Monarchy in North America

Okay Holla Forums, I believe it time we faced reality.

We aren't saving the American Republic and frankly there really isn't much worth left saving even if it were possible.

I mean why should we? So that white Boomer Cucks can applaud Illegal Spics choking out an White American Nationalist?

The goal of the Constitution was to "secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity" and this clearly didn't mean Muslims, Mexicans, and any nonwhite who happen to find himself which is now apparently the only things that our government actually is fighting for.

The Constitution is failed concept.

The fact is the U.S. exists to secure the existence of Jewish banksters and a future for shitskin slave children. The only rational conclusion is that political ideology behind the U.S. Constitution is Free Mason dogshit and anyone defending it needs to be gassed.

I suggest we create a new kind of Monarchy that retains the one positive element of the American system while returning a more natural traditionalist form of government.

Historically, as I understand it and EuroFags please feel to tell me how ignorant I am as a American, the weaknesses of monarchy are 2 fold the problem transition between a good monarch to a poor and unfit direct descent of the King or a military conflict resulting contesting claims to the throne upon the death of the monarch.

I don't have figured out of the details but my idea is that we can have a election system of voting by male citizens with children and veterans with children elect a member of the Royal family as an Executive Monarch every 10 years and several top position 5 branches of government being 1. Legislative 2. Judicial 3. Technocratic (Scientific/Technological Research&Publishing) 4. Financial 5. Military.

The Monarch then selects people to lesser position in those branches from a body of candidates determine via Chinese style Imperial Exams along Genetic and Medical Testing that create a meritocratic Aristocracy.

The Royal Family is only permitted to marry those from an elite from this Aristocracy.

So can this kind of hybrid system work?

Popular Elections to settle the rivalry system of monarchy rather than assassinations, civil wars, etc…

Come up with a better system…

We shall meme an Kekistani Royal Imperium in existence and crush our enemies.
It avoids the problem strictly popular "democracy" where any idiot can

checked
don't use that
a monarchy basically needs to depend on its people if the monarch can rule without eugnifying them it becomes a despotism

Monarchy harvests degenerates, just look at the angloshits.

It would have to be centered on a truly magnetic personality with immense depth of fame, intellect and capacity. So like Oswald Mosley, but not long dead.


Good fucking luck.

I believe Barron will be the first king of Amerika.

eat shit, summer fag op

Your alternative will fail too when Jews inevitably get their claws into it. And no, it doesn't matter how explicit your ban on Jews would be. You think Jews get into power through playing by the rules? TOP KEK. As always, all perceived faults in a system will go away when the Jews go away.

Gay thread, but I think hijacking it to figure out a new system of government wouldn't hurt. Hell, could be fun.


Not a bad start, but I would make a 6th branch being 6. Culture. As a country we need a way to maintain traditions and advance them without allowing them to be corrupted into degeneracy. We also need to be more unified as a country. Currently America has gotten rid of most of the little culture they had in the first place.

state cultural organizations get hijacked like the bbc in the uk or cbc in canada, pbs and npr even though they aren't directly controlled

ck'd. Culture must be free market.

you might as well say we should have an economy that runs on unicorn farts and angel tears. How do you plan to establish a monarchy in the U.S.? and if you reply "with a revolution", then fuck off back to cuckchan with your lamebrained idea of "discussion".

Technically OP could convert richfags into doing it but since they (((richfags))) it will be shit.

Of the three stages of Rome, my least favorite.

I prefer Republicanism or Imperium.


What could go wrong?

Ethnocentrically-Nationalistic
+ Ethnocentric Governance
+ Homogenous (European) Population
+ Miscegenation Laws at Borders; no need within interior (no non-Europeans)
+ Ethnically European immigration only; limited work or travel visas in border zones


Authoritarian
+ Government oversight of media, education and economy
+ Media: Limited censorship
=> Benefit-Based (ex. positive portrayal of fags = no benefit, removed)
+ Education: Instill national and ethnic pride, sense of duty to self, kin and nation
=> Youth outreach programs (scouts), supportive media
=> Address ALL material, in educational format (covering flaws)
=> Basic biological education course at 13; no 'sex ed'
+ Economy: National Socialist principles
=> No interest-based lending
=> Government oversight of industry (benefit-based investment)

Meritocratic Constitutional Republic
+ Constitution dictating basic foundations of nation-state, goverance
+ Off-World Expansion to Uninhabited Areas: Foundational column
+ Strictly enforced representative term of service limitations
+ Representative selection meritocratically-driven according to pre-determined (unalterable) factors
- Baseline Inherent Trait Requirement
=> Must be ethnically European
=> Must be male, or a mother of 3+ children to a single father (adult, living)
=> Minimum IQ 115
=> Must have franchise
=> Must be 40 or older
- Military/Service Record
- Education/Accomplishment(Contribution-Based)
-


- Strict Amendment Limitations
+ Time Required For Amendment
=> 10 years from introduction (?)
=> After 10 years, examined
-> If not passed, 10 year period must pass before reintroduction
+ 9/10ths Majority required to Amend


- Limited Franchise
+ Hazardous Service
=> Military
- Traditional Military Service, Off-World Expansion
=> Non-Military
- High-Risk; Testing, Research, Frontier Off-World Expansion
=> Anyone can serve; position variable
=> Position determined based upon physical/psychological requirements
+ Innate Male Preference
=> Phys/psych requirements on male baseline


- National-Socialist Economic Principles
+ Initially Implemented
+ Variable Time Frame, Based Upon Success

What is the basis of currency?

There is literally nothing wrong with the Constitution. Just restrict the franchise to white men like it was intended and everything will be alright. If its all white its alright.

Ehhhhhhhhh… Constitution has some issues that could be adjusted. Of course, that still implies a constitutional republic orientation, and that's… The appeal of that is variable, tbh fam.

Let's just blame the Irish again

Fucking potato niggers

We must reclaim the term "Amerykan".

America was not named for Amerigo Vespucci.

It was named for the British venture capitalist Richard Ameryk, who financed the exploration of the northern part of the New World, sending explorer John Cabot in 1497 to what is now Newfoundland. The founding Americans were British people who were displaced by emerging industrialization and religious conflicts. The founding fathers were largely deists who rejected religions. The Puritans were only a small group of religious people, while the larger English and Scottish population were agnostic. Moreover, they came here not to escape religious persecution, but to ignore religion and be conquerors of a land that was sparsely populated.

Also, Indians were not killed by European smallpox, they had a near-extinction event a few centuries prior to Amerykan conquest.

The most important thing is not to make a new government, but to properly define the origin of the nation.

You're on the right track in the wrong direction.

We should be figuring out ways to rework what we have into something unsubvertable with traditionalism hard coded into it and unable to be removed.

Garbage
Good Idea, but that MUST be applied to every branch of the new government ( including the head of state, aka your new king)

You're in for a bad time if you think popular elections can fix shit in the first place in CURRENT YEAR + 3

You can't be serious

...

Like how our forefathers originally set it up as?
We'd have to rid the corruption already embedded in our soil to go anywhere with this.

It's not infallible if it's already failed.

We need more safeguards, especially for more modern freedoms like anything associated with the internet.

Vinland
Vestheim

European here.
German, to be exact.
Living near Aachen, former residency of Charlemagne, etc.

I'll keep it brief.
((( Monarchy )))

Simply say no.
They have always been traitors and will forever be traitors.
Especially if they're Christian, which they pretty much all are.

Alright, Habsburg, for example.

Yeah, so?
I know.
But if you're lucky some other Deutschbag will watch this and transscribe it for you.

You cannot ask other Burgers about this anyway, because they were probably not even born in Europe.

So yeah.
Anyway.
Don't.
Don't do monarchs.

Grandpa proverb.
(The swedish King is lit mad, they should have bloted him)