Honestly, I've given up on them. The roadblock I keep running into is the fact that they seem to have this idea burned into their minds, that homicide and mass murder are these things that only happen in films and novels, and they don't have to worry about it happening to them.
Also
Signed. Read up on nuclear fusion and explain that to them in a few sentences.
And if they're receptive to anything on race, remind them that excessive third world populations, in third world countries, but also in second- and first world countries are a primary cause of pollution - if not the primary cause - including CO2 emissions for several reasons.
That'll open them up for redpilling on foreign aid. Start off reminding them (while still operating under 'one race, the human race') that humans are animals. Remind them of the basics of ecology. A population of any animal will grow exponentially for as long as it has the food source to support it and there is no similarly growing population of predators to take care of them. If a population of animals, whether by the hands of humans or those of other animals - isn't killed off in masses, the only natural mechanism that regulates their population is, and always has been starvation - often together with child mortality. The more food you send to a third world country, the more they multiply through overreproduction and lack of child mortality. The more they multiply, the more of them are there, they soon shoot beyond what the current amount of food you send them allows fore and they are starving again. And because it is a dynamic that happens across a large population and not consciously, the overshoot of people is not a flat value, but a percentage of the population. The only flat value at any given time is the population itself. Meaning the more food you send, the larger the population, the larger the population, the larger the population overshoot. The larger the population overshoot, the more people are starving (or killing each other because not doing so would result in starving). And just sending people from that country to another country, merely causes the current population to be artificially lowered a bit, which by the nature of how population growth works, keeps the population below the threshold, thus accelerates population growth and thus causes even more starvation.
TL:DR: Sending food to a third world country doesn't combat starvation, but causes more of it.
If googling 'Myth of foreign aid' and reading up the results you get isn't enough, tell them to try youtube.com/watch?v=gxL9qJ3RnEY , maybe a nigger can make them listen
Also tell them to put their morals aside. They chose to abandon those with christian moral values. Especially if they're not afraid of Wahabi Islam. If they are so open to Muslims, they have embraced cultural relativism. Hold them to their self-chosen principles. Cultural relativism means that morals as a genuine guiding factor are nil. Once they have done that, paint them a picture. Picture the entire African population gone. All of Africa being empty save for wildlife (wildlife not including niggers of course). So much area open to be put to use. All the cities gone, all the destroyed empty property gone, all the broken facilities gone, all the villages gone, everything gone. Imagine all this area (or at least most of it) being put to use by small human (AKA white) enclaves to cultivate masses and masses of biofuel. Any fears of CO2 emissions would be banished, masses of oil and thus foreign wars that use it to justify themselves would become obsolete, and starvation in Africa would end overnight (since there is no-one that's starving). Imagine being able to drive your car endlessly, and not having to worry the least bit for a moment about polluting or wasting fossil resources, like we do now.