When you realize WW1 Ally Propaganda Shills are still at it

Surely you must have some reason for saying "monarchy sucks". Please let us hear your reasoning.

Wonder Woman is actually the reason why I made this thread in the first place.

Monarchy is for faggots. I'm American, not British. No taxation without representation. Fuck the King.

user, please.

his brain has been melted by memes

lol, my favorite part of the last year is expecting the retards here who can't produce an argument to actually be able to put together a working political system with their top tier cognitive abilities.

Yup. Unfortunetly our board culture contributed a lot to that, ever since the election started.

I bet the average IQ dropped a lot since then.

Just remember a lot of the Plebs in here are just footsoldiers and base supporters. The real thinking have to be done by others.

What does "represent" even mean any more? What did it ever really mean?

It doesn't mean anything. Even in democracies your """representatives" have the UNIQUE privilege to be immune of any fraud charges.

Any other representative who lies about his promises in an organization as beneign as a pet association, would get charged for that behavior.

But it's not even common place that politicans lie, their immunity of fraud charges is often hand-waved that the simple act of putting an X on their or a party's name would somehow "make it all right".

Fact is, there are no democracies in the world. People who want democracies or like democratic ideals get brainwashed into supporting "modern western democracies".

That's why you and I should be libertarian.

Can you read?

...

I challenge you to act like you agree with me.

Why would someone want to act like a retard?

Why?

Also you didn't read all that in less than 1 minute and 20 seconds, autist.

how is monarchy better than a dictatorship or democracy? instead of a stupid population that fucks things up you can just have one stupid guy that fucks things up. you have autistic examples of both.

I thought we were supposed to gas our oppressive "representation" and install a Führer in its place?

I knew the second pic already.

People who can argue for a side they don't agree with are intelligent.

The one guy in charge may be wise or may be stupid. The masses are always stupid.

I think attempting to make the masses wise would've been a good move but the mechanisms we used to put that into motion became corrupted almost the moment they were created.

Same argument used to make Immigrants from the third world equal to the natives.

We need more schools, better education. We need to give them more money to make them equal to us. :(
Oh no. D:
Why isn't this working!!!

YOU TAXPAYER!!! You aren't libertarian, are you? You don't want to limit our power.

You: "N-no sir."

Well good, we need to spend more money. Here have our media-clery tell you why:

"Insert Appeal to your sense of Humanity/Social Justice/Nationalism/"

KNOW PAY UP OR I AM GOING TO SHOOT YOU!!!!

I love how obvious it is that you aren't from here with every post you make.

Nah.

A dictator does not neccesarily have a vested interest in the prosperity of the nation.
Democracy is 'rule of the idiot masses' and there is no central seat of power

Monarchy forces the power unto a person who is bred to rule from birth (thus experience and education around it) and have a vested interest in the prosperity of the nation as his power transfers to his children and his children's children. And since the seat of power is focused on a single person, if that single monarch steps out of line and starts fucking around with the nation then the people can kill just one person and get a better monarch.

Basically monarchy is very simple, efficient, rather safe and is tried and true. The negatives towards monarchy are mostly based in modern values of "but muh vote"… and there really is nothing that says a king can't let the people vote for things if he decides as much.

I've been here for 2 years.

I like you less now, user.

That is not an argument. It's a statement of fact about representative democracies. If a monarchist were to make a similar "argument" it would be "a king is father to his people." That's not an argument for monarchy; it's a statement of fact about life under monarchy. An actual argument for a representative democracy based on taxation would be "Only the people have the right to tax themselves; any other system is theft by one authority upon another." This is a faulty argument that is easily countered, but at least it's an argument.

If you really get into it, I think you'll find that the arguments for representative democracies only hold in homogeneous poplations with shared genetics and culture.

Making the masses wise and making the masses give a fuck about politics are two separate things. And there is absolutely no way to make the masses actually interested and invested in politics without using threats of physical or monetary description.

In short: You cannot have educated voters and if you tried it would be as artificial and unnatural as communism and still lead to people only pretending to care. Its not "normal" to care about politics. Human beings just want to live safe and secure lives and they don't want to think about things like politics. Anything based in voting is based in trusting the dumbest person you meet to make the smartest decisions.

I never stated it was an argument.

National monarchy supported by local aristocracies seems to be the best system.

lolbergs: when will they learn

They don't, because they have autism.

Nobody likes to argue with retards that force the entire world to be just like them. And they aren't fascists or ebil nutzis.

This. The elites can do whatever the fuck they want, as long as they don't abuse the masses. Machiavelli stated this directly in his book.
Any system can work, as long as the masses have most of the rights they did have in before the 20th century, or more specifically, before the NWO post 1945 (how ironic). They also need to be educated on how to watch over the basic rights they have (or bestowed upon them by men willing to die for those) and ethnic nationalism.
Personally, I think the Third Reich is the perfect system for the masses in lands with rich history and high population. You have a benevolent states guiding the youth into being tradesmen and soldiers (more productive than having them turning into nu male students). For the over achievers, a modification of Pre Civil War USA is probably better.

You mean what the anglo scum and french retards tried to rid the world of after their "enlightenment"? Daily reminder that the "enlightentment" philosophical direction was toward the republic instead of the empire. And the republic was like the democracy in Greece before the turks fucked them six ways til modern days.

bolshekpedia is awful , do normies still take it srs?

Actually, libertarianism CAN work. I am afraid I can't do the argument justice here since I would just be paraphrasing what a thread discussed long ago. Basically, it was that a libertarian society would work if the entirety of the populace was white. No Jews or Muslims allowed. It was a good thread.

Because murrica wasn't 99.9999% huhwhite when the kike loving capitalists started to fuck it, right?

Kill yourself 4cuck. But yes they do, they always think it's a 100% valid thing.

sure fam

Are you implying that the 'kike loving capitalists' did what they did of their own accord? They were influenced one way or another by kikes. What we know as America died when Woodrow Wilson was put in power.

It's an interesting theory worth giving a try (on a small scale, first)

...

To discredit a republic you don't even have to look far into history, you can bring up a recent example; America.

Republic-ism will always lead to democracy, which will always lead to the death of a nation.

To the mind of most lolbergs here, 60% huhwhite (the original citizens of the nation, and the statistics were released by ZOG itself) is not too bad yet. Until the days water stop running and nigger and spic gangs overwhelm the entire country, they won't listen.
But I do think they know what's up, but they are too autistic to see that.
Nothing wrong with this, of course. The way they do mental acrobatic about it is the problem though.

in theory it can, not in reality, but never mind about that

100 years and 200 million deaths later…

Realize that WW1 killed three traditionalist, well ordered and noble empires - The German, the Austro-Hungarian, and the Russian.

Realize that the AH emperor Franz Joseph was beloved by all his people from Austria to Poland to Hungary to Croatia, and that the disgruntled Slavs went to war purely because they were MEN who believed in HONOR and DUTY to their emperor, whom they regarded as something of a father.

Realize that Franz Ferdinand wanted to reorganize the empire, which would make Croatia the third kingdom and grant all Slavs a greater influence and more importantly the right for cultural representation and preservation of their languages. Realize that this would've solved the only issue AH was facing. Realize that in one form or another, under different names and political ordering the Austrian empire lasted for more than a thousand years.

Realize that tzar Nicholas II, though a weak monarch, was a decent human being who loved his children and his country and did the best he could under horrendous pressures and circumstances. Realize that Romanov Russia was a great enemy of the Jews since ancient times, and that the Romanov's were butchered by the (((communists))).

It was all a war against Tradition, against divine order, against the beating, living heart of true Europe (AH & Germany) that was assaulted not only by the republican vermin of France and mercantile classes of Britain, but that it was also those two forces that threw all their niggers, Arabs, Indians and who-knows-what-elses into the war against white men, white culture and white civilization.

I have no hate for the French, the least of which the true French soldier, nor do I hate the Brit - but they were tools of the Jews and forces less nameable. The moment they outlived their usefulness they were destroyed and never recovered. The parasite then transplanted itself into the USA…

One of the strongest arguments in favor of free markets actually applies to Monarchy. When a person owns something they have a tendency to take better care of it. Under a democracy basically no one owns anything, not even the leaders, so there's a lack of responsibility; but a king's kingdom is solely his responsibility, and its condition will reflect upon him, thus his best interest is in seeing his kingdom do well.

Hitler knew responsibility was essential to a functioning government, and made sure that every department was headed by one person to whom credit or blame would largely fall, ensuring that only the competent dare risk their reputation and well being in a critical position.

They were retards and deserve punishment and eternal infamy. What are you, a cuck? The mistakes can't be repeated or it will be the end of us all.

Sorry, but fall of these three empires gave independence to most of Europe.
I mourn Austria-Hungary because they had the most benevolent mode of working with other nationalities, but none of these empires was viable long term with the ethnic tensions as they were.

The Jews took over the USA when they got hold of the Federal Reserve, bought up the major newspapers and began agitating for WW I. "Beat back the Hun." Was their slogan.

Again I want to stress that a person usually wants the best for their children as well. So if you own something you know your children will inherit then obviously you want to take even better care of it. Hereditary rule is just another way to make your rulers desire the success of their own nation.

1795
Never forget
Never forgive

That wasn't my point. The hardcore capitalists treated their own people like shit before the official takeover like you say.
Somebody needs to be in charge to kick some ass. That's the only way of governance.

It's my understanding that the goal, and perhaps natural development of a racially and ideologically homogenous nation is libertarian, because a people that understand each other, and work together for the benefit of their nation will necessarily have high trust. The need for policing in such an environment would be very low, and perhaps would even be done locally without much state involvement.

Evidence throughout history that not all races can achieve this, though. I think libertarianism is an ideal achievable only to the highest quality people.

Very good point.

autism

It is just another deluded retard. To the like of his, the entire universe is actually an ancap system. That is how they rationalize every thing. Just shitpost them out of Holla Forums. They don't deserve our time.

What exactly is wrong with that statement? We were agreeing on the merits of monarchy a minute ago; surely you can give me enough respect to actually argue a point rather than "shitpost me out of Holla Forums" (been here since the beginning, faggots).

What's the point of National Socialism if not to create the conditions that allow a people to live free?

Because you are just a deluded douchebag. Here is the truth, most of the guys here who have the will, determination, honor and courage to pick up a gun in the coming war HATE basement philosophers like you. We HATE you. Everything bad that has befallen us since the "enlightenment" was because of your kind, douchebag, pompous, karl marx like trust fund kiddies.
This time, we are putting an end to it. No more blood of good men for your utopia.

not lolbergturdians
autism

England always has these really ridicules claims about Germany

Nobody can achieve it because it's self-defeating and suicidal. Whites had as close to libertarianism as anyone will ever get, and what is the result? The race is facing extinction.

Individualism is a civilization wrecking disease.

The republic has been shit from day 1

You mean the "The Great War" guy on youtube? He's still at it.
youtube.com/user/TheGreatWar

It's an ambitious undertaking; it's a shame that it's tarnished by being so cucked. The guy is a swede, no surprise. I watched a few dozen episodes and tolerated the war propaganda for a while, but he just wouldn't lay off the moralizing tone.
>guise srsrly, war sucks. let me tell you that war sucks for half of this episode for the 10th week in a row.
He's the worst sort of broken record, a moralizing broken record. Also the guy hates Austria-Hungary even more than he hates Germany, which is curious.

All of those legitimate arguments in favor of monarchy did not apply to British royal rule of America. If monarchy is good for a nation, it must be it's own monarchy. Not a foreign monarchy that doesn't give a damn.

Why are you tolerating falsehood? He and muh based guns jeebus are the reason most gun owners in the anglosphere still want to kill Germans.

You guys really don't understand what I'm saying at all. I'm not a libertarian, I'm a gun toting nationalist with pride and allegiance to my (white) race. I want the best for my people, and I understand it can only be achieved via methods outlined by Hitler himself.

What I'm saying in regards to a libertarian ideal is that it is the reward in the minds of many for achieving dominance and freedom from the subversion of other cultures is a culture in which you are finally free.

(checked)
However, I agree with you. It's like Hitler said: "In eternal battle mankind will find greatness. In eternal peace it will find destruction."

So, basically, we need enemies, and we need to cultivate the love of battle in our culture.

What were they to do? Turn on their computer, go to Holla Forums, and learn the truth about the world? Few if any of these men had the opportunity to ever learn the full truth about the world.

There were more kike haters back then than now. Your excuse was a pretty shitty one. Ok, maybe WW1 was unavoidable. But WW2? Millions of retards went against the wish of the veteran fathers to gain "glory", despise their warning that they are not fighting for muh freedom half way around the world. Some cucks killed themselves for not being able to join ZOG. What the fuck was that about?

Until you realize that pretty much all monarchs in Europe used jews to circumvent usury laws because the monarchs were (((Christian))).

Then stop being autistic and say what you mean without jumping through the hoops you claim to be. Claiming "NO, YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND! I AM CORRECT" doesn't mean jack shit sperglord.

but him hating the great war is a good thing

This is an accaptable answer. The typical response from burgerland of "monarchy sucks" XD is retarded. Washington should of maned up and been king.

And telling people what ebil fascists Germans were, too?

Forgotten Weapons is hardly political. And for every cucked statement Ian makes on InRange (a small and ultimately irrelevant channel), Karl makes a one contrary. Ian's impact on the Anglo gun-owning political zeitgeist is damn near non-existent.

W.R.T the great war cuck, I don't tolerate him. I stopped watching him years ago. I gave him a chance, perhaps too many chances, but I no longer tolerate him. The assertion that he's responsible for modern anti-German sentiment is still absurd however. He certainly has a great deal more blame than Ian for that, but even so his channel has less than a million subscribers. That's enough to have an impact, but it's a minor one. Decades of (((television))), (((hollywood))) and (((school teachers))) hold the overwhelming majority of responsibility for anti-german sentiment. Indy Nidel or whatever the fuck his name is is throwing a bic lighter onto a raging bonfire.

And they knew less about international jewry than we do today. Their knowledge of contemporary politics was fleeting at best. They hated jews, but what could they know of history or their modern situation? They could go to libraries, if a good library was in their community, and if they had time, but how many relevant books where there for every man in their nation? Not enough books to go around, that's for sure. Even if every Frenchmen were attempting to read as much as they could to inform themselves of their current situation, it would have been impossible to inform enough to make a difference.

The soldiers of WWII have much less of an excuse, since the jewish nature of that war was far more overt. That time, anybody could see that Germany was standing against the jews.

I said what I meant from the outset. Read more, faggot.

Like there is anything wrong with that.

Autism

The US is not a democracy, you cocksucking faggot kike.

he didnt tho

he did call out british war propaganda

Of course WW1 shills are still active; if the lies of WW1 were exposed, then so too would the subsequent lies surrounding WW2 and the post-war NWO. Why do you think they decided to make the Wonder Woman movie take place during WW1? To distract people from the horrible truth of the conflict with overly simplistic cape shit.

The US was a mistake and its cultural influence has turned Europe to shit.

Illiterate.

Hating that war is fine. Taking a moralizing tone every fucking episode is obnoxious. And hating Germans is not fine.

If you want to learn about why that war was awful, read Storm of Steel or All Quiet on the Western Front instead. (I'd recommend the former over the latter, but both have a unique perspective.)

But not eternally lost to the 'tism

...

Now we have the opposite problem: sensory overload. How many people are really going to dive into the material we consider essential? I guess that's what we meme for. Easy digestion through comedy.

Exactly right. We're awash in information, the only chance we have to break through is to meme as hard as we can.

Why the fuck are you here if you think so lowly of this board?

What kills me is that even if one takes the yarn court historians spin at face value, the world would be a great place compared with what it is today.

I watched the 3 prelude to war episodes on that channel. And it was rather interesting to see all that mess interconnecting in various countries to create a condition for war. But if you say that this guy cucked, I have to believe you. So are there any books about this pre-war stuff that are fairly red-pilled for the most part? Like including the pan-slavism efforts in the Balkans which were supported by Russia and forcing the Ottomans out of that region, etc?

Actually, the NS opened academic education for poor people. Before the NS the level of your education was determined by the wealth of your parents. Education was made gratis by NS, schoolbooks were free and talented but poor students got stipends.
NS was not egalitarian but a meritocracy.

Don't despair, your wishes will be fulfilled, that is exactly were the NWO is steering to, neo-feudalism.

He was a greedy idiot who arranged the murder of Franz-Ferdinand by Serbian proxy just to push Russian borders to the Mediterranean and North-Sea. In the end he and his family were killed not before plunging millions of Russians into misery.

Russia is the main culprit of world war one.

Without Russia the war would have petered out quite fast.

True words, but without Russian greed and backstabbing, they undermined and plotted against Austria for decades before the outbreak of the war, the Tzar family would be still alive along with the descendents of millions of people murdered by the Jewish Bolshevik in central and eastern Europe.
German governed prewar Central-Europe enjoyed a decent to high quality of life, equal or better to anywhere in the world. They lost hundred years of development and some, many place have not recovered yet.

Haiti
We wuz kangz
The Germans didn't enslave other people, destroy their culture (former prime minister Michel Rocard braged to the US ambasador how France was created by destroying five cultures ) nor did they massacre them wholesale like the Brits (30% of the Irish).

It's not internationalism, it's Imperium. Internationalism seeks to erode the differences between nation-states and unify them into one monolithic entity. Imperium is a collection of distinct nation-states under rule of an Emperor. Allow me to explain:

Look at the European Union, it seeks to turn the various nation-states of Europe into entities without distinction, one culture (ironically termed multiculturalism), one currency, one code of law, etc that will turn the now-distinct European nation-states into little more than artificial sub-units for bookkeeping purposes.

An Empire is a collection of distinct states that retain a degree of sovereignty (please be an adult and consider realpolitik) under the hegemony of a greater power. The constituent states remain distinct nations, with their unique cultural mores. They retain their currencies, their borders remain intact, they even often keep their native nobility, and generally, the character of the land and it's people do not change.

Certainly the two have some things in common, for example a universal tax code, a single military command, but there's that realpolitik at work, it's hard to run any kind of government without such things. Just because Hitler loved animals and ate vegetarian doesn't mean he was an SJW.

From what I've seen, the guy is cucked insofar as he believes all claims about German/Austrian warcrimes as absolute fact, and for the most part discounts or plays down any war crimes committed by anybody else. Victor's Justice never seems to have occurred to him.

daily reminder that kikes fear monarchy.
for further reading : Protocols of Zion

This user explain well the difference between Imperium and your typical empire. Besides, being pan-european or White imperialist doesnt mean that you must make all europeans the same mold. Thats why a European Confederation, or a Imperium would be good for Europe, because it would let for a long time to the european nations to cooperate and be toghetere, without loosing their identity. Thats not something that would be promoted by your tipical Imperium, even if it wants a "strong" european culture. And nevermind if it doesnt want that either, like the (((European Union))).

neweuropeanconservative.wordpress.com/2015/06/25/practices-of-ethnic-separatism-tudor/

Except that isn't even true, the usury laws forbade kikes to do it as well. But kikes being kikes just did it away until enough people bitched and they were rightly exiled for the 317th time. Unfortunately communications technology was limited so nobody could compare notes and create a final solution to the kike problem in those days.

Canada has regional autonomy and languages and is ruled by a monarch but you'd never call it anything but multicultural, they literally coined the term. Qualifying your descriptor of imperium by saying generally the people and land don't change is a cop out because thats usually the thing that destroys most empires to begin with (i.e. Roman, British, etc) and as such could just as easily be viewed as an endstate or inevitable result of empire. Austria-Hungary was a sick dog of a country incompetent at every level and a joiner of multiple different competing religions and ethnic groups that hated each other.

For such an incompetent country, with that many internal and external enemies they managed to have quite a nice standard of living, booming economy and were able to push multiple attacking enemies out of their territory, finally controlling a significant larger territory than at the begin of the conflict.

That said, not that their were much to criticize, Hitler didn't like A-H not one bit, but it wasn't because of being a “incompetent prison of peoples”. Nearly everything after was and still is shit.

Criminally un-heiled digits user.

The individual provinces do not have the ability to mint their own currency. They do not have the ability to raise their own military forces. They do not have the ability to regulate trade amongst themselves, nor to make treaties with foreign nations. No, not even Quebec, even though you are correct in your observation that they retain their unique culture and language. That is the purview of federal government (I'm not sure if they use that term up there but it is in essence a federal government). Canada is a nation-state that by and large shares one culture and heritage, until the recent Asian immigration at least.

I don't like the term multicultural nor did I use it at all except to disparage the EU. Multiculturalism is smashing various cultures together until they homogenize into one. Imperium preserves the character of the individual nations separate from each other but under the authority of a hegemon. What felled Rome is that they lost control of the monopoly of force within the Empire + the degeneracy of Roman culture into panem et circenses. Part of that was adopting traits of other cultures, the people of Rome forgot what it meant to be "Roman" (Etruscan + Greek influences) and simply wanted the benefits of being "Roman" (citizens of the Empire).

The idea of Imperium requires a hegemon. It is a concept that is bigger than that of the nation-state, not just in that it encompasses an extra level of governance but that the Imperium is more than the sum of it's parts, with one particular people taking a leading role.

As for the House of Habsburgs, they failed because they suffered defeat in the most important conflict the world had seen since the Romans burned Carthage, lost the heir to the throne, and their constituent states were subverted by foreign powers to seek independence. Imperium requires a careful balance, you must maintain enough authority to hold the various nations under hegemony, but not utilize too much force that the nations do not consent to be ruled.

A true Empire is not about "uniting nations into a superstate". It's about separate nations utilizing ones strength to cover another's weakness under the common banner of the strongest power.

bump for stimulating conversation

>when you realize that even accounting for this the total estimated death toll in europe of ww2 (both military and civilian) I wanted to do this by theater but separating the death tolls by theatre for countries that fought in both like the us, russia, etc turned out to be more work than I have time for at the moment so I simply removed the deaths and total population for countries which solely fought in the pacific is roughly 58million again the actual number should be lower by a couple million since it includes russian, us, and british deaths in the pacific

And as far as wars go based on percentage of the population, of nations involved, that were killed.. The thirty years war shits on both ww1 and ww2 at 10%

Because we built this place and we aren't going to let you forget that.

Get the fuck out faggot. wew logic of a plebbit refugee. Why defend your country if you think so lowly of it being overrun?

30 years war was indeed a fucking blood bath. Population reduction in some regions of Germany and Bohemia was >75%

send help

So have things now gotten bad enough to where we're now at the point of not being able to even say ww1 was a tragedy of human cruelty on all sides?

man thats some argument wew lad!

what are you trying to say user
are you SJW-mind focusing on the fee-fees of people and not the death caused?

yeah no. the US needs propaganda, even if its this blatand and open. the average burger is about as dumb as people 100 years ago.
the moment you say that theres "people" on the enemy side too your imperialism complex falls apart.
anything post vietnam that came from hollywood was more or less propaganda for this complex

I have a feeling there will be no war, everyone will be too busy waiting for it to happen. Then we'll grow old and die.

Mos maiorum, monarchistic republic is the truest way

Our countries has gone to exponantially more shit since democratic voting and representation was in store. During the monarch's time you actually had more power over how the country would be ruled than in today's society.

I don't have the source but i think i remember an article about the kingdom of Sweden that more petitions came through and was accepted in the 1600's than today or something like that.

((The ones)) who rules us now, do so by the ultimate divide and conquer-strategy, democracy and ideologies. Never have our people's been more divided, never have we have less of a power over our domains. Fuck sake, ((they)) have been importing hostile immigrants to our lands even. And the democratic system hasn't been able to stop or change that, even though it's apparent that there's a big portion of each nation that don't want them here and don't want these changes.

The democratic system is a lie.

Like the Kaiser and the Junker class in Imperial Germany.

...

all the death.
Are those the ones from where, in Finland, they allow rapefugees to hang out with their 13 year old daughters?

The left desperately holds onto their utopian fantasy future world.

The right, being a bit more cynical in nature, desperately holds onto the collapse that will purge everyone in fire.

Neither will come. The future may be far bleaker and more mundane than that.

...

care to find it, user? curious about it.

The biggest problem with hereditary rule is that the children of the king, after generations of rule, become spoiled and petty. And yes, though the populace can revolt, years of civil war every time a shitty leader comes into power would be the death of the nation. The next king must be chosen by merit, by the previous king. Remember- the best Roman emperors were adopted and chosen because of their own merit, not because they were the king's first born. Hereditary rule can only function in a system similar to what the Ottomans had, where the Sultans sons were put in charge of cities and told to kill their brothers. The one that remained was king.

Never forget that the lampshades and human fat meme goes back to WWI, only back then they couldnt prove it. Was a big part of propaganda against the Germans until the war was over and not a single shred of evidence besides 3rd hand accounts from dubious sources was amassed.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crucified_Soldier
also daily reminder that the allies were crucifying their POW's to trees for shits and giggles, which definitely does not sound like something from Tacitus' Germania, and again, not a shred of evidence. Still a popular story tho and you see tons of propaganda pieces related to it.

allies thought the germans were crucifying their POW's *

George Washington was a Freemason who loved kikes, your "father" is a false god. Americans are just exiled Europeans and monarchy is an ancient european system, fuck your "hurrrrr niggers are americans too!" retarded bullshit

t. American