He's wrong, right?

He's wrong, right?

It is not I that placed the contradictions of capitalism within capitalism.

Replacing the thing does not require or involve any particular subjective moral imperative or framework, if anything it is one process among the many processes that we collectively call history.

He is an idiot.

wew

the critique of capitalism isn't based on moral imperatives tho

It should be clear from certain vocabulary where and how this person derives their shit "understanding" of a competing philosophy, and with what bias shapes their anecdotes when presented.

You don't think people have tried?

I'm more offended by the use of 'utopia'/ I think socialism would be more efficient and better for more people, but I don't see it as a perfect world. I don't see the utopia of capitalism anywhere, either.

Capitalism has been tried, too, and it's still failing to provide decent lives to most of the population.

...

socialism isn't something that you "try" any more than a combustion engine is something to "try"

either you have a working engine or you don't. if you don't have the materials or expertise to build one then you don't just throw a bunch of stuff together and say "well, we tried combustion!" and just like an engine if the requisite parts aren't all functioning and the engine doesn't work it would be ridiculous to say that "combustion failed."

so no socialism hasn't been "tried"

You can try to build a combustion engine and fail.

You can try to build socialism and fail.

Missing user's point. Do you blame the failure then on the combustion engine itself?

Or the failure on socialism itself?

In spite of the fact that in both cases they have failed to constitute even what counts for the achievement of the concepts?

This.

Marxism doesn't derive from economics, it derives from dialectical materialism if anything.

Top meme lad

...

I'm not blaming the idea of socialism on the failure to achieve it. I'm saying people tried to achieve it.

The word 'try' could mean either given an adequate run before stopping, or attempting to give it a run and failing. I'm talking about the latter and I guess you are talking about the former. Now that we realise this there's no reason to disagree.

your brain is so rotted by the internet all you can do is think in memes

Okay, user. Let's kiss ( ˘ ³˘)

Kill yourself, tumblrtard

I don't even have to read it to know he's wrong.
America is a nation of illiterates and should be nuked to the ground.

el oh el

spooks
politics 101 tbh, not my problem if you can't into effective strategy because of "muh argument purity" which Holla Forums doesnt have anything of
Not an argument, its basically "well its technically a position I cant argue against but you look ugly so I will call you a cunt and pretend like its an argument"

Yes

Also

Pure idiocy.