"Sir Oswald, do you now, looking back with the hindsight and knowledge of history, blame the Jews or Hitler for the Second World War?"
"I blame BOTH: Hitler for driving east, before he had got a diplomatic arrangement with us; Jews, for gradually persuading us, or the British people or government, to do absurd things which were bound to result in war. I was against both mistakes."
youtube.com
What is your opinion of these remarks, Holla Forums?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
...
bump because Mosley is underrated on Holla Forums and yes his answer is correct. Not that Germany could ever have a diplomatic arrangement with GB under the Churchill rule was impossible and the Soviet Union was about to invade Europe. There were few other choices maybe the British fascists, who almost won the elections by the way, could launch a coup on their own government
I have to add that he was one of the softest of /ourguys/
They'd never have sided with Germany. That said, countries like Poland, Czechoslovakia, even the USA perhaps, would have been more likely to side with Germany.
But Britain and France would never have sided with the Germans. It was more than just the kikes, especially as far as the French were concerned.
a weaken Germany would have been crushed even faster by the Allies and they would still push their atrocity propaganda.
You make it sound like the Allies were justified in warring with Germany they were not nor did they care about the actual situation in Germany or its people.
First time I've seen one of these in a while, have a bump OP.
France would, at least it's population
You see, this would have been possible, but the axis powers formed a barrier between the east bloc and the western nations. The Soviets had to go through either Germany or Italy in order to attack France or GB
This. There was no way that Britain under Churchill would have come to a diplomatic arrangement with Hitler. The decision to strike the Soviets was also born out of necessity. The longer Hitler waited, the more the Soviets could mobilize their economy and revitalize their officer corps after the purges. Attacking as soon as possible was the most feasible way to win, given the situation in 1941. The better way would have been if Hitler had somehow managed to diplomatically isolate the Soviets well before invading Poland. Germany vs. Russia one on one in 1939 would have been the best chance for victory. Hell, the Soviets may well have folded just like the French did if Hitler had been able to concentrate all of his resources into one well-planned blitz.
/ourknight/ Mosley
...
...
Mosley was a remarkable man and an incredibly dignified politician. Second to him was Enoch Powell. I don't think Britain will ever see the likes of this calibre of men in politics, ever again.
must watch
THERE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN A DIPLOMATIC ARRANGEMENT. HITLER OFFERED PEACE A DOZEN TIMES. THE WEST DIDN’T TAKE IT.
Such as not take peace agreements. See also: WWI
Oswald is missing vital information: that his government rejected all peace overtures because jews didn’t want peace.
Wrong video, this one is the right one
Churchill wasn't voted in until after War had already been declared.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Hitler sent Britain numerous peace treaties and agreeable terms and let Britain go numerous times as a sign of peace.
Years later Churchill goes and basically tell people, "sorry, WWII wasn't about freedom or saving kikes or anything of the sort. It was about losing the whole damn fucking empire for international finance". Fuck Britain.
Does anyone have a cited timeline of Hitler’s peace offers? I’m pretty sure I’m missing that in my WWII database.
Do you have a nigger tier IQ? Mosley was referring to the time before Britain declared war. Maybe you should attempt to study pre-war Britain and Mosley's party - before you start running your retard fingers across your filthy keyboard.
besides do you not have any burger threads to kvetch in?
Which is irrelevant, as no peace was possible.
Go suck dune coon cock, limey. Your point is irrelevant.
...
So what are you contending, that, had Germany kept to itself and invaded no other countries, Britain would have aggressively declared war on it?
What about George Lincoln Rockwell?
Absolutely correct.
That's pretty funny mate because our population is still proportionately whiter than the US population.
Non-Hispanic white Americans are already a minority in births, right? Wouldn't surprise me if you were a ethnomasochist beaner tbh lad
He was a little soft on jews, but most fascists didn't really go to Hitler's extent so I can't really fault him too much for it.
Oswald is one more Fascist that got mad Uncle Adolf couldn't cover for his weakness. At the event where British Fascists and Antifa squared off for the last time and the Fascists buckled, where the fuck was Oswald? Fascism doesn't work. The only successful Fascist ruler was Franco, and that's only because Franco had a whole military loyal to him. Fascism seems to have an innate way of failing to secure the hearts, minds, and spirit of the common person. Meanwhile, National Socialism only needed one shot to get it right.
Why would you even bother putting national socialism in a different ideological category when it's essentially just German fascism?
Probably a butthurt kraut ignorant of "the Phony war" that left us to solve shit with them personally before kraut megalomania got to them and they dared declare war on Britain.
t. summerfag
How fucking new are you? We have a rule about lurking: Do more of it, faggot.
Besides natsocs racial component explain how they'e different
This is the problem. They're so committed to their ethnicity that they'll ignore racial constitution for the sake of saying Hitler or America was wrong. They have to go to the most basest of identifiers of 'human' (very illfully defined as a negation, as "not-racial").
It fucking pisses me off. If genetics aren't relevant, then you have to be a fucking cultural supremacist. If culture isn't relevant, then you have to be a genetic supremacist. Otherwise you have NOTHING. If both matter, and only your particular/individual idea(l)s of it, then you've defined yourself by common 'evils' you refuse to talk about'. It'll cost you your balls and transgenderism into being female in order to achieve your 'equality'. And that's what's happening. The ideological end to 'equality at any cost'.
The time is coming when the hypermasculine fathers which restrain us, will be no more or too frail and they will ask what is happening or demand we do something. The silence will then be about the evils of Judaism and 'equality', and then you will see the real fruits of hatred; the Jewish hatred of the gentile. The final solution is too good for what they've sought upon our people.
Holy shit that good goy host is so fucking punchable. What is it with Britcuck TV "reporters" that makes them so irritating?
Ironically you can't even watch the video for three minutes to see why I have that view.
wew lad that's a lot of sophistry for a quote in relation to Germany trying it's best to start a cock measuring contest declaring war on all the Germanic countries, Denmark, and Poland who was the only one keeping the Boshleviks at bay while the Jewish Question, where a lot of powerful and influential jews resided in Britain obviously, went unresolved; and Britain being obsesses with order and legislature was the one who let the Treaty of Versiales go unnoticed but warned against future intrusions on Global Law which they did not respect.
Hitler paid the price for the so-called 'cock measuring contest', when he pre-emptively attacked the Russians who were readying their deployments offensively to take over Europe.
If he was willing to pay that price, really makes you think about every other country that's seemed content to let Jews run amock on their populace so they can be injected with the blood of infants to preserve their youth.
Or that he was so content in risking it all on an American blunder that let the krauts keep Gdańsk inspite of Polish annexation following their retreat from the same army they pretended to be up against, and the same army they later allied with that led Japan to withdraw all support for Hitler and refuse carrying out an attack on Russia and feed the Polish soldiers Intel which without a doubt lead to their mutual demise; all because Japan wasn't trying to mislead "anti-communism" as a hidden German dominance over Europe agenda. The only ones who ever gave a shit about fighting communism were White Russians (not to be confused with Belorussians), Poles, and Nips.
*was so content in risking it all […] for Japanese withdrawl that later dragged them into a war with America.
If Germany had attacked Russia first, France and Britain would have answered Russia's call.
Heck if Germany had defended Poland, same shit, the Germans would fought the 2 front war. The entire purpose of France and Britain (again, especially France), was isolating the Germans.
How can you think that to be plausible - that Britain and France should have invaded Poland with the Russians? That is the world-view of a lunatic. The British people cheered when Chamberlain declared that he had come back from Germany with "peace for our time." German aggression was the only thing that could possibly have provoked them into going into another world war.
Oswald Mosley was Britain's Hitler and the British government feared him for it, which is why they silenced him. He isn't wrong, but in retrospect it's easy to see the flaws that you could have done differently.
What has been swept under the rug is how anti-war the English people were at that time and how hated that traitorous pig Churchill was despised. At the end of the day Winston did his part better than the masses, silenced his opposition, and finally got Hitler to bomb the English civilians in retaliation for months long bombings by Churchill.
It's really a pointless exercise to focus on the what if's. At the end of the day the war ended exactly how it was meant to. Hitler and the Nazi's played their part. Mosley played his. Without none of what happened happening the world wide European population would not be ready to fight the final fight between Good and Evil. Light vs eternal Darkness. This is what was always meant to be. Now it's up to us to live up to and play our part. We all see that this fight is for all the marbles. Either we live or perish from this earth forever, and either which way we are victorious.
kys
Pity his son turned out to be such a cuck faggot though.
He would rather that Adolf let the UK know the bantz before he invaded the Polaks, which could have prevented the war. This isn't fucking difficult to work out.
This.
and checked
You don't understand the dynamics here. The geopolitics of the first half of the 20th century was always "keep Germany down"
I'm not saying this is as a Germaboo or anything. It could have been anyone in charge of the krauts, not just Hitler, but Germany had to be kept down and isolated. That lead the foreign policy of France and Britain for decades. Heck France nearly full turned on the Soviets and saw a rise in the far right when the Soviets began to have a closer relationship (as close as one can expect) with the Germans, allowing them to use their soil for combined arms war games and other such things. Soviets had their reasons to do that, but that France reacted so negatively shows that it wasn't about ideology.
Britain was always kike tier "balance of power" as far as the continent was concerned. They MIGHT have sided with the Germans if they saw Russian hegemony as the bigger threat.
They declared war on Britain because Britain was already bombing them.
DOUBLE DUBS CHECKED
The worst part about Churchill is that he set Britain on a path to doom not only losing the empire but he himself feared that Britishers would be replaced by shitskins. He was a big literally fat fuckup.
Maybe because Germany was de facto puppeted to Prussia who was waging war like no tomorrow against everyone including France, Austria, and Britain's now ally Denmark who's empire they have dismantled.
Not for 9 months they weren't, until Hitler used a sneak attack (again) on France.
There was never a war on Austria, they declared war on Denmark and Norway because Britain was threatening Norway as well due to iron shipping and France is shit.
Stop defending the Brits. They were the bad guys in WWII and shitters in WWI.
So what you retard.
en.wikipedia.org
Which lead to further megalomania of """"unification"""" that included the annexation of Czechoslovakia and mainly Poland that has led to WW2.
>-Hitler proposed a 16 point peace plan to avoid war and Britain refused to publish it because the British citizens would find it fair and side with Germany
>Blames Hitler or Germany
The eternal anglo, everyone.
Are you going to blame Germany for WWI too? You Americans are at fault too. All your veterans in the US and UK these days saying they fought for the wrong side these days all because Hitler turned out to be right about everything instead of ridiculous at the time where culture and tradition was at its peak in the western world and all his predictions of the future if he lost.
All your countries are lost as much as Germany and numerous others in the west through your poor decisions. Only thing I wish is I could bring back Winston Churchill himself for a day to show him modern day Britain and in particular London to rub it in his fat face he cost his people everything even their heritage and watch him die from the heart attack of all the damn shitskins mudding his precious Britannia he wanted so badly to prevent.
anyone know the song in this?
Are you fucking retarded?
Yeah because real life events can really be distiputed you gigantic fucking RETARD.
Fucking kikes.
Oh we can't forget that Churchill and the anglos sold Eastern Europe into slavery to Soviet Jewish Bolsheviks either. Good fucking job.
By the way
>Churchill campaigned to "Keep Britain White"
>Churchill admitted that Nazi Germany's crime had everything to do with pissing off (((international finance))) and being a (((Rothschild))) slave for their precious (((Bank of England))) and their slave obeys to accomplish (((The Balfour Declaration)))
Underrated post. Oswald is simply wrong here. Hitler offered peace many times and the aggressor of the war was clearly the "allies". He had nothing but respect for the brits and went out of his way time after time to avoid getting into a war with them. Keep in mind this information wasn't readily available to him, so I don't exactly blame him for believing the propaganda that was being accepted as fact through Britain.
Notice how the kike reporter pulls kikes tricks
Masonic signaling that the election was as fraud. Mosley was a fraud as well, an admitted Fabian. Another fucking actor.
Prove it.
He's a fucking Fabian, case closed. It puts everything else in perspective.
So? They also had kikes fighting for them, clearly needed all the men that'd volunteer especially if they forced Czechoslovakians to fight too.
I assumed you meant the unification before WWII. Austria when it was a major power was anything but innocent, and in fact had been attempting to force unification long before Prussia was a thing.
Checks and Poles owned land that had majority German population at the time. It's called irredentism.
And Napoleon attacking the HRE was just backlash for the French losing the Seven Years War and the Spanish Succession a century before, and the French joining WWI was backlash for the Franco-Prussian war which was a continuation of the Napoleonic Wars, and even the Seven Years War and the Spanish Succession was just a continuation of the Sun King's fuckery which was framed within the larger context of the Habsburgs vs the Valois/Bourbon dynasties.
France and the German states NEVER got along.
Brits were pure fucking Kikes.
Czechs*
?
Which wasn't a point of mine anyway, I only included them as one of the many people who were subjected to German imperialism, not some secret agenda against Germany.
No shit, and Germany owned land with Polish majority population before, its called might over right and isn't exclusive to Germany.
True but to paint it as anything but, such as "Germany was trying to liberate everyone" is nonesense.
I never said Germany was liberating anyone. But Germany was the good guy in WWII by virtue of the enemies being the kike'd Brits, the butthurt French, and the full blown actually kikes the Soviets.
I know you didn't, "such as" pertaining to a lot of common thought around here.
They were, but they put personal reasons above "the cause" and let's not forget that. I'd comment "stupidly ambitious" but who wasn't in that era.