least unsure about) to get gender reassignment surgery because you wanted to get turned on is a sign of something, I'm sure.

Your friend obviously wanted the best for you, and equally obviously she was strongly misguided. She should have not tried to push you into getting gender reassignment surgery, she should have pushed you into getting psychological help to determine if you needed anything in the first place.

Unfortunately, gender reassignment is more like using duct tape than any actual solution. It's the best we have at the moment.

You should do the right thing and push these people to reconsider taking estrogen, and seek the help of a psychiatric help. Just like only a doctor can determine if you have to take drugs or not for a disease, only somebody expert in the matters of the mind can determine if gender dysphoria is present or not. Do they even sell estrogens to people so willy-nilly? I'm confused.

You can't, and you can never know. Religion is based on faith, which is believing in something you're not sure is true.

I'm unsure how you came to this conclusion because the existance and non-existance of god are logically two 50/50 choices.

...

Is that user who says evolution isn't real on again? I had a good laugh last thread.

Anyone else think Rapunzel was harder than the actual game?

He smuggled it to them as he himself got estrogen from his doctor, or he at least told them what to say to the doc to "pass"

It was a LOT of factors that I found tilting the odds. One of the big ones is that no scientific theory can, so far, give a satisfying answer to how the universe came to be, why does it work the way it does, etc.. When I have a question and only see ONE answer to it that makes sense (albeit it needn't have solid proof to support it), I'm more liable to believe it than an answer that makes no sense, or one that doesn't even exist

Citation?

Yeah, why the fuck is that? He could've at least changed. Even Erica wore a different dress. What's wrong with this nigga?

What was everyone's favorite level?
I think mine was either the prison or the torture chamber one, the one where "Katherine" hunts you with a fork left the biggest impression with me.
And I hated the ice blocks and the exploding ones.

britannica.com/topic/pornography

I didn't see anything about "sexual immorality"

Porn derives from "Porni" which meant Prostitute. I'm not a historian though so maybe I'm wrong who knows. Either way arguing semantics is a futile effort for a just and solid argument.

Yes there is, it's called the big bang. Theories aren't meant to "satisfy" you. They are there to explain the world in which you live in.

What the fuck is up with these obnoxious christfags lately? Did their board get nuked or are the loud mouth faggots just coming out of the woodwork?
Nobody wants to hear your drivel, faggots.

I liked the ice level, actually.
The spike blocks were so much fun to trigger. I think the most annoying ones are the springboards. At one point, I got completely lost. How was I supposed to know I needed to use them to climb. I spent a few hours until I figured it out.

To be fair some people can't get time off whenever they need it. He probably snuck over on his lunch break or some shit since it appears to be the same bar they're always at? I dunno, I haven't beaten it yet, just started to play

I don't get it either. I honestly think it's shitposting from an edgy TS group or something. Because they never have well researched or decent arguments.

I wish I could afford the collector's edition for this.

But to a wedding? Who goes to a wedding wearing a jumpsuit?

I've seen it over multiple threads, I think it might be that.

Big bang doesn't explain anything. Why was there a big bang? What was there before it? Why did it occur when it did?

This is terrible, I hope you report this to her doctor. Unless the doctor is in it too, in which case… I'm not sure who you'd have to report this too, I'd advise you to look into it.
It's like having chemo when you don't have cancer, it's fucking them up.

Fair enuff, however I'd like to give these counter-questions to you:

a) Why "god"? Surely, when there is no truth, all you can do is speculate, and surely there are hundreds of possible speculatory "answers". God is one shot in the dark as any other.
b) Do you need to know? Are you sure you 100% need to have an answer? There is nothing wrong in admitting that there are some things you don't know about.

Hell, if you asked a greek guy a few millennia ago why the sun travels through the sky he's answer you "You know, there is this Sun-Guy that pushes it around" which I assume you now know it's not true. Greek Guy had no possibility of ever knowing the truth. The other option was for him to accept that he had no idea.

Unfortunately, humans prefer to know about things rather than admit their own ignorance. It's just something we do. However, after centuries, you know have the ability to accept that some things are unknowable to us (at least for now) and that there is nothing wrong in admitting ignorance.

Also I want to make clear that I'm an Atheist, if that was not clear enough

I got it. Kinda sucks. Lost the shirt, some bitch probably stole it.
Boxers are way too small, and I'm a really skinny guy. I don't use the pillowcase cuz I wanna keep it nice, and the pizza box and artbook are…somewhere.

i assume toby is just poor as fuck

What came before it is irrelevant. That isn't the job of that theory to explain.

You obviously don't know anything except think it's an explosion and things happened. You clearly have not actually read any sort of details about it because you will find that your relevant questions would be answered.

fuck off

god isn't real

I just felt unsafe on them and that was annoying. There weren't that many though, so it wasn't as bad as the exploding ones. Those really fucked my shit up.

It took me a while to figure out the spring ones too, but when I did I liked them.

Trannies are degenerate but so is your stupid fucking mindset.
Piss off, christfags.

You know what fucked my shit up? The blocks with the mouths on them. Trying to climb the Babel level with it was a nightmare of its own.

Oh, man.

Supposedly another universe or the same one. People theorize about the big crunch occurring and which then leads to the big bang. If we're to assume that then it's been going on infinitely.

When matter ceased to exist and all matter in the universe came to a single point

Unanswered questions doesn't mean that they're an answer to a higher power rather they're just unanswered questions. Religion is faith and faith is belief in something we can not factually say tangibly exists or can be proven.

They were made for Japanese only then?

I never got past the first one

Yeah, and I really look like Vincent, so I wanted to do a cosplay, but I can't keep those boxers on for more than half an hour before I start getting hip pains.

It

LITERALLY
I
T
E
R
A
L
L
Y

does

Apparently there are is thought out that even in the case of a Big Freeze where matter and black holes evaporate and everything goes to the lowest possible energy state quantum fluctuations could become so bad as to trigger a new Big Bang.

Well, that's the thing. There aren't, or at least none that can actually hold up to questioning. The moment you start asking "why?" you're often met with "We don't really know." They aren't wholesome. Whereas, if you assume that our universe was built and designed by an intelligent entity, your questions are suddenly answered. You may not have the information about the entity itself (area of religion), but you DO have a wholesome answer to how the universe came to be - it was created ("how?" is, again, an area of religion). Even if that answer is vague, it is still better than "we just don't know".

There were also other things that tilted me towards religion (for example noticing that praying thends to shift luck in my favour), and this was more of an example of one. It alone wouldn't be neough to convince me, but with conjunction with other stuff…

If you accepted unknowing, you'd be an agnostic, however, not an atheist.

I find it more important than the event itself, for if there indeed was a big bang, and we look before it, we may find out what CAUSED the big bang (what caused the creation of our universe).

You obviously don't know anything except think it's an explosion and things happened. You clearly have not actually read any sort of details about it because you will find that your relevant questions would be answered.
Big Bang theory says that a singularity "sprang into existence" from "nothing" for "unknown reasons" and that it doesn't really precisely know what a "singularity" is. How in the ever loving fuck does that answer anything?

Who created the entity?
Why did he create this universe specifically?
Why did he generate a mathematical model that supports the BB theory?

sorry bucko, I got more questions than a chinese math test

In which case I'd want to know what started the whole cycle, as there has to be a beginning to everything. This crunch theory just pushes the start date back, but doesn't say what actually started everything

unanswered questions which could, however, be answered by a higher power. One could say that religious people simply subscribe to a different theory describing the beginning of universe than you do.

see above

Various religions answer this question (each one differently), which is why, like fifty posts ago, I asked which religion is the correct one

Thank you for showing me that you have little idea what the theory is and what it is trying to explain

You're the one who brought in the BBT in the first place. Originally, I said that there is no scientific theory that answers how our universe was born in a satisfying manner. Now you're shouting that BBT doesn't try to answer that question, so why the fuck did you bring it up in the first place?

I don't seem to recall any religion ever specifying that god was created by something else. The only one to come close to hinduism which basically states "lol because brahma" and then shuts off from there

They're no more answered than the many thousand theories that have more scientific bases for argument. A "wholesome" answer such as that is by no means superior to less religious explanations.

That's not what infinity means. There's literally no start nor will there be an end. Thus no need for a higher power.

Which is fine. But your argument that a higher power existing rather than not being more than 50/50 is bogus.

They seem answered to me, and when it comes to the matter of what I believe in, that's all that matters

The concept of there being no starting point seems absolutely nonsensical to me, I cannot see how that would be possible, and I therefore choose to subscribe to a different theory.

Except it was never an argument. I simply stated that in my case, subjectively, I found the odds to be different. That's all. It's you who made it sound as if I was trying to convert you all, when all I really did was talk about my personal religious beliefs.

Then perhaps it wasn't created at all. Perhaps it simply exists outside our frame of refference which, since it created our universe, seems entirely possible. For example, think of our universe as a small box, and of god as the guy who makes that box. Everything inside the box follows certain kinds of laws created by the guy, and contains things also defined by the guy. The guy himself is, however, not inside the box, and thus doesn't need to follow any such laws. Trying to infer anything about the guy rom the laws contained withing the box may therefore be simply impossible. Anyway, that was just my musings. I view the search for religion to be a different matter from the search of how universe works, and have started this whole derail by asking just that "Which religion is the correct one?"

As I said before, you can just accept that there are some things you won't know.

Also, Agnosticism and Atheism are not two separate things. Atheism means lack of belief, Agnosticism means lack of knowledge - I'm an Agnostic Atheist because I don't believe in God (or any other supernatural explanation) but I don't know if God exists. A Gnostic Atheist is somebody who is sure God (or other supernatural explanations) don't exist. Religious people are gnostic theists, they believe in god and they are sure it exists. An agnostic theist is somebody who believes that god exist but is not sure.

Aside from that being a loaded question, the thread ACTUALLY got derailed when you were discussing trannies. It just didn't get derailed into the way you didn't like until that point.

The only reason I'm not shouting not vidya is because the thread to begin with is a Ruga tier thread

So basically there's no reason you should be posting. If every point you're making is based off of faith and personal belief without offering room for criticism or questioning then you're not offering a single reason to continue this discussion. There shouldn't have been a reason to even start it.

I'm agnostic but you're seriously giving me reason to be happy that I'll be worm food if it means that the afterlife is full of complacently satisfied shits like you.

in that case I suppose I'd be an agnostic theist, which is kinda obvious from the odds thing. I can accept that I don't know something, but in that case, I need to at least form a belief about it. That's just how I, and I dare say most of humanity, works.

We were having a discussion just fine earlier with the religion fag, but then all you faggots jumped out of the woodworks.

Are you retarded?

...

is not a she

read St. Thomas Aquinas

despite the foolishness of the direction of the Catholic Church, I don't believe anyone can read the work of St. Aquinas and not be convinced that the Catholic bed-rock is strongest

protestants plz go

God usually kills heathens who do nasty things, are you sure you read the OT?

OT God is neither cruel or without reason, and the Jews were forsaken when they killed their messiah.

To be frank the "but OT God is cruel and unusual and does everything for no raisin, thus I can ignore the NT" is an idiot argument, and at times I suspect a Jewish one (if you haven't noticed, besides edgy atheists/pagans secular Jews hate God nearly all the time)

You cannot know God without knowing Christ ya dig

...

What I don't understand, is how people fail to realize that the contention with the Big Bang is only really a conflict between catholicism-protestant Christianity.

The Catholics believe the universe has a beginning and an end, the "Big bang" and the "fact" that the world/universe will end…does not conflict with anything the catholic church believes, and in fact bolsters it.

Only protestants are really butthurt by scientific theory because they believe in all sorts of willy-nilly things

GOD FUCKING DAMMIT I JUST WANNA TALK ABOUT VIDEO GAMES

A fetish is just arousal from something that is not normally considered sexual. The "self-destructive obsession" is an archaic definition of the term that never saw use outside the US.

You've come to the wrong place.

and stop shilling that fucking christcuck comic of yours, faggot.

TALK ABOUT VIDEO GAMES YOU FUCKING NIGGGERFAGGOT

also im gay

It's a shame. How's the pizza box?

It's a pizza box. It's small. A little bigger than personal pie size.

So, personal pizza box, really (really) tight underwear, and a pillow that's too nice to actually use. I really wanted to get it.

You could use it. The pillowcase is really soft, it feels nice.
I'm sure the stitching would wear out fast, though.

Well yeah, sure.

But neither is kek

Atlus mostly picks the neutral ending as canon in SMT, so true freedom

THE BEST

If you are denying someone pleasure on purpose they can still get off to it

Can a being who can do anything create something even they can not lift ?

long ass post, be warned

part of the 1K club on TA, and holy balls it was!
doubly so since the thing was way more brutally unforgiving and for the achievements related to it, you have to go for the secret ending to it and do another set of 64 more intense levels, and to keep this shorter, look up the list of requirements
by the time i finished everything and passed the last level of babel by co-op with myself on two controllers (360's version of Axis Mundi has an unfixable bug that starts you off at the 20-something step rate of decay and makes it impossible to finish on your own) and unlocked the ishtar secret ending as posted in , i dreamed of falling blocks too…
if you wanna feel the frustration the other sheep feel, play that game before you finish the main story and realize that the only way to beat those b4 the ending is trail and error (or you're just straight up a chessmaster robot), as you only get 5 credits to play the machine in-game (machine goes to freeplay mode after getting any ending)

tricky sitch, and multiple spoilers;
if you pay attention throughout the convos with the doods, they hint at and tease her for being a former dood too, yet they're still childhood friends, all of them, but try to protect toby as the new bro and since they can't think of erica as anything other than their ol'boy eric, yet want her to find happiness, they let them do their thing, but at some point if you talk to toby alone or thru messages, he expresses concern over the equipment "feeling off somehow" when things escalted in their relationship; this makes erica a full post-op mtf transmuchacha, which is important to take into consideration the fact that the story (catherine) has a game (rapunzel) that the presenter of the golden playhouse (ishtar/trisha aka goddess of love and fertility) would take offense at and order her former lover now low-level god of stray sheep Boss to drag those that prevent fertility and true love from happening which is what a post op tranny with a naive and unsuspecting boyfriend would be doing in the eyes of a goddess, not following the prime directive of primal man (she was basically going after MGTOW's and most of the ___-pilled non-breeders) and that can be accomplished by being a post-op trans if you think on it a bit

that's all of infinity-chan tho, we might as well as be called The Stray Sheep MK 2.0: Electric Boogaloo Revengence

metaphors for what we as doods do when given choices that can lead to extremes on either side of the spectrum such as the biblical family life bliss and hedonistic pagan pleasure society aside, there are heavy implications that kat was also cheating, most likely by fucking johnny at some point in the recent past while on the pill or wrapped up (convo's with him and the fact that she can see/feel the other catherine, gets pulled into the nightmares, which a normal, guiltless person won't be able to due to the temptational qualities inherent of succubi)

the goodies were good
the pillow gets used, but it's not a dakimura
the boxers were a US large, but felt japanese tailored, and the shirt was cool, but i think the parental decided to hijack that one since i haven't seen it for at least a year, and i had two of 'em, and the artbook/ost is slick and tasteful, the pizza box is a great stash box (double-walled, humidity & smell proof, about the size of a personal deep dish from the hut in japan) and the game is still deceptively hard to find outside of the usual suspects and the price has held pretty decently

the ricks must be crazy

ayyyeeeelmao, greetings fellow ausfag and resident of Kebab South Wales

You can also prefer professional care to romantic entanglements. Or celibacy. Or exclusively physical relationships without emotional investment.

Quirk means something, not someone.

You are reading that wrong. Some find dicks completely unarousing. It's like asking someone to jerk off while watching nothing but feet. If they can't or are unwilling, does that make them a sissy? Or rather you a foot fetishist?

My country is so retarded, i'd do a school shootout and take down a bunch of people but guns are illegal and i don't want to break the law

this pic made me look at my own feet to see if the finger count was right

...

science vs religion on how the world came to be is irrelevant since science just doesn't know and religion says "we know but we have no proof at all"

Infinite regression? Yeah there's a reason they call it The Big Bang Theory. It's just a theory that has no more proof to back it up than those who believe in a higher power and that the universe had its start a different way. Science doesn't support matter simply creating itself and expanding every which way on a whim.

soon

just like the theory of breathing air or the theory of multiplication or the theory of creationism am I right
wink wink nudge nudge