Political Simulator

filteries.com/
What is yours?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=adV8-_hgL4g
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

...

I don't like it.

It's says I'm a crappie.
there is no option to abolished property all land goods owned by no one used and shared by everyone.

I'm a transhumanist and what is this.

yeah, but to be fair your choices are the same an ancap would choose

Not really. An an-cap could favor allowing homosexuals to be homos on their own property while favoring a societal consensus that prohibits them from acting on it where the consequences for violating the social standards are economic/social ostracism, not violence. Since this only allows you to advocate a violent response, it's hard for an-caps to answer if they favor non-violence from the government but wouldn't want convenience stores to be able to be profitable while selling hard drugs.

am I suppowed to move them to the right or left?

nevermind

i am an idiot

yeah that is usually the case.

None of this fits a communist position. All of these things are completely irrelevant post-money, property and state society.

Nice quads mate.

I dunno mate, I would like to seeing an "An"cap take the test, also seeing an Ancom and an Egoist take the test would be neat.

I don't like the test itself but it's interesting. I got socialist monarchy. :^)

Post them choices lad

Egoist here. When you turn all the laws against fun off (strictly "so to speak") it calls you an ancrap.

It's fucking impossible to make ancomistan

...

...

...

wew lad.

You faggots just need to git gud.

My choices

Ancomistan would not have racism so it wouldn't need affirmative action

Where's the secret "spooks!" button to grant the unique-one boost?

Charge yer phone mate.

K
I will trust ye this time.

Equal benefits aren't the same as affirmative action.

Already on it

oh shit we did it lads

I messed up, I accidentally put it one spot over

Supposed to be equal rights and benefits to minorities

...

It's all kinds of fucked

By state I assume they just mean society in general because it's a decentralized society

It's a state ran through decentralized direct democracy. It's fucking anarchism. Just don't call it a state like you guys usually do.

...

dumb duck

.

the good stuff

inaccurate test

reeeeee

Hello fellow communists.

...

Hurrrr

noice

What would you prefer over a state to enforce the revolution? Vigilante justice? Because otherwise you're just forming a state and not calling it that.

“Immediately after established governments have been overthrown, communes will have to reorganise themselves along revolutionary lines … In order to defend the revolution, their volunteers will at the same time form a communal militia. But no commune can defend itself in isolation. So it will be necessary to radiate revolution outward, to raise all of its neighbouring communes in revolt … and to federate with them for common defence.”

“the Alliance of all labour associations … will constitute the Commune … there will be a standing federation of the barricades and a Revolutionary Communal Council … [made up of] delegates … invested with binding mandates and accountable and revocable at all times … all provinces, communes and associations … [will] delegate deputies to an agreed place of assembly (all … invested with binding mandated and accountable and subject to recall), in order to found the federation of insurgent associations, communes and provinces … and to organise a revolutionary force with the capacity of defeating the reaction … it is through the very act of extrapolation and organisation of the Revolution with an eye to the mutual defences of insurgent areas that the universality of the Revolution … will emerge triumphant.”

So you form a state and don't call it that, basically?

Every single person within these communes and alliances have their say and direct control in the organizations they form. There is not a single group of people calling the shots from above, but everyone having all of their say in the decisions. If you want to just call 'making decisions' a state than you can go fuck yourself.

BIG SISTER IS WATCHING YOU

So you're saying that the communes and alliances would have power over the bourgeoisie when redistributing the wealth? Then it's a state, even if it's the common man ruling over the former elite. Even if you want to give the elite suffrage after redistributing their property, you're still going to need to oppress them while you're doing the actual redistribution, hence you need a state.

WHAT A NICE FUCKING MEME

Go home, Kim! You're drunk!

gave me a hearty chuckle

Get a load of this ultragaylord

we don't have gays here, only metrosexuals

...

my niggas


That's a lot of adjectives there, partner

Fuhrer will have a shit fit if I get blood on my uniform

No wonder he killed himself when the soviets killed almost every german men and raped every german women

Not only the uniforms got bloody, but also the dresses :>}

Dear diary,

It has been 71 years since our defeat, and he still brings it up at every opportunity. I'm beginning to lose hope.

Lmao

Arent you supposed to bring arguments that help your cause

Nothing changes the fact that the original Not Socialists lost.

Final victory is still within sight, but it was significantly set back.

Unfortunately, history didn't tell us the flaws of Not Socialism in isolation, it was snuffed out by hoards of capitalist hedonists and misled communists.

Oportunistic egoists clinging at your "movement" will make it fail harder than ever before

Read hegel

Opportunistic egoists?

i.e. Trump

Ah.

I appreciate your concern. I personally see Trump as little more than a postponing of the (currently) encroaching destruction of the white race. I think some of my fellow fashies think he's "Fuhrer 2." They're just as ill-informed as the souls on here who thought Obama was going to sponsor a revolution.

youtube.com/watch?v=adV8-_hgL4g

Have a good night, pirate comrade

What do I kill myself with?

socialism and communism

Just because I do not support the actual liberal rethoric against muh privilege whites doesnt mean I am one of you roaches

Roach referring to which ideology?

Nazis aren't usually accepted here, and seldom use the term "comrade." I assumed you were a communist. Was I wrong?

the term comrade isn't for communists, it is
between communists.

Like how you don't called blacks niggers but they call each other niggers.

To fascism?

Not really, I just like the idea of a post-work, post- property society, I will support whichever ideology takes us there

I call niggers niggers

Write the complete sentence

Nah, I'm a big guy for you, niggers don't attack people who are bigger than they are

I agree with them on women.

A big guy that can't get laid?

...

Another delusion NotSoc going on about an unobtainable goal.

This thing is garbage tbh. It acts as if the only options for ownership or anything are private for-profit or state (for-profit?), and that the reason we can't have bennies for all is because of scarcity rather than political choice.

How about no absentee ownership at all and everyone benefits collectively from the abundance of industrial production?

All these tests are politically-illiterate garbage and should be banned from this board.

fix

...

Liberal propaganda

????
no option for autocracy

git gud scrub

muh technocracy

everyone whos a citizen is part of the state
like a really shitty family that pools money together

...

You don't need a special political simulator, the whole of reality has already become a mere simulation of politics. You filthy larpers.


If it can't be measured it doesn't exist :^)

What is your resistance quotient, comrades? Which apps can help me increase it?

but were still playing the simulation out, so it still exists and functions

it only stops when it stops

I'm trying to get feudalism, but this is all I got.
1/2

You aren't even a NotSoc.

2/2

...

big surprise

Whites onry

88%

...

...

How does one get this?

...

literal special snowflake syndrome

Like a 21st century communist revolution?

Do you have anymore ducks?

what a loser

...

i think i broke it.

The only correct answer